<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk">
    <title>gmane.lisp.guile.gtk</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1035"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1034"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1032"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1031"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1030"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1029"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1028"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1027"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1025"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1024"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1015"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1014"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1003"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1001"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/999"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/998"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/993"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/990"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/988"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/987"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1035">
    <title>guile-clutter 1.10.0 released</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1035</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Good news, everyone!

Guile-Clutter 1.10.0 is out!

Get it here:

  http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile-gnome/guile-clutter/guile-clutter-1.10.0.tar.gz

Guile-Clutter is a Guile wrapper for the Clutter library.  It lets you
create reactive, modern graphical interfaces from the Scheme language.

This release is the first of the 1.x series.  It wraps all of Clutter.
However, since there was no binding for Clutter 1.8 or before, we took
advantage of the opportunity to omit functionality that has been
deprecated within the 1.x series.

Guile-Clutter is almost entirely documented in Texinfo, generated from
the upstream Docbook documentation, automatically adapted to the actual
names and interfaces that Guile-Clutter exposes.  This has the advantage
of completeness and correctness, though it's still pretty obvious that
this is generated documentation.  Check it out here:

  http://www.gnu.org/software/guile-gnome/docs/clutter/

Learn more about Guile and Clutter here:

  http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
  http://www.cl&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T09:54:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1034">
    <title>guile-gnome-platform 2.16.2 released</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1034</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

I am pleased and embarrassed to announce the release of
guile-gnome-platform version 2.16.2.

Get it here:

  http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile-gnome/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform-2.16.2.tar.gz


About guile-gnome-platform
==========================

guile-gnome is a Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack.
It ships with an wrapper engine that allows semi-automatic wrapping of
GObject-based C APIs.

This release is the first in 4 years.  The API has not been
substantially updated.  The major change is simply that it works with
2.0, and there there is a tarball.


Changes
=======

* Instead of the terribly complicated revision control configuration
  that we had before, now all code is in git, and in just one branch.
  The build files like Makefile.am and configure.ac are no longer
  generated from other files.

* Update to support Guile 2.0 in addition to 1.8.  (We don't currently
  install compiled .go files yet.)

* Require G-Wrap 1.9.14.

* If Guile is new enough, tab compl&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T20:53:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1032">
    <title>guile-gnome-platform 2.16.2 released</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1032</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

I am pleased and embarrassed to announce the release of
guile-gnome-platform version 2.16.2.

Get it here:

  http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile-gnome/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform-2.16.2.tar.gz


About guile-gnome-platform
==========================

guile-gnome is a Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack.
It ships with an wrapper engine that allows semi-automatic wrapping of
GObject-based C APIs.

This release is the first in 4 years.  The API has not been
substantially updated.  The major change is simply that it works with
2.0, and there there is a tarball.


Changes
=======

* Instead of the terribly complicated revision control configuration
  that we had before, now all code is in git, and in just one branch.
  The build files like Makefile.am and configure.ac are no longer
  generated from other files.

* Update to support Guile 2.0 in addition to 1.8.  (We don't currently
  install compiled .go files yet.)

* Require G-Wrap 1.9.14.

* If Guile is new enough, tab compl&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T21:01:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1031">
    <title>guile-clutter - prelim work - patch 2/4</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1031</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;completing the previous email ...

cheers,
david_______________________________________________
guile-gtk-general mailing list
guile-gtk-general&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-gtk-general
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Pirotte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T20:11:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1030">
    <title>guile-clutter</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1030</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi guilers,

attached, a patch which updates configure.ac [to refer to clutter-1.0] and
has all 'recreated' clutter*.defs [*] files,  based on debian
libclutter-1.0-dev 1.8.4-1

the patch is incomplete: i am sending it to save time of some of you that might
be interested in helping me to complete the work [my C knowledge is quite
rudimentary], and actually the _real_ work still need to be done: 

updating
./clutter/gnome/gw/clutter-support.c[h]
./clutter/gnome/overrides/clutter*.defs probably

Andy said on irc that 'jave' may have a working version: please jave, if you
read this message and/or appear on irc, get in touch and help me :)

Thanks,
David

i named the patch clutter-1.0 but should have named it clutter-1.0-prelim or
something...

[*]i wrote a guile script which runs h2defs.py on clutter, clutter-glx and
clutter-x11: it would be nice if someone knowledgeable in wrapping C
libraries could verify that i did effectively create these files as they
should, let me know
_____________________&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Pirotte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T17:45:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1029">
    <title>guile-clutter: some migration doc...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1029</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hello guilers,

although most of you probably are aware, here are 2 [old] pointers that might be
helpful to the process of porting guile-clutter from 0.8 to 1.0:

http://lwn.net/Articles/345468/
http://docs.clutter-project.org/docs/clutter/stable/migration.html

cheers,
david
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Pirotte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T22:16:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1028">
    <title>guile-clutter - prelim work - patch 2/4</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1028</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;completing the previous email ...

cheers,
david
_______________________________________________
guile-gtk-general mailing list
guile-gtk-general&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-gtk-general
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Pirotte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T20:32:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1027">
    <title>guile-clutter - prelim work - patch 1,3,4 out of 4</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1027</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi guilers,

please disregard my 2 previous emails attachments:
one of them was too big and the second would only have made sense
if the first ...

i produced 4 patches instead, which i am sending in 2 emails, sorry for the
inconvenience.

so, as said, this is a very preliminary work to try to get guile-gnome/clutter
branch to work with clutter-1.0: these patches _only_ contains update of the
configure.ac and *.defs, recreated based on debian libclutter-1.0-dev 1.8.4-1

_real_ work actually needs to be done, i am sending the patches to [try to] save
the time of those of you that might be interested in helping me to complete the work
[my C knowledge is quite rudimentary], and actually the _real_ work still need to be
done: 

updating
./clutter/gnome/gw/clutter-support.c[h]
./clutter/gnome/overrides/clutter*.defs probably

Andy said on irc that 'jave' may have a working version: please jave, if you read
this message and/or appear on irc, get in touch and help me :)

Thanks,
David

[*]i wrote a gui&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Pirotte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-01T20:10:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1025">
    <title>Patch for the new glib version</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1025</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

in the new glib version they won't let you include some libs directly,
you have to include glib.h instead. Here's the patch.

- Daniel
_______________________________________________
guile-gtk-general mailing list
guile-gtk-general&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-gtk-general
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Krueger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-30T11:18:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1024">
    <title>guile-clutter</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1024</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi guilers,

today i tried to add guile-clutter to the wrappers 'built by' guile-gnome,
following Andy's email http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/987
bur got the following error at configure:

...
checking for G_WRAP... yes
checking for CLUTTER... no
checking for CLUTTER_GLX... no
checking for GUILE_GLIB... yes
configure: error: All wrappers failed their prerequisites.

These following wrappers cannot be built:
  clutter

would this wrap _really_ require clutter 0.7 or 0.8 ?

Thanks,
David

here is the list of packages installed [i actually installed all available
*clutter* debian packages]:

ii  clutter-1.0-tests                    1.8.4-1 
ii  gir1.2-clutter-1.0                   1.8.4-1 
ii  gir1.2-clutter-gst-1.0               1.5.4-1 
ii  gir1.2-gtkclutter-1.0                1.0.4-1 
ii  libclutter-1.0-0:i386                1.8.4-1 
ii  libclutter-1.0-common                1.8.4-1 
ii  libclutter-1.0-dbg:i386              1.8.4-1 
ii  libclutter-1.0-dev                   1.8.4-1 
ii&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Pirotte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-28T19:30:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1015">
    <title>guile-gnome-platform: segfault on exit</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1015</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;$ guile-gnome-2
guile&amp;gt; (use-modules (gnome gtk))
WARNING: (gnome gtk): `re-export-modules' imported from both (gnome
gobject utils) and (gnome gw support modules)
guile&amp;gt; (quit)
Segmentation fault

+ Only happens when (gnome gtk) has been loaded; seems not to be
triggered by any of the other guile-gnome modules
+ occurs with guile-gnome-platform-2.16.1 and guile-1.8.8 (most recent
releases in my distro)
+ Since this happens during cleanup, doesn't affect any program while
it's running

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb77b8e73 in suspend () at threads.c:388
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb77b8e73 in suspend () at threads.c:388
#1  0xb77b8ea9 in scm_leave_guile () at threads.c:398
#2  0xb77ba811 in scm_pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0xb77e9e00) at threads.c:1481
#3  0xb775f928 in scm_gc_for_newcell (freelist=0xb77f0ab8,
free_cells=0x83000c4) at gc.c:484
#4  0xb7773ece in scm_cell (car=1919, cdr=0) at ../libguile/inline.h:122
#5  0xb77b910c in guilify_self_2 (parent=0xb7440f20) at threads.c:491
#6  0xb77b93ac &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>gregory benison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-11T20:57:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1014">
    <title>Kisê - alpha version - call for help :)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1014</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello guilers,

this is not a real announce [yet] but a 'call for help' to whom might be
interested to jump in 

Yesterday [December 29, 2011 :)], thanks to some of you, I finally got Kisê [1]
under git and pushed it on gitorious. I also did create a 'common' project for all
the modules it depends on, and will later set it as a required submodule [or maybe a
guild hall project ?]

Before to further describe its actual state and get to the 'call for help' point, if
you are interested, please try it, feedback more then welcome. To do so you need a
running guile-gnome built/using guile 2.0, libsqlite3 + libsqlite3-dev as
well as a latex 'modern' distro for the pdf/printed reports [2]:

git clone git&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gitorious.org:common/common.git
git clone git&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gitorious.org:kise/kise.git

[  assuming your have cloned both in &amp;lt;mydir&amp;gt;, you need to add
   &amp;lt;mydir&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;mydir&amp;gt;/common to your GUILE_LOAD_PATH  ]

cd &amp;lt;mydir&amp;gt;/kise
./kise

The point :)

I would like to [try to] publish it as a GNU application, for many reasons &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Pirotte</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-30T21:46:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1003">
    <title>Still more problems on the way</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1003</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

so having a fresh copy of g-wrap available, I see that I need to build
guile-cairo to get any further.  Happily this worked without a glitch
for a fresh git checkout using the calling convention for autogen.sh
discovered only recently.

So it's up to the (newly updated) 'master' branch from git-gnome again.
configure tells me that there is something to be compiled:

  configure: Some packages will not be built.
  
  These wrappers will be built:
    atk cairo gconf glib gtk pango
  
  These wrappers failed their prerequisites and will NOT be built:
    corba gnome-vfs libglade libgnome libgnomecanvas libgnomeui
  
  Check the README files in the above subdirectories for more information
  on the prerequisites of a package.
  
make actually compiles a lot and make install also installs files.
Running the most basic example yields problems however:

  [dzu&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;deepthought ~][0]$ guile-gnome-2 
  GNU Guile 2.0.3.62-4eb28
  Copyright (C) 1995-2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  
  Guile comes with ABSOLUTELY &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Detlev Zundel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-12T14:41:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1001">
    <title>back to `master'</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/1001</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

The savannah admins flipped the switch that allowed me to replace
`master', so I did so.  We are back on `master'.  I'll remove
`platform', to prevent further confusion.  OK?

Cheers,

Andy
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-11T22:23:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/999">
    <title>[guile-cairo PATCH] fix cairo-pop-group wrapper to actually returnthe new pattern</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/999</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;* guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c (scm_cairo_pop_group): Fix return value.
  Bug #29040.
---
 guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c b/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c
index fa983eb..b9a9b8e 100644
--- a/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c
+++ b/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; -353,8 +353,7 &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; SCM_DEFINE_PUBLIC (scm_cairo_pop_group, "cairo-pop-group", 1, 0, 0,
                    (SCM ctx),
                    "")
 {
-  cairo_pop_group (scm_to_cairo (ctx));
-  CCHKRET (ctx, SCM_UNSPECIFIED);
+  CCHKRET (ctx, scm_from_cairo_pattern (cairo_pop_group (scm_to_cairo (ctx))));
 }
 
 SCM_DEFINE_PUBLIC (scm_cairo_pop_group_to_source, "cairo-pop-group-to-source", 1, 0, 0,
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Bernaud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-11T16:39:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/998">
    <title>[guile-cairo PATCH] fix declarations of wrappers for matrix operations</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/998</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;* guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c (scm_cairo_matrix_translate): Fix number of
  parameters.
  (scm_cairo_matrix_scale, scm_cairo_matrix_rotate): Fix procedure name.
  Bug #25328.
---
 guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c b/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c
index 843b585..fa983eb 100644
--- a/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c
+++ b/guile-cairo/guile-cairo.c
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; -2786,7 +2786,7 &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; SCM_DEFINE_PUBLIC (scm_cairo_make_rotate_matrix, "cairo-make-rotate-matrix", 1,
   return scm_from_cairo_matrix (&amp;amp;matrix);
 }
 
-SCM_DEFINE_PUBLIC (scm_cairo_matrix_translate, "cairo-matrix-translate", 2, 0, 0,
+SCM_DEFINE_PUBLIC (scm_cairo_matrix_translate, "cairo-matrix-translate", 3, 0, 0,
                    (SCM smatrix, SCM tx, SCM ty),
                    "")
 {
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; -2799,7 +2799,7 &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; SCM_DEFINE_PUBLIC (scm_cairo_matrix_translate, "cairo-matrix-translate", 2, 0, 0
   return scm_from_cairo_matrix (&amp;amp;matrix);
 }
 
-SCM_DEFINE_PUBLIC (scm_cairo_matrix_scale, "cai&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Bernaud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-11T16:39:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/993">
    <title>[PATCH 1/6] remove legacy .cvsignore files</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/993</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
---
 atk/.cvsignore                     |   31 -------------------------------
 atk/gnome/.cvsignore               |    1 -
 atk/gnome/gw/.cvsignore            |   13 -------------
 corba/.cvsignore                   |   31 -------------------------------
 corba/demos/.cvsignore             |    2 --
 corba/demos/corba/.cvsignore       |   11 -----------
 corba/gnome/.cvsignore             |    1 -
 corba/gnome/corba/.cvsignore       |   11 -----------
 glib/.cvsignore                    |   31 -------------------------------
 glib/gnome/.cvsignore              |    1 -
 glib/gnome/gw/.cvsignore           |   11 -----------
 glib/test-suite/.cvsignore         |    1 -
 gtk/.cvsignore                     |   31 -------------------------------
 gtk/examples/.cvsignore            |    1 -
 gtk/gnome/.cvsignore               |    1 -
 gtk/gnome/gw/.cvsignore            |   13 -------------
 libglade/.cvsignore                |   31 -------------------------------
 libglade/examples/.cvsignore       |    1 -
 li&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Bernaud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-11T16:38:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/990">
    <title>tests passing on `platform' branch</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/990</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

Just a brief note to say that for me, the test suite passes on the
`platform' branch with Guile 2.0.  I have had some issues with the
autocompilation facility, so you might need to build with a
GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=fresh.

Regards,

Andy
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-11T14:30:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/988">
    <title>Sound events</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/988</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I have noticed that gnome-gtk-2.1 propagates sound events correctly to
libcanberra (buttons plink if set to do so in gnome sound settings),
but gnome-guile does not, in both version 2.16.1 and in platform branch.

Is is necessary to do anything to get sound effects to work in
guile-gnome?

Chris
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Chris Vine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-09T21:24:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/987">
    <title>new status</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/987</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all!

I realized that the way I did the merge to `master' (what was
`platform') did not preserve the history in a way that git could
understand it.

Therefore I have rebased `master' to have a more proper merge, so that
one can cd into a directory and get a useful git log --follow foo.c.  I
have also continued with Mark's cleanups.

Because this is a rewrite of some parts of the git history, and because
`master' is the default branch for the savannah git repo, savannah is
not allowing me to make the update to `master'.  Therefore this work is
on `platform'.  I have opened a ticket with savannah folks and will
merge it to `master' ASAP.

Until this merge is complete, it's probably a good idea to hold off on
pushing to `master'.  However the patches will still apply, so don't let
that prevent people from sending them to the list! :-)

In other news, I have also done the same to the "other" repositories:
clutter, gstreamer, libwnck, gtksourceview, and even the ones in the
attic: evolution-data-server, dbus, &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andy Wingo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-09T18:37:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/983">
    <title>No success joining in yet</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.gtk/983</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi there,

looking at the cool new stuff in guile and finally seeing that the
malicious git setup of guile-gnome has changed (thanks Andy!) I tried to
take a look at the current state of affairs.

Unfortunately with no success yet - building g-wrap fails for me
already:

  [dzu&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;deepthought g-wrap (master)][0]$ git clean -f
  Removing config.rpath
  [dzu&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;deepthought g-wrap (master)][0]$ git describe
  v1.9.14
  [dzu&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;deepthought g-wrap (master)][0]$ guile --version
  guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.3.62-4eb28
  Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  
  License LGPLv3+: GNU LGPL 3 or later &amp;lt;http://gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html&amp;gt;.
  This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
  There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
  [dzu&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;deepthought g-wrap (master)][0]$ ./configure
  [...]
  checking for vasprintf... (cached) yes
  checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
  checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
  checking for LIBFFI... yes
  checking size of size_t... 8&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Detlev Zundel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-09T15:32:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.guile.gtk">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.guile.gtk</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

