<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel">
    <title>gmane.linux.gentoo.devel</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57822"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57812"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57806"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57787"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57783"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57782"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57771"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57764"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57763"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57752"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57738"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57725"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57723"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57722"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57721"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57717"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57713"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57710"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57693"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57689"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57822">
    <title>License Interpretation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57822</link>
    <description>IANAL, and I'm sure most of us aren't either, but I would appreciate
some opinions on Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/234542 and whether the
binary patch proposed there conflicts with section 2.5.1 of the license
agreement from Adobe:

http://www.adobe.com/products/eulas/pdfs/Reader_Player_WWEULA-Combined-20060724_1430.pdf

Specifically, here is the passage I'm wondering about:

2.5.1  You may not modify, adapt, translate or create derivative works
based upon the Software. You may not reverse engineer, decompile,
disassemble or otherwise attempt to discover the source code of the
Software except to the extent you may be expressly permitted to
decompile under applicable law, it is essential to do so in order to
achieve operability of the Software with another software program, and
you have first requested Adobe to provide the information necessary to
achieve such operability and Adobe has not made such information
available.

I *think* I would be okay using this binary patch since:

1) This is specifically to mak</description>
    <dc:creator>Jim Ramsay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-20T19:10:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57812">
    <title>media-fonts/droid licensing: should fonts include Apache licensein tarball?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57812</link>
    <description>Hello.

There are droid fonts package in the tree. Author states that they are
apache licensed [1] (supposedly similar to google's android sdk) but
license itself is not included in the package (only .ttf files are
there). Should we RESTRICT="mirror" in such case or it's safe to drop
such restriction?

[1] http://damieng.com/blog/2007/11/14/droid-sans-mono-great-coding-font

Thank you for any hints,
</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Volkov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-19T13:25:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57806">
    <title>gnat-gpl-2008 has been SLOTted differently from -2008</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57806</link>
    <description>Hi All.

I have some information for those of you using Ada on this list (it appears 
there are quite a few, so, please drop those "all two people using.." 
jokes ;)).

I have found that the recently released -2008 version has some "incompatible 
bugs" with the -2007 version (NB: this is gnat-gpl, the ACT varian), which, 
in itself, is rather usial. However, this time these bugs directly affect one 
of the Ada libs in the tree - qtada, prohibitimg me from releasing a new 
version (the qtada-1.0.4 still requires precisely gnat-gpl-2007, hopefully 
qtada-1.1 will be less picky, but I haven't tested it yet).

Considering also, that many of you might want to test the latest ADA-2005 
features but may very well have some projects similarly sensitive to these 
bugs, I decided to SLOT gnat-gpl-2008 differently from the -2007 version 
(they were in the same SLOT, as they both use the same gcc backend version). 
Now, the -2008 version has SLOT="4.1-2008" while the -2007 one simply "4.1" 
(not that this precise value </description>
    <dc:creator>George Shapovalov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-19T12:13:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57787">
    <title>Packages up for grabs</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57787</link>
    <description>Good afternoon fellow developers,

There are three ebuilds that I used to maintain that I no longer have the hardware for.
I'm hoping that one of you could give them some love. Do assign the bugs to yourself, 
and please drop me from the relevant metadata.xml once you do.

They are:
media-video/nvidia-settings
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
sys-auth/thinkfinger

I used to have a Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook E8410-nVidia with a 8400M G, but have switched to 
a Lifebook S6410 that has Intel graphics. Previous to said Lifebooks, I used to own a 
ThinkPad X41. While my new laptops have a fingerprint scanner, it is not of the type that 
thinkfinger prefers.

Regards,
Tony V.
(Chainsaw)
</description>
    <dc:creator>Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-18T15:18:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57783">
    <title>[RFC] Add support for package.keywords in profiles?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57783</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi everyone,

At least a few people have expressed a desire to have support for a
package.keywords file in the profiles [1] as a means to add or
subtract any number values to or from the KEYWORDS that apply to a
given ebuild. This would allow a specific profile to alter which
packages are visible to consumers of a given keyword. This is useful
for profiles that differ from other profiles in some significant way
despite sharing the same values for stable and unstable keywords.
For example, embedded profiles which use uclibc instead of glibc.

An alternative solution for some cases might be to introduce
additional keywords values, such as those suggested in GLEP 22 [2].
However, the package.keywords approach may provide greater
simplicity and flexibility which would allow it to serve as a
solution for a larger number of use cases. For example, the uclibc
profiles would not have to maintain separate keywords for every
single package.

Since older versions of portag</description>
    <dc:creator>Zac Medico</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-18T00:24:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57782">
    <title>Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-08-17 23h59 UTC</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57782</link>
    <description>The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-08-17 23h59 UTC.

Removals:
games-arcade/blobwars           2008-08-16 20:31:23mr_bones_
games-arcade/project-starfighter2008-08-16 20:31:24mr_bones_
games-action/blobandconquer     2008-08-16 20:32:41mr_bones_
games-arcade/viruskiller        2008-08-16 22:32:38mr_bones_

Additions:
profiles/default/linux/alpha    2008-08-11 17:14:10armin76
dev-tex/sketch                  2008-08-12 17:30:57aballier
media-plugins/vdr-bgprocess     2008-08-14 19:45:23zzam
app-misc/gourmet                2008-08-15 03:09:28nixphoeni
dev-libs/faxpp                  2008-08-15 06:46:20dev-zero
sys-fs/s3fs                     2008-08-15 12:30:33caleb
app-misc/beanstalkd             2008-08-15 21:24:34caleb
sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs         2008-08-16 04:42:13vapier
media-libs/libpano13            2008-08-16 10:58:41maekke
media-gfx/autopano-sift-C       2008-08-16 11:07:16maekke
dev-python/pycou</description>
    <dc:creator>Robin H. Johnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-18T00:15:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57771">
    <title>News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57771</link>
    <description>As per glep 42 (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html) here 
is the required email for a new news item. This news item is important
because otherwise users will be missing updates to the system set if 
they continue updating their system with the usual emerge --update 
--deep world. Unless objections come out the new news item will be 
committed at the same time as rc8 (rc8 will have an update man portage 
page describing world_sets).

Title: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
Author: Petteri Räty &lt;betelgeuse&lt; at &gt;gentoo.org&gt;
Author: Zac Medico &lt;zmedico&lt; at &gt;gentoo.org&gt;
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2008-XX-XX
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: &gt;sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc8

As of Portage 2.2 the world set does not include the system
set any more. If you want emerge --update --deep &lt; at &gt;world to
update the system set too, you need to add &lt; at &gt;system to the new
world_sets file in /var/lib/portage/. For more information on
world_sets see man portage.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Petteri Räty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-16T19:39:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57764">
    <title>unwanted CVS keyword substitution on patch files</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57764</link>
    <description>Every once in a while, I get bitten by the $Id keyword replacement done
on patches in $FILESDIR.

Can we do something to fix this annoyance? If repoman cannot add -kb for
*.patch and *.diff files, at least it should verify you have added those
files with this options.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Alin Năstac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-16T10:26:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57763">
    <title>Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57763</link>
    <description>Hi,

Borg hasn't  been updated in portage for a while despite the fact that
new versions were released over a year ago (see
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184699 ). Therefor I suggest
app-office/borg gets removed from portage.

Regards,

Aniruddha






</description>
    <dc:creator>Aniruddha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-16T07:17:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57752">
    <title>imlib/imlib2 useflag inconsistency</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57752</link>
    <description>app-office/magicpoint/magicpoint-1.12a-r1.ebuild
app-office/magicpoint/magicpoint-1.13a.ebuild
kde-base/kdegraphics/kdegraphics-3.5.9.ebuild
media-gfx/gimageview/gimageview-0.2.27-r2.ebuild
www-client/w3mmee/w3mmee-0.3.2_p24-r4.ebuild
www-client/w3mmee/w3mmee-0.3.2_p24-r5.ebuild
www-client/w3mmee/w3mmee-0.3.2_p24-r6.ebuild
x11-misc/wmakerconf/wmakerconf-2.11.ebuild
x11-terms/mlterm/mlterm-2.9.3-r1.ebuild
x11-terms/mlterm/mlterm-2.9.4.ebuild
x11-terms/mlterm/mlterm-2.9.4-r1.ebuild
x11-wm/fvwm/fvwm-2.5.18-r1.ebuild
x11-wm/fvwm/fvwm-2.5.19.ebuild
x11-wm/fvwm/fvwm-2.5.21.ebuild
x11-wm/fvwm/fvwm-2.5.25.ebuild
x11-wm/fvwm/fvwm-2.5.26.ebuild
x11-wm/icewm/icewm-1.2.30.ebuild
x11-wm/icewm/icewm-1.2.30-r1.ebuild
x11-wm/icewm/icewm-1.2.32.ebuild
x11-wm/icewm/icewm-1.2.33.ebuild
x11-wm/icewm/icewm-1.2.34.ebuild
x11-wm/icewm/icewm-1.2.35.ebuild
app-office/texmacs/texmacs-1.0.6.14.ebuild
dev-libs/DirectFB-extra/DirectFB-extra-0.9.25.ebuild
dev-libs/DirectFB-extra/DirectFB-extra-1.0.0.ebuild
dev-libs/DirectFB-extra/DirectF</description>
    <dc:creator>Benedikt Morbach</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-14T19:56:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57738">
    <title>The Plethora of Patches</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57738</link>
    <description>It has become abundantly clear that distribution maintainers should have 
as few patches as possible.  Patches waste time due to duplicate work, 
resources (portage disk space and bandwidth), and as the Debian project 
recently found out after a major vulnerability was discovered in the 
OpenSSH packages (see http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/6094, and 
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30276 among others), they can become a 
source of great embarrassment, and liability since they are not nearly 
so well audited as code in heavily used mainstream projects (an 
unintentional Cathedral if you will).  I therefore propose the following 
changes:

Patches in the metadata.xml should have some sort of status tracking for 
each patch, repoman should flag any that don't, and warn on any that 
have not been submitted upstream unless the status is signed off on by a 
herd leader (such as Gentoo specific patches). This would provide visual 
feedback for users and developers with regard to a pretty important 
metric on how </description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew D Kirch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-14T02:17:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57725">
    <title>[GLEP 56] metadata.xml USE flag descriptions [Clarifications]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57725</link>
    <description>Howdy all,

Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this 
GLEP. My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to 
state that

&lt;flag name='png' /&gt;

Would be allowed. This syntax is not actually disallowed or allowed by 
the current GLEP, but mentioning it would allow a metadata.xml contain 
all the USE flags that appear in IUSE, even the global ones. By using 
the above syntax, it would simply state that there is no additional 
descriptions or details but to just use the use.desc description.

Further more, it would allow us in the future to make that mandatory and 
repoman would only have to check metadata.xml for your USE flag.

Comments, Suggestions, Input are all welcome.

--
Doug Goldstein
Gentoo Developer


</description>
    <dc:creator>Doug Goldstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-13T17:11:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57723">
    <title>[RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57723</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello again,

I'd like to get some feedback about what people would like to have
in the final EAPI 2. In planning for this EAPI bump, we should
strike a balance somewhere in between everything that we'd like to
have and whatever we can implement in a short period of time. It
doesn't really makes sense to delay the EAPI bump too much for
implementation of new features, since those features can simply be
reserved for a future EAPI bump.

The latest experiment EAPI is 2_pre2, supported by
[1] for addition information about the experimental EAPI extensions
which are summarized here:

 * The 'doman' helper function recognizes language codes in man page
   source files, and uses them to generate an appropriate
   installation path.

 * Dependency atoms can be constrained to match specific USE flag
   states, including USE conditional expressions embedded within
   the atoms themselves.

 * The old src_compile phase function is split into separate
   src_configure and </description>
    <dc:creator>Zac Medico</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-13T08:18:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57722">
    <title>One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for August</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57722</link>
    <description>This is your one-day friendly reminder !  The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net.  See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).

If you're supposed to show up, please show up.  If you're not supposed
to show up, then show up anyways and watch your Council monkeys dance
for you.

For more info on the Gentoo Council, feel free to browse our homepage:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/


</description>
    <dc:creator>Mike Frysinger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-13T03:01:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57721">
    <title>[RFC] Should we introduce PROPERTIES into the ebuild metadata cache on the rsync mirrors?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57721</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi everyone,

Please consider the introduction of a new "PROPERTIES" variable to
the ebuild metadata cache that's distributed via the rsync mirrors
and resides locally in the ${PORTDIR}/metadata/cache/ directory.
This variable is intended to have identical syntax to the existing
RESTRICT variable, including support for the USE conditional syntax
that is also supported by the LICENSE, PROVIDE, SRC_URI, and *DEPEND
variables.

The idea to introduce the PROPERTIES variable arose from discussion
about the introduction of a new RESTRICT value [1]. By using a new
PROPERTIES variable instead of the existing RESTRICT variable, we
will have two separate categories of boolean attributes. This will
be useful since some boolean attributes, such as "primaruri" and
"live-sources", have an inverted nomenclature when compared to the
other boolean attributes that currently exist within the RESTRICT
set, show here:

    binchecks - Disable all QA checks for binaries.

    bindist</description>
    <dc:creator>Zac Medico</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-13T00:01:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57717">
    <title>best way to use profiles and package.use.mask?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57717</link>
    <description>Okay, this is something that I've wondered about for a while, but need 
to ask -- what is the best way (do we even have a policy) for using 
package.use.mask in profiles?

A couple of specific questions:

If I need to mask a use flag because of use flag dependencies that won't 
work on a particular arch, do I need to contact the arch teams to modify 
their package.use.mask profile?  If the answer is yes, I can see that as 
a huge blocker since I'd have to wait on the arches to do something 
before I can even put an ebuild in the tree.  I realize this is a 
per-arch question depending on how each one might respond, but a common 
consensus would be good.

Are there ever any cases where we could just simply put the use flag as 
restricted in the global package.use.mask and then unrestrict them in 
the profiles ones if, for example, it only worked on one or a few 
arches?  Or is the best policy always to mask it on each profile?

As for a specific example, mplayer's dxr2/dxr3 use flag now pulls in a 
dependency </description>
    <dc:creator>Steve Dibb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-12T18:00:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57713">
    <title>Last rites: dev-python/twisted-{pair, xish, flow} anddev-python/twibber (Removal due 11 October 2008)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57713</link>
    <description>The following packages have been masked for removal in 30 days. 

dev-python/twisted-xish
dev-python/twisted-pair
dev-python/twisted-flow

They are either unmaintained or deprecated and they force downgrade on
the newly stable dev-python/twisted*-8.1.0

dev-python/twibber is also unmaintained and depends on twisted-xish
that is to be removed. 

See bug #231675 for reference.

Best regards, 

Jesus Rivero


</description>
    <dc:creator>Jesus Rivero</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-12T03:49:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57710">
    <title>Unmasking of qt 4.4?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57710</link>
    <description>Hi,

I'm maintaining a package of merkaartor in gentoo, of which the latest version 
requires qt 4.4. I'll mask that for now, but I'm not really happy with that.

I wanted to ask what are the showstoppers for qt 4.4 to get unmasked. The mask 
is commented with:
"Masked for testing, various dependencies still need to be updated..."

I don't like "masked for testing" comments (we have far to many of them), as 
it basically tells nothing. Testing what? How long?
For the dependencies, I think this isn't a showstopper either, as if you don't 
have split dependencies on qt, it'll just take the metapackage and everything 
is like before.

So question, what are the showstoppers for qt 4.4? And more general comment, 
especially on important packages that many people rely on, please provide 
more informative comments in package mask, e.g. bug numbers.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Hanno Böck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-11T15:26:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57693">
    <title>Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-08-10 23h59 UTC</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57693</link>
    <description>The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-08-10 23h59 UTC.

Removals:
www-apps/knowledgetree                  2008-08-09 21:22:58hoffie
dev-php4/ZendOptimizer                  2008-08-09 21:53:34robbat2
dev-php4/adodb-ext                      2008-08-09 21:53:34robbat2
dev-php4/creole                         2008-08-09 21:53:35robbat2
dev-php4/eaccelerator                   2008-08-09 21:53:36robbat2
dev-php4/ffmpeg-php                     2008-08-09 21:53:36robbat2
dev-php4/jargon                         2008-08-09 21:53:37robbat2
dev-php4/jpgraph                        2008-08-09 21:53:38robbat2
dev-php4/pecl-apc                       2008-08-09 21:53:38robbat2
dev-php4/pecl-crack                     2008-08-09 21:53:39robbat2
dev-php4/pecl-fileinfo                  2008-08-09 21:53:41robbat2
dev-php4/pecl-http                      2008-08-09 21:53:41robbat2
dev-php4/pecl-id3                       2008-08-09 21:53</description>
    <dc:creator>Robin H. Johnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-11T00:15:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57689">
    <title>Retirement</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57689</link>
    <description>
Hello list,

As usual with this kind of mails, this has been long overdue, but it's
about time that I retire from Gentoo.
For a while Gentoo hasn't been going into a direction I like, and to me
it doesn't look like that's about to change any time soon. Despite attempts
to convince me of the contrary, I'm not sure I see the technical
advancements that I'd like happening, in Gentoo. That aside there're
numerous non-technical problems behind the scenes, that most devs
probably acknowledge by now...
There're other projects in the Free-Software world that I currently
enjoy putting my time into more, I'm sure it's more than obvious to those
of you who know me which...

So long,
Ingmar Vanhassel, ex-Gentoo KDE developer.



</description>
    <dc:creator>Ingmar Vanhassel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-10T20:56:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57688">
    <title>Retirement</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57688</link>
    <description>My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active for 
several months. It is now clear to me that Gentoo is not moving in the 
direction I had wished for and the last council election indicates that most 
current Gentoo developers appear to be satisfied with this current direction. 
Therefore farewell. If anybody wants to reach me I can be reached at 
bo.andresen at zlin.dk.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Bo Ørsted Andresen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-10T22:26:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.gentoo.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.gentoo.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
