<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general">
    <title>gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15226"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15223"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15210"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15208"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15202"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15185"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15182"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15181"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15172"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15136"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15129"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15105"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15090"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15086"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15084"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15082"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15073"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15064"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15059"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15056"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15226">
    <title>Documentation issues</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15226</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Autoconf
********

This manual (24 April 2012) is for GNU Autoconf (version 2.69), a
package for creating scripts to configure source code packages using
templates and an M4 macro package.

    Copyright (C) 1992-1996, 1998-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
[...]
15.2 Working With External Software
===================================
[...]
           AC_ARG_WITH([readline],
             [AS_HELP_STRING([--with-readline],  &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;=== invalid macro
               [support fancy command line editing &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt;:&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;default=check&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;:&amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;])],
             [],
             [with_readline=check])

           LIBREADLINE=
           AS_IF([test "x$with_readline" != xno],
             [AC_CHECK_LIB([readline], [main],
               [AC_SUBST([LIBREADLINE], ["-lreadline -lncurses"])
                AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LIBREADLINE], [1],
                          [Define if you have libreadline])
               ],
               [if test "x$with_readline" != xcheck; then
                  AC_MSG_FAILURE(
                    [--with-readli&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bruce Korb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-16T17:46:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15223">
    <title>Specify target in Makefile.am file</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15223</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We use SUBDIRS to specify the sub directories in Makefile.am file like

SUBDIRS = src doc examples bindings

Run "make" will compile the makefile under these directories by default.

But I want to remove doc from default option like it will run by "make
doc" target only.

This is looking for what step or variable??
Wiating for your response.


--
Avneet Kaur
www.avneetkhasla.wordpress.com
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Avneet Kaur</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-12T17:06:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15210">
    <title>implement workaround for header files</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15210</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi autoconfers,

I have the following case:

I maintain a library that uses boost heavily. Recently I learnt that 
&amp;lt;boost/exception_ptr.hpp&amp;gt; is broken with certain version of GCC (4.4.7 
for example). I would like provide a workaround for users of the library 
(myself e.g.) so we won't even notice the breakage. I've implemented a 
compile test with AC_COMPILE_IFELSE that tests whether the compiler and 
'exception_ptr.hpp' get along or not, but now I'm not sure what is the 
best way to use this test. If I wrote an application I would AC_DEFINE 
and whether depending on that define or not I could include a patched 
header file first. But since I'm writing a library and the problem is 
exposed in header files that are installed I'm not sure what is the best 
way to accomplish that. I already have a 'public_config.h' with a subset 
of content in 'config.h', which is installed. Yet I'm not sure what is 
the best way to accomplish a good solution here. If I need to install a 
patched boost header file, it must be &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Johansson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-07T00:03:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15208">
    <title>test for CXXLD</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15208</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

The C++ compiler I am using (charmc) needs an additional command line
argument during the linker stage (-language charm++). I am unsure how to
best add this argument. The generated makefiles use CXX for compilation and
CXXLD for linking, both of which are set to "charmc". How would I change
CXXLD to add a flag? Or is there a cleaner way to accomplish this?

Thanks already,

nick
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nicolas Bock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-06T19:08:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15202">
    <title>process result code in if</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15202</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I am trying to do a simple check to validate a value is a positive 
integer. There are many variations to do this but in general this should 
do the trick:
var=100
if echo "$var" | grep -Eq '^[0-9]+$' &amp;gt; /dev/null 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1; then
     echo "positive integer"
else
     echo "something else"
fi

if I put this in a file and execute it, it works as expected. But if I 
put it in my configure.ac, it doesn't work!
Also when I just have:
echo "$var" | grep -Eq '^[0-9]+$'
echo "$?"

the 'normal' script prints "0" if var is set to an integer and "1" when 
set to something else. But the configure script prints "1" no matter 
what I set var to.

I must be missing out on something because I took this construct from 
another configure.ac which worked just fine.

I am on a win7 x64 machine with MinGW 3.20 and W32API 3.17
sh --version
GNU bash, version 3.1.17(1)-release (i686-pc-msys)

Arie
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>A.P. Horst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-06T09:00:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15185">
    <title>Error while building autoconf-2.69</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15185</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I am trying to build autoconf-2.69. The ./configure command runs fine, but when i do make check, i get these errors

standards.texi:3229: Unknown command `guilsinglleft'.
standards.texi:3229: Misplaced {.
standards.texi:3229: Misplaced }.
standards.texi:3229: Unknown command `guilsinglright'.
standards.texi:3229: Misplaced {.
standards.texi:3229: Misplaced }.
makeinfo: Removing output file `standards.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve.
make[2]: *** [standards.info] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/MTS-AERO_Work-15/Aero_Design-15/Internship/TAU_Interpolation/Netcdf_libraries/autoconf-2.69/doc'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/MTS-AERO_Work-15/Aero_Design-15/Internship/TAU_Interpolation/Netcdf_libraries/autoconf-2.69'
make: *** [check] Error 2


Can you help. Please reply soon.
The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorise&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>DUBEY, Abir (Intern</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-31T06:24:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15182">
    <title>Help with static linking</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15182</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey lists,

Sorry for posting on both autoconf and automake lists. I wasn't sure
which one would be more appropriate for this problem.

I know this has come up before, judging by the archives, but I cannot
figure out the best way to have my executable statically link against
certain dependencies. This is needed because it executes off of optical
media and I cannot always guarantee that the user's runtime environment
will have the needed dependencies and shipping them shared would be a
maintenance nightmare.

The dynamic dependencies, according to objdump, are the following...

Dynamic Section:
  NEEDED               libgio-2.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libgobject-2.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libglib-2.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libzzip-0.so.13
  NEEDED               libpng12.so.0
  NEEDED               libstdc++.so.6
  NEEDED               libm.so.6
  NEEDED               libgcc_s.so.1
  NEEDED               libpthread.so.0
  NEEDED               libc.so.6

libc, pthreads, the C++ runtime, etc., are &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kip Warner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-31T05:30:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15181">
    <title>flex and bison in autoconf</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15181</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello friends,
My configure.ac is:

AC_PREREQ(2.69)
AC_INIT([mkbib], [2.1], [bnrj.rudra&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;yahoo.com])
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([1.9.6 dist-bzip2 subdir-objects foreign])

# Checks for programs.
AC_PROG_CC

AC_PROG_YACC
#if test x"$YACC" != x"yes"; then
#  AC_MSG_ERROR([Please install bison before installing.])
#fi
AC_PROG_LEX
if test "x$LEX" != xflex; then
  AC_MSG_ERROR([Please install flex before installing.])
fi

AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
GNOME_DOC_INIT 

# Compiling sources with per-target flags requires AM_PROG_CC_C_O
AM_PROG_CC_C_O
AC_PROG_INSTALL

#AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBSOUP, libsoup-2.4 &amp;gt;= 2.26)
AC_SUBST(LIBSOUP_CFLAGS)
AC_SUBST(LIBSOUP_LIBS)

AM_PATH_GTK_3_0([3.4.0],,AC_MSG_ERROR([Gtk+ 3.0.0 or higher required.]))

AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
AC_CONFIG_FILES([
        Makefile
help/Makefile
])
AC_OUTPUT

The problem is, while running ./configure built from this file, do check
existence of YACC (as bison, when the 3 line following AC_PROG_YACC, it
is showing una&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rudra Banerjee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-29T19:25:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15172">
    <title>autoconf tests and stdcall name mangling</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15172</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;(Not sure which list is relevant, so I'm cross-posting to both mingw-users 
and autoconf lists)

Hello lists,

when I'm cross compiling from linux x86_64 to 32-bit MinGW autoconf 
refuses to detect getaddrinfo and define HAVE_GETADDRINFO. I've limited 
the case to the following behaviour:

The "getaddrinfo-link.c" attached file is a simplification of what 
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(getaddrinfo) tries to compile and link. It fails to find 
the symbol because gcc most probably doesn't use proper calling 
conventions (stdcall). This is demonstrated by the build success of the 
second attached program. So:

$ i686-w64-mingw32-gcc     -o getaddrinfo-link getaddrinfo-link.c    -lws2_32
/tmp/cctQtw3q.o:getaddrinfo-link.c:(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `_getaddrinfo'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
$ i686-w64-mingw32-gcc     -o getaddrinfo-link getaddrinfo-link-2.c    -lws2_32
$

In the second case ("getaddrinfo-link-2.c") compilation is successful 
because the symbol linked is "_getaddrinfo&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;16" which actually exist&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dimitrios Apostolou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-22T18:22:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15136">
    <title>distcheck missing files</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15136</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey list,

My autotool'd project configure and builds fine. When I run distcheck
target, I notice that some tests fail because it is missing files that
ought to be in 'Tests/'. 

I checked my projects Makefile.am and, consistent with what I took from
chapter 14.1 of the manual, I made sure that the directory containing my
test files ('Tests/') was present in the EXTRA_DIST variable. If I'm not
mistaken, listing 'Tests' in that variable should copy everything
recursively in that folder which is what I want.

What am I doing wrong?

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kip Warner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T07:24:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15129">
    <title>config.status: error: cannot find input file: `po/Makefile.in.in'</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15129</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey list,

I have my message catalogues in a directory in my project other than in
the usual po/. I ran gettextize --po-dir=folder. I also updated
Makevars's subdir to point to the new directory. The SUBDIRS variable in
my Makefile.am also points to the right location.

However, the error I am receiving when I run ./configure is the
following, despite po/ not existing:

        config.status: error: cannot find input file:
        `po/Makefile.in.in'

Any help appreciated.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kip Warner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T08:57:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15105">
    <title>[Desperate] call for help with preparing an autotools-based package</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15105</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey,
I've been struggling with autoconf and automake for a few days now, and I
have to admit that those aren't simple tools to use.
I'm working on a small SDL-based environment for GNU guile and I decided to
release it. The repository is available through mercurial on bitbucket:

  hg clone https://bitbucket.org/panicz/slayer

Once cloned, one needs to switch to the autotools branch using

  hg up autotools

The repository contains only the minimal set of autotools configuration,
ie. configure.ac and several Makefile.am's, as well as empty directories
build-aux and m4.

The project's design would AFAIK make use of some more advanced features of
autotools, as it allows using various optional packages, and it also
consists  of loadable plugins, as well as contains some guile modules that
need to be installed in a proper place. It's definitely too complicated for
a noob like me and I thought that maybe someone more experienced could
direct me towards the goal.

What I need is the following features (I think tha&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Panicz Maciej Godek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-09T14:09:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15090">
    <title>Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2"</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15090</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

Linux Arch distributive recently added following compilation flags to
CPPFLAGS: "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2". Unfortunately it breaks autoconf based
projects such as gdb, gcc, ...


The issue is that autoconf compiles some programs to find whether system
has headers. And to compile it uses only preprocessor defines from CPPFLAGS
(-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 in case of Arch). recent versions of glibc produces a
warning when it compiles apps with _FORTIFY_SOURCE but without -O2.

Here is a simple application

#include &amp;lt;stdlib.h&amp;gt;
int main(void) { return 0; }

that compiles fine in Ubuntu LTS (glibc 2.15) but produces a warning on
Arch (glibc 2.17)

$ gcc -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 a.c
In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:24:0,
                 from a.c:1:
/usr/include/features.h:330:4: warning: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires
compiling with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp]
 #  warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)

The warning itself was introduced in this glibc commit:
http://sourceware.org/gi&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Anatol Pomozov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-08T03:49:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15086">
    <title>Failure in make dist</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15086</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I'm running autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.11.6 on Lubuntu12.10 and when I 
run distmake for my project, it aborts with the error:


when debugging, the failure appears that the directory "test" isn't 
created under winproglib-*/libwin.

When run configure, make, make dist on Cygwin or Ubuntu 11.10, then this 
error doesn't occur, indicating to me probably a failure of Lubuntu 
12.10. Note, I did *not* run autoreconf when rerunning on Cygwin.

But I don't know how to debug this further. I've added outputs to the 
generated Makefile, but I don't see where these directories should be 
created first.

when running autoreconf on Cygwin, with autoconf-2.69 and 
automake-1.12.5 I get the same errors on Lubuntu 12.10. It doesn't 
matter if I use bash, tcsh or dash (the default).
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jason Curl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-27T18:53:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15084">
    <title>Preserving generated files</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15084</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

Is there a possibility to preserve the generated source and output file 
generated by the many tests a configure does? In particular the 
"checking for dependency style of [compiler]" does a lot of tests, but 
it is very hard to find out what is going wrong. The compiler supports 
makefile style dependency generation, but configure fails to recognize 
it. I am trying to figure out what goes wrong, but the config.log has 
only a few lines dedicated to this test, and keeps silent on what tests 
it performs and why it fails.
Any other ideas on how to debug this are very welcome.

Arie
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>A.P. Horst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T09:51:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15082">
    <title>Looking for an installed font</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15082</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I've written a game that uses FreeSans as the font for displaying its
text.

I do not want to include that font in the distribution of the game but
rather use a the font file normally installed on the system. For that I
want to check in configure whether the font file is available in the
system and display an error message or warning if it is missing.

How could I do that? Is there anything provided in autoconf for that
problem? I think it might be good enough to see if the file is on the
filesystem but the problem is that the position is not standardized. Is
there any nice way to use 'find' or anything else to look into the
subdirectories of /usr/share/fonts for this?

Or do you have any other ideas how to do this?

Thanks

Andreas
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andreas Röver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-22T17:58:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15073">
    <title>Configure for non-gcc compiler</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15073</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

been trying my way in autotools land for a short while now, and I must 
say, it works like a charm.
But there is one thing I've been breaking my head on for a while now. 
Many of my projects use GCC, some use a totally different compiler and 
worse, some are mixed. How do I go about that with autoconf? Is there an 
easy way to 'add' a compiler to check for? Or a hard way?
If somebody could give me some handles to work with, I would be very 
thankful. My searches on the internet have turned up squat, bit might be 
I didn't use the magic combo of keywords.

Arie
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>A.P. Horst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-18T18:06:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15064">
    <title>How does one configure in directories with special characters in them?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15064</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I am running on Linux (Fedora 17 to be exact) and have a directory 
called: /home/jjohnstn/runtime-NewConfiguration(2)/hello

The directory was generated by Eclipse as a workspace directory.  It 
defaults the name each time and adds numerics if the default name is 
already in use.

What is happening is that I have a simple configure.ac for a hello world 
program:

dnl Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.

AC_PREREQ(2.59)
AC_INIT(hello, 1.0)


AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE()

AC_PROG_CC

AC_CONFIG_FILES(Makefile src/Makefile)
AC_OUTPUT

When I try to configure it, there is a generated call to "missing" and 
the call adds the directory name it has calculated but it fails because 
the () chars are not escaped.  This occurs whether I change to the 
directory and run it as ./configure or whether I specify an absolute 
directory and escape the () chars myself.

Is there a way for me to get around this or this is simply a bug?

I am using autoconf 2.68

Thanks,

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Johnston</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-12T20:45:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15059">
    <title>Link tests when cross compiling</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15059</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Why are link tests not allowed when cross compiling?  You don't have
to run the exe to verify that linking worked.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>NightStrike</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-12T20:20:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15056">
    <title>autoconf/tools produces to many top level files</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15056</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I'm creating a new project and using autotools. I've done this before,
but for some reason this time I've noticed how many files autotools
creates. It totally pollutes the top level of my project.

    lib             &amp;lt;- Mine originally
    aclocal.m4
    AUTHORS
    autom4te.cache
    bootstrap
    build-aux
    ChangeLog
    config.h.in
    configure
    configure.in
    COPYING
    INSTALL
    m4
    Makefile.am
    Makefile.in
    NEWS
    README

I understand why configure, Makefile.am and bootstrap (autoreconf script)
need to exist in this directory.

Is it possible to configure the autotools so that everything else gets
put somewhere else (like in a nested directory)?

Thanks,
Bob Rossi
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bob Rossi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-12T11:30:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15053">
    <title>license question</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general/15053</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

Since I'm not sure where else to ask this question, I'll ask it here:

I'm working on a project that uses the m4sugar.m4 file included with
autoconf to generate files using m4.  I'd like to license my project using
a BSD-style 2-clause license, rather than GPLv3 (with the exception of the
m4sugar.m4 file, which will be distributed under the terms of the GPLv3 as
required).  I several questions regarding this:

1. Can I license my source files with the BSD license even though they call
macros from m4sugar? (I can't think of a reason this isn't a "yes",
personally.)

2. Must any generated files (as produced by running m4 on my files which
m4_include m4sugar.m4) be distributed under GPL3?  (I'm assuming the
Autoconf exception as documented at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/autoconf-exception-3.0.html applies, since
m4sugar is part of Autoconf, so this would be a "no".)

3. My project generates source code.  Can binaries compiled from this
source code be distributed under the terms of the BSD license?  (Sin&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Gavin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-11T10:04:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
