<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general">
    <title>gmane.mail.bogofilter.general</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11300"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11299"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11289"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11280"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11278"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11272"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11270"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11245"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11241"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11223"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11220"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11216"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11211"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11200"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11199"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11196"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11194"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11185"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11171"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11168"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11300">
    <title>nan in bogofilter stats</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11300</link>
    <description>Recently I am seeing large numbers of false Ham results from my well-trained 
bogofilter.

The following is the output of a bogofilter scan of an obvious spam mail.

The Ham result seems to result from the "nan" values.

Where do these come from and how do I fix it?

Cheers and thanks,
Stephen Davies


[scldad&lt; at &gt;mustang bogofilter]$ bogofilter --version
bogofilter version 1.1.6
    Database: Berkeley DB 4.6.21: (December 28, 2007) NON-TRANSACTIONAL

X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
                                        n    pgood     pbad      fw     U
  "$59.95"                           2160       nan  0.006905       nan -
  "Viagra"                          12385       nan  0.039592       nan -
  "buy"                             13387       nan  0.042795       nan -
  "childrencloud.com"                  11       nan  0.000035       nan -
  "from:Blackburn"                     23       nan  0.000074       nan -
  "from:Destin"                        11       nan  0.000</description>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Davies</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-18T23:08:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11299">
    <title>Re Tuning Bogofilter</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11299</link>
    <description>Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:18:47 -0400
From: Tom Anderson &lt;tanderson&lt; at &gt;orderamidchaos.com&gt;
Subject: Re: Tuning bogofilter
To: bf-users &lt;bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org&gt;
Message-ID: &lt;48FD2DF7.9010303&lt; at &gt;orderamidchaos.com&gt;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

David Relson wrote:

[Hide Quoted Text]
We recommend against training over and over with the same messages as
it biases the wordlist.  Training with ham and spam yields a wordlist
that indicates how often individual words (tokens) occur in ham and in
spam.  For a simplified example:  if "xyzw" occurs in 10% of your ham
and in 20% of your spam, then a message with "xyzw" is twice as likely
to be spam as it is to be ham.  If you keep training with the same spam
you skew the results -- which is not recommended.
I don't really see biasing a spam message as spam to be particularly
problematic.  If indeed a particular word ought to be hammier, then it
will become so in the course of training your hams.  My experience has
been that someti</description>
    <dc:creator>barsalou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-22T23:22:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11289">
    <title>Berkeley DB vs Sqlite3</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11289</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter
</description>
    <dc:creator>Gour</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-18T07:05:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11280">
    <title>persistent spam missed by bogofilter.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11280</link>
    <description>I get several messages a day concerning imitation timepieces.  The 
word r-e-p-l-i-c-a without dashes of course is in the subject line of 
each. I always classify them as spam manually. For some reason 
bogofilter misses them. Is there a way that I can manually put this 
word in the bogofilter criteria? I can set up my own filter in Kmail 
but that seems to negate the need for an adaptive spam filter.
</description>
    <dc:creator>John Culleton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-08T14:03:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11278">
    <title>Zeroing out spam folder.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11278</link>
    <description>

I use bogofilter integrated with Kmail.

Every day my spam folder fills with properly trapped spam. Some of it 
is trapped by bogofilter, and some is caught by me manually. 

Once a week cron runs the following line:  
10 4 * * 1 /usr/local/bin/bogofilter -sv -B 
/home/safe/Mail/spam/cur&gt;/dev/null

(It is really all one line.)

Now I am considering emptying out the spam folder and starting a new 
collection. But when bogofilter runs  again on Monday morning will I 
lose all the spam-finding benefits already accumulated from the 
formerly identified spam items I just deleted? In other words is 
emptying out the spam folder a safe action?


</description>
    <dc:creator>John Culleton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-06T16:23:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11272">
    <title>qdbm successor</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11272</link>
    <description>Hi,

First of all I have to say I'm quite pleased with bogofilter.
Switched from spamprobe, and it seems faster; and after getting
acquainted with it I like the 3-way politics with "unsure".

I'm using qdbm as backend. Apparently it is not developed anymore
in favor of a successor tokyocabinet
&lt;http://tokyocabinet.sourceforge.net/&gt;.

Are there any plans to support tokyocabinet in the future?

c
</description>
    <dc:creator>Christian Ebert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-22T18:06:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11270">
    <title>Some automatic handling driving from Nigel filer set</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11270</link>
    <description>Following Nigel's how-to and philosophy I am now using "cron" to automatically 
handle bogofilter actions off KMail.

Recall :
. "Spam" folder contains manually handled messages of spam type  ; mainly used 
at the very beginning to start training bogofilter and then each week through 
cron automatic action.
. "NonSpam" folder contains manually handled messages of ham type  ; mainly 
used at the very beginning to start training bogofilter and then each week 
through cron automatic action.
. bogofilter filtering is piping messages to "inbox", "spam" or "unsure" 
folders depending of recognized type (spam, ham or unsure) ; all these folders 
but "inbox" folder have a 30 expiration period.
. it is up to the user to check from time to time :
- content of "inbox" folder to move spam messages not correctly detected to 
"Spam" folder,
- content of "spam" folder to move ham messages not correctly detected to both 
"inbox" and "NonSpam" folders,
- content of "unsure" folder to move spam messages not correctly detected</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Moyne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-22T12:24:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11245">
    <title>UNSURE messages end up in inbox folder</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11245</link>
    <description>I scrupulously followed Nigel's how-to with all these folders :
Spam
NonSpam
nonspamnew
spam
unsure
in KMail (kde-4)

Apprently everything works fine except that all "unsure" prefixed in subjet as 
???UNSURE??? end-up in my inbox folder though fliter-4 is upposed to get them 
dumped into folder unsure !

Regards.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Moyne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-08T22:55:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11241">
    <title>bogofilter and thunderbird</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11241</link>
    <description>I had been using it with Sylpheed-Claws, and liked it very much.  Due to
some friends sending me html mail, I've recently switched to Icedove
(aka Thunderbird).  I read in the faq for bogofilter that "Bogofilter
is known to work with kmail, mozilla-mail, mutt, pine, sylpheed-claws,
thunderbird. A google search will help you find more information on
using bogofilter with the mail program you use."  I did try a google
search, and a subsequent cuil search, and, alas, I have found nothing
about how to set up bogofilter with thunderbird.  So, how is this done?

Thanks,

Mark
_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter

</description>
    <dc:creator>Mark Grieveson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-31T15:36:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11223">
    <title>Fighting bogus news spam</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11223</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi everyone

I've been using Bogofilter for some time now and it has been working
great, only occasionally letting through one out of couple of hundred
spam mails I get per day.

Recently however I've been getting around 20 mails per day that contain
a short bogus news item in the subject and body. These beat bogofilter
with ease since they do not contain any of the usual spam keywords. Also
every mail seems to be different, so they also resist new bogofilter
training.

See below for some examples of such mails.

I've been wondering if anyone has found a reliable way of fighting this
new annoyance.

Thanks
Tomaž Šolc


Examples (each mail contains one such statement in subject and one in
body plus an URL). They are plain-text mails with random user agents.

Hurricane strikes Lousiana, thousands dead
US issues official threat to China over trade surplus
"I Won't Raise Taxes," Says Schwarzenegger, "except For The Indians."
Thousands of MSN passwords stolen, secu</description>
    <dc:creator>Tomaž Šolc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-26T15:10:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11220">
    <title>Bogofilter corrupts header</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11220</link>
    <description>Hi!
I'm currently trying to setup bogofilter on a debian 3.1 system. I compiled it by hand and tied it into postfix as mta. From there, a simple script is called with the line bogofilter -p | sendmail -i "$&lt; at &gt;" . I havn't altered the configuration file yet. What happens, is, that the header of incoming emails is cut off after the to: tag, where a undisclosed-recipients: is added. All tags afterwards are gone, so my mail client e.g. shows a "(no subject)". I removed the call to bogofilter by leaving the sendmail -i "$&lt; at &gt;" call alone, and the header arrives correctly. Has anyone any idea where my mistake is? I doubt that this is a bogofilter bug, as I can't find any occurance of this behavior anywhere.
Further, I can't get bogofilter to output anything to the syslog, neither in the postfix pipe, nor by training it from the command line. Again, any ideas here?

Thanks in advance,
Andreas Podgurski

</description>
    <dc:creator>Andreas Podgurski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-21T12:47:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11216">
    <title>Installing/training bogofilter on slackware 12.1 and Kmail</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11216</link>
    <description>Have searched the web and tried the man page. I have bogofilter 
installed, sort of. When I click the "filter classify as spam" the 
message is sent to trash. The wordlist.db file is about 25 megs. 

Just one problem, it doesn't catch any spams. Not one. 

Now if there is a current guide that deals with how to install and 
train bogofilter in Kmail, and only that,  please point me to it. The 
manpage tells me nothing about installing the filter in kmail.  I 
want to start from scratch.  

Thanks
</description>
    <dc:creator>John Culleton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-19T15:19:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11211">
    <title>Unsubscribed Bobby Johns bobbie&lt; at &gt;a1itsolutions.com</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11211</link>
    <description>Greetings,

I have unsubscribed bobbie&lt; at &gt;a1itsolutions.com for using a misconfigured
system that would harrass list posters with an anti-spam challenge.

Bobbie, before resubscribing, please make sure that:

1. ALL automated responses go to the ENVELOPE sender (some systems
record it as Return-Path, else it's only in SMTP and not visible in
messages) rather than the From: address

2. DO NOT CHALLENGE mailing lists.

Thanks.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthias Andree</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-01T09:00:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11200">
    <title>BDF-5E9: bogofilter-&gt;Postfix integration</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11200</link>
    <description>    could anybody help me with a tutorial, pdf o something similar?
    What must i've to modified in amavisd and bogofilter?

And the reply was to RTFM. I have been trying to get bogofilter and
postfix working, and have Read The Fine Manual over and over again. No joy
at all. Mail gets delivered and as best I can tell, the wordlist gets
updated as new mail comes through, but I see no headers or other
guarantees that bogofilter is in the loop. And yes, I do see spam:
obvious, clumsy, easily-identified spam. I slipped a logger command into
the filter script to see if it ever runs, and it never seems to.

Does anyone have updates to any of the existing docs, other than "works
for me"?

_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter

</description>
    <dc:creator>paul&lt; at &gt;paulbeard.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-27T22:38:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11199">
    <title>bogofilter-&gt;Postfix integration</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11199</link>
    <description>    could anybody help me with a tutorial, pdf o something similar?
    What must i've to modified in amavisd and bogofilter?

And the reply was to RTFM. I have been trying to get bogofilter and
postfix working, and have Read The Fine Manual over and over again. No joy
at all. Mail gets delivered and as best I can tell, the wordlist gets
updated as new mail comes through, but I see no headers or other
guarantees that bogofilter is in the loop. And yes, I do see spam:
obvious, clumsy, easily-identified spam. I slipped a logger command into
the filter script to see if it ever runs, and it never seems to.

Does anyone have updates to any of the existing docs, other than "works
for me"?
_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter

</description>
    <dc:creator>paul&lt; at &gt;paulbeard.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-27T17:07:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11196">
    <title>Bogofilter</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11196</link>
    <description>    Hi All,

    I'm new using bogofilter, and I've to install a mail server, using 
debian, postfix, amavisd-new,  clamav  and  an antispam  system,.
    More people, tell me about bogofilter, but i don know anything about.
    Now, the postfix is running with amavisd, but i can't integrate 
bogofilter. i've install bogofilter throught apt, and i've 
/etc/bogofilter.conf
   
    could anybody help me with a tutorial, pdf o something similar?
    What must i've to modified in amavisd and bogofilter?

    thanks

    Lorenzo

</description>
    <dc:creator>Lorenzo Ortega</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-02T14:48:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11194">
    <title>Bogofilter 1.1.6 divide by zero</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11194</link>
    <description>I am using the OS/2 port of 1.1.6. I keep getting a SPAM email in German that
takes BF out with a divide by zero. The porter does not believe the problem is
in the port and that it is in the BF code. The project web pages do not specify
how to log bug reports nor how to upload a troublesome file.

TIA

_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter

</description>
    <dc:creator>Dave Saville</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-23T09:10:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11185">
    <title>Bogotrain problem</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11185</link>
    <description>I can no longer run bogotrain with the command I've used previously -

/usr/share/bogofilter/contrib/contrib/trainbogo.sh -c -H /home/anne/Maildir/.INBOX.bogotrain_ham/cur/ -S /home/anne/Maildir/.INBOX.bogotrain_spam/cur/
bash: /usr/share/bogofilter/contrib/contrib/trainbogo.sh: Permission denied

ls -l /usr/share/bogofilter/contrib/contrib/trainbogo.sh
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9145 Jul 23 
2007 /usr/share/bogofilter/contrib/contrib/trainbogo.sh

What do I need to do to correct this?  I would have thought that I would only 
need read access?

Anne
_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter

</description>
    <dc:creator>Anne Wilson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-15T08:02:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11171">
    <title>possible idea for backscatter problem</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11171</link>
    <description>One of the users (actually the boss) had the email address harvested and we got clobbered 
by backscatter. Looking at the emails of the various 'unable to deliver' type messages, I saw 
what these could be filtered on, but don't know how to write up and implement the rule 
outside of procmail. I don't want to use procmail for this since it I think it would be an 
expensive routine for procmail to run.

In the body of the 'unable to deliver' message, the original message is quoted. One of the 
lines quoted is the Message-ID: header from the original. The format of this line is always 
wrong as it does not contain the FQDN that our server appends to the end of the hash 
number , following the '&lt; at &gt;' symbol .

So, need a rule that would parse the "Message-ID:" in the body (or attachment) and not 
header, and look for the &lt; at &gt;FQDN 
Is this rule already out in the wild?
-p

_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter&lt; at &gt;bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofi</description>
    <dc:creator>.rp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-07T21:58:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11168">
    <title>New version of bogofilter-milter.pl</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11168</link>
    <description>I've just posted a new version of bogofilter-milter.pl to
http://stuff.mit.edu/~jik/software/bogofilter-milter.  The new feature
added in this version is the ability to configure whether spam should
be rejected (i.e., an error code is sent back to the SMTP client) or
discarded (i.e., the client is told that the email was accepted, but
then it is thrown away rather than delivered).  The behavior can now
be configured not only on a global level, but also based on the IP
address, subnet, host name, domain name, or MX relationship of the
sending server.

The default configuration discards spam from MX servers of the
recipient's domain, to avoid contributing to the problem of spam
"blowback" caused by spammers who intentionally transmit their spam to
secondary MX servers.

As always, please let me know if you have any questions, comments or
concerns.

Thanks,

  Jonathan Kamens

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Kamens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-30T12:02:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11165">
    <title>FAQ translation help requested</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.bogofilter.general/11165</link>
    <description>Greetings,

I've just added a "How do I train using maildirs?" section to the FAQ.
Bogofilter also has French and Italian FAQs so if anyone can translate
the text below it would help.  Alternatively, I can just use the
English text and change it when somebody complains and provides a
translation :-&gt;

David

</description>
    <dc:creator>David Relson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-26T15:52:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.bogofilter.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.mail.bogofilter.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
