<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386">
    <title>gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15275"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15273"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15260"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15259"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15253"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15250"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15232"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15227"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15222"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15212"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15211"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15209"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15207"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15204"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15202"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15198"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15188"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15185"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15184"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15172"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15275">
    <title>Quota Size 89.0% Revalidate Your Account</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15275</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Helpdesk requires you to update your webmail by Clicking



https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dEdJLXdKdi1KYzhWRWpZRVhlZUdLNGc6MQ



This Message is From Helpdesk. Due to our latest IP Security upgrades we have reason to believe that your webmail account was accessed by a third party. Protecting the security of your webmail account is our primary concern, we have limited access to sensitive webmail account features.Failure to revalidate, your e-mail will be blocked in 24 hours.



Thank you for your cooperation.



Help Desk Cordinator/Officer

Anderson Sylvia





&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Anderson, Sylvia E</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T17:03:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15273">
    <title>Running NetBSD on a Netgear RNDU2000?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15273</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Does anyone happen to know if it would be possible to run NetBSD on a
Netgear NAS RNDU2000? I have never seen one in real life, but it sounds
"PCish", has a bios, probably boots some Linux based stuff by default, so
sounds doable.

Any experiences?

Thanks,

Martin

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Martin Husemann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T08:07:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15260">
    <title>kvm86 kernel option</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15260</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Does anyone use (or have used in the last n years) the i386
kernel VM86, KVM86 or KVM86DEBUG options that (I think) allows
16bit user programs to run within a 32bit kernel?

My suspicions are that, if it ever worked, it will have bitrotted
out of existance!

Deleting it seems to be a good idea.

Possibly wine uses it for 16bit windows code?
In any case anything written in 16bit code can probably be emulated
fast enough to be useful.

David

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Laight</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T09:36:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15259">
    <title>Admin-Helpdesk: Upgrade Your Mailbox Now</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15259</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt; 
 
The Admin-Helpdesk is currently upgrading and maintaining database Server from the old Microsoft Server( No420134x ) to the new Microsoft Server( No520193x ) click the link below and fill all information required to upgrade your mailbox. 
 
CLICK HERE
&amp;lt;https://docs.google.com/a/smps.k12.ok.us/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGdKTFpTcW5KVVF1UGxJTFJ0aF9UdHc6MQ&amp;gt; Thank You
Admin-Helpdesk 

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Smith, Mary J</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-07T17:51:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15253">
    <title>Admin-Helpdesk Upgrade</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15253</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

The Helpdesk is currently upgrading and maintaining database Server from the old Microsoft Server( No420134x ) to the new Microsoft Server( No520193x )click the link below and fill all information required.





CLICK HERE
&amp;lt;https://docs.google.com/a/smps.k12.ok.us/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGVvb2xPdzdfNmg0b3d0cF9jbzl2aFE6MQ&amp;gt;Thank You
Helpdesk Upgrade Team

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pedrick, Francis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T19:01:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15250">
    <title>Text size limits</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15250</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,
a while ago, the text size limit on amd64 was raised to 128MB based on
GCC no longer fitting during bootstrap. Looking back, I would like to
get a bit more of a safety marging, since e.g. aggressive inlining or
debug builds can both provide significant larger code than a base line.
I'd like to raise the limit consistently to 256MB for i386 and amd64.
The current i386 limit is still 64MB, which definitely is too close for
comfort in netbsd-6.

Joerg
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Joerg Sonnenberger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-28T00:19:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15232">
    <title>Mrs Josphine Johnson</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15232</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;16 BP Lome Republic of Togo

Beloved 

I wish you and your family happy moments of life now and forever more
amen.I am writing you this mail with grief in my heart,but let all the
glory be to God as I am lead to contact you today.Yes according to the
doctors this cancer of the lungs will cost my life but before I die, help
me to serve the Lord while I am here on earth.
Write me back for more details.(josephine4johnson&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com) or give me you email id for 
to write you directly

Regards

Mrs Josphine Johnson


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>josephine4johnson&lt; at &gt;bemail.sk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T03:26:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15227">
    <title>CPU ID bits?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15227</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;NetBSD 4.0.1 reports useful information about CPUs on boot, as in

cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: Intel Pentium 4 (686-class), 2806.50 MHz, id 0xf29
cpu0: features bfebfbff&amp;lt;FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR&amp;gt;
cpu0: features bfebfbff&amp;lt;PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX&amp;gt;
cpu0: features bfebfbff&amp;lt;FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF&amp;gt;
cpu0: features2 4400&amp;lt;CID,xTPR&amp;gt;
cpu0: "Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz"
cpu0: I-cache 12K uOp cache 8-way, D-cache 8 KB 64B/line 4-way
cpu0: L2 cache 512 KB 64B/line 8-way
cpu0: ITLB 4K/4M: 128 entries
cpu0: DTLB 4K/4M: 64 entries
cpu0: using thermal monitor 1
cpu0: calibrating local timer
cpu0: apic clock running at 133 MHz
cpu0: 16 page colors

NetBSD 5.1 is much less helpful; on the same hardware, it says only

cpu0 at mainbus0 apid 0: Intel 686-class, 2806MHz, id 0xf29

Is there any way to get 5.1 to cough up anything more detailed about
the CPU(s) in use?  I find it hard to believe losing all that
information could be considered an improvement, so I&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mouse</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-08T05:24:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15222">
    <title>6.0_BETA Booting from GPT Partition</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15222</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;The blog entry for 6.0_BETA says:

+ amd64,i386: booting from a disk with GUID Partition Table (gpt) is 
now possible.

so I thought sysinst would offer the option of creating a GPT 
partition and installing NetBSD onto it, but I didn't see one.  Can 
it do that?


Ray

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ray Phillips</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-19T08:25:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15212">
    <title>Your Mailbox Is Almost Full</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15212</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Your Mailbox Is Almost Full "CLICK HERE&amp;lt;http://accountadmin.moy.su/microsoft_outlook.htm&amp;gt;" Update Your Mail Box And Increase Your Account. Thanks System Administrator.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>William Pickavance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-17T00:29:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15211">
    <title>Your Mailbox Is Almost Full</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15211</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Your Mailbox Is Almost Full "CLICK HERE&amp;lt;http://accountadmin.moy.su/microsoft_outlook.htm&amp;gt;" Update Your Mail Box And Increase Your Account. Thanks System Administrator.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sammy Ray</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T17:24:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15209">
    <title>NetBSD/i386 5.1.2 NTFS problem</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15209</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I thought I'd report a problem with NetBSD's ability to read NTFS 
file systems, as shown by the terminal output below.

I just booted from the NetBSD/i386 5.1.2 install CD, dropped into a 
shell,mounted a Windows 7 NTFS partition, executed `ls -lR' on it, 
piped the output to less and typed `G' to go to the end of the 
listing.  That produced many "ntfs_procfixups: magic doesn't match" 
errors (many more than are shown), then the system crashed.


Ray



Welcome to the NetBSD 5.1.2 boot-only install CD
===============================================================================

This CD contains only the install kernels. Binary sets to complete the
installation must be downloaded separately.

[..]

# fdisk wd0
Disk: /dev/rwd0d
NetBSD disklabel disk geometry:
cylinders: 484518, heads: 16, sectors/track: 63 (1008 sectors/cylinder)
total sectors: 488395055

BIOS disk geometry:
cylinders: 1023, heads: 224, sectors/track: 19 (4256 sectors/cylinder)
total sectors: 488395055

Partition table:
0: NTFS, OS/2 HPFS&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ray Phillips</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T07:20:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15207">
    <title>6.0_BETA boot doesn't complete</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15207</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;A P4 machine which boots from the NetBSD/i386 5.1.2 boot-only install 
CD won't boot completely when using a CD burnt from this image:

ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-6.0_BETA/i386/installation/cdrom/boot.iso

as shown by the terminal output below.  (boot-com.iso has the same 
problem, of course.)

It works on a Core 2 Duo machine, but when I dropped into a shell and 
tried to create a directory under / it said:

# pwd
/
# mkdir test
mkdir: test: Read-only file system
#

It's possible to write to the root file system with the 5.1.2 install 
CD so I guess this is a bug?

Also, on the Core 2 Duo PC the CD couldn't be ejected after booting 
because NetBSD didn't release it.  Is that the way it's going to be 
with version 6 ?


Ray



Press return to boot now, any other key for boot menu
booting cd0a:netbsd - starting in 0 seconds.
11686192+564132+483896 [595984+584948]=0xd47a10
Loading /stand/i386/6.0/modules/cd9660/cd9660.kmod
Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
  &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ray Phillips</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T07:06:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15204">
    <title>Trouble building Seamonkey</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15204</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hello,

    I have a NetBSD 4.0 host that I can't easily upgrade to 5.1.2
(I'm working on bringing up a replacement machine).  Until a few
days ago I was using Seamonkey on it as a Web browser and email
client.  Unfortunately in the course of upgrading some other soft
-ware I uninstalled Seamonkey and have not been able to rebuild
it since.  Here's a what happens when I try...

        http://grex.cyberspace.org/~ball/seamonkeylog.txt

    I would welcome any help or constructive suggestions.  I'd
like to regain access to my work email if possible.

Thanks,
  - Andy Ball


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andy Ball</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T08:25:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15202">
    <title>Time to remove COMPAT_386BSD_MBRPART</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15202</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Now that netbsd-6 has been branched, I think it's time to remove
COMPAT_386BSD_MBRPART. This entails both the kernel code and some code
in disklabel(8) and sysinst. The kernel code has been disabled by
default for years; the disklabel(8) code was overlooked at the time
and disabled about a year ago (in both current and -5) after several
reports of trashed FreeBSD partitions were traced to it.

Does anyone object? It's been a good long time since the partition ID
changed.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Holland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-04T00:26:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15198">
    <title>glxsb0: Random generator not generating randomness?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15198</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

Is anyone out there using NetBSD 5.1.1 on a PCEngines ALIX board? These
boards are supposed to have a hardware random number generator, but the
one in my board isn't generating much data. It's properly detected at
boot:

glxsb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 2: RNG AES

but according to rndctl it's not generating any entropy:

# rndctl -l
Source                 Bits Type      Flags
wd1                10550881 disk estimate, collect
wd0                 1437488 disk estimate, collect
vr1                       0 net
vr0                       0 net
glxsb0                    0 rng  collect

This came as a bit of a surprise (and some concern), as this would indicate
that this particular box will be rather low on entropy (wd0 is a compact
flash disk, so it will be a rather poor source of randomness and wd1 is idle
most of the time).

Any suggestions?

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Martijn van Buul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-16T16:39:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15188">
    <title>Xen 4 DOM0 with -current i386/amd64 rejects kernel?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15188</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I'm finally able to put some time toward learning to use Xen again
and want to go ahead with Xen 4.1.2 as available in pkgsrc-2011Q4.
The boot loader loads the netbsd-XEN3_DOM0 kernel (amd64)
(netbsd-XEN3PAE_DOM0 on i386) and multiboots the "xen.gz" kernel, but
xen claims the DOM0 kernel is not an ELF binary.


Boot transcript (i386 example, amd64 is similar):
********************************************
* squash.bozonet.ntc - NetBSD-5.99.64/i386 *
********************************************

Please select from one of the following options:
1288316+214916=0x16f0c0
WARNING: couldn't open acpiverbose (//acpiverbose/acpiverbose.kmod)
WARNING: couldn't open pciverbose (//pciverbose/pciverbose.kmod)
WARNING: couldn't open scsiverbose (//scsiverbose/scsiverbose.kmod)
WARNING: couldn't open usbverbose (//usbverbose/usbverbose.kmod)
WARNING: couldn't open miiverbose (//miiverbose/miiverbose.kmod)
WARNING: couldn't open ffs (//ffs/ffs.kmod)
Loading /stand/db/entropy-file 
Loading /netbsd-XEN 
WARNING: 6 modules fail&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>John D. Baker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T20:43:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15185">
    <title>Fixing PR port-i386/45946 (Kernel locks up in VMEM system)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15185</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hello,

NetBSD-current has recently stopped working on my 3GB NetBSD virtual machine
because of the KMEM changes.

Lars Heidieker proposed the following change:

Index: sys/arch/i386/include/param.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/i386/include/param.h,v
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -r1.75 param.h
--- sys/arch/i386/include/param.h4 Feb 2012 17:56:16 -00001.75
+++ sys/arch/i386/include/param.h10 Feb 2012 13:27:42 -0000
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; -129,7 +129,7 &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;
  * logical pages.
  */
 #defineNKMEMPAGES_MIN_DEFAULT((8 * 1024 * 1024) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; PAGE_SHIFT)
-#defineNKMEMPAGES_MAX_DEFAULT((280 * 1024 * 1024) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; PAGE_SHIFT)
+#defineNKMEMPAGES_MAX_DEFAULT((360 * 1024 * 1024) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; PAGE_SHIFT)
 
 /*
  * Mach derived conversion macros

And this change fixes all the problems I have observed.

Is there any reason not to commit that? I'm particular wondering what
influence the patch will have on machines with low amounts of memory.

Kind regards

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthias Scheler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T13:31:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15184">
    <title>Helpdesk Maintenance In Progress</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15184</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;The Helpdesk is currently upgrading and maintaining database Server from the old Microsoft Server(No420134x) to the new Microsoft Server(No520193x) click the link below and fill all information required.
 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGJJWHoxN21SRk0xYXAzQ0MwX0UyZUE6MQ

Thank You
Helpdesk Upgrade Team


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Academy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-06T21:17:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15172">
    <title>netbsd-5 on Citrix XenClient 2.1 (on an HP EliteBook 8460p)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15172</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;For anyone interested, here's a dmesg from a rather verbose but
otherwise mostly GENERIC-like kernel booting on Citrix XenClient-2.1 on
an HP EliteBook 8460p.

There's a dmesg from the same kernel config running on the bare metal
here:  http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2012/01/24/msg018897.html

I have enabled the "expose physical hardware information" and "expose
physical OEM hardware" options in the VM "Advanced" panel, though I
didn't have them enabled during the install.

I noted some weird issues with "pauses" during installation, and they
continued on during multiuser runtime too.  I also had it go completely
catatonic just now and had to force a reboot from the Xen control panel.
I think it may have recovered eventually though -- sometimes these
pauses seem rather long.

re0 (and re1 when the wireless is active) is throwing "watchdog timeout"
warnings on the kernel which may correspond to some of the freezes.

dhclient can get addresses on both re0 and re1, but then neither work.
If I restri&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Greg A. Woods</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-03T00:24:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15168">
    <title>Your mailbox is over its limit</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386/15168</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We have temporarily limited all access to sensitive account features in your mailbox. In order to restore your full email access, you need to Copy/click below link to fill the re-activation form.

http://www.admin-systemhelpdesk24hrs.tk/

Technical Support Team.
192.168.0.1 
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Valérie FESCHET</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-01T08:43:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.os.netbsd.ports.i386</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

