http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12985 <pre>I'm in the process of setting up Quagga for use as an RTBH router and am trying to make it as simple as possible for staff to add routes to be injected. At first I was going to do just bgpd but I need to apply different communities under certain conditions, so I added zebra and am doing redistribute static with a route map on the bgpd side. Now I can go into zebra and add static routes and they get populated to bgp and off to the border routers and upstreams just fine, but looking to make that easier. I noticed on linux that "ip route show" lists routes I've added for blocking in zebra, for example: blackhole 1.2.3.4 proto zebra I was curious if there's a linux command I could use to add those routes myself and then zebra would pick them up? That would make it very easy to script an interface for our noc staff to use to quickly blackhole or block someone. Perhaps something like "ip route add blackhole 1.2.3.4/32 proto zebra"? I did that and it ended up in the routing table of the kernel but not in z</pre> David H 2013-05-16T22:14:45 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12984 <pre>Howdy, I was looking for an equivalent of `clear ip ospf process` which would restart ospfd. Is there any similar thing in quagga? I see a few `clear bgp ...` thingies. -- Ricky Charlet Software Dev / Routing Dude: Aries team, Roseville CA ricky.charlet-VXdhtT5mjnY&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&lt;mailto:ricky.charlet-VXdhtT5mjnY&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; USA: 916.785.2090 </pre> Charlet, Ricky 2013-05-16T21:22:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12980 <pre> Hello,   yesterday around 16:10 CET we experienced kernel crash on a box running quagga and peering to Cogent. According to our findings we suspect some malicious/malformed/unsupported IPv6 updates. Our other upsream peering on exactly the same box did not experience any problems.   We are running quagga 0.99.20 on debian squeeze 3.0.28 x86_64.   Anybody else experienced similar issues with Cogent or other ISP?   Thanks.   Miro _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users-UOy77sIEA+cAd7ICUelF/Q&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users </pre> mironto 2013-05-16T08:19:48 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12977 <pre>Hi ALL... I have quagga (version 0.99.15) and i have two backbone. I having problem when the packet in at backbone A and out backbone B, the linux is droping the packet. Someone know what can happening? regards, Cristian </pre> CPN 2013-05-15T21:58:44 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12974 <pre>Dear all, Does the BGP daemon support more than what the official documentation says it does ? If so, is there any other documentation available that has an updated list of commands supported ? If not then fine. thanks and regards, balaji venkat PS : I looked at www.nongnu.org/Quagga documentation. _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users-UOy77sIEA+cAd7ICUelF/Q&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users </pre> Balaji venkat Venkataswami 2013-05-08T19:18:58 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12971 <pre>Hi, I have to set up 2 quagga that will have to handle 2 BGP (full table) neighbors, an IBGP session between them and some ospf, like this : || Datacenter A || Datacenter B || AS ISP 1 AS ISP 2 || AS ISP 1 AS ISP 2 | | || | | | | || | | | | || | | | | Our AS | | +---+------+---+ || +---+------+---+ | | || | | | Quagga A | || | Quagga B | | |/___________IBGP OSPF____________\| | +------+-------+ || +------+-------+ |</pre> Ace Slash 2013-05-04T00:03:35 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12970 <pre>When I run /etc/init.d/quagga restart (or start) I am getting this message "*..* *Loading capbility module if not done already * *Starting quagga daemons (prio:10): zebra/usr/lib/quagga/zebra: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/quagga/zebra: undefined symbol: setsockopt_ipv6_multicast_hop*s " I am using quagga version 0.99.20.1 The same thing is working over other VMs except this one. All my VM use Ubunutu 12.04. I tried rebooting. reinstalling quagga etc. I also tried various combinations, without zebra enabled in daemons file its works fine, as soon as I enable zebra, it gives this error. It will be great if I can get some help form the community. Also let me know what information I should share to assist debugging this issue. </pre> Arpit Gupta 2013-05-03T20:08:49 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12960 <pre>Hello. I have quagga installed with 2 peers and I'd like to analyze incoming and outgoing traffic by ASN. I found only pmacctd which can simulate netflow. In the manual there is something about to configure to work with quagga, but I can't do it: [...] http://wiki.pmacct.net/OfficialExamples X. Quickstart guide to setup a NetFlow agent/probe [...] How to analyze the traffic by ASN using quagga? In the CISCO there is netflow v9 in which we can analyze the traffic by ASN, how to do it in Linux using quagga? Regards, </pre> sidlo.marek-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org 2013-05-02T01:08:24 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12958 <pre>is there a way of opening vtysh in config mode? </pre> André Gustavo N. Lopes 2013-04-24T18:42:43 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12955 <pre>Hi, I really like the idea of keep track of what is changing on my config files, specially with quagga. This is very useful where several people manage the environment, and can be a lifesaver finding the last working config. I use SVN to accomplish this, so whenever I remember, I am commiting my stuff to my svn server. Whenever I remember is not always good enough, so I decided to code a vtysh wrapper, to do it automatically. It's just an idea yet, but it may help someone else, and new ideas can be sugested. I spend just a little time coding and reviewing, so please don't be too strict reading the code =) See below #!/bin/bash # no control-c, control-z trap '' SIGINT trap '' SIGQUIT trap '' SIGTSTP # execute vtysh command vt(){ local m="$&lt; at &gt;" sudo vtysh -c $m } # save save(){ vt write echo -e "\tTODO: checkout running-config to svn" echo -e "\tTODO: checkout saved config to svn" } # commit the current status, before change anything echo -e "TODO: first things f</pre> André Gustavo N. Lopes 2013-04-22T23:58:16 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12951 <pre>Howdy, I'm new to quagga. And I'm pretty sure this is a trivial problem to most folks here, but please share a solution for me.... I can't seem to save a route map. I think I'm entering it ok. But I `set` a next-hop ip and it does not seem to actually have been saved in the route-map. I do this: ------------------------------cut------------------ rtr# conf t rtr(config)# route-map rickys permit 42 rtr(config-route-map)# match tag 42 rtr(config-route-map)# set ip next-hop 42.1.1.1 rtr(config-route-map)# exit rtr(config)# exit rtr# show route-map FIB: FIB: route-map rickys, permit, sequence 42 Match clauses: Set clauses: Call clause: Action: Exit routemap rtr# --------------------------------paste --------------------------- So why don't I see my match and set clauses? -- Ricky Charlet Software Dev / Routing Dude: Aries team, Roseville CA ricky.charlet-VXdhtT5mjnY&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&lt;mailto:ricky.charlet-VXdhtT5mjnY&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; USA: 916.785.2090 </pre> Charlet, Ricky 2013-04-18T03:34:18 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12942 <pre>Hi Quagga Users, I'm configuring a linux (FC17x64) router and all seems to be fine... Until the load moves to interfaces. After that the log starts to show this: 2013/04/12 14:25:50 OSPF: *** sendmsg in ospf_write failed to 10.44.0.147, id 57301, off 0, len 64, interface wan0, mtu 1500: Invalid argument 2013/04/12 14:25:50 OSPF: *** sendmsg in ospf_write failed to 224.0.0.6, id 57302, off 0, len 64, interface wan0, mtu 1500: Invalid argument 2013/04/12 14:25:50 OSPF: *** sendmsg in ospf_write failed to 10.44.0.147, id 57304, off 0, len 84, interface wan0, mtu 1500: Invalid argument 2013/04/12 14:25:51 OSPF: *** sendmsg in ospf_write failed to 224.0.0.6, id 57307, off 0, len 144, interface wan0, mtu 1500: Invalid argument 2013/04/12 14:25:57 OSPF: *** sendmsg in ospf_write failed to 10.44.0.147, id 57309, off 0, len 164, interface wan0, mtu 1500: Invalid argument 2013/04/12 14:25:57 OSPF: *** sendmsg in ospf_write failed to 224.0.0.5, id 57310, off 0, len 140, interface wan0, mtu 1500: Invalid argument 2013</pre> Сергеев Сергей Николаевич 2013-04-12T11:12:40 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12941 <pre>I am having a problem setting up an anycast address that is shared between two routers. I followed the info on: http://www.openfusion.net/linux/anycast_dns Here is the problem I experience: when I bring up lo:1 on router1, all works. When I bring up lo:1 with the same IP address on router1, traffic stops. Strangely, if the IP is on eth0 and I use eth0:1 on both machines, bringing up eth0:1 on the *second* machine results in a complaint that the IP address is already in use. I have another setup in another data center that is almost identical and it works flawlessly, so I am thinking it is probably something simple causing the issue, but am not sure what. Any help or pointers would be appreciated. sean </pre> Sean Fulton 2013-04-11T12:56:29 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12940 <pre>Hi! At http://opsec.eu/src/quagga-nagios-check/ http://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Plugins/Network-and-Systems-Management/check_quagga_bgpd/details https://www.monitoringexchange.org/inventory/Check-Plugins/Network/ISP/check_quagga_bgpd I made two perl scripts available: check_quagga_bgpd - monitors the daemon and the peers check_quagga_bgpd_routecnt- monitors the number of routes per peer If you can use those or have questions/suggestions/patches, I would be happy to hear from you. </pre> Kurt Jaeger 2013-04-09T11:46:24 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12938 <pre>Hi, Our setup consists of three routers A,B and C in an IPV6 network. The routing protocol between A and B is ripng ipv6. The routing protocol between B and C is iBGP ipv6. A---[ripng-ipv6]---B---[ibgp-ipv6]---C We want B to advertise a route towards A with the next hop set to the global IPV6 address of B. We are overriding the default behaviour of setting the next hop as a link local address. We have setup a next-hop routemap using the "set ipv6 next-hop global" command. But we still see that the router is still advertising the next hop with a link local address. The configuration for Router B is shown below. (I have added [SNIP] as per customer request). ! Router B router bgp 65521 ! Router ID bgp router-id 192.168.182.100 ! Configure BGP_GW1 as iBGP peer ! Router C - IPV4 neighbor 192.168.182.98 remote-as 65521 neighbor 192.168.182.98 weight 1000 ! Router C - 1PV6 neighbor 2001:[SNIP]:2eff:4182::98 remote-as 65521 neighbor 2001:[SNIP]:2eff:4182::98 route-map set-nexthop out addr</pre> Sandeep Ahluwalia 2013-04-08T14:37:07 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12926 <pre>All, I built the topology with three AS connected with BGP: AS105 &lt;-&gt; AS101 &lt;-&gt; AS2901 AS105 and AS2901 have only one BGP router, the central AS101 has two BGP routers located located multiple hops away from each one: (AS105)--n16- | --n12--&lt;AS101_IGP_routers&gt;--n13- | -n19--(AS2901) Screenshot of the network in CORE emulator is enclosed, BGP/OSPF gateways are green, OSPF routers are blue. I set iBGP connection between two BGP routers n12 and n13 within the AS101 and ran OSPF as IGP on all routers in AS101. As soon as the iBGP connection was established, BGP router n13 injected to OSPF the routes to AS105 it learned from n12 through iBGP, what made the dead loop in the routing: n13 sent all traffic for AS015 to n19, but n19 sent it back to n13. If I don't establish iBGP link between n12 and n13, all routes are OK. Is this a bug in the iBGP implementation or I misconfigured the iBGP? The configuration of the n12 is: ! OSPF router ospf router-id 10.0.0.1 network 10.0.3.0/24 area 0 networ</pre> Ros Molodyko 2013-04-03T21:02:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12924 <pre>Dear quagga users, I just set up a kind of "route collector" using quagga, connected to my border routers (mixed Juniper/Quagga) via ibgp. My border routers just learn default route from upstream. On the route collector, "show ip bgp" shows the upstream AS for the route learned from Juniper border routers, but not for Quagga Border routers :( Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 100 0 i * i x.x.x.y 100 0 8218 i does anyone have an idea on how to show the upstream as in the route collectors paths? </pre> Emmanuel Lacour 2013-04-03T15:11:44 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12920 <pre>Anyone know how to configure ripng to advertise global address instead of local link address?_______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users-UOy77sIEA+cAd7ICUelF/Q&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users </pre> richard xiao 2013-04-03T10:04:45 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12919 <pre>Hi Quagga Users, I have a small question. I am building a small prototype for a project. I have installed Quagga on a Virtual machine and am trying to connect it to another VM. I am using Host-only Adapters and I have two interfaces assigned an IP address of 192.168.56.11 and 192.168.56.12 and they are on the same subnet for the Quagga VM. The interfaces have the corresponding IP ie eth0 had 192.168.56.11 and eth1 has 192.168.56.12. I am sending RIP packets from another VM to the VM on which Quagga is present. I am receiving the packets on the Quagga VM. But the problem is even if the packets destination IP address is 192.168.56.12, I am seeing that the packets are being received on eth0 which is 192.168.56.11 on the ripd logs. Is this problem because both the interfaces are on the same subnet? It would be great if some light can be shed on this issue. Regards, </pre> vinay pai 2013-04-02T22:43:56 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12918 <pre>Hi all, Would like to understand the level of support for BGP MPLS VPN in Quagga. Also is BGP scan the only mechanism for taking care of IGP nexthop change for remote BGP routes? Thanks Ramesh _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users-UOy77sIEA+cAd7ICUelF/Q&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users </pre> ramesh ram 2013-04-01T19:04:25 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.quagga.user/12913 <pre>Hi, We are trying redistribute ripng routes into BGP with no success. When we add "redistribute ripng" command to bgpd.conf, bgpd reports a parsing error and exits. IPV6 BGP updates work in our configuration. Are we missing something? Thanks in advance, Sandeep _______________________________________________ Quagga-users mailing list Quagga-users-UOy77sIEA+cAd7ICUelF/Q&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users </pre> Sandeep Ahluwalia 2013-03-28T19:06:57 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.network.quagga.user