<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap">
    <title>gmane.mail.qmail.ldap</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11808"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11804"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11803"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11798"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11797"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11796"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11794"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11789"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11782"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11781"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11778"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11777"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11773"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11772"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11770"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11767"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11763"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11762"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11758"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11755"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11808">
    <title>Issues with plain authentication mode with qmail-ldap 20120221</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11808</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello Guys,

I'm having a problem since I started using the patch 20120221, about 1 
year ago, I had not noticed yet.

The problem is as follows:

If I use the LOGIN authentication mode, everything happens normally. 
This is how I configure my email clients by default.

If I set any email client PLAIN authentication mode, the login process 
usually happens when the user enters the correct password, and send 
email normally follows too.

But when the user misses the password at login, the qmail-smtpd process 
falls with a segfault, but he usually responds well:

535 authentication failure
or
501 failed authentication exchange

It ends the session normally.

I noticed this strange behavior when a user configured mode PLAIN by 
mistake in your email client instead of LOGIN so that is what standardized.

Appears in the log with LOGLEVEL=255 and DEBUGLEVEL=3:

&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;400000005197d6e333ee9034 tcpserver: pid 27959 from XXX.XXX.45.10
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;400000005197d6e333f575d4 tcpserver: ok 27959 
correio.domaindst.com.br:172.16.1.2:587 
c&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>André Alexandre Gaio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T01:51:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11804">
    <title>ezmlm</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11804</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Does qmail-ldap works with ezmlm ?

Thanks.

Fried
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-02T19:37:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11803">
    <title>Qmail-LDAP/Dovecot Cluster</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11803</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I have worked with qmail-ldap and Dovecot for a number of years, and 
recently wrote up a piece going into great detail about all aspects of 
our environment.  It currently supports a rather small installation of 
~10K active users.  If it should be of interest:

http://fritz.potsdam.edu/projects/email

It is intended primarily for system administrators or mail 
administrators interested in building mail infrastructure on top of 
open-source technologies, and is inspired by the likes of Life with qmail.

Topics include storage, backup, directory integration, local and remote 
mail exchange, checkpassword SMTP-Auth and Dovecot login, RBLs, 
content-scanning and anti-spam, quarantine, webmail, etc.  Full 
installation directions and configuration stanzas are provided for 
nearly every piece of the infrastructure.

Comments/criticism welcome.  Cheers.

-Jeff

--
Jeffrey M Hardy
Network / Systems Administrator
hardyjm&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;potsdam.edu

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Hardy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-13T17:19:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11798">
    <title>Want to blacklist a sender and drop mails silently</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11798</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello All,

Is there a way in qmail-ldap, where I can blacklist one sender and drop all
mails from this id silently?
I don't want to send a 'mail rejected' message to her.

Regards,
Raja.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Raja T Nair</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-04T13:09:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11797">
    <title>YNT: changing user mailhost on working environment</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11797</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Just move the user mailbox like a regular directory. If the messagestore path is different on the new host. You must update this attr. Or use a Shared storage on all machines. Nfs might be easy solution.




-Sent from Galaxy NoteFriedrich Locke &amp;lt;friedrich.locke&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; yazdı:Hi,

suppose i have a cluster with 5 machine. For a given user, let me say: xyz, the mailhost is z, i want to change his mailhost to b. The ldap part is pretty easy, but what about the email the user already have in mailhost z. How do i move them from mailhost z to mailhost b.
How do you do that ?

Thanks in advance.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ismail Yenigul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-15T18:15:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11796">
    <title>changing user mailhost on working environment</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11796</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

suppose i have a cluster with 5 machine. For a given user, let me say: xyz,
the mailhost is z, i want to change his mailhost to b. The ldap part is
pretty easy, but what about the email the user already have in mailhost z.
How do i move them from mailhost z to mailhost b.
How do you do that ?

Thanks in advance.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-15T16:18:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11794">
    <title>patches for qmail-ldap</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11794</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Sorry folks,

but in my journey to get obsd+oldap+qmail working i am in need for a patch
(AFAIK, by Mr. Jeker) , more precisely:

http://www.mail-archive.com/qmail-ldap&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;qmail-ldap.org/msg07407.html

I cannot cut and paste it right now, that's why i am asking!

Does anybody have it and would like to send me ?

Thanks in advance.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-14T18:41:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11789">
    <title>openbsd+ldap+qmail: a nightmare</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11789</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi folks,

i have been walking around and now i need to get qmail+ldap+openbsd working.
I could configure  everything, as usual openbsd runs rock solid. But i
believe openldap does not like openbsd somehow. That's what i want to
figure it out.

The point is: i have just setted up obsd+oldap+qmail. I am trying to send a
message for the only user i have in the tree: somehow, i don't know why is
"eating" all my system memory. I am really curious why it happens on OBSD.
I am running amd64 5.2, but i remenber to have given up some time ago when
the obsd version was not 5.2. When i issue ldapsearch not memory increase
is realized.

The problem remains even with the 5.2 version.
Some information is provided below :

sioux&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav$ uname -a
OpenBSD gustav.cpd.ufv.br 5.2 GENERIC.MP#368 amd64
sioux&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav$ pkg_info | grep openldap
openldap-client-2.4.31 Open source LDAP software (client)
openldap-server-2.4.31p0 Open source LDAP software (server)
sioux&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav$

For the /etc/openldap/slapd.conf, here you have it:

#
# S&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-14T16:15:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11782">
    <title>Just installed qmail+ldap: i am loosing my hairs</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11782</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi folks,

I have just finnished installing my qmail-ldap system. I am trying to send
me a local message, but no success so far.

Here is what i am trying:

sioux&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav$ echo to: vlobo |
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
sioux&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav$


Here is what i got from qmail-ldap logs:

&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;4000000050f4201a17a0e594 new msg 1039956
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;4000000050f4201a17a0e97c info msg 1039956: bytes 220 from &amp;lt;
sioux&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav.cpd.ufv.br&amp;gt; qp 4069 uid 1000
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;4000000050f4201a17a1761c starting delivery 21: msg 1039956 to local
vlobo&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav.cpd.ufv.br
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;4000000050f4201a17a1df94 status: local 1/100 remote 0/400
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;4000000050f4201a17d130dc delivery 21: deferral:
Temporary_failure_in_LDAP_lookup._(#4.4.3)./
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;4000000050f4201a17d1f814 status: local 0/100 remote 0/400


Here is what i get from qmail-ldaplookup:

gustav# ../bin/qmail-ldaplookup -d 255 -m vlobo&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav.cpd.ufv.br
Searching ldap for: (|(mail=vlobo&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav.cpd.ufv.br)(mailAlternateAddress=
vlobo&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gustav.cpd.ufv.br)))
under dn: ou=people,dc=ufv,dc=br
qmail-ldaplookup: fatal: qldap_filter: unspecified er&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-14T15:17:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11781">
    <title>qmail-ldap failed to compile</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11781</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!

I am trying to install qmail-ldap in my server, but i am getting problems
related to compilation. Here you have it:

...
...
nroff -man forgeries.7 &amp;gt; forgeries.0
./load auth_dovecot auth_mod.o checkpassword.o passwd.o digest_md4.o
digest_md5.o digest_rmd160.o digest_sha1.o base64.o read-ctrl.o  getopt.a
control.o qldap.a dirmaker.o mailmaker.o localdelivery.o  locallookup.o
pbsexec.o constmap.o getln.a strerr.a substdio.a  stralloc.a env.a wait.a
dns.o ip.o ipalloc.o ipme.o alloc.a str.a  case.a fs.a error.a
timeoutconn.o timeoutread.o ndelay.a open.a  prot.o auto_uids.o
auto_qmail.o -L/usr/local/lib -lldap -llber   `cat dns.lib` `cat socket.lib`
/usr/local/lib/libldap.so.12.0: warning: strcpy() is almost always misused,
please use strlcpy()
/usr/local/lib/libldap.so.12.0: warning: strcat() is almost always misused,
please use strlcat()
/usr/local/lib/libldap.so.12.0: warning: sprintf() is often misused, please
use snprintf()
auth_dovecot.o(.text+0x26f): In function `auth_init':: undefined reference
to &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-14T12:42:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11778">
    <title>studing qmail-ldap</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11778</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!

i am studing qmail-ldap solution and some doubts arose.

I would like to integrate qmail-ldap with my current unix user base.

My base tree for posix accounts is: dc=people,ou=abc,ou=de. So for instance
if a have a user called vlobo, its dn is: uid=vlobo,ou=people,dc=abc,dc=de.
Since it is a unix user, its entry object class is posixAccount.
Since, i want this same unix user as a qmail user, I added an object class
qmailUser to the same posixAccount entry.

First doubt: is it wrong ?

For the qmailUser, the only mandatory attribute is "mail". So, when i
should add the objectClass qmailUser, I must, at least, define this
attribute, right?

So, what would it be procedures in order to remove the user vlobo as qmail
user ? Should I "take" out the qmailUser attributes for the given entry ?
How should I do it ?

Thanks in advance.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-13T17:46:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11777">
    <title>YNT: Re: qmail cluster</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11777</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Friedrich

Yes correct.




-Sent from Galaxy NoteFriedrich Locke &amp;lt;friedrich.locke&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt; yazdı:Thanks Ismail,

let me see if i understood correctly!

For each domain, i set one single MX pointing to my domain.
Then add the mx record in my domain context for each of the mail server.

It will be one mx record pointing to my domain's mx record and n ( the number of mail server) in my domain dns for each mail server, i.e. :

1k domain records + 5 mail servers record.

Right ?


On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Ismail YENIGUL &amp;lt;ismail.yenigul&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;surgate.com&amp;gt; wrote:
Hi Friedrich,

You do not have to setup 5 mx.  If you distribute users on qmail backends via mailhost entry on LDAP.
Just create a A DNS record for each mailhost.  and define a MX record has 5 IP address.

example dns settings for all domains:
IN  MX mx.mymasterdomain.com


mx IN A 192.168.1.1
mx IN A 192.168.1.2
mx IN A 192.168.1.3
mx IN A 192.168.1.4
mx IN A 192.168.1.5

mail1 IN A 192.168.1.1
mail2 IN A 192.168.1.2
mail3 IN A 192.168.1.3
mai&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ismail Yenigul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-13T08:09:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11773">
    <title>qmail cluster</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11773</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi.

I am willing to try qmail+ldap. Some doubts arose!
The scenario would be:

1 ldap server,
5 qmail servers,
1K domain
30K users.

My doubt is the following:

These 1k domain may be served by any of the 5 qmail server, ok? Will i have
to include 5 mx recorder for each of the 1k domain?
That will make 5k entries in my dns server, is that right ?

thanks in advance.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-12T15:31:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11772">
    <title>fetching email via pop3</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11772</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi list members,

in a qmail-ldap cluster implementation i can set the box where the email
for a given pop3 account will be stored.

What happens if my client (the owner of that pop3 account in particular)
connect to a different box in order to fetch his/her emails ?
I ask because in a cluster system, the user should be able to abstract
things like box hostnames, right ?

Thanks for your time and cooperation.

Fried.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Friedrich Locke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-22T12:19:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11770">
    <title>qmail-ldap pop3 auth problem</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11770</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all,

i'm having an issue to use latest qmail-ldap patch on debian squeeze

ldap configured correctly
qmail-smtpd working find, all incoming emails accepted
qmail-pop3d is not working so i try to test with qmail-ldaplookup
qmail-ldaplookup able to search for stored emails with -m but not with -u

when i do:
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-ldaplookup -u info (or -u info&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;mydomain.com), the
response are:
==================================================
Searching ldap for: (mail=info)
under dn: ou=accounts, dc=mydomain, dc=com
No entries found.

qmail-ldaplookup: fatal: qldap_first: no such object
==================================================
and slapd logs shows:
==================================================
Oct 29 23:03:36 mydomain slapd[3298]: conn=1004 fd=13 ACCEPT from
IP=[::1]:55750 (IP=[::]:389)
Oct 29 23:03:36 mydomain slapd[3298]: conn=1004 op=0 BIND
dn="cn=admin,dc=mydomain,dc=com" method=128
Oct 29 23:03:36 mydomain slapd[3298]: conn=1004 op=0 BIND
dn="cn=admin,dc=mydomain,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE ssf=&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>gpl4all</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-29T16:13:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11767">
    <title>SRS patch for qmail-ldap-1.03-20120221</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11767</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

i would like to know if anyone has an SRS patch for
qmail-ldap-1.03-20120221 ?
There is a patch for qmail-ldap-1.03-20060201 but it doesn't apply to
the new version
You can find the patch at
http://qmail-ldap-smtpauthuser.googlecode.com/svn-history/r26/trunk/qmai
l-ldap-1.03-20060201-SRS.patch 
Maybe there is another solution but I haven't found one

Regards
Stefan Berger



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Berger Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-24T14:13:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11763">
    <title>qmail-ldap</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11763</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I'm a newbie of qmail-ldap and I'd like to learn what other patches are
already available via
*qmail-ldap-1.03-20120221*&amp;lt;http://www.nrg4u.com/qmail/qmail-ldap-1.03-20120221.patch.gz&amp;gt;
patch &amp;lt;http://www.nrg4u.com/qmail/qmail-ldap-1.03-20120221.patch.gz&amp;gt;

Thx
** &amp;lt;http://www.nrg4u.com/qmail/qmail-ldap-1.03-20120221.patch.gz&amp;gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sipringo Inc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-15T17:32:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11762">
    <title>Earn extra from Part-time Ad Campaign !</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11762</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,




We have a part time job vacancy for individual that would like to take part in
the RED BULL global advertisement campaign. How would you like to make extra
money by simply driving your car advertising for RED BULL?





How it works?


Here’s the basic premise of the "paid to drive" Ad concept.  RED BULL Ad
managers are searching for people, regular citizens,professional and
professional drivers to go about their normal routine as they usually do, only
with an advert for "RED BULL" plastered on your car. The ads are typically vinyl
decals, also known as "auto wraps, that seem to be painted on the vehicle and
which could cover any portion of your car's exterior surface.


What does the company get out of this type of ad strategy? Lots of exposure and
awareness. The auto wraps tend to be colorful, eye-catching and attract lots of
attention. Plus, it's a form of advertising with a captive audience, meaning
people get to notice them and for those in big cities, people who are stuck in
traffic can't &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>RED BULL INT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-20T16:38:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11758">
    <title>block attachments on per user basis</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11758</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,

Dose anyone has a patch for qmail-ldap to block attachments on per user 
basis?

For example:
user1&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;example.com is allowed to send emails but user2&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;example.com is not 
allowed to send emails with attachments.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mario Remy Almeida</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-17T12:03:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11755">
    <title>gmail-greylist on CentOS 6.3</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11755</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,

Has anyone successed in compiling "gmail-greylist" from 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qgreylist-pgsql/files/qmail-greylist-pgsql/v1.2.3%20release/ 
on CentOS 6.3 x86_64?

It seems default postgres-devel in CentOS 6 and above do not include 
/usr/lib64/libpq.a.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mario Remy Almeida</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-30T12:59:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11754">
    <title>Using a certificate with private key encrypted</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.qmail.ldap/11754</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello friends,

I hope somebody can resolve my doubt. Can I use a certificate with
encrypted private key in qmail-ldap?

I have bought a SSL certificate for my organization. This SSL
certificate was implemented on my apache web server without problem (I
only need insert the private key's password when I start apache
service), but in the case of qmail, when I use this private key, the
service doesn't work.

Can I configure qmail in any manner for it ask me the password of
private key at first start?

I think that is not very sure store the private key without password
protection in a server exposed to Internet... If somebody break my
server, can take the private key easily.

Regards,
Fran M.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fran Márquez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-14T11:47:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.qmail.ldap">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.qmail.ldap</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
