<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco">
    <title>gmane.comp.voip.cisco</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67773"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67770"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67757"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67754"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67753"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67749"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67745"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67744"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67736"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67732"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67731"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67724"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67718"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67711"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67710"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67708"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67707"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67706"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67696"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67693"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67773">
    <title>Anyone with Dialogic SR-140 / RightFax experience?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67773</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Trying to figure out if I can point RightFax/SR-140 to multiple ip addresses based on destination address.

I'm pretty sure the RightFax 9.4 / SR-140 doing H323/T38  can only point to 1 ip address or RightFax can route to particular SR-140, then it's up to your peer PBX/H323 gateway to do the TEHO/Least Cost Routing etc.


Example customer request, they only have a couple SR-140s and locations in many more cities and want outbound to go out the end user's city.

We have some scope items that I want to make sure that we can meet for the outbound faxing project.

*             Outbound faxes will use the PRI/trunk of the site of the originating fax.  For example, if the fax is sent out of Tokyo it will use the local Tokyo PRI for the outbound call.
*             If the outbound trunk is down, the fax can route out of a secondary path._______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jason Aarons (AM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T21:17:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67770">
    <title>End of Cius?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67770</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.adcapnet.com/blog/cisco-cius-end-of-development-announced/

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Matt Slaga (AM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T13:00:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67757">
    <title>Hide external phone mask from displaying on phone?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67757</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;From what i can tell this is not possible, i was hoping this was fixed in
CM8.

I have a hotel, and I need the external phone number mask for e-911 for
like 400 rooms. That works fine, but it displays on the top of the phone
and they can't tell what extension they are. Is Cisco planning on fixing
this?

Thanks,
Adam
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Adam Piasecki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T20:14:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67754">
    <title>Max char abled to display for each phone type</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67754</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I'm wondering if anyone complied a list of Max characters each phone type can support in their line text label as well as their calling name before they get truncated on the display? 

Sent from my iPhone
Pls pardon my fat fingers.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ki Wi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T16:54:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67753">
    <title>Interesting the Device Defaults is not part of UCM 8.5DRS</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67753</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/drs/8_5_1/drsag851.html

Did a DRS restore and my device defaults didn't follow.  But it's not listed as part of DRS._______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jason Aarons (AM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T16:47:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67749">
    <title>OT: WAV to WMA conversion</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67749</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Anyone done any conversions between Wav and WMV?  Specific to cisco Voice?

we have one tool and the conversion causes the sound to be very quit.

Any other applications that have worked for you in the past?

TIA

Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Scott Voll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T15:12:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67745">
    <title>BAT to change voice mail profile for selected groups</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67745</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,

Quick one if anyone has tried changing Voice mail profile in Bulk, with
selective users. Lets say we have names\ extensions of 100 users we want to
migrate to a new voice mail system. I know we can migrate all using line
update query or if they have some sort of common pattern. BUt this is like
random 100 users every time business selects to migrate. Can we do this
using CSV file or any other means?


Thanks,
GR
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>gr11</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T09:42:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67744">
    <title>T/E 1 Crossover cable DB15 to RJ45 Pin Out?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67744</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear All.

Done a bit of a google but can't find a diagram for DB15 to RJ45 Crossover cable.

Anyone able to help?

Thanks

Rob

=========================
Robin Clayton

Network Transition Manager
Richard Rose Federation
Richard Rose Central Academy
Victoria Place
Carlisle
Cumbria
CA1 1LY

Tel: 01228 822075
www: www.rrfa.org.uk



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Important Notice:

This e-mail and any attachment are confidentialand may be privileged
or otherwise protected from disclosure. It is solely intended for the
person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, any
reading, use, disclosure, copying or distribution of all or parts of this
e-mail or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not
an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by
replying to this message or by telephone and delete this e-mail and
any attachments permanently from your system.

The Richard Rose Federation&amp;lt;ht&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Robin Clayton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T09:38:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67736">
    <title>RTMTSessionsExceedsThreshold CUCM 8.6.2.22028</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67736</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,
Running CUCM 8.6.2.22028 and getting an annoying RTMT alert.  All known
RTMT sessions have been disconnected.  Can't figure out what the deal is.
 It started happening Monday morning at around 03:00.  I upgraded the
cluster the Friday before from 8.6.2.20000.  Not sure why these annoying
alerts are happening all of a sudden.

Thanks,
Steve
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Steve Gustafson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T22:54:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67732">
    <title>Cupc / jabber / EM</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67732</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I've not played much with either CUPC and Jabber.  We only use IP
communicator so far.

if we went to CUPC or Jabber do they support Extension Mobility?

Do they support remote working with UCCx Agent desktop?

We have a Call Center that they use EM to log into there IPC client and we
would not want to lose that.

TIA

Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Scott Voll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T21:08:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67731">
    <title>UCCX Agent Upgrades</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67731</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We're prepping to upgrade our UCCX (from 8.5.1 SU2 to SU3).  Of course,
this means all our agents will have to upgrade.

Since our endusers are not admins on the machines, this means I have
upgrade the client for them.

It begs the question, has anyone tried a software deployment solution (SCCM
or Altiris) to push the updated agent?

I'll have to get a feature request into my Account team.  My SSL
VPN utilizes an installer service that you install as an admin once, and it
runs with local system privileges.  When the SSL vpn client needs to
update, it will utilize this service, and the service will perform the
upgrade, neatly sidestepping the fact the end user does not
have privileges to install software.

Cisco could easily use the same tactic for the CAD / HRS / Supervisor
desktop.

Mike
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mike King</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T20:41:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67724">
    <title>silent monitoring issue</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67724</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

Using CCM based silent monitoring using CTI Supervisor toolkit.

CCM 7.1
Ucce8.0
IPC7.0

when Supervisor clicks for silent monitoring,it's throwing an error

Cann't find column [ID]

Anyone faced similar issue/resolution.

Any suggestion welcome.

TIA

Sourav
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>sourav ......pa$$ion of IT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T18:16:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67718">
    <title>UCCE 8.5 and CAD/CTIOS 8.5 on same Citrix server?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67718</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I recall older versions of UCCE CAD/CTIOS couldn't be installed on same Citrix server.

Is that still true with the newer CAD/CTIOS  in UCCE 8.5.

Can anyone say they have both CTIOS and CAD running together on same Citrix server?_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jason Aarons (AM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T16:33:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67711">
    <title>Anyone hear of Avaya with CUPS integration?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67711</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have a client who is working backwards to go forwards. Mgmt wants to compare Avaya to Cisco so a pilot is in works starting today but call control will stay Avaya. There are no immediate plans on going Cisco. We are involved to help push the pilot as we are not an Avaya reseller. There are Cisco phones but the users whom will be evaluating this only have Sip Avaya and legacy Avaya phones. There will be test phones in the pilot lab area but these will not be made available to the evaluation users. Maybe ip communicator phones will be available to the eval users not sure.
A remote cucme site does have h323 peer to Clan / Med card on the Avaya switch so 4 digit dial works both ways is currently in use but that brings nothing to the pilot.

We are thinking to have CUC for store with Single inbox integrated to exchange 2010, Avaya system will get mwi and so will Cisco test phones in the lab and have Jabber client but call control of Avaya sip phones is where we fall short.  I don't see how that could work. Lync&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Gregory Wenzel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T12:05:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67710">
    <title>CUCME Call Forward CallerID</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67710</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

We've got a situation where we need to forward calls incoming over a SIP trunk back out via the same sip trunk.

All works fine, however how can we set the source callerID of the call to be the same as if the extension were to dial an outside call.

For example

01234567890 calls in, and extension 201 has it set to call forward to 077777777777. The receiving party see's the caller ID of the person called it. How can we force it to be the caller id of the last-redirecting extension?

Thanks,

Alex






&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alexander Fossa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T11:11:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67708">
    <title>MCS-7816-I4 hard drive firmware problem question</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67708</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Quick question on this older problem, had a 7816-I4 go read only
today. I know there are other causes for this also...

The current FW update CD is 3.6.6, FW CD 3.01 was ran on this awhile back also.

https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12955

My question is how does one really verify the current hard drive
firmware version on the 7816-I4?  This is on unity connection system
and a CUCM 8.0.x system.

'show hardware' doesn't report hard drive fw version numbers for
7816-I4, unlike some other models.

I went into BIOS System Information screen like FN and support
document covers but that screen doesn't report firmware version
either. No where in BIOS does it report it or boot up screens from
watching the boot process a few times. So those docs seem to be not be
accurate.

I did the create hardware report at console on unity and looked at the
output files and it just has 02.0 as the Revision number also.

  SCSI Devices
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Erick B.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T03:48:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67707">
    <title>Call routing based on holidays in CUCM</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67707</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

  I was wondering if anyone could tell me if there is a way route calls in CUCM based on holidays.  I know that I can set hours and days for partitions to active or not, but nothing for holidays.  I am pretty sure this something I would need to use Unity Connection to do.  Is this correct?

CUCM and Unity conection versions 8.5

Thanks,
Bill Hendrix

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>george.hendrix&lt; at &gt;l-3com.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T02:49:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67706">
    <title>application user / extension mobility / not sendingline status</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67706</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;we have a call recording software that uses an application user to give
line status to the recording software server.

we have see it happen were it working in the office (CM 7.1.5) with 7961
phones with Extension Mobility.  they go home and use IP Communication and
log in with extension Mobility and it works, but then they come back to the
office and log in with extension mobility they they no longer get line
status.  if we rebuild the user in the call recording software then have
the user log out and back in with Extension Mobility it works again. (not a
good option with ~ 200 users)

Any direction would be great.

I'm going to start looking at CM / CTI / ExMob trace files.  We do not use
NICE but this bug CSCte75384 looks alot alike.  Any idea how I can comfirm
this is the bug we are running into?  Any idea if 7.1.5.31900-3 is still
affected by it?

TIA

Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-v&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Scott Voll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T21:22:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67696">
    <title>Error adding in a CTI Route Point in UCCX</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67696</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

        I'm in the UCCX Administration trying to add in a new "Cisco Unified CM Telephony Trigger".  Before doing so, I went into Call Manager and created a new extension, and added it to the CTI Route Point.
        When I try to add it in UCCX, it comes back and says "Failed to create the CTI Route Point and corresponding Line in Cisco Unified CM.
        Any thoughts?  Are there any additional configurations I need to do on the Call Manager?  This particular Trigger is being set up on the Call Control Group:  JTAPI Group.


Thank you,
Alan M. Collopy
Network Administrator
Cambridge Trust Company
10 Fawcett St. 6th Floor
Cambridge, MA 02138
Office: 617.503.5234




  ________________________________

DISCLAIMER:
****** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Collopy, Alan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T16:31:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67693">
    <title>cisco tac?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67693</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Anyone else having issue getting to cisco.com/tac/caseopen ?

Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Scott Voll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T16:00:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67687">
    <title>CCM 8.5.1SU4 but where are the release notes?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.cisco/67687</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/prod_release_notes_list.html

Shows release notes are dated 26 January, but SU4 came out 15 May -jason_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jason Aarons (AM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T14:54:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.voip.cisco">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.voip.cisco</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

