<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners">
    <title>gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1751"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1743"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1718"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1713"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1706"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1703"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1699"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1694"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1691"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1690"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1685"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1664"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1660"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1659"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1654"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1652"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1647"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1646"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1637"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1632"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1751">
    <title>lisp FAQ status</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1751</link>
    <description>
Hi guys,

(I'm sorry I took longer than I said I would, but I had to update my
server before I did any work on the faq.)

I tested ikiwiki [1] and phpmyfaq [2] as two potential technologies to
store the lisp FAQ. As a preview of each tool, I put two "mock" lisp
FAQs [3] available on my server, one using ikiwiki:

    http://genos.mus.br/lispfaq/

and the other using phpmyfaq:

    http://genos.mus.br/lispfaq2/

feel free to play with them.

here is my list of pros and cons for ikiwiki:

* pros
  - can be edited on-line (just like a wiki) and off-line (it uses git)
  - simple and clean
  - uses a "standard" format (markdown)
  - very css friendly (all visual things can be changed)
  - has a page for discussion (like wikipedia)
  - distributed: each git clone is a full repo of the wiki. If I decide
  to go nuts and live in the Bahamas (not a bad idea) the lisp faq can
  be easily set up by anyone with a git clone

* cons
  - not really a faq manager
  - has no top 10 list or rating system

here is my list of </description>
    <dc:creator>Pedro Kröger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-20T21:43:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1743">
    <title>Cross implementation libraries?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1743</link>
    <description>
I'm finding that I need to support multiple CL implementations in the
same code base.  (I've tried to avoid doing this for a long time!)

So I have to questions for any gardeners out there:

- Are there any good libraries that provide a common API for the things
  like multiprocessing, network programming, POSIX, etc.  I'm looking
  for direct experience with a package.

- What do people use to compile C code used by an FFI?  I am happy using
  CFFI, but I also need to create the .so libraries themselves.  What I
  do right now is use a Makefile (which isn't well integrated with the
  rest of my asdf world).

(I hope this is enough on topic for the list.)

Cheers,
Chris Dean
</description>
    <dc:creator>Chris Dean</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-25T18:22:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1718">
    <title>test</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1718</link>
    <description>Test per gigamonkey's request on #lisp, take 2.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Ryan Davis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-13T20:42:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1713">
    <title>consider bidding on .lisp top level domain</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1713</link>
    <description>Considering how the ALU and lisp.org site have come up on this list, 
perhaps someone here might be able to keep this on their radar?


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: consider bidding on .lisp top level domain
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:22:22 -0700

In case you have yet to hear about what's coming in second quarter of
2009, new generic Top Level Domains beyond .com, .org, etc. may be any word.

http://icann.org/topics/new-gtld-program.htm

It appears that ICANN will be using an auction/bid approach for initial
allocation.

Perhaps it's appropriate to do a little fund-raising and secure .lisp,
.scheme, etc?

While operating a TLD raises other issues, you can be sure there will be
third party hosting available shortly after.  (When there's a gold rush,
sell shovels.)

-Daniel
</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel J Pezely</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-03T01:00:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1706">
    <title>test gmane</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1706</link>
    <description>
test
</description>
    <dc:creator>Pedro Kröger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-01T23:44:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1703">
    <title>Lisp FAQ</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1703</link>
    <description>
Hi,

I think it would make a great project to take Peter Seibel's Lisp FAQ
(http://www.lispniks.com/faq/faq.html) and make it annotable/extendable
by everyone. Interactive Web and all that.

  -T.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Tobias C. Rittweiler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-18T22:56:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1699">
    <title>pythononlisp and array operation error</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1699</link>
    <description>Hi,

I am am using the python on lisp and face the
following problem, hope you could be in a position suggest some
solution.

OS: debian
Lisp: Allegro 8.0
python on lisp: 0.2

when i try to load the library these are the errors:

#&lt;Printer Error, obj=#x1000000ae9: attempt to take the length of a non-sequence:
#&lt;unknown object of type number 10 &lt; at &gt; #x61007e0020003a&gt;&gt;
Restart actions (select using :continue):
 0: Return to Top Level (an "abort" restart).
 1: Abort entirely from this (lisp) process.
[1] TOP-DEALS(9): :zoom :verbose t
Evaluation stack:

  call to ERROR
required arg: EXCL::DATUM = TYPE-ERROR
&amp;rest EXCL::ARGUMENTS = (:DATUM
                        #&lt;unknown object of type number 10 &lt; at &gt;
                          #x7fff5baab81a&gt;
                        :EXPECTED-TYPE ...)
function suspended at relative address 805

----------------------------
 -&gt;call to FORMAT
required arg: STREAM = #&lt;EXCL:TERMINAL-SIMPLE-STREAM
                        [initial terminal io] fd 0/1 &lt; at &gt; #x1000241602&gt;
required arg: EXCL::ST</description>
    <dc:creator>Prashanth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-25T13:55:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1694">
    <title>Ping!</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1694</link>
    <description>A few years ago I was trying to pick a language to learn and I was
torn between Python and Lisp.  I worked through some of the Wizard
book with with Scheme and really liked the language but it didn't look
like a good investment in terms of job prospects so I ended up going
with Python.  I'm not looking to learn a language for pay just now so
I'm back to "something functional".  I went back and forth between
spending time learning Lisp and OCAML but I ended up going with Lisp
because the first thing I want is *development speed* and the last
time I messed around with OCAML the typing system kept slowing down my
development.

For any given situation I generally believe in "one canonical
implementation" that creates a lot of value by working as an official
standard that lets people work with each other without too many layers
of coordination.  Based on my initial surveys I'm thinking that the
right thing to do is:
1. Work through Practical Common Lisp - http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/
2. While using Steel Bank</description>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Rodriguez-Mueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-24T05:22:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1691">
    <title>clbuild</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1691</link>
    <description>Hi,

Has anyone else had a go at clbuild?

http://common-lisp.net/project/clbuild/

Bill Clementson did a quick write up here:

http://bc.tech.coop/blog/080116.html

I'm trying to get it going now. There seem to be some errors in the
shell script and at least one broken repository, but as it is written
in shell I think I'll understand it from the start. Finally a common
lisp project (or support project anyway) that I won't feel like a
complete language newbie in.

It still looks to me like it might rely on ASDF for system definition.
It just isn't using cliki.net to get the latest tarballs. It goes to
the source repositories directly to get the latest code. I suppose
this has downsides as well as upsides, but I'm doing lisp for fun
rather than production, so I might as well live on the bleeding edge.

cheers,
Bruce (who just thought he'd give the garden a rustle)
</description>
    <dc:creator>Bruce Durling</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-18T04:53:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1690">
    <title>Announcement: European Common Lisp Meeting, Amsterdam,April 19/20, 2008</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1690</link>
    <description>[Sorry if you receive this announcement more than once.]

Arthur Lemmens and Edi Weitz are proud to announce the European Common
Lisp Meeting 2008.  The meeting will consist of a Sunday full of talks
on April 20, 2008, with optional dinners on Saturday and Sunday
evening.

For a list of speakers and more information please visit

    http://weitz.de/eclm2008/

We're looking forward to meeting you in Amsterdam,

Arthur Lemmens &amp; Edi Weitz
</description>
    <dc:creator>Arthur Lemmens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-09T13:51:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1685">
    <title>Fw: Simple SDL demo in Common Lisp</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1685</link>
    <description>
Hi,

Using your advices, and thank to #lisp people, I finally succeeded a
small lisp demo using the LispBuilder bindings of SDL, SDL-image, and
SDL-ttf.

It's really simple, just a bunch of particles flying all over the
screen, plus a bit of text rendering.

My lisp code is of course unperfect; do not hesitate to signal me any
error or crappy code.

All was tested with sbcl.

Demo: http://codemore.org/files/other/particles.tgz
Screenshot: http://codemore.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/particles.png

Bench result:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon X2 3800+ 2GHz

sbcl 1.0.10
lispbuilder-sdl 0.9.0
lispbuilder-sdl-image 0.4.0
lispbuilder-sdl-ttf 0.2.0

sdl-doublebuf sdl-hw-surface
640x480

Particles   Framerate
---------------------
   0           435 
  10           338 
  50           175 
 100           110 
 250            52  
 500            28  
1000            15  
2500             6
---------------------------------------------------------------------

I enjo</description>
    <dc:creator>Nicolas Martyanoff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-20T09:34:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1664">
    <title>Here I am</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1664</link>
    <description>
Hi,

I'm a 21 years old french student which has just discovered Lisp. I've
been astonished by this language; I've been practicing C, C++, Perl,
Python and Php for years, and this is the first time I find a language
so harmonious and graceful.

However, I'm badly deceived that there is no real community. I'm coming
here without hope, since I see the history of the mailing-list (no
post...).

I've been doing a lot of Google searchs to find some stable libraries,
and most of the libs I found were abandoned, hardly ever finished.

In this context, it's really difficult to be motivated about working
with Lisp. It's a language very tempting, but it seems it has no future.

Anyway, I want to believe in Lisp, and I want to use it (I'm working on
an online 2D RTS video game, and would want to use Lisp for server and
client).

So, here I am :)

Regards,

</description>
    <dc:creator>Nicolas Martyanoff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-17T20:07:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1660">
    <title>Hello world</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1660</link>
    <description>Hi everybody,
My name is Nubis, I'm rather new to lisp. I run OpenMCL on an Ibook g4.
I come from a heavy python background but I only achieved Nerdvana  
when I got lisp.
My main interests with lisp are games and websites. (and building the  
tools required to build them)
Im 21 year old from Argentina, my native tounge is Spanish.

Is there anyone here with similar interests, and or living in Argentina?

Thanks in advance. I'll be writing again shortly.

Best regards to all
----nubis :)
</description>
    <dc:creator>nubis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-03T22:33:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1659">
    <title>emacs localisation framework... any taker ?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1659</link>
    <description>

A discussion started on the topic of emacs l10n a few days ago on  
emacs-devel and reached the above conclusion.

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-07/threads.html

A similar (but shorter) discussion took place in 2001 but nothing  
happened because there were basically no takers to write the  
necessary code.

My understanding (...) is that the task involves elisp coding as well  
as C coding (for the emacs/gettext combination part).

Emacs lovers all over the world...  Any taker ?

Jean-Christophe Helary
(sadly not a coder, but willing to test and to contribute to the  
localization of the beast to French when the necessary code is laid  
down)
</description>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Christophe Helary</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-03T03:38:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1654">
    <title>proposal for a new project</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1654</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
Gardeners-0Lpivb7LZrJWk0Htik3J/w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
</description>
    <dc:creator>Alan Rossum</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-24T06:40:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1652">
    <title>Intro</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1652</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
Gardeners-0Lpivb7LZrJWk0Htik3J/w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
</description>
    <dc:creator>Harrison Maseko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-20T21:06:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1647">
    <title>Back and forth between SBCL and plt-scheme</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1647</link>
    <description>Fellow Gardeners,

Well, I've been doing my usual back and forth between lisp (sbcl) and
scheme (MzScheme) and as per usual, the libraries around for lisp have
driven me back to the lisp camp (and quiet but useful newbie lists
like this one).

I'm going to be doing a little bit of web client and xml programming.
I think I know which http library I'm going to use (Drakma), but I'm
not sure which one of the various xml libraries out there would be the
best. I know that library reviews have been discussed on this list
before and I was wondering if anyone had done any xml programming
recently with lisp and could share their experience.

I'll write up my stuff as I go on my blog and as I have something to
show I'll share it. ;-)

cheers,
Bruce (whose thumb is brown and wilted rather than green)

(ps I know there isn't a lot in this post, but every time this someone
shakes this list a bit a whole bunch of new and interesting things
come out.)
</description>
    <dc:creator>Bruce Durling</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-15T20:08:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1646">
    <title>Pretty quiet on this list lately</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1646</link>
    <description>After abandoning Lisp for about six months, I'm using it again for
generating boilerplate code in web applications. The idea is, you
supply a schema, associations, and other data written as
s-expressions, and you get pretty much all the database access code
you're likely to need (outside of weird ad-hoc reporting queries).

There have been plenty of people who have written database access tier
generators in other languages, but they always make you supply the
metadata as XML, which is much weaker than s-expressions. Even Ruby's
power is no match for CLOS and the MOP.

So, for just generating schemas, this code:

(emit-table (make-table posts :cols (list (varchar 'title :maxlen 50
:unique :not-null) created-at (text 'content :indexed :not-null))))

Evaluates to:

CREATE TABLE POSTS(
ID SERIAL  PRIMARY KEY,
TITLE VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL UNIQUE,
CREATED_AT timestamp(0) with time zone DEFAULT now(),
CONTENT TEXT NOT NULL);

CREATE INDEX POSTS_CONTENT_G5535 ON POSTS(CONTENT);
CREATE INDEX POSTS_TITLE_G5724 ON POSTS(</description>
    <dc:creator>Warren Henning</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-21T11:27:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1637">
    <title>cl-strings, or, learning to make a library</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1637</link>
    <description>Folks--

Is this list still in existence?

Anyway, I created a library located at:

   http://code.google.com/p/cl-strings/

which is an imitation of Java's String and StringTokenizer classes.   
Does anyone need such an imitation?  Is the Java String functions  
particular great as these things go?

Probably not.

But the main purpose for me was to force myself to do the sort of  
things one does for creating a library, such as setting up the  
project on the web (in this case google code), documenting the code,  
writing tests, writing a nice Weitzian documentation page and so on  
and so forth.

(Alas, not all the tests are complete, but the functions are so  
simple.... )

The great thing about picking the string library from Java is that I  
had a spec and I didn't have a specific app I needed these functions  
for.  Normally, if I'm in the middle of writing an application, I  
just write the functions I need and don't attempt to generalize  
because, well, I need to get the application done.

I hope ot</description>
    <dc:creator>Keith Irwin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-10T22:16:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1632">
    <title>library for tokenization of natural languages ?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1632</link>
    <description>I am looking for a library that would do basic to reasonably smart  
tokenization of natural language strings.

Like, if fed something in English or French, it creates tokens for  
the things between the spaces, for Japanese, it deals with the non- 
spaced strings in a rule based fashion.

I think Lucene can do that and so montezuma would be a candidate (?),  
but I wonder if any of you has experience with such tools, especially  
for languages that do not use spaces.

Jean-Christophe Helary
</description>
    <dc:creator>Jean-Christophe Helary</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-02-05T08:11:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1623">
    <title>Lisp running on a microprocessor</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners/1623</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
Gardeners mailing list
Gardeners-0Lpivb7LZrJWk0Htik3J/w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
</description>
    <dc:creator>sathya gnanasekaran</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-09T19:11:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.cl-gardeners</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
