http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114 hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9588 <pre>I have been successfully using priolist.mfp to match email addresses that I want to black/whitelist for ages. Now I want to block on a particular phrase such as: yahoo messenger online now which is from a particularly egregious sort of spam/scam my organization is receiving. I have tried putting the following combinations, none of which have worked: -yahoo messenger online now -yahoo\ messenger\ online\ now -yahoo\smessenger\sonline\snow -"yahoo messenger online now" and probably various others which I cannot now reproduce. I really expected the first one to work. I have finally stumbled upon a combination which does work: -yahoo.messenger.online.now Why would . work (I'm plenty familiar with regex and know it will match anything) but \s to match the spaces or simply raw spaces not work? Is there some unintentional parsing being done on the whitespace I put in which is breaking things? Thanks! </pre> Tracy Reed 2012-04-12T00:14:20 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9587 <pre>Hi Bill, It's been a long time since I last wrote to the list. I'm interested in playing around with libcrm and the SVM classifier, but am a bit confused. 1. Where might I find the "best" version of the library? The link on the wiki seems pretty old. For me, "best" means reliable enough for doing personal spam filtering. 2. The HowTo mentions CRM114_SVM, but I see that there is also CRM114_LIBSVM and that the two choices follow different code paths in crm114_base. Which should I use, or why might I choose one vs. the other? Best Regards, Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure </pre> Steve Pellegrin 2012-03-29T01:55:14 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9578 <pre>I was discussing a security issue with my new employer today, about scanning backups of servers that should not have confidential data on them for precisely such data. In the short term, scanning the email would do, especially if attachmants can be scanned. And I thought of CRM114 for the task, instead of the very slow and painful tools that are often used now. Is there a toolkit for such scanning? I'd much prefer to avoid take on the full integration project, but if anyone's already got such a toolkit assembled, even if it's a commercial toolkit, I'd love to review it for use at my new workplace. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d____________________________________</pre> Nico Kadel-Garcia 2012-02-28T03:22:22 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9577 <pre>Hi, All. I'm back to looking at CRM114, and I decided to update some of the documentation, working from "the (possibly) slightly unstable latest mainline version" -- thanks for the continued good work, and I hope the updates prove useful. This is the first. /Jskud --- crm114-20120205-ORIG/CLASSIFY_DETAILS.txt2009-09-11 11:25:57.000000000 -0700 +++ crm114-20120205/CLASSIFY_DETAILS.txt2012-02-06 07:49:00.000000000 -0800 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -18,7 +18,8 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; The current distribution builds in this set of classifiers. The classifiers are: -1) SBPH Markovian (the default) This is an extension of Bayesian +1) SBPH Markovian (the default) - This classifier uses + Sparse Binary Polynomial Hashing (SBPH), an extension of Bayesian classification, mapping features in the input text into a Markov Random Field. This turns each token in the input into 2^(N-1) features, which gives high accuracy but at high computation &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -52,7 +53,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; other classifiers. It _will_ work against binary files, though, which n</pre> Jskud.CRM114-hFAK3oOPH3QAvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org 2012-02-07T06:27:59 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9576 <pre>Hi, All. I'm back to looking at CRM114, and I decided to update some of the documentation, working from "the (possibly) slightly unstable latest mainline version" -- thanks for the continued good work, and I hope the updates prove useful. This is the second of two. I mostly reworked the formatting to make it consistent, and made the step titles consistent as well, fixing a few obvious typos in the process. /Jskud --- crm114-20120205-ORIG/CRM114_Mailfilter_HOWTO.txt2009-09-11 11:25:57.000000000 -0700 +++ crm114-20120205/CRM114_Mailfilter_HOWTO.txt2012-02-06 19:52:36.000000000 -0800 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -7,7 +7,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; The CRM114 &amp; Mailfilter HOWTO -Bill Yerazunis, 2003-09-18 -(last update 2009-03-02) +(last update 2012-02-06) This is the CRM114 Mailfilter HOWTO. It describes how to set up CRM114 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -31,7 +31,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; ---------------------------------------------------------- -That said, I hope CRM114, Mailreaver, and Mailreaver is useful to you; +That said, I hope CRM114, Mailfilter, and Mailre</pre> Jskud.CRM114-hFAK3oOPH3QAvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org 2012-02-07T06:31:46 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9574 <pre> Hello Khalid Something is broken, either with my package for libcrm114.a or something else. When I set up pecl-crm114 I get this during the configure step: checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for cc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for icc... no checking for suncc... no checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking for system library directory... lib checking if compiler supports -R... no checking if compiler supports -Wl,-rpath,... yes check</pre> Thomas Spahni 2012-01-08T18:36:37 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9570 <pre>Hoi Zaeme, So, setting up crm114 for someone else led me to a seriously overdue cleanup of my own rewrites.mfp file. I decided that it's probably just doing string replacements to normalize the data, so it should deal just fine with an IPv6 colon separated address. So far, it seems to do so just fine, so, Bill, I think you can call crm114 "IPv6 compliant" Reto </pre> R A Lichtensteiger 2012-01-05T18:37:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9574 <pre> Hello Khalid Something is broken, either with my package for libcrm114.a or something else. When I set up pecl-crm114 I get this during the configure step: checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for cc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for icc... no checking for suncc... no checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking for system library directory... lib checking if compiler supports -R... no checking if compiler supports -Wl,-rpath,... yes check</pre> Thomas Spahni 2012-01-08T18:36:37 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9570 <pre>Hoi Zaeme, So, setting up crm114 for someone else led me to a seriously overdue cleanup of my own rewrites.mfp file. I decided that it's probably just doing string replacements to normalize the data, so it should deal just fine with an IPv6 colon separated address. So far, it seems to do so just fine, so, Bill, I think you can call crm114 "IPv6 compliant" Reto </pre> R A Lichtensteiger 2012-01-05T18:37:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9574 <pre> Hello Khalid Something is broken, either with my package for libcrm114.a or something else. When I set up pecl-crm114 I get this during the configure step: checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for cc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for icc... no checking for suncc... no checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking for system library directory... lib checking if compiler supports -R... no checking if compiler supports -Wl,-rpath,... yes check</pre> Thomas Spahni 2012-01-08T18:36:37 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9570 <pre>Hoi Zaeme, So, setting up crm114 for someone else led me to a seriously overdue cleanup of my own rewrites.mfp file. I decided that it's probably just doing string replacements to normalize the data, so it should deal just fine with an IPv6 colon separated address. So far, it seems to do so just fine, so, Bill, I think you can call crm114 "IPv6 compliant" Reto </pre> R A Lichtensteiger 2012-01-05T18:37:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9563 <pre>Hello everybody, Happy new year :-) I just released a php extension of the C-callable library crm114. I use it for a blogs platform, to detect the spam articles, since 2 weeks. Your library work fine. Are you agree to let me maintain a official php extension of the crm114 system to web developers ? Here is the futur project website : http://gymx.net/php-crm114/ The libcrm114 is staticely compiled with the php module. Based on your documentation, I have implemented the major functions. I'm open to discuss with you for any improvements or modifications. Regards, Khalid Ahsein ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev_______________________________________________ Crm114-general mailing list Cr</pre> Khalid Ahsein 2012-01-03T18:25:14 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9560 <pre></pre> Ger Hobbelt 2011-10-14T21:24:17 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9556 <pre>Hi, I tried to upgrade the version of crm I use from 20070810-BlameTheSegfault to 20100106-BlameMichelson whenever I run the classify script I get errors (pasted below). I run crm from a working directory .crm114working, and in that directory I placed the new mailreaver.crm and mailtrainer.crm files. (are there other files I should put there also? And then in my procmail filter, crm gets called like this: :0fw: .msgid.lock | /usr/bin/crm -u /home/jason/.crm114working -w 64000000 mailreaver.crm I re-ran the command with -t to get the trace pasted below. Any ideas what might be going wrong? Is there something I need to do to my css files to upgrade? Thanks, Jason Executing line 526 : Statement 526 is non-executable, continuing. Parsing line 527 : --&gt; { Executing line 527 : Statement 527 is an openbracket. depth now 1. Parsing line 528 : --&gt; isolate (:stats:) // Executing line 528 : executing an ISOLATE statement Parsing line 529 : --&gt; classify [:in_text:] &lt;:*:clf:&gt; /:*:lcr:/ (:*:</pre> Jason Lewis 2011-10-11T01:29:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9555 <pre>I've been busy, but someone brought up their unhappiness with Barracuda lately, and I said "you know, there's this CRM114 toolkit...." Has anyone bundled CRM114 into a commercially supported appliance? Is anyone about to? I just can't take on the integrating it with user configuration tools and deployment tools, but I bet I could find resources to buy an applicance with it all sorted out. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 </pre> Nico Kadel-Garcia 2011-10-09T16:32:26 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9554 <pre>Hi, I know that this message itself verges on spam, but I hope that I've directed it enough and that it is quirky enough to hit most people's 'I'll let that slide/that interests me' filter :) I have a CRM-114 customization/feature request, and I was wondering if I could trade one of my peak skills (chocolate) for work that I could do only slowly and poorly (CMR114 coding). I have been using CRM-114 for about a year now, for my own personal e-mail, first running on a blog standard linux box, then running in linux environment inside of a 'virtualbox'. I use mailreaver and training via the e-mail interface. So far this has been working quite well. What I have noticed is that a significant portion of my (somewhat) desired 'solicited commercial e-mail' looks one hell of a lot like UCE. Which makes sense; very often the key difference between spam and proper sales e-mail is consent. When I train the desired stuff as good, it makes the undesired stuff look good as well. Additionally, while I ac</pre> Jonathan Edelson 2011-10-04T19:00:33 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9546 <pre>Hi all, after some initial playing with libcrm114, I've found myself sorely missing... the CRM114 language! in fact using libcrm114 unfortunately means doing without the powerful CRM114 language, practically needing to reinvent the wheel every time some fancy pre-filtering 'massaging' is required. is there any possibility/future plans to (re)implement the language within the crm library, one way or another? I'm wondering if the current JIT compiler [standalone CRM114 binary] might be migrated into libcrm, allowing some byte-code to be loaded/cached/executed by libcrm, or perhaps some precompiled native code for CRM114 programs to be linked together with the C (or whatever) program using libcrm. Does that make any sense? thanks Corrado ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Malware Security Report: Protecting Your Business, Customers, and the Bottom Line. Protect your business and customers by understanding the threat from malware and how it can impact your o</pre> Corrado 2011-09-09T23:39:51 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9543 <pre>Hi Guys, I received a spam that seems to cause CRM some grief. When i tried to train it it as spam it crashes crm I am using: jason&lt; at &gt;debian:~$ crm -v This is CRM114, version 20070810-BlameTheSegfault (TRE 0.7.5 (LGPL)) Copyright 2001-2006 William S. Yerazunis Trace follows. Is this a problem with my CRM or with the email? It could be the email as it's an email with an attachment. I seem to recall though that crm is suppose to truncate the attachment before processing or something? I run it like this: crm -t mailreaver.crm --spam &lt; ../1315543615.M799816P25984V000000000000FD00I0000000000020F4B_19.debian\,S\=4324304\:2\,S this is the (end of the) trace. Executing line 341 : Statement 341 is non-executable, continuing. Parsing line 342 : --&gt; call /:reavercache_init:/ Executing line 342 : Executing a user CALL statement surgery on the var &gt;:_cd:&lt; new value is ***&gt;1&lt;*** Parsing line 1112 : --&gt; { Executing line 1112 : Statement 1112 is an openbracket. depth now 1. Parsing line 1113 :</pre> Jason Lewis 2011-09-09T07:23:54 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9511 <pre> I finally have all the ducks in a row and am ready to upload the new libcrm114 onto Sourceforge. However, my incantations are no longer working; can anyone refresh my memory of how to put files up on sourceforge, specifically into the crm114 tarballs directory? - Bill Yerazunis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 </pre> wsy-MXLR4ItNKm8< at >public.gmane.org 2011-06-28T19:55:16 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9508 <pre>Hi! Since I now use an Intel SSD 320, I´d like to disable reaver_cache completely. Upto now I have a cron job that clears stuff in there thats older than two days all two days. But that means the files are written and then deleted. In order to avoid those unnecessary writes, since I do not want to keep the cache anyway, I´d like to disable it. Is it possible? If so, how? Thanks, </pre> Martin Steigerwald 2011-06-25T13:29:00 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.crm114/9479 <pre>hey folks, been running crm for years now and this problem ive been having is driving me nuts.. I only run 2 accounts on my server for mail, mine and my wifes.. mine (of course) seems to run fine, but hers Subject: Laugh Away Your Stress with these Funny Tips Folder: /home/thewife/Maildir/new/1302105620.15673_1.beast 29782 procmail: Program failure (-25) of "/usr/bin/crm" procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded so yeah the usual fix is to edit the main.cf postfix file and up the values for message_size_limit = 246240000 mailbox_size_limit = 259240000 and this seems to work for like a week or so.. procmail works fine, but then it will stop working again.. I up the limits and it works for a while.. now, Im up to message_size_limit = 316240000 mailbox_size_limit = 329240000 and hate to keep raising these limits if I dont need to. like I said, my account doesnt have this problem, but the wifes inbox does. what else can I look at on the crm side? CRM114-Version: 20090807-Blame</pre> jason-fYJcuH/IXMo8ep5uyLeENA< at >public.gmane.org 2011-04-06T17:58:38 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.spam.crm114