<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user">
    <title>gmane.mail.exim.user</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91329"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91328"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91307"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91303"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91296"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91288"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91281"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91252"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91240"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91231"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91230"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91226"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91220"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91209"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91207"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91204"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91201"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91199"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91195"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91192"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91329">
    <title>AUTH PLAIN fails while AUTH LOGIN succeeds with Exim -&gt; Dovecot SASL auth</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91329</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,
we're trying to setup a platform with authenticated SMTP with exim and 
relying on dovecot as auth agent.

We've read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL and so made 
the changes mentioned there, also setting

auth_mechanisms = plain login

in conf.d/10-auth.conf .

With this setup, we're able to use AUTH LOGIN method on an SMTP session, 
but using AUTH PLAIN fails.

What we receive in the SMTP session is:

auth plain `echo -e -n `\0user\0password' | mimencode`
535 Incorrect authentication data

(it's actually the output of that command that we put there), and in the 
dovecot log we see:

2012-05-24 15:04:20 auth: Debug: client in: AUTH        1       PLAIN 
service=smtp    secured rip=127.0.0.1   lip=127.0.0.1
    nologin resp=&amp;lt;hidden&amp;gt;
2012-05-24 15:04:20 auth: Info: plain(?,127.0.0.1): invalid input

Do you know where we can look to resolve this problem? If you need any 
further information/test feel free to ask.

Thanks in advance,
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sandro Tosi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T15:38:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91328">
    <title>Can exim delay emails after a defined limit is reached?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91328</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all!

In a vps I am limited by a certain number of sent emails per minute, I
could use a relay server but I don't want!
Probably I will never reach the limit, but just in case, can I define a
limit to exim and delay the emails a certain time if the limit is reached?

Thanks,
Pedro Cirne
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pedro Cirne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-26T19:22:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91307">
    <title>Exim 4.80 RC5 uploaded</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91307</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have uploaded Exim 4.80 RC5 to:
        ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/

There is an attempt to resolve the compiler issues on some versions of
Linux, a fix for OpenBSD's resolver library not having an expected
typedef, and fixes to work on older OpenSSL libraries which lack SNI
support.  Everything else changed is documentation and test suite, so
I'm going to permit myself a little optimism that this will be the last
RC and that the final release can be cut late in the weekend, to await
people on Monday morning.

As an experiment, this time there are three versions of each file;
bzip2, gzip and lzip.  If you like lzip and want it to stay, please let
us know.  The main distribution is only 8% smaller than bzip2 (28%
smaller than gzip), but perhaps this will really add up.  I'm inclined
to put out the 4.80 release with lzip and see what the reaction is.

I'm also thinking that 4.80 might be the last release with SHA1
checksums in the release mails and that afterwards we'll stick to just
SHA256.  If &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Phil Pennock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T05:32:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91303">
    <title>Am I right that no_more has no effect within the includedsimple routers?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91303</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;  Consider the following two routers:

1) nonlocal:
      driver = redirect
      domains = ! +local_domains
      allow_fail
      data = :fail: Mailing to remote domains not supported
      no_more

2) dnslookup_relay_to_domains:
      driver = dnslookup
      domains = ! +local_domains : +relay_to_domains
      transport = remote_smtp
      same_domain_copy_routing = yes
      no_more

  Am I right that, in both cases, if the router run, it can not decline?
Therefore, the no_more has no effect.  It can be omitted without any
consequences.
  I think spec.txt mentions a similar situation in a discussion about the manualroute.
(Note that the following spec.txt discussion is about two other routers, not those
I showed above.) 

    $ grep -A34 '* The manualroute router' spec.txt | tail -10

    There is no difference in behaviour between these two routers as they
    stand. However, they behave differently if no_more is added to them. In the
    first example, the router is skipped if the domain does not matc&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Regid Ichira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T10:03:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91296">
    <title>hash{20}{62}</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91296</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Good afternoon,

I came across this:

warn set acl_m4 = ${hash{20}{62}{$sender_address$recipients
$h_message-id:}}

...and realised I'd never seen it before.

My Googling to find out what the figures symbolise is getting me
nowhere, has anyone got a link to an explanation?

Kind regards
Ron



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ron White</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T16:42:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91288">
    <title>SPF, DKIM and DomainKeys activation for signout</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91288</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt; Hello everyone.
 I've just got into this following issue with versions 4.69 and 4.77.
 How can I activate SPF, DKIM and DomainKeys (if possible the three at
the same time) in exim and to signout each sent mail and check each
incoming mail.
 Thanks.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>fmendez73&lt; at &gt;terra.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T20:44:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91281">
    <title>Exim 4.80 RC4 uploaded</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91281</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have uploaded Exim 4.80 RC4 to:
        ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/

There was no RC3; there are some changes since RC2 worthy of note.

There is a new option "tls_dh_max_bits" which affects TLS; with OpenSSL,
it may cause a "tls_dhparams" file to be ignored.  With GnuTLS, the
number of bits GnuTLS recommends be used for Diffie-Hellman generation
will be clamped to at most this value.  The default "tls_dh_max_bits" is
the current maximum allowed by the NSS security library used by Mozilla
products such as Thunderbird.  This resolves a GnuTLS vs NSS
interoperability problem.

Exim will now check the configured value of "tls_require_ciphers" at
startup; what was an error that would cause Exim to fail STARTTLS will
instead cause Exim to fail to start.  This exposes latent
misconfiguration and makes it clearer that something is going wrong.
This also avoids the risk of crashes while talking to a remote server,
if there are library linkage problems, reducing the chances of anything
being exploitable&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Phil Pennock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T05:00:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91252">
    <title>Weird Characters</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91252</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have started seeing these weird characters in a couple of emails. On 
this list anything W B Hacker sends I can't read his mail at all! I have 
to go to the board to read them. This just started in the last week or 
so and I am at a loss as to why it is happening at all. This also 
happened on an online purchase and every email they sent me was the same 
weird characters.


can anyone explain why this is happening?





��z{i���{ 
�1��1��=��z\+�׈���i���v'^j�,��^r�aj�Z��Z�Z'�ȧq��z{Z��ڲ�b��Z��B�{^�֧j 
\���^�����v�����v�ꮊ����+�W�jg�z�+��b�}t�D�D�V��,�� 
�&amp;amp;i�kz�"�)��z�0�+^�+-��&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;`D���`�z�)jjk����X��+8��:��(��9�MV*�'�)Z�t��׏w��z�ޭ�lr(��ܢe� 
2��ԭj۬P)!��5�Ɍ�()5�Ɍ�A�ɭ����ɽє�(�$���ٔ�����܁ݕ�ɐ������()$���&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>eximmail</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T01:34:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91240">
    <title>Log Spamassassin Rejects</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91240</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all -

Another question for the group.

I've increasingly been rejecting good messages and am trying to find out why.  However, when looking at the rejectlog, it mentions why it was rejected (spam points) - but it doesn't show me how the e-mail qualified with that many points.

Is there a way in Exim to set it so that it will log all of the rules that matched the e-mail into the rejectlog - indicating how the message got to that point level?

Trying to look up information from the spamassassin website - and they mention a logging module to add to the local.cf file - but it doesn't seem to do anything different.

Thank you!

Brian S.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Brian Spraker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-19T21:33:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91231">
    <title>Tricky DNS servers [OT]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91231</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have a few weird ideas and would need a smart DNS server of some sort 
to pull it off. Basically looking for a programmable backend that might 
do DNS lookups itself.

Here's a possible example. There are servers out there that return 
country codes of IP addresses. But what about a country code for a host 
name? You would have to do an IP lookup on the host and then use the IP 
to get a country code.

So - is there source code for something like this or a DNS server with a 
scripting language?



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Perkel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-18T21:59:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91230">
    <title>Exim 4.80 RC1 uploaded</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91230</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have uploaded Exim 4.80 RC1 to:
ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/exim4/test/

This release contains a number of backwards-incompatible changes, for
both OpenSSL and GnuTLS, in the name of security (about the only reason
we normally accept for being backwards incompatible).  Please read over
README.UPDATING carefully!  We have jumped from 4.77 to 4.80 for this
reason.

This is the first release of Exim to support OpenSSL 1.0.1+.  This
release of Exim abandons maintaining hard-coded lists of ciphers for
GnuTLS in favour of honouring GnuTLS library policy, so MD5-based
certificates will no longer work and are not supported.  The GnuTLS
support has been re-written and there is the possibility of bugs.

When building, please do not just recycle your previous Local/Makefile;
there are a number of new possibilities in this release which may make
your life easier, as support for using pkg-config to query CFLAGS/LIBS
for various pieces of software has been added.

Please join me in welcoming Jeremy Harris and Todd Lyon&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Phil Pennock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-18T03:55:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91226">
    <title>Quota Limits - Setting Greater Amounts</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91226</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

Been using Exim for several years.

I have a setup that checks a file for the quote size and I then use a MySQL backend with virtual users.  Here is a snippet of what I currently have:

maildir_format
maildir_tag = ,S=message_size
maildir_use_size_file = true
maildir_quota_directory_regex = ^(?:cur|new|\..*)$
current_directory = /
quota = ${lookup mysql{SELECT quota FROM horde_users WHERE user_uid="${local_part}&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;${domain}"}{${value}999}}
quota_warn_threshold = 90%
quota_is_inclusive = false
quota_warn_message = "\
To: $local_part&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;$domain\n\
Subject: Mailbox Approaching Size Limit (90% Usage)\n\n\
Please note that your mailbox is approaching its limit.  Upon receiving this message, your mailbox was at 90% of capacity.\n"

However, please note that the "quota_warn_threshold" is set to an equal number as noted above.

Sometimes a user receives a very large e-mail that puts them over their quota limit.  Does anyone know of a way to set it so that if the value is at 90% or GREATER, the message is s&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Brian Spraker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-17T23:28:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91220">
    <title>Error compiling 4.77 Exim on Solaris</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91220</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Can anyone help with the following error, I am trying to compile the 4.77
EXIM on version 10 Solaris.:-

`Makefile' is up to date.

Missing CFLAGS_DYNAMIC inhibits building dynamic module lookup

gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY spool_in.c
In file included
from /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/3.4.2/include/sys/signal.h:44,
                 from /usr/include/signal.h:26,
                 from exim.h:61,
                 from spool_in.c:12:

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee and is strictly confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, please do not read, print, retransmit, store or act in reliance on it or any attachments. Instead please notify us immediately, e-mail it back to the sender and delete the message from your computer.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free and we accept no liability for changes made to this e-mail (and any attachments) after it was sent or for viruses arising a&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew.Young&lt; at &gt;cfs.coop</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T09:45:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91209">
    <title>check for no Content-Type header?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91209</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I installed a RAID monitor software and it sent some notification
emails through my mail server that had no Content-Type header so they
got stuck on the mail queue.
I've added this check for non Content-Type in a system-filter.mf file
but is there a better way?

Thanks,

Oliver

# Exim filter

if $message_body does not contains "Content-Type:"
then
 logfile /var/log/exim4/no_content_type_log.txt
 logwrite "$tod_log:$message_id:no content-type"
 headers add "Content-Type: text/plain"
endif

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Oliver Howe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-15T09:24:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91207">
    <title>Migrating from qmail to exim question</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91207</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello everyone,

1st of all thanks for taking the time to read and reply to my inquiry here.

I am very in-experienced when it comes to mail server administration,
however I was assigned a task to migrate an existing qmail server running
on a ubuntu 8.0 server to a new  opensource mail server that will be
install and setup on a fresh redhat enterprise version 6 server.

doing a bit of research I came across exim and it seems a really good MTA
choice for our purpose specially being open source. ( we can't afford to
have any commercial products )

Is there any good documentation out there that can help me, guide me
through migrating 300 mail boxes from qmail server to exim server? our
current qmail server uses the Maildir format and we would like to keep the
new one that way, also runs courier-imap for IMAP on ports 143 &amp;amp; 993, we
don't use POP3, and all users in qmail server authenticate to their e-mail
accounts through an openldap server that is hosted on the qmail server as
well. Our current qmail server doe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Miguel Lanz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T18:59:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91204">
    <title>Limit No. of recipients in email client</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91204</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I have couple of requirements.

1- I need to restrict no. of recipients in email client
(outlook/thunderbird). Let say a user can't send email if he has no. of
recipients greater than 100 regardless in To, CC, BCC.
Also. Sender should get an bouce back with customized message.

2- I need to block sender email address temporarily if no. of emails sent
from his email address on specific threshold per hour. And sender email
address should get an customized bounce back message. e.g. No user can send
emails if 50 mails/hour send already from his account.

NOTE: emails should be count as if 10 emails sent in one email. Overall 10
emails should be counted.

I am using Exim 4.

Thank you.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Muhammad Irfan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T10:40:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91201">
    <title>Executing $run command ???</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91201</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I use Exim 4.63 with Centos 5.8

I wanted to send an email from within Exim's ACLs.

Googling I found the recent posting from Lena
http://www.exim.org/lurker/message/20100323.122536.8fe8af1a.en.html


and found I could get Exim to run a shell. For example this works:-

warn message = ${run{/bin/bash -c "echo $sender_helo_name

However all my attempts to feed the Exim Binary with an email message
failed:-

EXBINARY       = /usr/sbin/exim
MAILME         = user&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;domain.com
SHELL          = /bin/bash

${run{SHELL -c "\N{\N echo Subject: Test Msg; echo; echo Un Deux \
      Drie Vier; \N}\N | EXBINARY MAILME"}}

I found success with PHP:-

warn message = ${run{SHELL -c "/usr/bin/php /dx/php/exim01 'SSSSS' 'test
msg AZC'"}}

&amp;lt;?php
$subj = $argv[1];
$mess = $argv[2];
$headers = 'From: Exim Server &amp;lt;.....&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;......com&amp;gt;'."\n".
           'Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1'."\n";
$to      = 'Exim Warning &amp;lt;.....&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;......com&amp;gt;';
mail($to,$subj,$mess,$headers,'-f .....&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;......com');
?&amp;gt;

and a nice email was produced a&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Always Learning</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-12T21:18:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91199">
    <title>Exim maximum line length limit</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91199</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;It appears that Exim core does not impose any limits on line lengths of
message bodies.

However, some optional Exim components have arbitrarily set limits:

src/src/pdkim/pdkim.c:
        #define PDKIM_MAX_BODY_LINE_LEN     16384

src/src/mime.h:
        #define MIME_MAX_LINE_LENGTH 32768

src/src/demime.h:
        #define MIME_SANITY_MAX_LINE_LENGTH 131071

I encountered a strange DKIM problem after I received a spam mail which
contained an embedded JPG image file, all encoded on a single long line.
The spam mail was received successfully, but when I tried to forward it
for further processing, the message got stuck in the queue and caused
the following log messages on each delivery attempt:

message delivery.

It appears that DKIM signing failed because the message contained a line
longer than 16384 characters and I had "dkim_strict = true". After
unsetting "dkim_strict" the delivery succeeded (without DKIM signature).

The problem can be repeated by setting DKIM signing policy to strict and
running the fo&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Janne Snabb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-10T09:12:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91195">
    <title>exim-users ML a bit slow</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91195</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hi,
    is this normal or a teporary problem:

| Received: from tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.192])
| by mail.tu-berlin.de (exim-4.75/mailfrontend-3) with esmtp 
| for &amp;lt;Frank.Elsner&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;tu-berlin.de&amp;gt;
| id 1SRnz1-0004ag-E0; Tue, 08 May 2012 19:13:55 +0200
|                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35144 helo=tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk)
| by tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
| (envelope-from &amp;lt;exim-users-bounces+frank.elsner=tu-berlin.de&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;exim.org&amp;gt;)
| id 1SRnz0-0004Ll-Fx
| for Frank.Elsner&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;tu-berlin.de; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:13:54 +0100
|                                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| Received: from c64.shuttle.de ([194.95.226.64]:54266)
| by tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
| (envelope-from &amp;lt;frank&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;moltke28.B.Shuttle.DE&amp;gt;) id 1SRkMo-0002gB-CJ
| for exim-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;exim.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 14:22:19 +0100
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Nearly 4 hours in Cambridge?


Just curious, Frank El&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Elsner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T13:03:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91192">
    <title>[+]: Exim / Dovecot and AUTH LOGIN</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91192</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Forgot to mention the versions :-(

exim 4.77
dovecot 2.1.6

self compiled under Fedora 14.


--Frank Elsner

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Elsner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T13:34:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91191">
    <title>Exim / Dovecot and AUTH LOGIN</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.user/91191</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hi to both adressed mailing lists,

I followed the instructions in http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL

exim.conf:

|   plain:
|     driver = dovecot
|     public_name = PLAIN
|     server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
|     server_set_id = $auth1
|   
|   login:
|     driver = dovecot
|     public_name = LOGIN
|     server_socket = /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
|     server_set_id = $auth1


10-master.conf for dovecot:

|   service auth {
|     # auth_socket_path points to this userdb socket by default. It's typically
|     # used by dovecot-lda, doveadm, possibly imap process, etc. Its default
|     # permissions make it readable only by root, but you may need to relax these
|     # permissions. Users that have access to this socket are able to get a list
|     # of all usernames and get results of everyone's userdb lookups.
|     # unix_listener auth-userdb {
|       #mode = 0600
|       #user =
|       #group =
|     # }
|   
|     # Exim SMTP AUTH
|     unix_listener auth-client {
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Elsner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T13:22:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.exim.user">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.exim.user</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

