<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel">
    <title>gmane.network.zeromq.devel</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19145"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19142"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19141"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19138"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19137"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19133"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19132"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19131"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19128"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19108"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19102"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19098"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19089"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19088"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19085"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19078"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19076"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19071"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19068"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19067"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19145">
    <title>(no subject)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19145</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,



I am trying to use ZMQ with PHP.



The instructions at http://www.zeromq.org/bindings:php state



    Download the latest snapshot from http://snapshot.zero.mq/

    Copy libzmq.dll into your php directory (e.g. C:\wamp\bin\php\php5.3.8\)

    Copy the appropriate version of php_zmq.dll to your php extension directory (e.g. C:\wamp\bin\php\php5.3.8\ext)

    Add the following line to your php.ini:

    extension=php_zmq.dll


    Restart your web server to pickup the ini changes



I tried to get the .dll from the snapshot but cannot connect to http://snapsho.zero.mq



Where can I get a copy of php_zmq.dll?



Joyce





________________________________
This message is for the addressee's use only. It may contain confidential information. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender. Tripp Lite disclaims all warranties and liabilities, and assumes no responsibility for viruses which may infect an email sent to you from Tripp Lite and which damage your electronic syst&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Joyce Norris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T22:05:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19142">
    <title>inproc sockets</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19142</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;what is the preferred mechanism for having threads talk to one another?

the old way was for the main program to do the bind
before spawning threads who do the connect,
and passing that bind socket to teh thread who needs it.

does this still work?
the new meme talks about creating sockets within threads
but it is awkward to arrange the bind first.

-----------------------
Andrew Hume
623-551-2845 (VO and best)
973-236-2014 (NJ)
andrew&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;research.att.com



_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Hume</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T15:29:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19141">
    <title>ZeroMQ Open port Issue</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19141</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

This is the second version of my previous message. I hope this will help to
understand better.

I'm just developing a C# client application that requests some data to some
servers.
I'm using ZeroMQ Client/Server pattern to perform this solution.

The servers are linked by wireless connection, so the connections are not
always guaranteed.
I noticed some problem using ZeroMQ when some communications expired with
the timeout.

In order to debug this problem, I created a simple project that call a
no-connected server.

http://pastebin.com/b5EnLaL4

Using a port sniffer, I noticed that a huge quantity of ports are opened
and not closed, as you can see by the attached file (shooted after
few requests). Only few ports refer to the server address while the others
refer to localhost.

Is it correct or something is wrong?

My software scenario is:

   - Windows 7 Home Edition 64 bit
      - Microsoft C# Express 2012
   - clrzmq version 3.0 downloaded by NuGet.
   - libzmq.dll compiled in C++ on my machine.

U&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Federico Spagnolo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T08:47:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19138">
    <title>memory preallocation for realtime use cases</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19138</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I read pdf(s) and code to see if zmq could fit my current use cases

I've got some problems to understand the memory management:

- for "send": ok it seems that i can manage my own list of buffers and be
informed with the free callback the the buffer is not used by the lib.
There is the malloc for the content_t part of a msg...

- for the "recv": even if i prepare a msg with a data buffer, it is freed
before the reading (i see msg_close when i follow the source code)

so i wonder how can I alloc all the memory at start of my app, and say to
zmq lib "work with that"

can you light me?

with my best regards, and my apologies for my experimental english

michel pacilli
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>mitch p</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T19:49:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19137">
    <title>Enabling log</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19137</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello All,

Is it possible to enable built-in trace/debug level logging for ZeroMQ?

Thanks,
Erwin Karbasi
AT&amp;amp;T, Senior Software Architect
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Erwin Karbasi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T09:53:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19133">
    <title>ZMQ_PAIR sockets</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19133</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;i thought i understood ZMQ_PAIR sockets, but apparently not.
the man page mentions that they are experimental, but otherwise
doesn't really say how they work.

what are the semantics?

-----------------------
Andrew Hume
623-551-2845 (VO and best)
973-236-2014 (NJ)
andrew&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;research.att.com



_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Hume</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T05:55:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19132">
    <title>MSVC 2008 no longer supported in master?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19132</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I haven't been checking every platform, but master requires stdint.h which
only hit Microsoft with MSVC 2010SP1.

https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/commit/b0b8ab27c5a3734aa2e9103a61e1a850e14d7dd3

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Steven McCoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T03:22:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19131">
    <title>PUB/SUB appears to be 'missing' first byte 3.2.2</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19131</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I appear to have a issue with PUB/SUB apparently 'dropping' the first byte.

Setup: 
 * Basic PUB/SUB running on same machine over TCP/localhost. 

 * Message has first 4 bytes as subscription id, rest payload

Problem:
 * On dev box runs fine
 * On prod box the subscriber sees no messages 
 * The reason is that the received message is 'missing' the first byte

Logs:

Machine 1 (Ubuntu 12.04 64, JZMQ/ZMQ 3.2.0) runs fine, e.g.:

01:19:10:042 DEBUG [qtp1866572071-24] Publishing: [0, 0, 0, 13, -49, 0, 0, 1, 62, -72, -90, -29, 63, 7, -108, -53, 63, -12, -122, -13, 110, -8, 5, 96, -53, 64, 89, -9, -101, -128, 35, -90, -50, -53, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -53, 64, 68, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
01:19:10:042 DEBUG [SubscriptionDataHandlerThread] Received data: [0, 0, 0, 13, -49, 0, 0, 1, 62, -72, -90, -29, 63, 7, -108, -53, 63, -12, -122, -13, 110, -8, 5, 96, -53, 64, 89, -9, -101, -128, 35, -90, -50, -53, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -53, 64, 68, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

Machine 2 (Ubuntu 12.04 64, JZMQ/ZMQ 3.2.2) an&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mark Sutheran</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-18T17:56:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19128">
    <title>about the swap option in zmq3.2</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19128</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;


Hi, all.
I noticed that the swap option are disappeared in zmq3.2. So if I want to transmit
files with zmq, the memory will increase  too much, so, how to resolve this problem
in zmq3.2?
Thank you very much.

Best Regards.

Richard
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>张龙华</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-17T17:31:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19108">
    <title>Do Sockets free memory after..</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19108</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;storing say a million msgs in its outgoing buffer and when the client has
finally caught up and consumed all msgs?

I am seeing that the memory usage goes up as the client is slow or not
there but even after the client comes back and consumes all msgs.. the
memory stays where it was.. any comments?

thanks,

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nishant Mittal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-16T14:07:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19102">
    <title>Help on the PUB/SUB socket reconnection.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19102</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello zmq guys,

I am writing this letter to confirm whether zmq PUB/SUB socket tcp
connection have no timeout mechanism.

Recently, I am coding with ZMQ3.2.2 API.  In my program, there are two
nodes, one is publisher, the other is subscriber, communicated with zmq tcp
PUB/SUB sockets.  These two nodes are running on virtual machine. When the
publisher's VM is RESET(code restart),  the subscriber won't received any
message from the restarted publisher. However,  restart the publisher
program, reboot in guest os, disconnect interface for a period of time
won't lead to such result, subscriber always reconnects to the new started
publisher.

With tcpdump, we noticed that
1)  restart the publisher program or reboot the guest os, makes publisher
zmq send a FIN to terminate the connection. And when publisher restarts,
subscriber will reconnect to it automatically.

2) Reset the VM of publisher, no FIN is sent out and when publisher
restarts, the subscribe do nothing, no communication is observed, so the
subscribe &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>许海玲</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-16T03:05:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19098">
    <title>Oddities when working with Cygwin environment</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19098</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have been doing some development of 0mq-based C (console) applications in cygwin, and there are two oddities that I would like to comment on. I would like to know if anybody else sees these issues:


1.       Behavior of Control-C: for certain operations (I believe mostly when calling zmq_recv()), Control-C does not abort the operation. The only way to exit the application is killing the process. I am properly handling the return value of zmq_recv().

2.       This may have nothing to do with 0mq proper, but sometimes I get the message "fatal error - cygheap base mismatch detected" when running my application. Right after that, I re-run it and it works ok.

My environment is:


*         Windows 7 64 bit (all patches applied as of today).

*         Cygwin 1.7.18(0.263/5/3) (updated yesterday, with gcc 4.5.3).

*         0mq 3.3.0 (cloned from github yesterday) compiled with Visual C++ 2010 Express.

Thanks for any hints,

--
Gonzalo Diethelm
DCV Chile





----------------------------------------- 
De&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>gonzalo diethelm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T16:26:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19089">
    <title>sending and receiving multiple messages and repliesfrom same thread</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19089</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,
I want to use zeromq for the following scenario, but can't recognize the proper pattern for this.
Server listens to port 5555. When a client connects to server, thread A handles this connection and from now on, every request from client goes to thread A, and thread A sends a reply to the client.

Currently, I am using normal req/rep pattern with Router/Dealer on top to handle multithreading. but every request from a client is round robined and load balanced between thread. What I need, is that when a thread answers the first request from a client, from now on, the same thread answer the rest of the requests from that client. (like having a persistent connection with client).

Is this scenario possible with ZMQ? if yes, how?

Thank you very much for your assistance,
Jerry_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Hamed Afshar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T12:14:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19088">
    <title>recvmsg deprecated</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19088</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;boy, i haven't been paying attention!

what is teh strength of zmq_recvmsg being "deprecated"?
should i worry that in fact it is going away?
or is it just a poor choice of words?

-----------------------
Andrew Hume
623-551-2845 (VO and best)
973-236-2014 (NJ)
andrew&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;research.att.com



_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Hume</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T09:26:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19085">
    <title>Unable to use ZeroMQ 3.2 in my Android application</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19085</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear Sir

 I am trying to use the ZeroMQ-Jzmq in my Android project.
I had followed the all steps suggested in
http://www.zeromq.org/build:android.
I had successfully created the zmq.jar and libjzmq.so on the fedora linux
os.

But when I use these in my Android application I am getting following error.


05-15 12:26:15.034: I/dalvikvm(781): Could not find method
org.zeromq.ZMQ.getVersionString, referenced from method
com.example.zmq2test.MainActivity.onCreate
05-15 12:26:15.054: W/dalvikvm(781): VFY: unable to resolve static method
3570: Lorg/zeromq/ZMQ;.getVersionString ()Ljava/lang/String;
05-15 12:26:15.054: D/dalvikvm(781): VFY: replacing opcode 0x71 at 0x000a
05-15 12:26:15.114: D/AndroidRuntime(781): Shutting down VM
05-15 12:26:15.124: W/dalvikvm(781): threadid=1: thread exiting with
uncaught exception (group=0x40a71930)
05-15 12:26:15.155: E/AndroidRuntime(781): FATAL EXCEPTION: main
05-15 12:26:15.155: E/AndroidRuntime(781): java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org.zeromq.ZMQ
05-15 12:26:15.155: E/Androi&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ranjeet Kumar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T07:14:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19078">
    <title>Synchronizing Access to a Publisher</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19078</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;In our application server, we have multiple threads servicing web requests.
At the end of each request, the thread emits a simple text-based string
indicating the activity performed by the request, like a journal entry. We
want these threads to use ZMQ publishers to send this activity message to
ZMQ subscribers listening on other machines. The QoS we desire is "best
effort" only, some messages could be dropped, but each message must be
published to ALL subscribers available.

 

Single Publisher per App server instance

We thought about initializing a single ZMQ publisher on each app server
instance and synchronizing access to it using locks. But based on the ZMQ
guide, synchronizing thread access to sockets is not a good choice, so we
abandoned this option, not to mention a single instance could easily become
a bottleneck. 

 

Create Publisher On-Demand, Send, then Destroy

In this approach, the executing thread creates a ZMQ publisher on-demand,
publishes the message, then closes the publisher; all other &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>etc1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T00:12:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19076">
    <title>Use unused 'fd' field in zmq_pollitem_t to storeadditional data</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19076</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!

I have seen in the documentation that the fd field in zmq_pollitem_t should be ignored if a ZMQ socket is also present in the structure. I have thought of using this field to store additional information for the socket. 

I poll many sockets that all of them use the same function to be processed but the arguments differ, so I use the fd as a pointer to an structure where I store this arguments.

Is there any other option to do this polling scheme?

Best regards,

    Juan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Juan López Rubio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-13T16:05:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19071">
    <title>Getting information about connected hosts, hitting high water mark, etc.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19071</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;While I'm complaining about stuff missing from the current API, let me
mention this: It would be nice to be able to get at some information
about what peers are currently connected to a socket, and how close
each peer is to hitting its high water mark (i.e., how many queued
messages).  It would also be nice to get connect/disconnect and
muted/unmuted notifications somehow.  These could be reported via
zmq_poll() (either as ZMQ_POLLERR or a new ZMQ_POLLPEERSTATUS or
something like that), or if you want to get really fancy, report them
back to the app via a special inproc PUB/SUB socket.  I like the
latter, but it's more like a high-level API while the rest of libzmq
is currently more like a low-level socket API.  A higher-level library
could always build the latter on top of the former.

By the way, my complaining is a form of flattery.  I wouldn't bother
complaining about something I didn't really want to use.  ZMQ is
pretty cool and has a lot of promise, it just has a little more
maturing to do.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Randall Nortman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T12:54:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19068">
    <title>epoll spurious events</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19068</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello, list.

I've wrote fairly simple program to
check if 0mq socket is usable with external
eventloop
http://pastebin.com/St0DJ4jX

We have main thread runs epoll
for socketpair handle and for a 0mq socket.
Another thread ('buzzer') writes something 
via 0mq and via socketpair.

I would expect that epoll fires once for
socketpait and once for 0mq socket,
while in reality I can see that 0mq shows
some activity three times
==
$ ./zmq_epoll 
hello from buzzer
fd=16, j=0 zmq events: EPOLLIN 
sent something via 0mq
fd=16, j=0 zmq events: EPOLLIN 
0mq:zmq
sent something via socketpair
fd=13, j=0 socketpair events: EPOLLIN 
socket_pair:something
fd=16, j=0 zmq events: EPOLLIN 
timeout
timeout
timeout
timeout
timeout
timeout
==

May be I am doing something wrong?

The assumption that two 'extra' events caused
by connect and close seems wrong
(at least not all 'extra' events are always caused
by connect/close things).

My concern is such spurious events
are harmful from performance point of view.

Explanation (or l&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ilja Golshtein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T12:11:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19067">
    <title>DTLS over NetMQ</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19067</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,

Inspired by latest talking on securing zeromq I set down and developed DTLS
over NetMQ.

The API is very similar to the CurveZMQ, it's not yet merge to the main
repository. You can find the source code at
https://github.com/somdoron/netmq/tree/Security/src/NetMQ/Security.

I covered most of the TLS 1.2 features, the main features from DTLS is
supporting unordered messages and only using block ciphers.

Because the similarity between NetMQ and clrzmq it can easily be merged
into clrzmq as well.

Also developing this library in another language with
openssl cryptography shouldn't be hard (I'm using .net native cryptography
library).

It's still in early stage and need more testing. You can read more about
the library in my blog: http://somdoron.com/2013/05/securing-netmq/.

Doron
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Doron Somech</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T11:57:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19061">
    <title>Minimum version of libpgm for ZMQ 3.2.3</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.zeromq.devel/19061</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I have build libzmq 3.2.3 for debian 7, and install libpgm 5.1
The application fail in a SIGFPE exception, does the libpgm is too old for
ZMQ ?

Thanks

Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
[Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7fec720 (LWP 32202)]
0x00007ffff6efaef8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpgm-5.1.so.0
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff6efaef8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpgm-5.1.so.0
#1  0x00007ffff6f1776a in pgm_init () from /usr/lib/libpgm-5.1.so.0
#2  0x00007ffff7bc8ba9 in zmq_ctx_new () from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzmq.so.3
#3  0x00007ffff7bc8ea9 in zmq_init () from
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libzmq.so.3
#4  0x000000000041b855 in mqinit ()
#5  0x000000000043136b in Server_init ()
#6  0x00000000004124df in final_setup ()
#7  0x0000000000412d4f in taskmain ()
#8  0x000000000041d16d in ?? ()
#9  0x00007ffff717f020 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#10 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>William Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T08:37:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.network.zeromq.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.network.zeromq.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
