<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep">
    <title>gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6373"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6363"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6357"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6354"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6341"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6332"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6328"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6324"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6318"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6312"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6288"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6279"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6278"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6274"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6270"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6252"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6236"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6208"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6189"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6183"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6373">
    <title>Littele Question about litestep.com</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6373</link>
    <description>Hi &lt; at &gt; all

here is a little question at josh or at the ls dev Team

What will happen with litestep.com?

There is not really much this time. But I'm glad to see changes there.

By the way:

What's about to put links to all available LiteSTEP sites on the net.

There are not so much that time.

Best Regards

Joachim
</description>
    <dc:creator>LiteSTEP.de Mailing List account</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-15T20:56:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6363">
    <title>LiteStep on Vista</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6363</link>
    <description>Fellow 'Steppers,

I have recently come over a new laptop with Vista
pre-installed. I will definitely not work without LiteStep,
so I face the task of either installing XP (forfeiting, e.g.
Office 2007) or dealing with hiccups in using LS.
How usable is the very latest, unstable version under Vista?
Has there been any significant progress since the last State
of the Step in April, where it said: "Still, LiteStep 0.24.8
should be usable on Vista. Maybe not the Betas, but the
final release should."
How far are you guys?

Thanks for keeping LiteStep up to date!

Bjoern


</description>
    <dc:creator>Bjoern Brembs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-07T10:49:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6357">
    <title>LiteStep 0.24.8 Release Candidate 1</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6357</link>
    <description>Hello fellow LiteSteppers!

Thanks to the efforts of Acidfire, ilmcuts, jugg, Maduin and Tobbe the 
LiteStep Development Team is happy to announce LiteStep 0.24.8 Release 
Candidate 1.

More information and downloads are available at: http://www.lsdev.org/

We expect this release to be a drop-in replacement for 0.24.7.  If you 
have *any* issues (minor or large) please be sure to inform us about 
them rather than working around the issue and not telling us.  We'd much 
appreciate it.  You can contact us at our team address: devteam [at] 
lsdev.org or right here on the mailing list.

Happy LiteStepping,
- The LiteStep Development Team


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


</description>
    <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-31T22:21:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6354">
    <title>non-english litestep websites?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6354</link>
    <description>What active non-english LiteStep community portals are out there?

I'm currently remembering www.litestep.de and www.litestep-france.net

Any others?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


</description>
    <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-11T17:20:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6341">
    <title>Windows OS Poll</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6341</link>
    <description>Please take a moment to participate in this poll on litestep.net:

http://www.litestep.net/index.php?section=4&amp;action=view&amp;catId=1&amp;id=6555

If you do not want to vote at litestep.net, feel free to respond here. 
But please don't do both.  Thanks.

What is the oldest Windows OS that you use LiteStep on?
  Windows 95
  Windows 98 SE
  Windows ME
  Windows NT 4.0
  Windows 2000
  Windows XP Home Edition
  Windows XP Professional
  Windows Server 2003
  Windows Vista Home
  Windows Vista (Other)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


</description>
    <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-20T23:52:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6332">
    <title>State of the Step April 2008</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6332</link>
    <description>Dear LiteSteppers,

When you least expect it... an update from your friendly LiteStep
Development Team:

Welcome to the April 2008 edition of the State of the Step!

On the agenda this time:

1. The Development Team
2. LiteStep vs. Litestep
3. LiteStep 0.24.8
4. Windows Vista
5. In Closing...

Go!


1. The Development Team
- A(nother) new lineup
-------------------------

Development at a snail's pace... and that's being nice. jugg and I
(ilmcuts) have been working on the core on and off, but that's hardly
enough to fulfill the expectations. Thus we went out recruiting people.
Of the several people we contacted, we are proud to announce that three
have accepted the offer. Welcome, Acidfire, Tobbe, and Xjill!

This means the devteam now is:

Acidfire
ilmcuts
jugg
Tobbe
Xjill

Even with the new lineup it will be very hard to follow through with
everything we need and would like to do. We're trying our best but very
much want and need any help we can get.  We hope that others we have
talked to will decide to wo</description>
    <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-14T05:53:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6328">
    <title>Litestep.Info</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6328</link>
    <description>As some of you might remember, there was a large amount of talk 
semi-recently regarding bringing litestep.info back online. A lot of 
talk, not much action, both on here and on West's board (which seems to 
be down :-( )

The site's intent was to be an "informative", user-friendly place for 
new and prospective users.

Anyhow, I thought it prudent to ask YOU, the litestep users, what sort 
of ideas could be seen as "informative" and thus, something to be 
considered as content for the site.

As I recall, things "we" DON'T want:

    * Forums -- We have enough of these. I don't really think having
      forums is necessary.
    * Wiki -- Dont think another one of this is needed either, as we
      already have one: http://wiki.litestep.com.ar/Index (Note:
      Although, I like the idea of a wiki.litestep.info mirror/redirect
      thing)
    * Themes -- We have SEVERAL sites that cover this as well. Also,
      doesn't fit into the scope of the site either.


Things we "do" like/want:

    * Module Document</description>
    <dc:creator>Darrin Roenfanz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-12T03:05:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6324">
    <title>Long time no type!</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6324</link>
    <description>Greeting all! I know it has been a while since I have been on here, but
I found something that I thought I would share with the group.

 

http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/5/5b/Windowsvistamarketing.j
pg

 

Paul Hale
Sales Analyst

 

Berry Network, Inc
3170 Kettering Blvd

Dayton, OH 45432

Phone 937.296.2301
Fax 937.296.4742

www.berrynetwork.com &lt;http://www.berrynetwork.com/&gt; 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential, proprietary and or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender
and delete the material from all computers.

This electronic mail message was sent from L. M. Berry &amp; Company or Berry Network, In</description>
    <dc:creator>Hale, Paul</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-21T20:38:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6318">
    <title>lsdev download link</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6318</link>
    <description>Was Re: "OTS3"

fractal.design wrote:
 &gt; Can jugg or ilmcuts or whoever at lsdev tell me the url for the
 &gt; "latest stable build". One that wont change and still provide the
 &gt; latest public core package.

?  you need a direct download for a tool, or a url to refer people to?

www.lsdev.org will always have the downloads available.  If you need a 
link to the last release, one is currently at:

http://www.lsdev.org/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=lsdev:downloads:ls-0.24.7.zip

If you're desiring a generic url, please let me know for what purpose so 
we can see if a solution can be had.

chris


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


</description>
    <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-07T03:14:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6312">
    <title>"OTS3"</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6312</link>
    <description>Greetings,

yet again i come in peace and with an anouncement regarding the litestep
distribution that could be ots3:

Since Andymon released his great ThemeManager (
http://www.ls-universe.info/news.php?item.455.1 ) with support for ots3, i
have all the tools required for a "normal" Litestep distribution. So i
made one :]


Features:

- a neat installer
- full ots2 compability (if not its a bug)
- no additional requirements ( "no python" )
- all that ots3 stuff (
http://www.ls-themes.org/index.php?cat=article&amp;show=ots3 )


Why use it?

While nothing speaks *against* using it, there are only meta benefits from
using it either.
What i mean by that is that nothing will change if you just install and
use it. How could it, since your theme will stay the same and there are no
ots3 themes so far.

There is only one reason to use it: *If* you improve it, everyone,  
including
you, can benefit from it. OTS2 wont change anymore, but OTS3 can and will
benefit from your help!

So, if i you want to try it, please do and</description>
    <dc:creator>Jochen Ritzel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-30T18:21:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6288">
    <title>LOSI nightly?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6288</link>
    <description>Hey Tobbe,

Can you please build the installer more often?
Release a version every news bite ;)

I wanna see what your up to! :D
</description>
    <dc:creator>fractal.design</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-07T05:46:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6279">
    <title>LOSI 0.0.9</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6279</link>
    <description>That's right folks, a new version of LOSI is released! Read all about
it and download your copy at http://tlundberg.com/LOSI/

Happy new year!

//Tobbe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


</description>
    <dc:creator>Tobbe Lundberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-30T00:17:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6278">
    <title>French translation of LOSI</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6278</link>
    <description>I'm getting ready to release a new version of LOSI. In fact, the only
things missing right now are the German and French language strings.
I've got help with the German part, but need someone to translate the
English language strings to French. I have some of the strings already
translated from an earlier version of the installer, but a few strings
has been added and/or modified since then.

Here are the language strings: http://tlundberg.com/LOSI/LanguageStrings.nsh

All the ... in the French part of that file needs to be replaced with
something meaningful.

Thanks in advance and Happy Holidays!

//Tobbe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


</description>
    <dc:creator>Tobbe Lundberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-25T00:55:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6274">
    <title>LSX Command &gt; Add text to file</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6274</link>
    <description>Hi Everyone,

I'm trying to track my time at work.  I was hoping to use LSXCommand (plus
any needed modules) to do something like:

?tracker "Some Client &gt; I did this for them"

And it would simply write the string to a file and add a timestamp if
possible.

Anybody have any recommendations on how to get this started?  Thanks!
</description>
    <dc:creator>Ace McKool</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-10T19:22:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6270">
    <title>Vista DWM</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6270</link>
    <description>Hullo,

I've just installed Vista in a side-by-side setup with XP, and even
though I haven't gotten around to testing LS on it yet (need to build
from the latest source), I've been thinking a little about the way
Vista handles it's windows. The way the Desktop Windows Manager (DWM)
in Vista does it is to buffer all windows offscreen, and then put them
together as is needed (for more info see this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/greg_schechter/archive/2006/03/05/544314.aspx ).
This is what gives Vista the possibility to do things like real time
updating previews for tasks and such.

Now, as the customizer/modder I am, I start thinking that this is
something LS should be able to make use of. Not through the core of
course, but through modules. Think taskbars and VWM: At the moment
explorer does something LS does not, i.e. show previews of tasks when
you hover them in the taskbar. For VWM this should open up a bunch of
stuff (think something ala Beryl for Linux, even though that's a bit
over the top of what one would wa</description>
    <dc:creator>Xjill</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-22T23:52:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6252">
    <title>lsdev.org revamped</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6252</link>
    <description>Hey all,

You may or may not have seen it already - we have redesigned, rewritten
and updated the Litestep Development site: lsdev.org. Many thanks and
all credit go out to jugg, who has put tremendous effort into this one.

The forums have been replaced by the LSDev Mailing List and its
gmane.org interface, but apart from that all content from the old site
has been migrated - and new content has been added. For example, we now
have a 'Community' section with an overview over our community
resources: Mailing Lists, IRC Channels, Websites. Then there's the
'Development' section, including the infrastructure the devteam uses:
our bugtracker which is finally put to good use, the cvs repository, and
more. Over time we'll also try to amass development guides and hints for
both core and module development. Some of it is already in place, some
of it is very much a work in progress.

If you want to take part in that work in progress, join the LSDev
Mailing list or come visit us in #litestep and #lsdev on irc.freenod</description>
    <dc:creator>ilmcuts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-11T23:22:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6236">
    <title>Paging Brian's Brain -- HTML 'theme config' with form elements</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6236</link>
    <description>This is mostly for Brian, because I think he has knowledge in this 
field. As I understand it, you helped create an HT-based utility of somesort
For a little bit of background, I'm working on a series of themes. 
Basically, you have a SimpleTheme, which includes tutorials on how to 
implement addons/widgets. Then you have the IntermediateTheme, which has 
all those addons/widgets included already. I was thinking that the best 
way to do this would be with HTML-type files.
Anyway, I was wondering if'n it's possible to create an HTML doc that 
makes use of forms elements (checkboxes and such) that would directly 
interact with an associated rc file.
If what I'm thinking is right, it would be an easy(?) way to create a 
'graphical' themeconfig since no modules really allow use of GUI 
elements such as checkboxes or radial buttons.


Let me know if I'm on the right track, totally offbase, or what...

the-golem
---------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe</description>
    <dc:creator>Darrin C Roenfanz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-21T05:02:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6208">
    <title>LiteStep Progress website</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6208</link>
    <description>"Lately there has been a rumor saying Litestep is dead / dying. People 
claim no progress is being made and that soon no one will use it 
anymore. Not only do these rumors annoy the heck out of Litestep 
developers and users, it also discourages new people from starting to 
use Litestep.

The LiteStep Progress website (http://lsp.litestep.info/) exists to 
prove them wrong. By posting all bits of progress being made in Litestep 
development we will show the skeptics that Litestep is very much alive. 
We will show potential new users that they don't have to be afraid 
Litestep won't be supported anymore in the future. We will show 
developers all their work will not be in vain.

This site is also here to motivate developers to continue their work. 
Seeing lots of other people all work on Litestep related projects is a 
great way to get yourself motivated to keep coding."

Tobbe and I created this website some time ago. There are already a lot 
of progress reports on it and now it's time to really promote it. </description>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Vermaat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-17T14:24:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6189">
    <title>About Eclipse</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6189</link>
    <description>What exactly is the problem with LS and Eclipse?

With all the discussion about why LS is lacking in popularity, I
really want to try it out again, even though it's just a work computer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Can't Unsubscribe? Check http://desktopian.org/listunsub.html
        LS List Homepage: http://wuzzle.org/list/litestep.php
            Get the LS FAQ: http://lsfaq.shellfront.org


</description>
    <dc:creator>Arve Barsnes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-15T12:59:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6183">
    <title>LiteStep and Linux?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6183</link>
    <description>I know that there are several open source programs that are developed 
and then compiled specifically for the various platforms.

Is this possible for LiteStep?

If so, even those wistful Linux users might have reason to check out a 
"LiteStep for Linux." It would seem that an open source shell would have 
an advantage in this sort of portability: Use LiteStep/Linux at home and 
LiteStep/Windows or LiteStep/Mac at work. Same theme, but with different 
ways of addressing the compatibility problem.

Especially in that its purpose is as "a visual output" rather than input 
to another program or incorporation into a common database, etc. Some 
three or so programmers might be able to work up a "LinuxStep" 
(LinuxLite?) utility which can handle any OTS2 theme.

Run it though "Windows prep" and it compiles into the LiteStep we 
currently have and enjoy. Run it through "Mac/OS prep", however, and the 
result will be a compiled version for Macs. "Linux prep" could do the 
same for that platform.

No doubt a lot of w</description>
    <dc:creator>Roy Gathercoal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-15T07:11:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6165">
    <title>[litestep] A theory about the decreasing popularity</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep/6165</link>
    <description>So we all know that Litestep is losing users, and is not nearly as popular
as it once was.

I would like to state for the record that I think this is due to the
internet, and the web 2.0 stuffs going on.
Take for instance the web browser: firefox.
Firefox is another open source effort.

If people used their computers (eg word, office) more than their browser (eg
google, wikipedia)
then Litestep, an open source shell should be more popular than firefox.

Think about it. Web browsing is 1 capability of an OS. Litestep basically
skins the shell of that OS.
How is litestep losing popularity?

Its because people are using their browsers far more than any other function
of a computer.

As an example, with tabbed browsing, people dont need/require/want a VWM
anymore. Its not that big of a deal anymore.

P.S.
Just a theory, no data was collected to form these opinions or anything.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Fractal Design</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-13T15:39:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.windows.shells.litestep</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
