<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general">
    <title>gmane.network.opennic.general</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8777"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8764"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8747"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8738"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8719"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8708"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8704"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8697"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8696"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8669"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8640"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8615"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8569"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8557"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8552"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8546"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8542"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8530"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8528"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8523"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8777">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Proposal for End-to-End Encrypted Root-Less DNS</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8777</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Okay so, correct me if I'm wrong, but
isn't it possible to have an alternative blockchain for NameCoin that 
has a much higher difficulty,
let's say only one mined genesis block per three months, and then use 
that as the TLDs, eliminating
the need for a centralized root.

The significantly high difficulty makes it financially infeasible to 
squat on TLDs, yet is enough to keep
TLD abuses in check, since there is enough to encourage competition.

For second-level and third level, you'd have normal nameservers like 
PowerDNS and BIND9, though
I'd strongly suggest implementing DNSSEC + DANE + DNSCurve and a few 
more enhancements
for privacy and security as a general convention from the outset.

What do you think?


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex M (Coyo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T11:10:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8764">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] ShofarDomain's rootless domain system</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8764</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We have added OpenNIC to ShofarDomain's rootless domain system and would
welcome a dialog.  Our objective is not to be an alternative root, but to
eliminate the need for roots.  With the rootless system all TLDs are peers.
With the peer model, the central authority is gone and the whole system is
more resilient.

 

Our offering of TLDs, such as ".Gun", ".TeaParty", ".Occupy", ".ProChoice",
",ProLife", and others use a digital signature based system that allows for
true ownership rather than the rental model.  SLDs are offered at a $10
one-time fee and the business model allows for any party to become a
retailer and retaining about half of that amount.

 

Our technology includes a model where DNS traffic is hidden from the ISP to
prevent logging.

 

We invite dialog here and you can contact me directly at
John.Kozlowski&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ShofarDomain.com.

 

While not all data is in place, you can see what we have thus far for
OpenNIC at http://ShofarDomain.com/Org,OpenNIC.

 

Respectfully,


John Kozlowski



 &amp;lt;http://sh&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>John Kozlowski (ShofarDomain.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T20:27:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8747">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] OpenNIC Donations</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8747</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;heya guys--

OpenNIC is pleased to now take donations! We offer paypal and bitcoin
donations.  While paypal is the most popular way to pay online these
days, we do realize there are security concerns and thus we welcome any
ideas for further consideration.  If you would like to donate funds in
another way, please email alex at alex [AT] opennicproject [DOT] org and
we can see what we can do for you.  Rest assured that these donations
are put only towards the maintenance of OpenNIC infrastructure. As we
are able to receive more donations, we will be able to add additional
services and servers to our global community.  Once again, please feel
free to contact Alex by email or on the OpenNIC IRC (purrdeta) if you
have any questions or concerns.


--julian


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Julian DeMarchi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T00:23:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8738">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8738</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear OpenNIC,

I have setup my iptables rules according to the wiki but still getting a
lot of unwanted traffic with isc.org and ripe.net.
Here is the output of dnstop:

Query Name           Count      %
---------------- --------- ------
ripe.net               590   54.2
isc.org                406   37.3
cnr.it                  13    1.2
akamaiedge.net           6    0.6
140.in-addr.arpa         6    0.6
125.in-addr.arpa         5    0.5
2-0.pl                   5    0.5
86.in-addr.arpa          5    0.5
multi-play.pl            4    0.4
multi-play.eu            4    0.4
net.pl                   4    0.4
202.in-addr.arpa         3    0.3
46.in-addr.arpa          3    0.3
91.in-addr.arpa          3    0.3

I have setup the following iptables rules which were supposed to block this
traffic:

# isc.org
-A DNSFILTER -p udp -m string --hex-string
"|00000000000103697363036f726700|" --algo bm --dport 53 -j DROP
# ripe.net
-A DNSFILTER -p udp -m string --hex-string
"|0000000000010472697065036e6574|" --algo bm --dpor&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Psilo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T14:23:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8719">
    <title>[opennic-discuss]  DoS amp attack / Top20</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8719</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;According to my IPS here are the top 20 - counting from 04/22/2013 until 04/28/2013

Source IPCountryPackets
93.170.92.40NL309949
203.124.103.1SG75174
182.50.156.206SG74860
77.64.198.79DE50088
184.72.223.220US48852
72.20.10.245US46466
186.2.161.24BZ41649
205.251.193.221US31930
186.2.165.1BZ28029
174.37.121.123US15333
173.193.159.94US14763
174.37.121.182US14630
173.193.137.84US14476
208.43.227.116US11874
5.153.6.205NL11489
184.172.60.180US11443
199.245.52.48US10774
199.83.134.214US9819
209.236.127.128US9714
64.215.195.237US9229


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Uwe (ML) Kiewel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-29T10:33:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8708">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Pirate Party International?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8708</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;So apparently, a lot of my friends at #USPP have realized that I'm 
everywhere, including here.

I've been making a point of spending more time at irc.PirateIRC.net and 
interacting and keeping up.

Very recently, I've been saving up money for a Linode (their new 4GB 
plan in Dallas)
so I can host a Discourse ( http://www.discourse.org/about/ ) instance.

I plan on hosting this for the purposes of discussing and voting on 
issues of interest to TXPP,
and on organizing and coordinating efforts both internally within TXPP 
and to other state chapters.

I just thought I'd poke the listserv about this, since it seems people 
noticed me here, as well.

So hai :D


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex M (Coyo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-28T23:33:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8704">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Wiki server offline</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8704</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;The wiki server has died its final death.  It has been down for over 24
hours, and will likely remain offline for another day.  I have contacted
Julian, and was told there may be some new hardware tomorrow to replace
the failing machine.  Unfortunately there will be no way to bring the
old server back online again before then.

If you have an immediate question, your best bet is to find someone in
the IRC channel to ask.  Otherwise, hang in there until we get it sorted
out, and we'll be back up and running again soon!

FYI - The wiki server does not handle any of the DNS tasks, so services
will not be affected by this outage.


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Taylor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-28T05:37:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8697">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Wiki still offline?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8697</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I went to add a v6 address for my tier 2 server and the wiki.opennicproject.org seems to be down.  Any ETA on a fix?

- -Kenny
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8
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=/vw7
-&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kenny Taylor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-22T21:49:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8696">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Linode Internal services</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8696</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I listed my server on the Linode Internal Services page:
http://www.linode.com/wiki/index.php/Internal_Services#Tokyo.2C_Japan

If any of you are using Linode in Japan, my server should now my accessible
over its private IP. If you have a Tier 2 in Linode's other data centers, I
encourage you to also list it on the page!

SLA is as close to 100 that I can get.

Thank you,


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Guillaume Parent</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-22T19:43:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8669">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] .free TLD</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8669</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I just found this site; http://www.dotfree.com/ and am so mad had to post to this list!

Forgive me if I have forgotten previous conversations but did 'we' (OpenNIC) know about this?

Peter


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8

iQFBBAEBCAArBQJRdQ96JBxQZXRlciBHcmVlbiA8cGV0ZXJAZ3JlZW5wZXRlLmNv
LnVrPgAKCRDwSqngs+9nOQWUB/4sa6swXzr4R3N2Na/SfmOnZR1Kx50Pr5NZOVOY
IXMLfPywitbP/5rnnZ/SnnASsKkuN9YrNyw81KCEp4CeX0ZHS5Z3mGWTeAgJ9iVq
7RBopwTkVc1v07lbcGbZofyF+XLMBb82nhK4AyiJkhgcyOEJWKXhMay2wmOJoRCy
Cru9PkmYiLKLq0QL7CBjE9QhwaW6d33N4N+ZixX3grRYrhNO76tQ5mLRflf8vaU3
W8cTWSoB5G/NqQ9kkq6lLqgNJXO4WJ48PdYVH8swklMy26GxE4gWA4hhyar240rp
Bq6LU8xGMKfJyCxL+/Skx/glFfx0TNIa78r1Jlu9WhCzk8ua
=IbNv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Green</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-22T10:22:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8640">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] wiki.opennicproject.org down?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8640</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Can't seem to reach the wiki.

root&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;uriel:/etc/bind# curl -I wiki.opennicproject.org
curl: (7) couldn't connect to host

http://isitup.org/wiki.opennicproject.org

wiki.opennicproject.org. 86400  IN      A       202.83.95.228

Also the main page opennicproject.org seems to be in a half-finished state.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>staticsafe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-17T14:46:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8615">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8615</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey guys,

Got hit by my first semi significant DoS today, about 28 queries per second
caused 4 Mbps outbound.

CPU went from 4-6% to 20%. The whole thing went on for about 4-5 hours
until I blacklisted the 3 IPs involved.

They requested a massive TXT record that was on a russian server somewhere.

Anyone see something similar?


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Guillaume Parent</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-16T01:21:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8569">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Ferorum FTTH/FTTP Broadband</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8569</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;What do you guys think about this? Feedback appreciated!

Full Text is here:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64434594/ferorum-service-offerings.pdf


TL;DR version:


"How does 20-600 gigabit full-duplex (synchronous) FTTH/FTTP broadband 
Internet sound to you?"

"The domestic phone and cable companies suck, and need to be boycotted 
to the point of bankruptcy."


"Ferorum seeks to [...] offer ridiculously overkill broadband Internet 
services to residential subscribers...."

"Ferorum is a charitable half customer-owned, half worker-owned 
not-for-profit cooperative corporation."



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex M (Coyo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-12T14:21:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8557">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] ML and T1 Downtime</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8557</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey,

The ML and my T1 (ns2.tx and ns4.tx) will be down for some time tonight 
to migrate to the new Linode plan.  Unfortunately, the downtime can't be 
guessed but it shouldn't be too long and no mail will be lost as I'll 
stagger the upgrades.  I do need the RAM (thanks BIND!) so this will 
proceed tonight around 3AM CDT if work doesn't get too busy :)

Thanks guys for being awesome!
Alex


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex Hanselka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-10T03:12:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8552">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Fw: Cat Signal!</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8552</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Begin forwarded message:

Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:46:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Internet Defense League &amp;lt;info&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;fightforthefuture.org&amp;gt;
To: discipline&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmx.net
Subject: Cat Signal!


Dear IDL members,





We need to beat back a bad proposal to expand the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) -- in a hurry.  So we're asking the Internet Defense League to snap into action on Monday and Tuesday of next week.  (April 8th and 9th.) 



Our friends at Demand Progress have created code for an embeddable contact-Congress widget. Read more and grab the code here. Internet Defense League code will be available soon: 



http://www.fixthecfaa.com/ [ http://www.fixthecfaa.com/ ]

 [ http://www.fixthecfaa.com/ ] 

You'll be joining Fight for the Future, Demand Progress, EFF, Boing Boing, Reddit, and other great groups and sites as we stand together against this awful proposal. 



As many of you probably know, our friend (and friend to many of you) Aaron Swartz committed suicide earlier this year, while he was being prosecuted f&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>subhuman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-06T04:25:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8546">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Previous articles in the public domain</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8546</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;For anyone interested, my previous OpenNIC related articles which 
received good feedback last year (http://www.mchomenet.oz/opennic.html) 
are now released into the public domain.

If you find one that you feel you could use to help increase OpenNIC 
awareness in your own way, please do so, however you like. Permission 
already granted.

Martin.


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Martin C</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-04T22:07:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8542">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] DDOS blocking</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8542</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

I am getting hit tonight with 5-10 minute bursts of the DNS reflection attack.  I have an iptables rate limiter in place and that seems to reduce the impact without adversely affecting legit traffic.  There's a snippit of bind log below.  I'm not entirely sure offhand what that query is asking for.  I think it's asking for the ICANN root servers, but I'm not sure what the +E means.  Is this a request that any legitimate client would ever make?

02-Apr-2013 22:45:25.304 client 72.240.106.159#47803: query: . IN ANY +E (208.111.40.37)
02-Apr-2013 22:45:25.304 client 72.240.106.159#47803: query: . IN ANY +E (208.111.40.37)
02-Apr-2013 22:45:25.331 client 72.240.106.159#15198: query: . IN ANY +E (208.111.40.37)
02-Apr-2013 22:45:25.332 client 72.240.106.159#15198: query: . IN ANY +E (208.111.40.37)

Thanks,
Kenny


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>kennytaylor&lt; at &gt;runbox.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-03T05:53:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8530">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Today's DDoS</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8530</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Have anyone's OpenNIC nameservers been disrupted in today's epic battle between Spamhaus and Cyberbunker?  I saw something about DNS reflection being used.  All quiet here..

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8
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&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kenny Taylor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-27T18:09:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8528">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Change of IP: .oz</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8528</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This is to announce that the IP address of .oz is changing this weekend, 
with completion expected by tomorrow (Sunday), but will probably be 
done within a few hours.

The new IP address is: 103.4.16.80
Location: Sydney, Australia.

This change brings more resources and brings responsibility fully upon 
me now. I have a complete backup from the old server, so those domain 
changes that came through over the last few days should be just fine.

Thank you.

Martin.


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Martin C</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-23T09:13:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8523">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] ML Reboot</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8523</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

The mailing list server will be rebooted tonight in order to take advantage of the increase CPU allocation from our host.  In all honesty there is a fairly high chance of a RAM increase as well in the next few days or weeks which will also require a reboot and I will let you know if/when that happens.

Thanks,
Alex


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex Hanselka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-19T21:36:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8519">
    <title>[opennic-discuss] Mailing List</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.opennic.general/8519</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

I apologize that today the ML was unavailable due to a mistake on my part.  You may have received a bunch of mails trying to catch up from dns-reports, or you might have received a mail delayed message for something sent.  I renumbered my vpn and I thought I caught all of the things that needed to be changed but alas I didn't until *I* got the mail delayed message. 

Again, I apologize for this inconvenience.

Have a great day,
Alex


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.opennicproject.org

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex Hanselka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-19T02:08:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.network.opennic.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.network.opennic.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
