http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33515 <pre>wow this is pretty awesome you should give it a look http://www.news15de.net/biz/?employment=1690581 </pre> Albert Tsui 2012-05-26T23:41:12 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33514 <pre>Hi, I was running S10 Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC I did an luupgrade to the latest release Now I am reading this document: https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&amp;type=NOT&amp;id=1446032.1 It says: The following table lists the minimum revisions of Oracle Solaris 10, 9, 8 patches or Solaris 11 SRUs required to resolve the vulnerabilities listed on CPU April 2012. CVE Solaris 11 Solaris 10 Solaris 9 Solaris 8 SPARC X86 SPARC X86 SPARC X86 CVE-2012-0539 148948-01&lt;https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&amp;bugfix_name=148948-01&gt; 148949-01&lt;https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&amp;bugfix_name=148949-01&gt; 122300-63&lt;https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&amp;bugfix_name=122300-63&gt; 122301-63&lt;https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&amp;bugfix_name=122301-63&gt; 109007-29&lt;https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&amp;bugfix_name=109007-29&gt; 109008-29&lt;https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/d</pre> Dariusz Dolecki 2012-05-26T22:41:59 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33512 <pre>Hi, We are tired of EMC and Netapp, their support sucks. Is there any "new" Storage/DAS vendors that anyone recommends? A plethora of them are new, wonder if anyone has had any luck with an "alternative" vendor. Thanks in advance..... </pre> Dariusz Dolecki 2012-05-25T15:11:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33511 <pre>Hi Managers, I am running Solaris 11 as a NFS server and have found a script called nfsv3rwsnoop.d It works fine for most files but some times it lists the file name as &lt;unknown&gt; why? # ./nfsv3rwsnoop.d TIME(us) CLIENT OP OFFSET BYTES PATHNAME 1171685002348 192.168.17.75 W 3093304 2389 &lt;unknown&gt; 1171685003791 192.168.17.75 W 3093304 2426 &lt;unknown&gt; 1171687011333 192.168.17.75 W 3093304 2492 &lt;unknown&gt; 1171687013031 192.168.17.75 W 3093304 2529 &lt;unknown&gt; 1171689020596 192.168.17.75 W 3093304 2595 &lt;unknown&gt; # more ./nfsv3rwsnoop.d #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -s /* This DTrace scripts traces NFSv3 read and write requests, showing details of each operation * ./nfsv3iosnoop.d * TIME(us) CLIENT OP OFFSET BYTES PATHNAME * 4299383207 192.168.17.75 R 0 4096 /export/stuff/bin/ghex2 * 4299391813 192.168.17.75 R 4 28672 /export/stuff/bin/ghex2 * 4299395700 192.168.17.75 </pre> Richard Skelton 2012-05-25T10:23:00 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33510 <pre> Am I correct in assuming that Sun/Oracle recommends UPGRADING FIRST to the highest release instead of applying the recommended patch cluster? Of course then apply the recommended patch cluster to the highest S10 release...... Some info is here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/40022723/Patching-Best-Practices#outer_page_4 </pre> Dariusz Dolecki 2012-05-24T18:06:28 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33508 <pre>Archive-name: sunmanagers-before-posting Last Updated: $Id: before.posting,v 1.21 2005/12/28 21:05:10 jdd Exp $ NOTE:This message is posted periodically to sunmanagers on behalf of all members of the Sunmanager's mailing list. Please read it carefully before posting. This document can be retrieved from: ftp://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/jdd/sunmanagers/before.posting Dear prospective sunmanagers poster, Before posting, please stop for a minute and consider whether or not your posting is suitable for Sunmanagers. The list is not intended for just any possible question related to managing Sun equipment or software. The only appropriate questions for Sun Managers are time-critical questions about Sun system management problems that are not answered in the manuals or system documentation, or in the Sunmanager's FAQ. In particular, the following kinds of postings are not appropriate: - Subscribe and unsubscribe messages. Point your web browser to http://www.sunmanagers.org instead. - Test messages </pre> John DiMarco 2012-05-24T04:30:02 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33507 <pre>Greetings, SPARC box running Solaris 10. bash-3.2# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 10/09 s10s_u8wos_08a SPARC Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 16 September 2009 Solaris 10 8/11 (Update 10) Patchset applied. `usermod -G` complains about the group name being too long: bash-3.2# usermod -G abcd,abcdefgh1034,abcdef103 user852 UX: usermod: user852 is currently logged in, some changes may not take effect until next login. UX: usermod: abcdefgh1034 name too long. UX: usermod: abcdef103 name too long. (I guess, because the group name is longer than 8 characters), but adds the user to the additional groups: bash-3.2# cat /etc/group | grep user852 abcd::100:user852 abcdefgh1034::102:user852 abcdef103::103:user852 However, If I add the user to the first secondary group, like `usermod -G abcd user852` then latter I add the same user to the</pre> inemes 2012-05-23T14:27:47 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33506 <pre>Hi all, The server x4200 cannot boot . Messages: " Cannot find boot.bin solaris 10 x86 ". how to fix it. Rija </pre> RANDRIAMANANA 2012-05-21T08:29:38 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33505 <pre>Hello I moved a Storedge from a solaris server to another one, both are solaris 10 . I dont see the device with the format utility as I was seeing on previous server. The previous server was installed, years ago, by another person. I checked on google and it seems that this storedge is not supported on solaris 10, I mean the raid manager software is not supported. It is amazing because I have found it working on solaris 10! Does anybody had some experiences with this scenario? Thanks for suggestions... I will summarize. </pre> borgarello< at >abex.it 2012-05-20T19:35:19 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33504 <pre>Solaris extend VxFS file system I have a VxFS filesystem in "testdg" diskgroup I have an extra drive c0t1t5 what are the steps I need to take to add this disk to the "testdg" diskgroup and to extend the filesystem. Please give me the exact commands so that I can add the whole disk(entire capacity of c0t1d5) to the filesystem </pre> Dariusz Dolecki 2012-05-20T03:02:48 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33503 <pre>Need Help: Reverted to old BE with older version of ZFS cannot mount rpool root or get back to new BE Solaris 10 u9 on sparc v490. 3 non-global zones. I did the following: I used Live Upgrade method to install latest 10_recommended which worked with no errors. Rebooted into the new BE with no apparent problems. ZFS tools reported that my disk format was now outdated ZFS version, so I ran zpool upgrade rpool; zpool upgrade dpool. No errors. Now my ZFS disk format is ZFS version 29. In the porcess of troubleshooting a strange error that surfaced with regard to zones -- zoneadm and zlogin both fail with &lt;segmentatin fault&gt; core -- I decided to revert back to the original BE with the luactivate command. Rebooted and mout reboot fails with panic as the system cannot mount root -- rpool -- because the original BE is still at an earlier ZFS version and not comapatible with the newer ZFS version 29 on disk format. NOTICE: zfs_parse_bootfs: error 48 Cannot mount root on rpool/51 fstype zfs panic[cpu2]/threa</pre> Vander Hoof, Paul L (IS 2012-05-18T22:27:44 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33501 <pre>Hello all, I am trying to help someone out to bring back up a Sunblade with an attached StorEdge A1000 after moving locations. The A1000 is setup for raid5 and we have a known disc that went bad. The problem is there is a second disk that is in the "wrong disk" status when I run "healthck -a". Can anyone tell me what the "wrong disk" status signifies? Google has done nothing for me. </pre> Cesar Covarrubias 2012-05-17T21:26:55 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33500 <pre>Archive-name: sunmanagers-faq $Id: faq.html,v 1.30 2011/02/28 15:08:12 jdd Exp $ SunManagers Frequently Asked Questions This is collection of common questions posted to the sunmanagers mailing list twice a month. It is intended to benefit Sun System Managers and reduce traffic to the list by providing quick answers to common problems. Keeping with the style of a similar FAQ for comp.windows.x, questions marked with a '+' indicate questions new to this issue; those with significant changes of content since the last issue are marked by '*' The Information Files maintainer is John DiMarco &lt;jdd&lt; at &gt;cs.toronto.edu&gt;. All corrections, submissions and FAQ administration-related messages should go to &lt;sunmanagers-faq&lt; at &gt;sunmanagers.org&gt;. Do not send questions, subscription or unsubscription requests, or sunmanagers postings to this address; they will be quietly ignored. The List Server maintainer is Bill Bradford &lt;mrbill at mrbill dot net&gt;. Any problems with</pre> John DiMarco 2012-05-17T04:30:02 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33499 <pre> Spencer Kantor sent the following link which had the information in needed. Thanks, http://www.oracle.com/us/support/library/lifetime-support-hardware-301321.pd f -----Original Message----- From: sunmanagers-bounces&lt; at &gt;sunmanagers.org [mailto:sunmanagers-bounces&lt; at &gt;sunmanagers.org] On Behalf Of Clift, Tom CIV NSWCDD, K55 Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:30 PM To: sunmanagers&lt; at &gt;sunmanagers.org Subject: Solaris 9 support Does anyone have a link that shows Oracle's support (extended) for the various OS versions. I have a webpage that shows all the EOL and ESOL for hardware but nothing for software. </pre> Clift, Tom CIV NSWCDD, K55 2012-05-15T18:42:48 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33498 <pre> Does anyone have a link that shows Oracle's support (extended) for the various OS versions. I have a webpage that shows all the EOL and ESOL for hardware but nothing for software. Thanks in advance, </pre> Clift, Tom CIV NSWCDD, K55 2012-05-15T18:29:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33497 <pre>Hi All, I have FC LUNs from NetApp FAS 3240 mapped to two SPARC T4-2 clustered nodes running Veritas Cluster Server software. For now, the configuration on NetApp is as follows: /vol/EBUSApp/EBUSApp 100G online MBSUN04 : 0 MBSUN05 : 0 /vol/EBUSBinry/EBUSBinry 200G online MBSUN04 : 1 MBSUN05 : 1 /vol/EBUSCtrlog/EBUSCtrlog 5G online MBSUN04 : 2 MBSUN05 : 2 /vol/EBUSDB/EBUSDB 300.0G online MBSUN04 : 3 MBSUN05 : 3 /vol/EBUSIO_FENC1/EBUSIO_FENC1 5G online MBSUN04 : 4 MBSUN05 : 4 /vol/EBUSIO_FENC2/EBUSIO_FENC2 5G online MBSUN04 : 5 MBSUN05 : 5 /vol/EBUSIO_FENC3/EBUSIO_FENC3 5G online MBSUN04 : 6 MBSUN05 : 6 /vol/EBUSRDlog/EBUSRDlog 5G online MBSUN04 : 7 MBSUN05 : 7 I will be mapping the above volumes on hosts and creating zpool </pre> Bruce McGill 2012-05-15T09:51:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33496 <pre>Hi, Can someone help me find the download link for JET 4.9 or greater ? The original wiki was moved by Oracle and I can't access it. ________________________________ Sugan Moodley I UNIX Platforms Product Engineer - Products and Services I Global Technology Infrastructure I Standard Bank of South Africa | 5 Simmonds Street I Johannesburg I South Africa Standard Bank email disclaimer and confidentiality note Please go to http://www.standardbank.co.za/site/homepage/emaildisclaimer.html to read our email disclaimer and confidentiality note. Kindly email disclaimer&lt; at &gt;standardbank.co.za (no content or subject line necessary) if you cannot view that page and we will email our email disclaimer and confidentiality note to you. </pre> Moodley, Sugan S 2012-05-15T08:55:02 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33493 <pre>Sun Managers, A Friday Puzzler. How do we get an uptime value of 11 years and change when that value is twice the number of years we've owned it? $ uptime 1:54pm up 4198 day(s), 19:54, 2 users, load average: 0.34, 0.38, 0.39 $ uname -a SunOS co-vm-998 5.10 Generic_138888-08 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200 $ 1. Looking at our logs, we did bring that entire rack down 350 days ago for maintenance - so the figure is doubly improbable. 2. Pity we can't apply this to our SLA ... Brian Dunbar Systems Administrator Plexus Corporation Desk: (920) 751-3364 Cell: (920) 716-2027 email: brian.dunbar&lt; at &gt;plexus.com </pre> Brian Dunbar 2012-05-11T19:00:06 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33492 <pre>Archive-name: sunmanagers-before-posting Last Updated: $Id: before.posting,v 1.21 2005/12/28 21:05:10 jdd Exp $ NOTE:This message is posted periodically to sunmanagers on behalf of all members of the Sunmanager's mailing list. Please read it carefully before posting. This document can be retrieved from: ftp://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/jdd/sunmanagers/before.posting Dear prospective sunmanagers poster, Before posting, please stop for a minute and consider whether or not your posting is suitable for Sunmanagers. The list is not intended for just any possible question related to managing Sun equipment or software. The only appropriate questions for Sun Managers are time-critical questions about Sun system management problems that are not answered in the manuals or system documentation, or in the Sunmanager's FAQ. In particular, the following kinds of postings are not appropriate: - Subscribe and unsubscribe messages. Point your web browser to http://www.sunmanagers.org instead. - Test messages </pre> John DiMarco 2012-05-10T04:30:01 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33491 <pre>I have two T5220's. The first is 4x core and has all 8x drive bays filled. The first two drives are hardware mirrored using raidctl. The other 6x drives are in a zfs pool. The second T5220 has just two disks hardware mirrored. This machine has 8x core and more memory. I'd like to pull the ID prom and drives from the first machine and put in the 2nd machine. I'm not concerned with the zfs disks; I know they'll just plain work. I'm concerned about the hardware mirrored drives. The ID prom will need to move due to some licensed software. The question is where this hardware mirrored information is stored and whether I'd mess things up with this move. thank you for any advice. I'll summarize Tom Lieuallen Oregon State University </pre> Tom Lieuallen 2012-05-09T14:47:49 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.managers/33490 <pre>Hi Managers, I have a Solaris 10 DHCP servers which is claiming it has n more IP addresses for the network Using prntadm -P 192.168.0.0 I can see a load of the same MAC addresses with different IP address with old expire dates:- Client IDFlagsClient IPServer IPLease Expiration Macro Comment 0100155876741804 192.168.0.10192.168.0.20004/21/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.24192.168.0.20004/21/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.26192.168.0.20005/03/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.27192.168.0.20004/28/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.28192.168.0.20004/27/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.29192.168.0.20005/02/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.33192.168.0.20005/01/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.45192.168.0.20005/02/2012 server1 0100155876741804 192.168.0.50192.168.0.200</pre> Richard Skelton 2012-05-09T11:14:04 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.os.solaris.managers