<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened">
    <title>gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3795"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3773"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3771"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3764"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3763"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3760"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3741"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3740"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3739"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3735"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3729"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3726"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3723"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3710"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3701"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3693"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3690"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3685"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3662"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3657"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3795">
    <title>tg3 driver - transmit timed out, resetting</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3795</link>
    <description>
Hello Folks!

Maybe some of you have seen this before, or know something ...  I have a 
Broadcom NetXtreme card which have locked up twice within 13 days.  I 
upgraded to the 2.6.25-hardened-r8 kernel mid-october, and have a feeling 
this upgrade introduced this issue.  Before that I was 
linux-2.6.22-hardened-r8 for over a year without any problems.  The log 
entries from both episodes are identical.

Any hints?  Are there any safe 2.6.26 or 2.6.27 kernels available?


kind regards,

David Sommerseth


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5721 Gigabit 
Ethernet PCI Express (rev 21)
         Subsystem: IBM eServer xSeries server mainboard
         Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 219
         Memory at d8200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
         Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 2
         Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data &lt;?&gt;
         Capabilities: [58] Message Sign</description>
    <dc:creator>David Sommerseth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-28T13:28:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3773">
    <title>whitelist of apps granted network access?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3773</link>
    <description>Is there some known good way to make an effective whitelist of applications, 
which are granted network access?

By the way, there is another related question: I remember, I once started 
googleearth as user1 and had firefox running as user2; really, googleearth 
opened link into user2's firefox! So I can easily have an illusion of 
protection such a way (user1 application bypasses firewall by signalling 
user2 application somehow).
What the question really is? How can I know, that particular application can 
make / accept a dangerous signal (or other interprocess comm.) and how can I 
forbid that, if necessary? 

Jan


</description>
    <dc:creator>Jan Klod</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T15:13:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3771">
    <title>hardened workstation - is that worth it?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3771</link>
    <description>Suppose, I want to take some extra precautions and set up PaX&amp;co and MAC on a 
workstation with Xorg and other nice KDE apps (only some of which should be 
granted access to files in folder X). I would like to read others opinion, if 
I can get considerable security improvements or I will have to make that much 
of exceptions to those good rules, as it makes protection too useless?

Regards,
Jan


</description>
    <dc:creator>Jan Klod</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T15:00:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3764">
    <title>How to compile with hardened toolchain?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3764</link>
    <description>Please, could someone give a short introduction in how should I make sure, I 
am compiling with hardened features support? And if I do manually with 
some "make" or "gcc" or "g++"?
Thank you...


</description>
    <dc:creator>Jan Klod</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T20:06:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3763">
    <title>Isolate users/programs?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3763</link>
    <description>Well, the idea is: if program is started with userid N != 0, what are the ways 
it can access the information, it is supposed to be forbidden to access in a 
normal Linux configuration (other users info)? 
As you might think, I am not really sure of what I need other than a way to 
forbid all the users access to other users files unless they are in a group 
and permissions allow it.
Many wild things can happen, I just think, this might be a good place where I 
could ask.

For example: I install mailserver or run samba on a server, where some other 
things are going on and I totally don't want them to interfare in any 
possible way unless it has been intended. 

Hope, I made it clear enough...

Jan


</description>
    <dc:creator>Jan Klod</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T20:03:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3760">
    <title>Grsecurity: Role flag "G" problem</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3760</link>
    <description>Since I've upgraded to a kernel based on 2.6.27 (2.6.27-hardened-r1), some
error messages are logged every time I authenticate myself as root.
"
Nov 23 10:09:44 hostname grsec: (root:U:/sbin/gradm) denied access to
hidden file /root by /sbin/gradm[gradm:7187] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0,
parent /bin/bash[bash:7033] uid/euid:0/0 gid/egid:0/0
"
Role flag "G" is specified for root in order to make this user able to
authenticate using gradm. Some directories - including boot - are hidden.
No matter if I replace "h" to "hs" for role root, these messages still get
logged. If I try to create a policy for gradm, grsec reports, that I've
tried to modify an already existing instance - which is probably included
because Role flag "G", but the exact contents are hidden.
This behavior appeared recently.

Did I miss something?
Any ideas on this are greatly appreciated.

Is it discouraged to authenticate using gradm while logged in as root?

Regards,
Dw.
</description>
    <dc:creator>atoth-J1cgac+wqeJaB7pSnPOuKA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-23T09:48:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3741">
    <title>Tin Hat Linux 20081025 released</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3741</link>
    <description>Hello everyone,

I just wanted to make the list aware that a new release of Tin Hat is
out.  This release did not add new features, but addressed some
bugs/security issues.  The major changes included the kernel upgraded to
hardened 2.6.25-r8, gnome upgraded to 2.22.3 and postfix upgraded to
2.5.5 to address a security issue.

For those unfamiliar with Tin Hat, it is a linux distro derived from
hardened Gentoo which aims to provide a very secure, stable and fast
Desktop environment that lives purely in RAM.

Home page: http://opensource.dyc.edu/tinhat
Downloads: http://opensource.dyc.edu/tinhat-downloads

--Tony Basile





</description>
    <dc:creator>dante</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-30T15:14:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3740">
    <title>SELinux boot errors - udev/dhcpcd</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3740</link>
    <description>Hello, 
 I'm trying to install SELinux on a freh Gentoo install and have
followed the guide, but they system will not boot in enforcing mode.

The are numerous messages that say
Unable to exec /lib64/udev/path_id:Permission denied.
The initscripts then get stuck when running DHCP for an address, and
that's as far as I have gotten. I have tried relabeling repeatedly.
Any idea what's going on?
Thanks


</description>
    <dc:creator>George Socker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-28T22:31:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3739">
    <title>I want use bastille..</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3739</link>
    <description>Hello, what version of bastille work fine with gentoo.2008 I'm trying to install a server with selinux-hardened profile. I read about Bastille project in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/ and I want use it in my server, I  installed a version masked in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask, but it don't work just like it write there. What I have to do for use bastille?

これも通過する..
Eroz.


</description>
    <dc:creator>Ernesto Rodriguez Ortiz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-27T18:33:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3735">
    <title>Stopping libselinux being linked</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3735</link>
    <description>Well I've given up on selinux now and I'm trying to just get rid of selinux
and just use a hardened system.

I've change my profile and recompiled the system so none of it is using the
selinux flag.

The problem is that even though the selinux USE flag isn't exabled, packages
like coreutils are still linking into libselinux. So if I remove libselinux
and all the selinux related packages, it breaks a whole load of binaries on
the system, so much so that I can't recompile packages afterwards.

How should I proceed to eradicate selinux from my system? or am I stuck with
the libraries now until I do a full re-install?

Thanks

Matt
</description>
    <dc:creator>Matt Harrison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-26T16:02:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3729">
    <title>Failure when "switching" to hardened-gentoo profile</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3729</link>
    <description>Hello.

I was trying to make a switch form normal, freshly installed gentoo to
hardened like described in PaX quickstart.
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/pax-quickstart.xml Though, that
guide is missing to inform about when should I boot hardened-sources.
Not sure if after "emerge binutils gcc virtual/libc" or "emerge -e
world", but I got this error, which persists:

============================================================================
*** stack smashing detected ***: cc1 - terminated
cc1: stack smashing attack in function ix86_split_to_parts - terminated
Report to http://bugs.gentoo.org/
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1)
Please submit a full bug report.
See &lt;URL:http://bugs.gentoo.org/&gt; for instructions.
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/math/s_catanl.o]
Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1/work/glibc-2.6.1/math'
make[1]: *** [math/others] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving director</description>
    <dc:creator>Jan Klod</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-25T18:44:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3726">
    <title>Autoreply: bastille</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3726</link>
    <description>

</description>
    <dc:creator>oxbvdarbbvy-ZFVw8cl5+jdGBRGhe+f61g&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-24T15:00:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3723">
    <title>What if I won't need multilib after couple of years?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3723</link>
    <description>Good day to you all!

Will move away from multilib automatically force me to make a fresh install of 
whole system, which is painful? 
Will there be serious performance looses, if I use multilib (is the bulk of 
GNU software running in 64 then)?
And one more transition question: how about move from gentoo to hardened-* 
after gentoo is installed?

/installing fresh system now.../


</description>
    <dc:creator>Jan Klod</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-17T11:19:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3710">
    <title>glibc not using PIE</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3710</link>
    <description>I'm still fiddling to get my firewall running smoothly on hardened/selinux

I'm re-emerging various things but I'm seeing this:

 PIE hardening not applied, as your compiler doesn't default to PIE

When emerging glibc, google doesn't have any answers...


Any ideas?

thanks

Matt


</description>
    <dc:creator>Matt Harrison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-13T21:52:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3701">
    <title>/etc/init.d/named stop hangs</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3701</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Markus Bartl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-08T12:45:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3693">
    <title>/etc/init.d/dhcpd start -&gt; error</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3693</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Markus Bartl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T15:04:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3690">
    <title>problem with Apache2::Request</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3690</link>
    <description>Hi,

Currently just not able to get Apache2::Request to work on Gentoo
hardened amd64.

Did an emerge of www-apache/libapreq2-2.08-r2 and all compiled fine.

Did the following test using a simple perl script as follows,

perl test.pl

The contents of test.pl is as follows.

----------- start ------------------

use strict;

use Apache2::Request;

------------ end -------------------



Got the following error,

------------ start ----------------------

Can't load
'/usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/APR/
                                           Request/Apache2/Apache2.so'
for module APR::Request::Apache2: /usr/lib64/perl5/s

ite_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/APR/Request/Apache2/Apache2.so:
un                                              defined symbol:
modperl_xs_sv2request_rec at /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux
                                      -thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 230.
 at
/usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Apache2/Reque</description>
    <dc:creator>P.V.Anthony</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-02T23:07:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3685">
    <title>SELinux boot errors</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3685</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Markus Bartl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-01T06:45:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3662">
    <title>Password vor sysadm_r</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3662</link>
    <description>Hi there.

Ist there any chance to set a different password for the sysadm_r role 
than the root password?
Excuse me if my questions seem dumb, but im doing my first steps in SELinux.

Lets describe my goal:
I want to let cron do its job as its supposed to do.
But : I want manipulation of the scripts getting lauched by cron only to 
be possible in sysadm_r.
And i want the command "crontab -e" only to be available in sysadm_r.

Thanks and I hope nobody will lose patience ;-)

Many kind regards,
Markus



</description>
    <dc:creator>Markus Bartl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-28T08:04:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3657">
    <title>Documentation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3657</link>
    <description>Hi there.

Can anybody recommend a good documentation with examples or maybe a good 
tutorial on SELinux?
I suppose I got a bit of a lack in basic knowlegdge on things concerning 
SELinux.


Thanks and many kind regrads,
Markus



</description>
    <dc:creator>Markus Bartl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-27T21:04:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3652">
    <title>weak policy?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened/3652</link>
    <description>Hi there.

Ive got my SELinux kernel up and running.
What im wondering about is that i can restart services without changing 
to the sysadm_r role.
Im logged on as root but root belongs only to staff_r.
Do I have to worry about it or is this just as expected?
Im new to SELinux. Just dealed with regular hardened stuff so I get lost 
in the basics i guess.

Regards,
Markus



</description>
    <dc:creator>Markus Bartl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-27T13:38:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.gentoo.hardened</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
