http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16806 <pre>The company I work for requests to have every email (including inter departmental) from employees be reviewed and approved by their manager. I'm wondering if the confirmation workflow of TMDA can be tailored to this type of confirmation. For instance, if email from John&lt; at &gt;example.com, then place item in pending queue, and send a confirmation email to Manager&lt; at &gt;example.com, and don't place in whitelist. I've looked at the readme with examples, and it seems there's no way to set a rule to request confirmation from a different email address. I was hoping there might be some undocumented syntax that I have not found, or that perhaps you know of an application that may fulfill this function. We are testing Zimbra 8.0.3 on a SLES 11.2 system. We are not locked into Zimbra, and could fall back to basic postfix if this gives up the functionality required. Brad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now &amp; We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Rel</pre> Bradley Howe 2013-04-29T02:09:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16802 <pre>Hi all, Recently I noticed that if my emails had multiple recipients they would be injected by tmda-inject into /usr/sbin/sendmail as multiple transactions, one per recipient. Often, this would result in multiple parallel deliveries (by Postfix) to the same host, for multiple recipients at that host. Now, I appreciate that in these times of increased bandwidth this isn't too big of a deal, but I'd really rather use SMTP correctly and deliver just one copy. Most hosts today now do pipelining, so there's really no good reason not to. Is there anything I can do meantime, or is a fix possible? Was there some reason for this particular choice of implementation? Cheers, Sabahattin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases </pre> Sabahattin Gucukoglu 2012-02-08T10:23:56 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16801 <pre>As with 8BITMIME, I'm just whipping up a Sendmail wrapper TMDA can call to turn on DSN support. From this I gather that the feature needed is the ability to pass in arguments to the sendmail program, or the ability to pass parameters into the MAIL and RCPT commands of the downstream submission server, depending on which is selected by the user. Tip: if you're on Sendmail (the real thing), set O RRTImpliesDSN=T and then have TMDA add a "Return-Receipt-To:" header. Sendmail will helpfully turn your request into a DSN success, discard the header value and strip it from the next hop output. Tip: some MTAs (Mercury/32 on Windows, EG) are still honouring Return-Receipt-To even when they themselves do not support DSN. In these enlightened times of greylisting and other spam-vapourising nonsense, I love DSNs. Cheers, Sabahattin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for M</pre> Sabahattin Gucukoglu 2012-01-25T04:12:47 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16800 <pre>I just upgraded to Postfix from XMail. With TMDA there is an immediate noticeable difference: my challenges go out with the address in $RECIPIENT in the From: field. $RECIPIENT is my account name after expansion from my alias 'mail', as used in this message. I realise this isn't a "Big deal", and it isn't even worth writing a wrapper shell script to fix it, but is there any way to fix it in TMDA itself? Cheers, Sabahattin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Sabahattin Gucukoglu 2012-01-02T15:54:07 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16799 <pre>Hi, I have an (arguably broken) email client which will not do duplicate detection in the absence of Message-Id fields. While I can get Postfix to insert that field along with From/Sender/Date, I'd rather not since it breaks the purity of mail when relayed or for delivery to non-TMDA destinations, and Message-Id can't be enabled without enabling all the other fields. Is there a server-side equivalent to the TMDAINJECT variable, or a way to implement it? Cheers, Sabahattin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Sabahattin Gucukoglu 2011-12-26T19:31:11 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16798 <pre>I see that the incoming filter (http://tmda.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/FilterSpecification#addlfeatures) allows a deliver=&amp;&lt;email_address&gt; for forwarding messages. This works very well. However, the local, original recipient user does not get the email as well. Is there a way to make this happen? Can an incoming filter have multiple actions (e.g. ok AND deliver=&amp;&lt;email_address&gt;)? I've tried to get this to work, but I either get an error or just the first action is performed. Brent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmd</pre> Brent Spencer 2011-11-19T00:35:47 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16797 <pre>So, I thought I had made some progress on this by adding a rule to my .procmailrc to check for the existence of a "X-TMDA-Action" header in the message as an indicator that the message was validated and should be forwarded. However, this header is not availble when the message passes through .procmailrc as TMDA seems to directly move the validated message to the appropriate /var/spool/mail/&lt;user_name&gt; directory. Is there a way to get TMDA to send the validated message through the .procmailrc routine via sendmail again? Brent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://list</pre> Brent Spencer 2011-11-18T22:24:44 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16796 <pre>Nevermind. I found ACTION_HEADER_INCOMING. Brent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Brent Spencer 2011-11-18T21:36:36 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16795 <pre>When an email is accepted by TMDA for delivery, the "Actn:" line in the incoming log file describes why the message was accepted. How would I add this information as a header in the email. For example, if the incoming log message is "Actn: OK (from-file -autocdb ~/.tmda/lists/whitelist ok)", I would want to add a header to that message such as "X-TMDA-Actn: whitelist ok". Is there a way to do this? Brent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Brent Spencer 2011-11-18T20:59:30 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16794 <pre>I have a working TMDA setup. Currently, as expected, messages that are validated arrive in my Inbox. However, I would like to be able to also forward these messages to another email address. How do I configure this? Brent Spencer XsiteDesigns ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Brent Spencer 2011-11-18T17:11:23 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16789 <pre>Both the released and "updated" version Kevin "published". Basically when attempting to execute the cgi I get the following dump from my browser: ELFàƒ4T4 (44€4€ TTT€€xxŸŸ Ÿ ŸÐÐhhh QåtdRåtdŸŸôô€e(/lib/ld-linux.so.2GNU ­KãÀC H)/6&lt;˜†__gmon_start__libc.so.6_IO_stdin_usedexeclprintfchdirputenvopen__libc_start_mainGLIBC_2.0ii ZðŸ U‰åƒìè±è(èóÉÃÿ5øŸÿ%üŸÿ% héàÿÿÿÿ% héÐÿÿÿÿ% héÀÿÿÿÿ% hé°ÿÿÿÿ% h é ÿÿÿÿ% h(éÿÿÿÿ% h0é€ÿÿÿ1í^‰áƒäðPTRhà…hð…QVh¨„èÿÿÿôU‰åSƒìè[Ãä‹“üÿÿÿ…ÒtèZÿÿÿX[ÉАU‰åSƒì€=$ u5»Ÿ¡( ëŸÁûK9Øs&lt; at &gt;£( ÿ…Ÿ¡( 9ØrêÆ$ X[]Í´&amp;U‰åƒì‹Ÿ…Òt¸…Àt ƒìhŸÿЃÄÉ</pre> Anthony Ercolano 2011-10-31T21:51:27 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16788 <pre>Both the released and "updated" version Kevin "published". Basically when attempting to execute the cgi I get the following dump from my browser: ELFàƒ4T4 (44€4€ TTT€€xxŸŸ Ÿ ŸÐÐhhh QåtdRåtdŸŸôô€e(/lib/ld-linux.so.2GNU ­KãÀC H)/6&lt;˜†__gmon_start__libc.so.6_IO_stdin_usedexeclprintfchdirputenvopen__libc_start_mainGLIBC_2.0ii ZðŸ U‰åƒìè±è(èóÉÃÿ5øŸÿ%üŸÿ% héàÿÿÿÿ% héÐÿÿÿÿ% héÀÿÿÿÿ% hé°ÿÿÿÿ% h é ÿÿÿÿ% h(éÿÿÿÿ% h0é€ÿÿÿ1í^‰áƒäðPTRhà…hð…QVh¨„èÿÿÿôU‰åSƒìè[Ãä‹“üÿÿÿ…ÒtèZÿÿÿX[ÉАU‰åSƒì€=$ u5»Ÿ¡( ëŸÁûK9Øs&lt; at &gt;£( ÿ…Ÿ¡( 9ØrêÆ$ X[]Í´&amp;U‰åƒì‹Ÿ…Òt¸…Àt ƒìhŸÿЃÄÉ</pre> Anthony Ercolano 2011-10-31T22:00:40 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16787 <pre>I got a bit fed up of dropping to a terminal to generate addresses when signing up for things in Firefox, so I wrote this a little while back: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tmda-address-gen/ Maybe it'll be useful to someone else on this list too. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Dagger 2011-08-22T04:06:45 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16786 <pre>I have a working sendmail+virtusertable+tmda configuration. However, I would like to be able to send confirmed emails to a group of recipients. For instance, if an email is sent to local user A and the sender positively responds to the challenge, I would like for not only user A but also someone&lt; at &gt;gmail.com to receive the email that was initially sent to user A. Any help is greatly appreciated. Brent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Tips for Better Web Security Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered include: Web security, SSL, hacker attacks &amp; Denial of Service (DoS), private keys, security Microsoft Exchange, secure Instant Messaging, and much more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426210/ _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Brent Spencer 2011-07-20T00:17:15 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16783 <pre>I've been using tmda and qmail for years quite successfully. I've had mail clients connecting to my mail server using stunnel for a secure connection and using tmda-ofmipd so that outgoing mail could add destination addresses to my whitelists and also to append a header to outgoing messages. After a recent upgrade I've lost the ability to send - receiving works just fine. stunnel is running under tcpserver: /usr/bin/tcpserver -v -P -R -x /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.tmda-ofmipd.cdb -c 40 -u 89 -g 89 mail.ercolano.net 8026 /etc/tmda/stunnel/stunnel-wrapper stunnel-wrapper: #!/bin/sh exec /usr/sbin/stunnel /etc/tmda/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2&gt;&gt;/var/log/tmda-ofmipd-starttls-stunnel-wrapper My stunnel.conf is: exec = /etc/tmda/stunnel/tmda-ofmipd-wrapper execargs = /etc/tmda/stunnel/tmda-ofmipd-wrapper cert = /etc/tmda/stunnel/stunnel.pem client = no foreground = yes protocol = smtp debug = 7 My /etc/tmda/stunnel/tmda-ofmipd-wrapper is: #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/src/tmda/current/bin/tmda-ofmipd -d -f -1 -R imaps://m</pre> Anthony V. Ercolano 2011-06-02T20:20:27 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16781 <pre>Hello, I'm new on TMDA. Is it possible to setup TMDA + Postifix per user basis ? I've found this possibility only using Exim. Thanks in advence. WM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1_______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Wardner Maia 2011-05-28T17:07:41 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16777 <pre>Another puzzler for you all. :-) Debian's brain-dead procmail installation will not let me use my primary address - the one in the From: of this email - to send bug reports or in fact do anything requiring interacting with a mail server, because procmail's infamous "Daemon" check (that's supposed to get rid of automatic mail system mail) filters out email with the word "mail" in sender headers. No problem, I'll just kludge a workaround by sending my mail out with a return and From: header set to my SourceForge forwarding address, and have the Reply-To point to the desired dated address (sample in Reply-To: of this email). That's the plan, anyway. I configure my mailer (Apple Mail) to send out mail through tmda-ofmipd with a newly added rule in my filters/outgoing file: to *&lt; at &gt;bugs.debian.org tag from bare=append envelope bare reply-to dated resent-from bare But now, when I send mail purporting to come from my SF account, an entry like this in my outgoing log, and the corresponding headers in email which i</pre> Sabahattin Gucukoglu 2011-05-25T00:53:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16774 <pre>Just a reminder to put it on a todo list somewhere, in case it isn't already yet. :-) It's not in the latest tmda-ofmipd. Cheers, Sabahattin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Sabahattin Gucukoglu 2011-04-25T19:53:58 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16770 <pre>I'm setting up Postfix+mysql virtual users, with maildrop as the MDA. It's been quite a task and I'm close to finishing it, but alas, I get new challenges after sending in a response. I don't have the email address or user part in /etc/aliases, as the FAQ mentions about Sendmail. Does anyone know of any other common reasons for this, or what I should look at? Below is .tmda/logs/incoming for one message and a response == Challenge Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:25:52 -0400 From: Darek M &lt;darek&lt; at &gt;DOM.net&gt; To: someone&lt; at &gt;DOMAIN.com Subj: Testing again Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming (1257) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:25:52 -0400 From: Darek M &lt;darek&lt; at &gt;DOM.net&gt; To: someone&lt; at &gt;DOMAIN.com Subj: Testing again Actn: CONFIRM pending 1302636352.14229 (1257) == Response Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:33:10 -0400 From: Darek M &lt;darek&lt; at &gt;DOM.net&gt; To: someone-confirm-1302636352.14229.71b35f&lt; at &gt;DOMAIN.com Subj: Re: Please confirm your message Actn: CONFIRM action_</pre> Darek M 2011-04-12T19:36:44 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16759 <pre>I'm still experiencing delays caused by verification using the issuer's intermediate certificate, using a referral to the intermediate's web servers whenever I submit a message using tmda-ofmipd for the first time in each session of my MUA (tmda-fork version). Is there any way to fix this, by having the entire chain sent to the client, without going through stunnel? Cheers, Sabahattin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev _______________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list tmda-users&lt; at &gt;lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users </pre> Sabahattin Gucukoglu 2011-04-10T05:36:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user/16751 <pre>Hi there, I think I'm missing a step in this policy script. In this bit of code, which is pretty much the meat and potatoes of the whole thing: tmda-filter -M $recip $sender | grep MATCH | grep -q bounce$ ## If they find something in the filters, dispose of the message. if [ $? = 0 ]; then [ -n "$LOGGER" ] &amp;&amp; $LOGGER -p mail.info -t postfix/tmda \ "Rejecting email recieved from $sender to $recip" echo "action=reject Message rejected by recipient (TMDA)." echo else [ -n "$LOGGER" ] &amp;&amp; $LOGGER -p mail.info -t postfix/tmda \ "Permitting email recieved from $sender to $recip" echo action=permit echo fi If I put a sender address in the 'bounce' filter file, it gets rejected at SMTP. But if the address isn't listed anywhere (the "else" block), the message gets passed right on through to the inbox. Am I reading this right? Where is the challenge created? I must be missing a step as it seems the script onl</pre> Darek M 2011-04-01T19:38:25 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user