<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel">
    <title>gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/51"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/48"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/40"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/38"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/26"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/3"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/51">
    <title>Some questions</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/51</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;_______________________________________________
cltl3-devel mailing list
cltl3-devel-F1HGIaG5STRyXAeb93iumQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cltl3-devel
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Edward Tate</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-22T13:08:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/48">
    <title>Bug tracker at Launchpad</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/48</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I just registered

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cltl3

From my experience, Launchpad's bug tracker is quite nice to work
with. And it offers more persistence and organization than a mailing
list. Hence I thought it'd be a good idea for cltl3 to make use of one.

(I hope I didn't step on anyone's foot by taking initiative and just
registering one before asking.)

If people have time, it'd be a good idea to convert Cliki's Proposed
ANSI Revisions etc. over to the bug tracker.

  -T.

PS.

The bug tracker is /not/ supposed to become everyone's Christmas
Wishlist, please be modest. :-)
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tobias C. Rittweiler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-12T14:44:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/40">
    <title>Pathnames</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/40</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;... just to start a bit of a flame war :), I submit here that a good  
start to solve the pathname issue is my very own NAMES-AND-PATHS effort.

http://common-lisp.net/project/names-and-paths/

I also have code that implements a lot of the syntax.

Comments and developers welcome.

... and no: symlinks (a UNIX concept and one of the problems that  
newbies find with ASDF) are explicitely not handled.

Cheers


--
Marco Antoniotti
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Marco Antoniotti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-07T09:25:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/38">
    <title>wishlist items</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/38</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Here are a few items on my post-ANSI wishlist.  Please forgive me if I'm 
not following proper CLtL3 wishlist protocol.


* Get REQUIRE right.  IIRC, CLtL2 had *MODULE-PROVIDER-HOOKS*.  This is 
good.  There should be a standard way for defsystems to coexist.

* If versioning semantics are added to REQUIRE, I suggest something like
   - (require system &amp;amp;optional version), NIL matches any version
   - require signals an error if the requested version doesn't match a
     currently loaded version
   - versions have three numbers (a la libtool)
     - "major" number represents external API changes (e.g. new functions)
     - "minor" number represents internal changes (e.g. bugfixes)
     - "range" counts minor numbers that are binary compatible
   - Example: 5.7.2
     - API 5, release 7, backwared compatible with 5.6.x and 5.5.x
     - projects compiled against 1.x.y-4.x.y will need to be recompiled and
       may also need code changes
     - projects compiled against 5.0.x-5.4.x will require a recompile but
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Herring</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-07T04:44:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/26">
    <title>Types</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/26</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

Some issues about the type system that comes to my mind (some of them
might be less important than the others):
 - no reliable way to figure out whether something is a type specifier or not
 - no way to portably expand a type specifier by using its definition
 - practically there is no reflection on types
 - no easy way to specify a parametric type of strings with less than
N characters (this is just an example of the issue: (deftype
length-limited-string (limit) ...)
   due to the limits of satisfies
 - no portable way to get the inferred type of a function, a variable, etc.

Cheers,
levy

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Levente Mészáros</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-02T12:12:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/3">
    <title>RFC: CLtL3 Charter</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel/3</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

Below is a draft of the charter for the CLtL3 project. Please comment
as you see fit.

Cheers,

drewc

Purposes of the CLtL3 effort. SECOND DRAFT - 2009-08-31 -

1) The CLtL3 group wishes to create an updated description of Common
  Lisp.  It should codify existing practice and provide additional
  features to facilitate portability of code among diverse
  implementations.

2) The group intends the description to be a base for a larger "standard
  library" of code. The focus of the effort will be to provide
  library authors with a stable and portable lisp on which to build
  an evolving distribution that meets the ever changing needs of
  modern developers.

3) The group will begin with ANSI Common Lisp as described in the
  _Common Lisp Hyperspec_. All possible effort will be made to ensure
  source compatibility. The group does not intend to remove any
  functionality from the language, and will only deprecate features
  that are superseded by those in CLtL3.

4) The group will address the fol&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Drew Crampsie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-31T19:57:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.cltl3.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

