<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana">
    <title>gmane.ietf.pana</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/879"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/877"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/858"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/853"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/850"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/836"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/825"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/822"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/821"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/815"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/814"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/787"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/786"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/784"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/783"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/781"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/774"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/772"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/770"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/767"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/879">
    <title>"PRF key" in RFC 5191 Section 8.5</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/879</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I got a question from my colleague about meaning of "PRF key" in the
following text in Section 8.5:

"
1. The PaC and the PAA each are likely to be able to compute a
random nonce (according to [RFC4086]). The length of the nonce
has to be 1/2 the length of the PRF key (e.g., 10 octets in the
case of HMAC-SHA1).

2. The PaC and the PAA each are not trusted with regard to the
computation of a random nonce (according to [RFC4086]). The
length of the nonce has to have the full length of the PRF key
(e.g., 20 octets in the case of HMAC-SHA1).
"

As far as I remember, "PRF key" means "output block of the negotiated
pseudo-random function used in prf+". So HMAC-SHA1 is prf, the output
block length is 20 octets.

Please let me know if you interpret "PRF key" in the above text in other
ways.

Best Regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-21T01:27:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/877">
    <title>OpenPANA and PANA Relay Implementation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/877</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all,

As you may know, University of Murcia (Spain) published a PANA source code named OpenPANA to sourceforge. We have updated the source code to support PANA Relay (PRE) RFC 6345 and improved previous OpenPANA version.

The PRE implementation is also written in C language.

The link where you can download the project is http://openpana.sourceforge.net/

It is also worth noting that we have developed a PANA client (PaC) implementation in Contiki SO (PANATIKI) that can be downloaded from 

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpana/files/panatiki-0.1.tar.gz/download

It has been tested in Jennic JN5139 Wireless Microcontroller.

Any comment and feedback is welcome.

Please contact the mailing list associated to the project to obtain any help openpana-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net

Best regards and many thanks.

-------------------------------------------------------
Rafael Marin Lopez, PhD
Dept. Information and Communications Engineering (DIIC)
Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia
30100 Murcia -&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rafa Marin Lopez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T14:06:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/858">
    <title>[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5191 (2997)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/858</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5191,
"Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5191&amp;amp;eid=2997

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Yoshihiro Ohba &amp;lt;yoshihiro.ohba&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;toshiba.co.jp&amp;gt;

Section: 8.4

Original Text
-------------
The Key-Id AVP (AVP Code 4) is of type Integer32 and contains an MSK identifier.  

Corrected Text
--------------
The Key-Id AVP (AVP Code 4) is of type Unsigned32 and contains an MSK identifier.  

Notes
-----
The Correct Text will be consistent with the following text in Section 5.3, "The Key-Id AVP is of type Unsigned32..."

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>RFC Errata System</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-14T06:52:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/853">
    <title>RFC 6345 errata</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/853</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;My colleague Tanaka-san found out a potential error in RFC 6345 (PANA
relay).

The following paragraph in Section 2:

"
When the PRE receives the PRY message, it retrieves the PAA-
originated PANA message from the Relayed-Message AVP and the PaC's
IP address and UDP port number from and PaC-Information AVPs.  The
PAA-originated PANA message is sent to the PaC's IP address with
the source UDP port number set to the PANA port number (716) and
the destination UDP port number set to the UDP port number contained
in the Relayed-Message AVP.
"

should read:

"
When the PRE receives the PRY message, it retrieves the PAA-
originated PANA message from the Relayed-Message AVP and the PaC's
IP address and UDP port number from and PaC-Information AVPs.  The
PAA-originated PANA message is sent to the PaC's IP address with
the source UDP port number set to the PANA port number (716) and
the destination UDP port number set to the UDP port number contained
in the PaC-Information AVP.
"

(s/Relayed-Message/PaC-Information/ i&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-13T13:50:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/850">
    <title>Open source PANA implementation (OpenPANA)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/850</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all,

I hope this information is useful for you.

I am pleased to announce that University of Murcia (Spain) has published a PANA source code named OpenPANA to sourceforge. The implementation is written in C language and it is able to interact with a backend RADIUS server.

The link where you can download the project is http://openpana.sourceforge.net/

Please contact the mailing list associated to the project to obtain any help openpana-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net

Best regards and many thanks.

-------------------------------------------------------
Rafael Marin Lopez, PhD
Dept. Information and Communications Engineering (DIIC)
Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia
30100 Murcia - Spain
Telf: +34868888501 Fax: +34868884151 e-mail: rafa&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;um.es
-------------------------------------------------------




_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rafa Marin Lopez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-29T11:41:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/836">
    <title>Fwd: [IANA #454490] Last Call: &lt;draft-ohba-pana-relay-03.txt&gt; (Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Relay Element) to Proposed Standard</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/836</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We have received the following question from IANA.

Since the 'R' (Request) bit is not set for PANA-Relay, I think it
should be filled with "Ans" (not "Req").

BTW, I've found that PCI, for which the 'R' (Request) bit is not set,
is filled with "Req" in the IANA registry.  I think this should have
been filled with "Ans" as well.

Any opinions?

Yoshihiro Ohba

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [IANA #454490] Last Call: &amp;lt;draft-ohba-pana-relay-03.txt&amp;gt;
(Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Relay
Element) to Proposed Standard
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:37:04 +0000
From: Amanda Baber via RT &amp;lt;drafts-lastcall&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;iana.org&amp;gt;
Reply-To: drafts-lastcall&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;iana.org
CC: paduffy&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;cisco.com, samitac2&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com,
robert.cragie&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gridmerge.com, yoshihiro.ohba&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;toshiba.co.jp,
alper.yegin&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;yegin.org, iesg&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org

IESG:

IANA has reviewed draft-ohba-pana-relay-03.txt and has the following
comments:

IANA has questions about the IANA Actions in this document.

IANA understands that, upon approval of this &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-09T03:46:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/825">
    <title>RFC 5191 Key-Id data type inconsistency</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/825</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;There is inconsistency about Key-Id data type as follows:

In Section 5.3, "The Key-Id AVP is of type Unsigned32 ..."

In Section 8.4, "The Key-Id AVP (AVP Code 4) is of type Integer32 ..."

The text in Section 8.4 seems incorrect, and should be corrected to:
"The Key-Id AVP (AVP Code 4) is of type Unsigned32 ..."

Regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-12T07:44:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/822">
    <title>[Pana] PANA relay implementation status</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/822</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I would like to note that PANA relay (and RFC 5191 of course)  is
being implemented by a couple of ZigBee vendors and showing successful
interoperability in ZigBee IP mesh networking environment.

I guess this is something people on this ML wanted to know.

Regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-15T16:07:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/821">
    <title>[Pana] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ohba-pana-relay-03</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/821</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We have updated pana-relay draft, incorporating all received comments
and associated discussions.

Thanks,
Yoshihiro Ohba

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ohba-pana-relay-03
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:13:23 -0800 (PST)
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool &amp;lt;idsubmission&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org&amp;gt;
To: yoshihiro.ohba&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;toshiba.co.jp
CC: paduffy&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;cisco.com, samitac2&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com,
robert.cragie&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gridmerge.com, alper.yegin&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;yegin.org


A new version of I-D, draft-ohba-pana-relay-03.txt has been
successfully submitted by Yoshihiro Ohba and posted to the IETF
repository.

Filename: draft-ohba-pana-relay
Revision: 03
Title: Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access
(PANA) Relay Element
Creation_date: 2011-02-04
WG ID: Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 12

Abstract:
This document specifies Protocol for carrying Authentication for
Network Access (PANA) Relay Element functionality which enables PANA
messaging between a PANA Client (PaC) and a PANA Authentication Agent
(PAA) wher&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-08T00:24:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/815">
    <title>[Pana] FW: Token (was RE: Secdir review of draft-ohba-pana-relay)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/815</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Resending to the list...

-----Original Message-----
From: Alper Yegin [mailto:alper.yegin&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;yegin.org] 
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:32 AM
To: 'Yoshihiro Ohba'; 'Alan DeKok'
Cc: 'secdir&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org'; 'draft-ohba-pana-relay&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;tools.ietf.org';
'margaretw42&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com'; 'Ralph Droms'; 'paduffy&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;cisco.com';
'samitac&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ipinfusion.com'; 'robert.cragie&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gridmerge.com'; 'pana&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org'
Subject: Token (was RE: Secdir review of draft-ohba-pana-relay)

Alan,


Arbitrary traffic cannot pass the validation on the PaC, as the sequence
numbers need to match. And there is also state machine match needed. PaC's
is in certain state and would not react to any arbitrary message unless the
message is expected in the current state.

Alper
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alper Yegin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-14T08:40:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/814">
    <title>[Pana] FW: PRE enforcing message validity (was RE: Secdir review ofdraft-ohba-pana-relay)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/814</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Resending to the list.....

-----Original Message-----
From: Alper Yegin [mailto:alper.yegin&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;yegin.org] 
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 10:28 AM
To: 'Yoshihiro Ohba'; 'Alan DeKok'
Cc: 'secdir&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org'; 'draft-ohba-pana-relay&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;tools.ietf.org';
'margaretw42&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com'; 'Ralph Droms'; 'paduffy&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;cisco.com';
'samitac&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ipinfusion.com'; 'robert.cragie&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gridmerge.com'; 'pana&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org'
Subject: PRE enforcing message validity (was RE: Secdir review of
draft-ohba-pana-relay)

Hi Alan,

Thank you for the review.


Is the concern that a rogue PRE injecting bogus PANA messages towards the
PaC, or a legitimate PRE relaying bogus PANA messages injected by some rogue
PAA?




Why not let the PaC deal with this? It already performs such checks.


Alper
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alper Yegin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-14T08:40:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/787">
    <title>[Pana] Security Comment: draft-ohba-pana-relay-02.txt</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/787</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,

As part of asking the Security Directorate to review draft-ohba-pana- 
relay-02.txt, I reviewed the Security Considerations section and tried  
to determine how/if this relay changes the security model for PANA.

As I understand it, the original PANA protocol relied on return  
routability...  We didn't worry about address spoofing, because the  
credentials were returned to the address they were meant for, meaning  
that only an on-link (or on path? -- but we didn't allow a path  
originally) attacker could spoof a client address and see the  
response.  With introduction of relay code on the PAA, any node can  
pretend to be a PRE
and get credentials for any other node.

This isn't mentioned in the Security considerations section, but it is  
potentially significant.  So, there might be a need for the PAA to  
authorize the PRE before responding to messages from it.  If there is  
some reason why you don't believe the PAA needs to authorize the PRE,  
you would (at the very least) need to explain &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Margaret Wasserman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-19T20:28:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/786">
    <title>[Pana] draft-ohba-pana-relay-02.txt</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/786</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Pana Relay Authors,

I've been asked to shepherd draft-ohba-pana-relay-02.txt for RFC
publication as a standards track document.  As part of that process, I
am required to perform my own review of the document before doing a
document write-up.  During my review, I found several issues that
should be resolved before this draft is published.

I'll start with a question: Before I read this draft, I was under the
impression that the Pana Relay would forward Pana messages between an
unmodified Pana Client (PAC) and an unmodified Pana Authentication
Agent (PAA), allowing Pana to be used on networks, such as 6lowpan
networks, that have multi-hop links.  However, the mechanism in this
draft requires modifications to the PAA to support a new message type
for relayed messages.  Are the expected users of this technology
aware that an updated PAA will be required?  Is there reason to believe
that updated PAAs will be available?

Now onto issues with the document text...

SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES:

S1) It appears that this &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Margaret Wasserman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-19T17:50:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/784">
    <title>[Pana] PANA relay draft</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/784</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;A new draft extending PANA has been published: "Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) Relay Element", draft-ohba-pana-relay-02.  This document will be advanced to the IESG as an AD-sponsored individual submission.  As part of the process, I'd like to get external review of the document.  Please read the draft and reply to pana&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org with any comments.  Thanks.

- Ralph
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ralph Droms</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-16T10:46:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/783">
    <title>[Pana] CPANA available</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/783</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all,

I am pleased to announce that Toshiba published PANA source code
written in C language (CPANA) to sourceforge.

The project webpage is http://cpana.sourceforge.net/.

The best way to get help with its software is by sending email to its
mailing list at cpana-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.sourceforge.net.

Hope this helps,

Yoshihiro Ohba
Toshiba Corporation
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-23T05:43:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/781">
    <title>[Pana] FW: I-D Action:draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-01.txt</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/781</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Please see below for the revised version of this I-D.


-----Original Message-----
From: i-d-announce-bounces&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:00 AM
To: i-d-announce&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-01.txt 

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.

Title           : Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network
Access (PANA) with IPv4 Unspecified Address
Author(s)       : A. Yegin, et al.
Filename        : draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-01.txt
Pages           : 9
Date            : 2010-03-08

This document defines how PANA client (PaC) can perform PANA authentication
prior to configuring an IP address.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-01.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MI&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alper Yegin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-09T08:45:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/774">
    <title>[Pana] FW: I-D Action:draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-00.txt</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/774</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Comments are welcome.


-----Original Message-----
From: i-d-announce-bounces&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 3:00 PM
To: i-d-announce&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-00.txt 

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.

Title           : Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network
Access (PANA) with IPv4 Unspecified Address
Author(s)       : A. Yegin, Y. Ohba
Filename        : draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-00.txt
Pages           : 9
Date            : 2010-03-01

This document defines how PANA client (PaC) can perform PANA authentication
prior to configuring an IP address.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yegin-pana-unspecified-addr-00.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
impleme&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alper Yegin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-01T14:47:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/772">
    <title>[Pana] PANA implementation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/772</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Georgopoulos, Panagiotis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-02T15:36:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/770">
    <title>[Pana] draft on PANA IANA update</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/770</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

We have written a draft to update RFC 5191 IANA rules, relaxing them a 
bit. This makes it possible to process drafts such as the preauth draft, 
which is experimental but allocates a bit in the header.

It would be great to get reviews of this draft.

Here's the URL: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-arkko-pana-iana-00.txt

Jari
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jari Arkko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-01T05:26:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/767">
    <title>[Pana] I-D Action:draft-ietf-pana-panaoverdsl-01.txt</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/767</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access Working Group of the IETF.


Title           : Application of PANA framework to DSL networks
Author(s)       : L. Morand, et al.
Filename        : draft-ietf-pana-panaoverdsl-01.txt
Pages           : 25
Date            : 2010-01-25

This document provides guidelines for PANA deployment over DSL access
networks.  The document specifically describes the introduction of
PANA in DSL networks migrating from a traditional PPP access model to
a pure IP-based access environment.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pana-panaoverdsl-01.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
Internet-Draft.
__________________________&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Internet-Drafts&lt; at &gt;ietf.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-25T14:30:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/765">
    <title>[Pana] [Fwd: New Version Notification -draft-ietf-pana-preauth-08.txt]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.pana/765</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Changes from the previous version:

- Changed the intended status to Experimental.

- Made clarification on CPAA discovery to provide IP address 
of CPAA as the output.

- Made 802.21 Information Service an optional CPAA discovery 
mechanism.

Regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification - 
draft-ietf-pana-preauth-08.txt
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:45:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Internet-Draft&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;ietf.org
To: pana-chairs&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;tools.ietf.org, 
draft-ietf-pana-preauth&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;tools.ietf.org, jari.arkko&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;piuha.net

New version (-08) has been submitted for 
draft-ietf-pana-preauth-08.txt.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pana-preauth-08.txt
Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed

Diff from previous version:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pana-preauth-08

IETF Secretariat.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Yoshihiro Ohba</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-15T06:42:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.ietf.pana">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.ietf.pana</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
