<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel">
    <title>gmane.text.xml.fop.devel</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22204"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22200"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22194"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22148"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22147"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22114"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22112"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22111"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22110"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22104"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22103"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22091"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22087"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22066"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22065"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22064"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22054"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22053"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22047"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22046"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22204">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46319] New: OutOfMemoryError after generating several thousand pdfs</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22204</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46319

           Summary: OutOfMemoryError after generating several thousand pdfs
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P1
         Component: pdf
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: adrian.meyer&lt; at &gt;crealogix.com


After upgrading from fop 0.20.5 to fop 0.95 our web application crashes after
generating about 15000 small size pdfs (max. 1-12 pages) with the following
exception: (number of bytes varies)

Exception java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: requested 65536000 bytes for GrET* in
/BUILD_AREA/jdk1.5.0_10/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities/growableArray.cpp. Out
of swap space?

Before crashing used heap and process memory are growing slowly but
continously. (USER_MEM_ARGS="-Xmx3072m -XX:PermSize=128m")

We already tried using newest xalan/xerces libraries (from 2.7.1 xalan
distribution) and also appli</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T22:40:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22200">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46315] New: fox:needs-balancing extension</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22200</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46315

           Summary: fox:needs-balancing extension
           Product: Fop
           Version: 1.0dev
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: gd&lt; at &gt;geneon.de


This is how far I got (if the attachment is correct):

Parameter value is transfered from fo:flow to Flow.
Parameter value is transfered from fo:block to Block.
Parameter is inherited from Flow if not specified in Block.

Parameter value is used in LayoutContext.

Open issues: 
How and where do I transfer the parameter value from Block to LayoutContext?


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T10:36:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22194">
    <title>Bug report for Fop [2008/11/30]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22194</link>
    <description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bugzilla Bug ID                                                           |
|     +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|     | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New         ASS=Assigned                |
|     |         OPN=Reopened    VER=Verified    (Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
|     |   +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=Critical  REG=Regression  MAJ=Major   |
|     |   |           MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal    ENH=Enhancement TRV=Trivial |
|     |   |   +-------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   | Date Posted                                                 |
|     |   |   |          +--------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   |          | Description                                      |
|     |   |   |          |                                                  |
| 1063|Ne</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T07:08:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22148">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46294] New: start-indent on list-item is not correctly handled</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22148</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46294

           Summary: start-indent on list-item is not correctly handled
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: pdf
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: bowditch_chris&lt; at &gt;hotmail.com


I stumbled across a bug in the PDF Renderer (may also affect other layout
engine based renderers - I haven't checked, but doesn't affect RTFHandler)
whilst testing a patch for bug 42437. I have attached the test FO to this bug.

The problem is that the list-body within this FO use body-start() function to
control indentation of body, but label is dependent on list-item indentation,
since label start-indent is not set. 

The spec defines the body-start() function based on the indentation of
list-block and doesn't take the indentation of list-item into account.
Therefore the correct resul</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T16:46:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22147">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46292] New: [PATCH] PS Renderer does not handle a string value for a key in a dictionary.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22147</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292

           Summary: [PATCH] PS Renderer does not handle a string value for a
                    key in a dictionary.
           Product: Fop
           Version: all
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ps
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: kunhart&lt; at &gt;kadel.cz


Created an attachment (id=22943)
 --&gt; (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22943)
patch for class PSDictionary

There is no possibility to assign a string value for a key in a dictionary. 

E.g.:
It is needed for example if you want to choose a concrete output tray in the
output PS file:
/OutputType (FACE UP BIN)

This patch should solve it.


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T14:19:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22114">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46278] New: AFP Renderer doesn't handle fixed with spaces, e.g. thin space &amp;#x2009;</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22114</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278

           Summary: AFP Renderer doesn't handle fixed with spaces, e.g. thin
                    space &amp;#x2009;
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P4
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: bowditch_chris&lt; at &gt;hotmail.com


Created an attachment (id=22925)
 --&gt; (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22925)
AFP File

This effect is illustrated by the FO in the layout engine test case
block_white-space_4. I have attached the AFP File generated and the PDF for
comparison.


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T14:09:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22112">
    <title>[VOTE] Merge Temp_AFPGOCAResources branch into trunk</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22112</link>
    <description>Hi all,

I would like to call for a merge of the AFP branch [1] back into trunk.

This branch [1] contains a major rewrite of pretty much all the original AFP code.  The majority of
the AFP code is now homed in its own package separate from the renderer code in org.apache.fop.afp.
The AFPRenderer itself is now only sone 800 or so lines long down from the previous 1800+ lines and
now more properly extends the AbstractPathOrientedRenderer.  There is also now much more shared code
now betweeen the PDF and AFP renderers.

Major new functionality in the branch includes :-

* An AFPGraphics2D implementation which provides the ability to use Batik to drive the production of
  AFP Graphics (GOCA) output from SVG.
* Resource group leveling, external streaming and de-duplication of images and graphics using
IncludeObject and ResourceGroup.
* Native image embedding support (e.g. JPEG, GIF, TIFF) using ObjectContainer and a MOD:CA Registry
implementation.
* More robust AFP font parsing, although this is still in need of</description>
    <dc:creator>Adrian Cumiskey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T14:08:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22111">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46277] New: RTF - Block elements with id but without other content shouldn't create a paragraph</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22111</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46277

           Summary: RTF - Block elements with id but without other content
                    shouldn't create a paragraph
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: rtf
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: maximilian.aster&lt; at &gt;boc-eu.com
                CC: maximilian.aster&lt; at &gt;boc-eu.com


Created an attachment (id=22923)
 --&gt; (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22923)
example fo

Block elements which have only an id defined should not create a paragraph in
RTF, because they are just used to reference somewhere, to the last page for
example. 

        &lt;fo:block id="middle" font-size="15pt"/&gt;
        &lt;fo:block id="last" font-size="18pt"&gt;&lt;/fo:block&gt;


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T14:01:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22110">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46276] New: Justified text rendered poorly in AFP Renderer</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22110</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46276

           Summary: Justified text rendered poorly in AFP Renderer
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: bowditch_chris&lt; at &gt;hotmail.com


Created an attachment (id=22922)
 --&gt; (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22922)
sample AFP File

This affect can be observed using the FO from the test case
block_text-indent.xml in test\layoutengine\standard-testcases. I have attached
a generated AFP file to illustrate. See the second paragraph where the lines
don't end evenly against the right margin.


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T13:58:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22104">
    <title>Bug report for Fop [2008/11/23]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22104</link>
    <description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bugzilla Bug ID                                                           |
|     +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|     | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New         ASS=Assigned                |
|     |         OPN=Reopened    VER=Verified    (Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
|     |   +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=Critical  REG=Regression  MAJ=Major   |
|     |   |           MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal    ENH=Enhancement TRV=Trivial |
|     |   |   +-------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   | Date Posted                                                 |
|     |   |   |          +--------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   |          | Description                                      |
|     |   |   |          |                                                  |
| 1063|Ne</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T07:08:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22103">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46272] New: printing the first page with full contents but page breaks in next pages itself</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22103</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46272

           Summary: printing the first page with full contents but page
                    breaks in next pages itself
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.94
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: XSLTBug
          Severity: major
          Priority: P1
         Component: pdf
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: nain_amitnain&lt; at &gt;yahoo.com


After printing the first page with full contents upto the length specifed but
in the next pages it breaks page and shifted to next page even though the this
page have the space for the more contents.
I am using the dynamic table creation with the conditional data.

Please suggest some solution?


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T04:58:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22091">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46253] New: break-after not honored</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22091</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46253

           Summary: break-after not honored
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: page-master/layout
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: gd&lt; at &gt;geneon.de


Created an attachment (id=22907)
 --&gt; (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22907)
Testcase

With break-after="odd-page" there should be one empty page and the second block
should start on page 3.
FOP 0.94 gets it wrong since it creates one empty page when break-after is set
to even-page, and indeed two empty pages with odd-page, instead of respectively
0 and 1.
FOP 0.95 doesn’t seem to honor the break at all.


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-21T08:12:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22087">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46251] New: space-end on &lt;inline&gt; throws off formatting in pdf</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22087</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251

           Summary: space-end on &lt;inline&gt; throws off formatting in pdf
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: pdf
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: pilcme&lt; at &gt;yahoo.com


When a block begins with an &lt;inline&gt; and the &lt;inline&gt; has a space-end
attribute, the first line of the block is badly formatted in pdf. 

The first line is longer than it should be by the amount of the space-end.

I have not tried any other output besides pdf.

This also happened on 0.94. I have not tried it on any older version and I have
not tried in on the current trunk.

I am attaching an FO file. If you generate a pdf from this FO you should see
the problem.

Note that my block has text-align="justify". This makes the problem easier to
see but the problem remains without the text-align.


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-20T18:26:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22066">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46240] New: break-before breaks span?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22066</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240

           Summary: break-before breaks span?
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.94
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: page-master/layout
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: gd&lt; at &gt;geneon.de


Attached you will find a small fo-file containing one simple page master and
two pages. Although the page master has a column-count=2, both pages should be
single-column, therefore span=all is used. Both pages should start at an odd
page, therefore  break-before=odd-page is used. 

The unexpected result: The text on the first page uses both columns, the second
page is empty, but the text on the third page uses only one column. When I
remove the first page or break-before, the second text uses both columns.


</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-19T09:21:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22065">
    <title>Updating the FOP release plan</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22065</link>
    <description>On a serious note (as opposed to my outburst on fop-users), I think we
should really discuss the FOP release plan which we haven't updated in a
while. I would hate to see FOP in 0.x mode after 10 years of existence.
Let's assume 0.20.5 was actually FOP 1.0, and FOP 0.95 was actually FOP
2.0. How about calling the next version 2.009 (to be released in early
2009). Skip 1.0 entirely since that would only let the expectations rise
into the sky. FOP had a major redesign which warrants at least a version
jump of one major version. Not calling it 2.0 means it's not a first
release from a fresh development branch. That will carry the message
along that FOP is stable and usable in a productive environment. Hell,
it's used in production by so many people for so many years.
OhpointXitis is really bad.

I know we still have about one item left on our pre-1.0 list:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ReleasePlanning
But that's still going to take a while. I want to revisit this list and
see what today's view is.

Fla</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremias Maerki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-19T08:37:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22064">
    <title>Table carry over to new page</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22064</link>
    <description>
I am generating tables in xsl-fo format and using fop to generate the pdf. A
table is repeated n times. Some time the table is spread across two pages.
How can I force the table to carry over to the next page if it does not fit
onto the current page and not spread across two pages.
</description>
    <dc:creator>JavaPenguin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-19T08:11:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22054">
    <title>OutOfMemory Error When Building Website</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22054</link>
    <description>Hi,

I have the following error when building the website with Forrest:
* [352/33]  [0/0]     8.844s 0b      compliance.pdf
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at java.util.LinkedList.addAll(LinkedList.java:278)
at java.util.LinkedList.addAll(LinkedList.java:247)
at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockStackingLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements(BlockStackingLayoutManager.java:361)
at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements(BlockLayoutManager.java:116)
at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockStackingLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements(BlockStackingLayoutManager.java:294)
at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.list.ListItemLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements(ListItemLayoutManager.java:234)
at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockStackingLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements(BlockStackingLayoutManager.java:294)
at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.list.ListBlockLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements(ListBlockLayoutManager.java:119)
at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockStackingLayoutManager.getNex</description>
    <dc:creator>Vincent Hennebert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-18T11:40:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22053">
    <title>Remove FAQ Entries Related to 0.20.5</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22053</link>
    <description>Guys,

What do you think of removing entries in the FAQ section that are
specific to 0.20.5 and earlier versions? This would make it shorter, so
less likely to scare people away, and in the same time easier for them
to find the answer to their question. Plus it would stress the fact that
we no longer support 0.20.5.


Vincent

</description>
    <dc:creator>Vincent Hennebert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-18T11:14:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22047">
    <title>fo:inline screwing up rendering</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22047</link>
    <description>Hi All,

Does anybody know why FOP Trunk completely screws up the rendering of
the attached file? It works fine when removing the fo:inline element, so
I guess this has something to do with that element. FOP 0.95 renders the
file correctly, both with and without the fo:inline.

Thanks,
Vincent
</description>
    <dc:creator>Vincent Hennebert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T11:36:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22046">
    <title>Bug report for Fop [2008/11/16]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22046</link>
    <description>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bugzilla Bug ID                                                           |
|     +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|     | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New         ASS=Assigned                |
|     |         OPN=Reopened    VER=Verified    (Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
|     |   +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=Critical  REG=Regression  MAJ=Major   |
|     |   |           MIN=Minor   NOR=Normal    ENH=Enhancement TRV=Trivial |
|     |   |   +-------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   | Date Posted                                                 |
|     |   |   |          +--------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   |          | Description                                      |
|     |   |   |          |                                                  |
| 1063|Ne</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T07:08:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22037">
    <title>DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46211] New: Synchronization fault in FontCache</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.fop.devel/22037</link>
    <description>https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46211

           Summary: Synchronization fault in FontCache
           Product: Fop
           Version: 0.95
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: fonts
        AssignedTo: fop-dev&lt; at &gt;xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: rogov&lt; at &gt;devexperts.com


I have an application which renders a lot of PDFs using several threads. We had
an issue recently, concerning font loading. While investigating this stack
trace:

java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.fop.fonts.FontCache.isFailedFont(FontCache.java:294)
at org.apache.fop.fonts.autodetect.FontInfoFinder.find(FontInfoFinder.java:179)
at
org.apache.fop.render.PrintRendererConfigurator.addFontInfoListFromFileList(PrintRendererConfigurator.java:233)
at
org.apache.fop.render.PrintRendererConfigurator.buildFontListFromConfiguration(PrintRendererConfigurator.java:140)
at
org.apache.fop.render.PrintRendererConfigu</description>
    <dc:creator>bugzilla&lt; at &gt;apache.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-14T13:12:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.text.xml.fop.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.text.xml.fop.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
