<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb">
    <title>gmane.comp.web.rdfweb</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4274"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4272"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4268"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4264"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4261"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4260"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4258"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4257"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4250"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4248"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4245"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4248"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4245"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4233"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4223"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4216"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4210"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4209"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4206"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4197"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4274">
    <title>[foaf-dev] FOAF DataSource availability</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4274</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,

I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a Sri Lankan research student interested in semantic
web, linked-data concepts. My research project is about implementing a
digital identity verification model. I'm really interested in using foaf
networks as the data-source to implement my model and I consider entity
disambiguation as a sub-module in my system. I have submitted a
proposal&amp;lt;https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/dileepaj/1#&amp;gt;to
Apache Stanbol as a GSOC project to develop an entity disambiguation
engine using foaf co-reference techniques. For this project I need an
up-to-date foaf datasource. The link at foaf wiki site :
http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/DataSources suggests several datasources but
it seems most of them are obsolete.

Can I please get some pointers to up-to-date foaf datasources which I can
use for my project? I also appreciate your ideas about using foaf as a
mechanism for entity disambiguation over the web.

Thanks,
Dileepa
__________________________________________&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dileepa Jayakody</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-08T06:02:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4272">
    <title>[foaf-dev] are Agent and Account disjoint</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4272</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;an agent is something that does stuff

but an agent can also have an account that does things, e.g. sends alerts
or pays bills

is there an argument to say that there could be an overlap between an
account and an agent?
_______________________________________________
foaf-dev mailing list
foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/+iASST3g8Odh+X&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Melvin Carvalho</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-29T12:21:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4268">
    <title>[foaf-dev] AaronSw</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4268</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I guess most people have heard already, but for those who haven't...
Aaron Swartz is dead.

His family have a site at http://rememberaaronsw.tumblr.com/

I wrote a little about his presence here and in the early RDF
community, http://danbri.org/words/2013/01/13/815

Such awful news, but it needs sharing.

Dan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-13T17:14:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4264">
    <title>[foaf-dev] Webid on windows?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4264</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;webid working on windows? with client cert ;and NO prior registration? http://wp.me/p1fcz8-39F via &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;wordpressdotcom

Last year, I could not properly implement webid, since I could access the client cert without first having in done way registered it on windows. Today I think I did that, making webid interesting again.

Could some windows programmer type confirm the result? All one has to do is run a std sample (just the right one).
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Williams</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-12T19:46:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4261">
    <title>[foaf-dev] ORCID ID</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4261</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I saw the thread at http://lists.foaf-project.org/pipermail/foaf-dev/2012-June/010856.html in which there was a call for features for an upcoming revision, and I was wondering if it would be possible to create an orcidid property - similar to openid, but refering to http://about.orcid.org.

Cheers,
Melanie

---
Mélanie Courtot
MSFHR/PCIRN Ph.D. Candidate,
BCCRC - Terry Fox Laboratory - 12th floor
675 West 10th Avenue
Vancouver, BC
V5Z 1L3, Canada
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Melanie Courtot</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-08T20:07:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4260">
    <title>[foaf-dev] CFP: International Conference on Knowledge Capture 2013</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4260</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;*********************************************************************************
Call for Research and Application Papers : Seventh International Conference on Knowledge Capture (KCAP) 2013
23-26 June 2013. Banff, Canada

Web site:http://kcap2013.org/
Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/KCap2013
Twitter:http://twitter.com/kcap2013
*********************************************************************************


In today's technology-driven society, effective access to and use of information is a key enabler for progress. Driven by the demands for knowledge-based applications and the unprecedented availability of information on the Web, the study of knowledge capture is of crucial importance. Knowledge capture involves the extraction of useful knowledge from vast and diverse online sources as well as its acquisition directly from human experts.

Researchers and practitioners who work in the area of knowledge capture traditionally participate in several distinct communities, including knowledge engineering, ma&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matthew Rowe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-17T10:07:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4258">
    <title>[foaf-dev] xmlns.com / foaf-project.org down</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4258</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all,

I'm afraid the two sites are down. There's nothing we can currently do, but Dan should be able to investigate on Sunday evening.

Sorry about that,

Libby
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Libby Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-04T20:01:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4257">
    <title>[foaf-dev] WebID Exploitation via Turtle Document &amp; Amazon S3 Bucket</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4257</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;All,

Continuing from yesterday's thread re., hassle free Linked Data 
deployment via Turtle documents, I've just published a new article [1] 
demonstrating how adding a few identity claims to my Amazon S3 bucket 
hosted profile is all that's required for WebID exploitation.

Why is this important?

It showcases how the combination of Web Architecture and PKI address the 
important (but thorny) issue of Web-scale verifiable identity. Put 
differently, WebID is a powerful showcase of Linked Data virtues and its 
boundless utility.


Links:

1. http://bit.ly/P3WECX -- exploiting WebID via a simple Turtle document 
published using an Amazon S3 bucket
2. http://bit.ly/NYwGCd -- minimalist profile document template
3. http://bit.ly/LNIeLj -- initial post re. simple Linked Data 
deployment using a Turtle document.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kingsley Idehen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-26T21:17:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4250">
    <title>[foaf-dev] Hastags for foaf agents</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4250</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello

The social media people have begun filling in:
http://bbc-social.herokuapp.com/

But have pointed out that many more programmes have semi-official hashtags
than accounts. Eg #bbcqt is the on-screen promoted hashtag for question
time:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006t1q9

They've asked if it would be possible to associate hashtags with programmes
but I'm not sure how to publish this or what a hashtag is semantically
speaking

Is there a way to associate a foaf:Agent with a hashtag?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Smethurst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-17T10:02:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4248">
    <title>[foaf-dev] FOAF 1.0 Planning Doc</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4248</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

In the context of the Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV) project I lead with
Bernard Vatant, I made a review of the most popular vocabulary FOAF. It
appears that this vocabulary lacks of metadata and language information.

you can find a revised version of FOAF (based on v0.98)
[here]&amp;lt;http://vocommons.org/foaf.rdf&amp;gt;

As Dan suggested ,I list below the modifications I've done, a diff file is
available [here] &amp;lt;http://vocommons.org/foaf.diff&amp;gt; :

   - add xml:base to make explicit the default namespace (required for
   several RDF API library)
   - add useful vocabularies for the description of foaf metadata (voaf,
   vann, cc)
   - add issued and modified date
   - add version info
   - add voaf:Vocabulary type
   - add creators URI
   - add homepage link
   - add dc:rights
   - add cc:license
   - add vann:preferredNamespacePrefix and Uri
   - add xml:lang="en" on every english string
   - add french labels for each non archaic element


What else could be done :

   - add a isReplacedBy to archaic elements&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-05T22:23:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4245">
    <title>[foaf-dev] aggregation vs trusted proxying; FOAF+SSL etc</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4245</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;For years, folks have explored crawlers aggregating data sets - for which ontologys assist in that process (amongst other benefits). We have seen data APIs form the likes of Facebook, for graphs specified as sets of connections to other data sets. And, we have seen sites that enable data clouds for individuals, leveraging websso connections to aggregate person data and then other datums tied to person entities.

Typically, Microsoft waits till things have matured a bit, before releasing mainstream support for things. And, dataexplorer.sqlazurelabs.com may be the signal that it thinks things are more mainstream than once we thought.

Of course, what I note is that its a hybrid approach, not choosing any one winner of a technology or standard (being as happy to parse HTML5 semantic markup as use a webAPI, or do a SQL query). but what is interesting is that the security model for proxying is built in - with the site's rights to go pick up backroom data requiring an OAUTH-like delegation from the user (so the si&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Williams</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-02T19:12:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4248">
    <title>[foaf-dev] FOAF 1.0 Planning Doc</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4248</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

In the context of the Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV) project I lead with
Bernard Vatant, I made a review of the most popular vocabulary FOAF. It
appears that this vocabulary lacks of metadata and language information.

you can find a revised version of FOAF (based on v0.98)
[here]&amp;lt;http://vocommons.org/foaf.rdf&amp;gt;

As Dan suggested ,I list below the modifications I've done, a diff file is
available [here] &amp;lt;http://vocommons.org/foaf.diff&amp;gt; :

   - add xml:base to make explicit the default namespace (required for
   several RDF API library)
   - add useful vocabularies for the description of foaf metadata (voaf,
   vann, cc)
   - add issued and modified date
   - add version info
   - add voaf:Vocabulary type
   - add creators URI
   - add homepage link
   - add dc:rights
   - add cc:license
   - add vann:preferredNamespacePrefix and Uri
   - add xml:lang="en" on every english string
   - add french labels for each non archaic element


What else could be done :

   - add a isReplacedBy to archaic elements&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-05T22:23:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4245">
    <title>[foaf-dev] aggregation vs trusted proxying; FOAF+SSL etc</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4245</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;For years, folks have explored crawlers aggregating data sets - for which ontologys assist in that process (amongst other benefits). We have seen data APIs form the likes of Facebook, for graphs specified as sets of connections to other data sets. And, we have seen sites that enable data clouds for individuals, leveraging websso connections to aggregate person data and then other datums tied to person entities.

Typically, Microsoft waits till things have matured a bit, before releasing mainstream support for things. And, dataexplorer.sqlazurelabs.com may be the signal that it thinks things are more mainstream than once we thought.

Of course, what I note is that its a hybrid approach, not choosing any one winner of a technology or standard (being as happy to parse HTML5 semantic markup as use a webAPI, or do a SQL query). but what is interesting is that the security model for proxying is built in - with the site's rights to go pick up backroom data requiring an OAUTH-like delegation from the user (so the si&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Williams</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-02T19:12:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4233">
    <title>[foaf-dev] FOAF 1.0 Planning Doc</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4233</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;(It's a google doc rather than Wiki page for now, to avoid getting
distracted by sysadmin; if you'd like access please request...)

Libby and I just met to sketch out a plan towards FOAF 1.0, looking at
feedback from the recent thread here, and integration possibilities
with PoCo, Schema.org and other work.

Current notes are at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18sktpEWqREts-IjtrWU6eFXiR_VR3GVX9HPdlazOC0o/edit

Feedback welcomed here or anywhere...

cheers,

Dan &amp;amp; Libby
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-13T12:34:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4223">
    <title>[foaf-dev] [retro] ETech 2004 FOAF talk</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4223</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Just stumbled across this old talk, from the pre-Facebook, pre-Linked
Data RDFWeb days:

http://web.archive.org/web/20040331155648/http://rdfweb.org/people/danbri/media/2004/02/11/etech/foaftalk.txt

'what might search engines evolve into, as we move from indexing the
words in a page to indexing claims about the world?'

Dan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-11T17:30:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4216">
    <title>[foaf-dev] Wishlists / requests for next rev of FOAF spec?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4216</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;


Yeah, it's about time we shipped a new one.

Anyone else got suggestions? I'd like to align the basic addressbook
stuff with Portable Contacts (and schema.org) and do some general
tidying. Anything else?

Dan


ps. (continuing the original thread as a sideline)

Any idea what the situation is with G+? There are various curated
circles, but not sure if there are APIs yet that give you links to
wikipedia/freebase and so on.


Wikidata - maybe. The core team don't want to "do content" at any
level, including imposing a type hierarchy. But they could collect IDs
even if the page template machinery doesn't pull them all into the
viewable pages...
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dan Brickley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-31T01:00:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4210">
    <title>[foaf-dev] Mapping (tv and radio) programmes to their social mediaaccounts</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4210</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello!

I've been planning to publish mappings from BBC programmes to their social
media accounts on Facebook / Twitter / etc

The easiest way would be to use foaf:Agent and foaf:account and say the
foaf:Agent is same as po:Programme

Can a programme be an agent? Would declaring same as break anything
horribly? Or is there a neater way to do this?

Cheers
michael


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Smethurst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-30T16:54:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4209">
    <title>[foaf-dev] How to import the FOAF to my own ontology?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4209</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear,

I have been building a domain ontology, part of which should organize
person's information, so I considered to import the foaf to my own
ontology, and in that case, the organization of person's information that I
do not pay a lot of time on due to the FOAF. Does it work? if it works,
what should I do that could connect the two ontologies together?
Any reply from you will be appreciated!

Bests,
Wentao
_______________________________________________
foaf-dev mailing list
foaf-dev-RyYwo1q5J+qsOXdr9/+iASST3g8Odh+X&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Wentao Zhou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T07:32:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4206">
    <title>[foaf-dev] PhD position at the French LIFO Lab: "Access Control forCloud computing"</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4206</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Apologies for multiple copies.
---------------------------------------------------
The French 'LIFO' Laboratory seeks a versatile, highly motivated PhD candidate to work on Cloud Computing Security. 
LIFO (Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale d'Orléans) - France
---------------------------------------------------
PhD thesis subject: Access Control for Cloud computing

1. Subject description
The security of Cloud Computing is becoming highly critical for computer information systems. Many concrete examples have shown that public cloud architectures, such as Google, Twitter[a] or Amazon[b], didn’t provide enough security for their customers. Many problems occur: data corruption, data loss, information leakage [3], as well as problems of quality of service, and chain of responsibility.
The work to be done in this PhD thesis vill aim at securing cloud architectures, while letting the actors involved in the cloud services and usages, the ability to express themselves their security needs. To do that, they w&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrice Clemente</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-18T23:30:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4197">
    <title>[foaf-dev] are these files valid FOAF?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4197</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I try to add foaf to my organizations contact and project data base.

can you have a look at the links:

http://iwlearn.net/con-info/contacts/mxmcontactsorganization.20050928Z122513.155/foaf.rdf

http://iwlearn.net/con-info/contacts/mr.-anjan-kumar-datta/&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;foaf.rdf


and tell me if this makes sense to you?


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Christian Ledermann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-20T13:43:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4190">
    <title>[foaf-dev] di: (DIGEST) URI scheme and foaf:mbox_sha1sum</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.rdfweb/4190</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;All,

I've been playing around with the di: (DIGEST) URI scheme [1] re. a 
variety of WebID related endeavors [2]. In doing so, it dawned on me 
that foaf:mbox_sha1sum could also benefit from this (immensely) if the 
range of this property was changed to a URI :-)

Links:

1. http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hallambaker-digesturi-02.html - di: 
(DIGEST) scheme URI specs

2. 
http://id.myopenlink.net/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fid.myopenlink.net%2Fmv%2Fdata%2Fafacf6b868e6cb36f71d2cecc6d531a26ce1f2ef%23767F34A711C3AC275A27A9C9B25EB7BC9D4A861C 
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kingsley Idehen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-01T22:00:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.web.rdfweb">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.web.rdfweb</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
