<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists">
    <title>gmane.linux.elitists</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12536"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12534"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12532"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12529"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12527"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12525"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12523"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12521"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12520"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12512"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12508"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12503"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12470"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12466"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12463"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12459"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12452"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12447"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12444"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12441"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12536">
    <title>RIP Ed Foster</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12536</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
linux-elitists mailing list
linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
</description>
    <dc:creator>Karsten M. Self</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-01T22:43:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12534">
    <title>Brett Glass speaks out against Net Neutrality</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12534</link>
    <description>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902077.html


</description>
    <dc:creator>Teh Entar-Nick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-31T14:56:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12532">
    <title>One more thing on DRM...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12532</link>
    <description>From the political news files:
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/26/michael-savage-lawsuit-ag_n_115103.html

  "In her ruling Friday, U.S. District Judge Susan
  Illston said people who listen to a public broadcast
  are entitled to use excerpts for purposes of comment
  and criticism."

Of course, if the comment and criticism had used a
circumvented copy of a DRM-restricted work, no such
exception applies.

Anyone got an example of a straight-up _political
speaker_ who's using a DRM-restricted format, and
a comment on or criticism of that speaker? 

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-27T21:49:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12529">
    <title>[rms&lt; at &gt;gnu.org: Re:  Defective By Design]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12529</link>
    <description>----- Forwarded message from Richard M Stallman &lt;rms&lt; at &gt;gnu.org&gt; -----

From: Richard M Stallman &lt;rms&lt; at &gt;gnu.org&gt;
CC: linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
Subject: Re: [linux-elitists] Defective By Design
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:14:51 -0400

    Is it just me, or is it the FSF that seems to have gone defective?

Maybe neither.  I think you and some others have misunderstood and
misjudged our protest.

    Their latest anti-iPhone campaign[1] crosses some lines I'm not too pleased
    with. They're urging people to setup a meatspace denial of service attack
    against the "Genius Bars" in Apple Stores world wide

That's not what we are doing.  We have asked people to go to Apple
stores and show Apple's staff their opposition to Apple's DRM.
Describing this with terms such as "denial of service" and
"disruption" is untrue.

Calling it an "attack" is an exaggeration.  When people go one by one
to a store and tell the staff what they think, that's not an attack.
When Apple implements DRM, when Apple deactivates unlocked iPhones</description>
    <dc:creator>Aaron Porter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-27T20:13:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12527">
    <title>Defective By Design</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12527</link>
    <description>
Is it just me, or is it the FSF that seems to have gone defective?
Their latest anti-iPhone campaign[1] crosses some lines I'm not too pleased
with. They're urging people to setup a meatspace denial of service attack
against the "Genius Bars" in Apple Stores world wide in an effort to
educate Apple about it's product is "restricting your freedoms".
They previously posted "5 reasons to avoid iPhone 3G"[2], a brief
but quite valid list of reasons users might want to avoid the iPhone
(curiously omitting the lack of any support for non-iTunes activation,
use, etc). Their last reason for avoiding the device -- "iPhone is not the
only option." seems to negate the militant tactics they're adopting now.
I've been a longtime supporter of the FSF (up to but not including
prefixing Linux with GNU), contributing my own time and money as well as
pushing through software "purchases" by my employers. I'm not sure I want
to be associated with the group after this.
Sure the iPhone is sexy, but there has been sexy hardwa</description>
    <dc:creator>Aaron Porter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-26T20:31:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12525">
    <title>Installfest for Schools</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12525</link>
    <description>Hi Folks:

I'm very pleased to announce that Untangle &amp; ACCRC have teamed up with LinuxWorld (Aug 5-7) for our second Installfest for Schools.  The first ACCRC/Untangle Installfest for Schools in March refurbished 350 Ubuntu computers for schools[1].  This time we've gotten a large booth on the expo floor and will have workstations setup for volunteers to refurbish recycled computers with Ubuntu and GnewSense.  We particularly need help with the following:

1)Installing Ubuntu and/or gNewSense  
2)Hacking older hardware and identifying good/bad components

You can signup for a work station here:

http://www.untangle.com/installfest

Also, if you know of a school in need of computers that’s willing to try GNU/Linux please nominate them here:

http://www.untangle.com/index.php?option=com_collect&amp;task=installfestNominate&amp;Itemid=1426

And if you have an older computer that you want to donate or recycle, please bring it to LinuxWorld.  ACCRC will have a collection booth setup and can provide tax deductable rece</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Fife</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-24T20:00:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12523">
    <title>Applications and the infamous DNS vulnerability</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12523</link>
    <description>On a properly set up home or office network, it should
be difficult to poison the nameserver completely
from the outside -- for a long time it's been best
practice to put your public DNS on a separate machine.

Of course an attacker can easily trick an application
on the inside into doing a bunch of DNS queries --
the simplest example is that a user could visit a
malicious web page with a bunch of images.

Should applications that handle untrusted data
be keeping track of the number of times they get
NXDOMAIN for subdomains of one domain -- some kind
of wrapper around getaddrinfo -- then refusing to
query again if there are so many that it looks like
an attack?  Maybe with a "I'm not looking up another
randomcrap.example.com domain for you" dialog, or
maybe just stop processing the offending web page or
whatever other data source is causing the queries?

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-24T16:40:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12521">
    <title>Obfuscated TCP</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12521</link>
    <description>Anyone following the "Obfuscated TCP" kernel patch
set and userspace library?
  http://code.google.com/p/obstcp/
Fast opportunistic crypto at the TCP level.

Looks like a useful way to make it difficult for
ISPs to use services such as Phorm and NebuAd to
collect user tracking data and ad revenue -- so
webmasters should be all over it.  And, of course,
it's protection against forged RST attacks.

Doesn't work if the attacker is willing to spend
more and do an MITM attack, though.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-18T17:16:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12520">
    <title>Spam complying with CAN SPAM</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12520</link>
    <description>Looks like the Marketing types of the world are
getting emboldened by our pro-spam FTC...
  http://weblog.infoworld.com/gripeline/archives/2008/06/ftc_says_yes_yo.html

I'm starting to see spam that looks like it traces
back to a semi-legit company.

Anyone else getting spam linking to disposable domain
names that copy the content from patchperfect dot
com -- with the company's actual contact info and an
apparently working unsubscribe link?

whois has officialtvwebsite822 dot com at the same
postal address as the original site:

6070 Mission Gorge Rd. Suite 1, San Diego, CA 92120.

Either this is a very good joe job, or it's another
attempt by DMA types to push the boundaries.

Looks like an opportunity for another Gevalia-style
lawsuit.  Of course, the infomercial impresarios
behind this grass seed company will start another
company selling something else, but there's probably
enough money to make it worthwhile for a small ISP
or mail host with a reasonably priced lawyer.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-14T18:10:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12512">
    <title>USB-Serial and pppd</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12512</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
linux-elitists mailing list
linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
</description>
    <dc:creator>Greg Folkert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-12T06:27:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12508">
    <title>eee-pc 900 FLOSS impurity [was Re: attack of thelow-cost ultra-mobile linux boxen]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12508</link>
    <description>
Yes, quite possibly.  But I'm willing to accept
baby steps in our direction.  While fully GPL-free
drivers are very much the ideal, I'll take BSD-free
as two steps forward, and semi-proprietary as
one step forward away from Microsoft-world.

I think this strategy is more effective than the
FSF-style all-or-nothing confontational approach.
It's more in line with Linus' and Ubuntu's
approach and look where it's got them vs FSF.
Heck, even Debian is not hostile to proprietary
software; they just say it won't be in Debian.

Anyhow, there's no pure Libre laptop in this
class and I think it's a huge step ahead to
(a) have Linux installed and (b) see the
manufacturer cooperate with and document
other peripherals not of its own manufacture
that work with it.


I hope not, but I'm not such a purist that
I'll avoid all proprietary software: I think
infrastructure (OS) should be Free, and more
importantly, that file and network standards
should be Free, but I don't mind letting the
market decide about apps, as long as</description>
    <dc:creator>Tony Godshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-19T21:32:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12503">
    <title>attack of the low-cost ultra-mobile linux boxen</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12503</link>
    <description>I was tempted by the eee-pc but stayed out
because of the screen (800 pixels wide?  heck,
my cell phone does that!).  To me, a device
needs 1024 wide to render a web page properly
(due to rigid web designers) and at least 100dpi.

But now with the HP2133 coming out (ship
date ETA 6/1 at last visit to HP.com) I looked
around again I found that there's now an eee-pc
with a bigger, sharper screen, and another very
interesting ultraportable: the wibrain (heheh).

I post here the specs I collected in the hopes it'll save someone else
some trouble:

wibrain b1lh   1024x600   4.8"   247dpi1.15lb$499512M RAM       30G
    VIA C7M 1.2GHz CPULinux/Ubuntudynamism.com or redorbit.com
wibrain b1le   1024x600   4.8"   247dpi1.15lb$6491G RAM
60G     VIA C7M 1.2GHz CPULinux/Ubuntudynamism.com or redorbit.com

eee pc 900    1024x600   8.9"   133dpi2.1lb$5501G RAM           20G
    IntelLinux/Susecentralcomputer

hp 2133         1280x1024 8.9"   184dpi2.8lb $550512M RAM
20G     VIA C7-M 1.2 GhzLinuxKR922UT</description>
    <dc:creator>Tony Godshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-19T17:36:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12470">
    <title>What would be the proper course of action for apossible GPL violation?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12470</link>
    <description>All,

   As some of you may have seen on slashdot there is an announcement that all 
asus mobo's will in the near future contain built in splashtop Linux desktop.  
Being the curious monkey I am.  I go to the site and start looking for 
packages and source.  Just to see what it is I'm dealing with.

  Not only am I not finding a path to source, but I saw this page and the 
following paragraph contained within.  

http://www.splashtop.com/aboutus-corporate.php

&lt;snip&gt;
DeviceVM is releasing its first software product, Splashtop, in October of 
2007. Splashtop is a proprietary technology developed by DeviceVM that 
provides users with a rapid-start alternative to the traditional operating 
system.
&lt;/snip&gt;

Now before people start calling me alarmist.  I'm not trying to raise a call 
to arms, and I do understand business.  What I'm looking for is the proper 
method to follow to find the people able to assist DeviceVM in working with 
GPL'd software, and complying with it's license.  

Suggestions?

James
</description>
    <dc:creator>James Sparenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-15T02:55:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12466">
    <title>micro-linux servers powered over ethernet?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12466</link>
    <description>All,

We've got a possible application for a tiny linux server. The form 
factor would be small, USB-key sized, and they'd need to have an 
ethernet port and draw their power from a PoE socket.

(The specific application is plugging them into old ethernet switches, 
and the devices would emit LLDP packets, thus allowing us to 
topology-discover our network)

Anyone know of such a thing?
</description>
    <dc:creator>Phil Mayers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-14T16:03:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12463">
    <title>So, how about those 46 Patent Court Judges...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12463</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
linux-elitists mailing list
linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
</description>
    <dc:creator>Greg Folkert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-06T21:05:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12459">
    <title>Deploying server apps with git hooks?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12459</link>
    <description>Is anyone using a git repository with an appropriate
hook script to deploy a server-side application?

You could do something like "git push staging" or
"git push live" on your own repository, and a hook on
the server takes care of checking out and deploying
the software, and running any necessary init scripts.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-05T19:04:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12452">
    <title>Announcement: FreedomHEC 2008</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12452</link>
    <description>FreedomHEC 2008, the Linux device driver
"unconference", will take place November 8-9, 2008
in Santa Monica, California, following WinHEC in Los
Angeles.  Plan to attend and learn why Linux support
has become an industry standard requirement for new
hardware, and how you can get your products supported
under Linux quickly and conveniently for customers.


Who:   Hardware engineers, driver developers, you.

What:  Device driver unconference

Where: Santa Monica, California, USA

When:  November 8-9, 2008

Why:   Make your hardware valuable to the growing
       Linux market.


At FreedomHEC, participants will learn how the Linux
driver development process works, differently from
the complex processes used to develop drivers for
proprietary operating systems.  The kernel team and
the Linux distributions take on much of the build,
test, and support work for a driver, freeing up the
hardware manufacturer's driver team to concentrate
on the core code.

You'll also have an opportunity to discuss your driver
develo</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-28T23:37:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12447">
    <title>NYLXS Press Release on the OLPC Project</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12447</link>
    <description>In response to many of the questions regarding the changes in the
OLPC project, and specifically the decision to base the project at
this juncture to a Microsoft Operating System, proponents of this
change have come out swinging against Free Software developers who
have worked for the current Free Interface, code named Sugar.  A
large segment of the critique of the against Free Software developers
like Bender is that they have put their "Open Source" agenda above the
welfare of the project.  Others claim that the "Open Source" advocates
should be pleased with the what has already been done and that the
project as it stands can either be relaunched or has already met
goals.

The problem, though, is that in many ways, the marketing and financial
positioning of the OLPC program is harder to develop then the hardware
and software. And the goals that have been met are small in light of
the original mission of the OLPC project.

An operating system is more than a commodity.  It becomes the looking
glass that devel</description>
    <dc:creator>Ruben Safir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-26T18:15:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12444">
    <title>Privacy project</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12444</link>
    <description>Hi all,

I started an open source project to enhance privacy. A lot is going on 
in Europa (actually the US too) that needs some attention. The whole 
story is below in the original posting. I would like to encourage 
everybody who feels like lurking or joining to mail me: 
brenno&lt; at &gt;dewinter.com and I'll put you on the list. Of course I won't 
start spamming this list now. This is a one off post and people that 
know me, know also that this is an urgent matter.

Cheers,

Brenno de winter



Dear all,

As promised I would kick-off a mailinglist on privacy in order to build
an open source project. I tried it off-list for some time, but it is
hard to get things going in a direction. So I start over without any
prejudice to technologies or solutions. Let the wisdom of the crowd take
care of the project. You're on the list, because we discussed this and
you wanted to lurk or participate. The list of members is not public, so
if you lurk you are not giving away your identity.

*Anecdote*
Today I flew back home from </description>
    <dc:creator>Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter, wgasa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-14T09:06:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12441">
    <title>Research Project: Legislation that impactsinformation rights</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12441</link>
    <description>
Greetings,

As Ilan and I attempt to document all of the various ways that the US 
government has tweaked (butchered?) IP laws, I was wondering if anyone can 
help pull together the pieces of legislation that I should look at. So far, 
I have these:

Federal government -

DMCA 1998
Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2007 (HR811)
FAIR USE Act of 2007 ( H.R. 1201)
PERFORM Act  (S. 256)
Open Government Act 2007 (S. 849 / H.R. 1309)
Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO IP) Act of 2007
H.R.1908 - Patent Reform Act of 2007
The Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act of 2004  (S.2560)
Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act of 2003 (HR 107)
Digital Media Consumer's Rights Act of 2005 (H.R.1201)
H.R. 3155: Intellectual Property Enhanced Criminal Enforcement Act of
2007
H. Res. 231, H.Res. 169,  and (H.R. 170 the Sunlight Act of 2007)

And on a California state level:

California Induce Act SB 96 (2005)
California  AB1668 - ODF / Open Standards in Government


If you can think of any more, whethe</description>
    <dc:creator>John Mark Walker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-09T08:48:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12438">
    <title>BytesFree.org Call for Participation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12438</link>
    <description>
Greetings, 

We at BytesFree.org are putting out a call for participation and wanted
to share with LUG's and other Free Software-friendly groups what we are 
up to and why we need your help. We are currently in the process of, but 
have not yet completed, incorporating as a non-profit in California. 

If you're going to Lug Radio Live this weekend, we hope to see you in
our booth: http://lugradio.org/live/USA2008/


Our Mission

BytesFree.org is a group of concerned citizens dedicated to the
protection of information rights - the right to access information we
own. Some of us you may already know - myself, Ilan Rabinovitch from
SCALE, Deb Bryant from GOSCON, Josh Berkus from PostgreSQL, Sun and SPI,
Josh Drake from PostgreSQL and SPI, and David Fetter, also from PostgreSQL,
as well as a few others. As far as what we do, here's our mission statement:

    BytesFree.org is dedicated to the idea that all people should have full
and unrestricted access to all information to which they are legally or
morally ent</description>
    <dc:creator>John Mark Walker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-08T06:21:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.elitists">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.elitists</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
