<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user">
    <title>gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5821"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5820"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5818"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5803"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5802"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5801"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5797"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5796"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5792"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5789"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5786"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5783"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5776"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5775"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5762"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5761"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5727"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5719"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5718"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5715"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5821">
    <title>Content Filter</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5821</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi to all,

we use EFW in school and run a content filter (at level 50). Of corse a lot of unwanted keywords are forbidden but "Google" is open and the pupils can search for "sex and porn sites" via "google - pictures" :-(

I tried to enter the URL
http://www.google.de/imghp?hl=de&amp;amp;tab=wi
and
http://www.google.de/imghp?hl=de&amp;amp;tab=ii
into the list of forbidden URLs - it didn´t work.

So I remembered the ACL-List for (Cisco-)Routers and created a filter
that is located before the pupils-Filter to close the hole:

Filter 1:
deny http://www.google.de/imghp?hl=de&amp;amp;tab=wi
deny http://www.google.de/imghp?hl=de&amp;amp;tab=ii

Filter 2:
permit all

and not:

Filter 2:
permit all
deny http://www.google.de/imghp?hl=de&amp;amp;tab=wi
deny http://www.google.de/imghp?hl=de&amp;amp;tab=ii

It didn´t work either.

How can I deny porn-pictures or may be all "google-pictures"? Any suggestions?

thanks

Herbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now &amp;amp; We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic i&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Herbert Appel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T07:37:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5820">
    <title>vlan</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5820</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi, I'm trying to setup VLANs on a EFW, what's the "none" option used to?

Thanks.-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis &amp;amp; visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andres Gonzalez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-22T23:18:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5818">
    <title>Bandwith and Thruput</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5818</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

thanks to all who helped me to solve the problem esp. Josh, Kevin, Andre, Farzan, Davo and all the others.

The solution was the IPS!
I switched it off and ......
53MBit/s up and 13MBit/s down :-)

Now we have no IPS but there are two firewalls in a row 

LAN--------EFW------------FOS 100------FTTH/WAN

thanks a lot

Herbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Herbert Appel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-21T14:15:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5803">
    <title>Bandwidth and Thruput</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5803</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello together,

we use the latest version of EFW 2.51 in school.
Since about one week we are connected to FTTH (FOS 100 as CPE) with 50MBit/s.
On the red IF there are truely 50MBit/s, but on the green IF there are only 7MBit/s.
Of course the services decelerate the thruput but I didn´t excpect this decrease.
We are running CLAVAV, AMAVIS, NTP, DHCP, Content-Filter.
What bothers me is that,when we were connected to DSL with 368kBit/s, we had full speed on the green side (47kB/s).

Can somebody confirm that this is normal?
Or, what can we do to lever the thruput?

I would be grateful for any hint.
Thanks in advance

Herbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Herbert Appel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-20T06:40:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5802">
    <title>Automatic LOG delete on Endian?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5802</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Endian 2.5.1 Community Version:

Hello

Today our Endian firewall was going down, as the partition where 
/var/log reside was full up to 100%. I was not aware of this circumstance.

Going to the command shell I found plenty of old archived logs, even 
later ones than those specified by a 30 days setting. Also I have 
configured the settings in order that only refused and bad packets are 
logged. Although also the firewall.log was about 1.2 GBytes.

As I did not found any possibility on the Web-Interface to delete the 
old logs I did it manually. Is there any other way, in order that old 
logs are deleted automatically, when the partition is going to 90%?

I would be grateful for any hint. Thanks in advance, Andre



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Mueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-14T17:19:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5801">
    <title>PPTP Client on LAN behinde Endian to Internet?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5801</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Endian 2.5.1 Community Version:

Hello

I feel a bit silly - behind an Endian 2.5.1 from the LAN I am not able 
to establish successfully a PPTP-client working connection to an 
PPTP-server outside on the internet. Outside of the Endian firewall or 
from the public internet (eg. iPhone) the PPTP-connection to the 
PPTP-Server works correct.

 From behind the Endian firewall on the LAN I am able to connect to the 
PPTP-Server, the routes are configured correctly on the client-PC 
(standard VPN-Client on MacOSX), but no data traffic is possible 
in-between the client-PC and the remote network of the PPTP-server 
(neither ping nor any other type of data exchange).

On the Endian firewall the outgoing firewall settings are disabled. Thus 
default rules are enabled. By enabling outgoing firewall settings the 
default rule for GREEN is : Source=GREEN; Destination=RED; 
Service/Protocol=&amp;lt;ANY&amp;gt;; Policy=ALLOW. Therefore no additional rules 
should be necessary.

On the firewall live Log I cannot see any related drops&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andre Mueller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-14T17:09:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5797">
    <title>VPN Beta Testers Needed</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5797</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I'm just finishing up changes to the VPN support in EFW Community 2.5.1. 

It includes the following improvements: 

    * Add Xauth support to IPsec for host-net connections 
    * Proper IPsec operation when initiator is behind NAT 
    * L2TP PSK and Certificate 
    * Xauth/L2TP User configuration page 

This not only adds a new package for the L2TP support it also modifies the existing efw-ipsec package. As a result I would like to get as much testing as possible before releasing it and possible breaking someone's IPsec connection. 

If you are interested in giving this a try (and can access your firewall even without your IPsec connection :-)) please let me know. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlw&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Robert B. Nelson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-27T22:41:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5796">
    <title>[EFW 2.5.1.] Skype audio block</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5796</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi! I need to block audio feature on Skype, but allow chat. Any idea if
it's possible ?

Regards.-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andres Gonzalez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-26T02:05:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5792">
    <title>New EFW Community 2.5.1 Repositories</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5792</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I've created some new repositories for EFW Community 2.5.1. 


There are three repositories: release, updates, and addons. Each repository has two actual repositories, one for RPMs, the other for SRPMs. 


The release repository just contains the binary RPMs you get when you use the Developer Environment I created to build the SRPMs from Endian. It also contains the SRPMs used to build those binaries. This repository is intended to allow users of the Developer Environment to install the necessary *-devel RPM packages without having to build all the packages from the SRPMs. Please don't use it to download the RPMs or SRPMs that are available from the Endian update site or SourceForge. 


The updates repository is currently empty but will contain packages which replace packages that ship as part of EFW, either to fix bugs or provide additional features. 


The addons repository has packages that are in addition to, rather than replacements for, standard packages. It currently contains wget, subversion (with h&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Robert B. Nelson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-23T22:43:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5789">
    <title>Upgrade?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5789</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi.
I've some systems still running 2.4, what's the best way to upgrade to 2.5.1?
efw-upgrade doesn't do anything.

thanks
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Lorenzo Milesi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-08T13:02:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5786">
    <title>EFW Development environment</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5786</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I am trying to get endian to support wifi - it appears this has not been 
enabled in the kernel.

So what I had in mind was to re-config the kernel (with wifi) and 
rebuild the kernel - using the development environment.

Can anybody help with the steps needed to unpack the kernel sources snd 
to re-build afterwards?

TIA

D

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Derek Sims</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-21T11:43:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5783">
    <title>endian and wifi</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5783</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi

Has anybody got any WIFI working with endian (Community)?
I would like to build a system with built in WIFI AP - but I dont seems 
to have the right drivers.

D

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Derek Sims</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-19T17:22:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5776">
    <title>Mail from iPad</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5776</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi guys,

I´m sitting behind an ENDIAN-MINI. Mails from my iMAC with pictures inside go to the outgoing mailserver "mail.hosting-agency.de" SMTP port 25 or 587 and come from IMAP Server "mail.hosting-agency.de" but
sent from my iPAD there is no connection with the SMTP-Server - so I was told from my mail-hoster.

Has anybody heard about such a behavior?
What can be wrong?

thanks a lot for any hint

Herbert


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Herbert Appel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-11T15:01:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5775">
    <title>Endian installation not detecting CISCO RAID COntroller</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5775</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear Community,

I am trying to install Endian firewall 2.5.1 on Cisco Cisco UCS C220 M3
Server with RAID controller UCSC SAS 2008M-8i,LSI SAS 9266-8i 8. It boots
up but then the installation says "DISK is too small" after giving an error
"unable to read device"...  I wounder if any one of you had any success of
installing it on a machine with RAID controller. It looks like controller
driver is not loaded.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Farzan

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Farzan Qureshi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-10T01:34:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5762">
    <title>endian firewall + SIP</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5762</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Hello, 
I am new with endian firewall and I have a doubt regarding its operation with SIP. I am using Asterisk as proxy server behind the firewall and I have made portforwarding of the corresponding SIP and RTP ports. However I do not know if I should disable the endian SIP proxy feature or not? What do you think? 
Thank you very much in advance!

       ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts 
and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>luis felipe picó herrero</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-29T20:51:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5761">
    <title>Features</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5761</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,
I've been using Endian FWs for a few years now, at the beginning just
the Community versions but as I gained trust in the product I started to
sell the idea to my clients and they started to buy Endians.
Usually I would recommend the Endian FW to customers who didn't have the
know how to set a decent firewall, apart from the firewall issue it's
nice to have an integrated dashboard and that matters to the less techy
clients. Even for others that have the knowledge is nice to be able to
have an whole in one package.

But I think Endian still lacks a bit in real enterprise solutions I'm
talking in:

1 - IPV6 Support (it's on the roadmap for endian 3).
2 - BGP,IGP Support, and if its not much to ask MPLS support.
3 - Bonding support (specially with LACP).

I'm not sure if there are people out there looking for this too, but if
there is please let Endian know :)

Cheers,
Pedro


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pedro M. S. Oliveira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-26T11:34:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5727">
    <title>Missing SRPMs</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5727</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Robert,

I have seen your postings on the mailing list and received your email.
We apologize that we did not reply immediately. Unfortunately you caught
us right in the middle of our annual meetings which were held during
this weekend. Additionally we have some huge projects going on that take
away lots of our time.

But enough about that - you were correct, some SRPMs were missing and we
apologize for that. Thank you for pointing this out as we simply were
not aware of it. Therefore we published them on Sourceforge on Monday
and they can be downloaded here:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/efw/files/Development/EFW-2.5.1/EFW-COMMUNITY-2.5.1-201201271721-MISSING-SRPMS.tar.gz/download

One thing is bugging me a little bit, though...  complaining about
somebody not replying during the weekend isn't all that great of an idea
if you ask me.

In any case, I would very much like to get in touch with you this week.
Can you send me a phonenumber so that I can call you (if you would like
to have a chat, that is)?
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Christian Graffer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-13T21:10:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5719">
    <title>How to create VLANs and protecting them with firewall</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5719</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Good afternoon. I'm searching since last week a way to create 4 subnets in
the green zone and then restrict access between them with firewall rules.
Unfortunately I did not find a documentation or a response on the forums.
I added the VLANS through the menu, but there is no option to assign an IP
address to the VLANs, VLAN can only associate to a zone, and I added the 4
in the green zone.
I need to add IP addresses to a VLAN in Endian? Where should I add these
addresses?
After creating VLANs, they appear no address. How do the rules and routes
if they have no address?
Can anyone help me?
I created this scenario with 4 VLANS on DEBIAN Squeeze and work, why not
work in Endian?
Thanks in advance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues
Automate, monitor and manage. Do m&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-07T21:54:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5718">
    <title>AUTO: Shane Ingram is out of the office (returning09/11/2012)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5718</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I am out of the office until 09/11/2012.

I am off site for training and will not be back in the office until the
ninth of october.

Please contact our help desk for any immediate need.  I will be checking my
email periodically and will respond to your request as promptly as
possible.

Thank you and have a good day


Note: This is an automated response to your message  "Efw-user Digest, Vol
75, Issue 1" sent on 11/7/2012 2:40:18 AM.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues
Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Shane Ingram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-07T07:42:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5715">
    <title>EFW CLI utility</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5715</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Is it right to say that with the CLI, I can't do very much? Unless I 
rely on linux commands standard.
I mean, is there a list of the functions allowed in the CLI?
I dunno, something like: start/stop firewalling, start/stop admin, 
start/stop vpn.
AFAIK you can only start and stop the ssh service. There is a "command 
help" and I suspect that that's is all we got.
Am I right?
Thanks
Davo


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues
Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>d.davolio-jhqqPEzQr+OgsXowIWgXJ16hYfS7NtTn&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-06T14:50:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5711">
    <title>EFW 2.5.1 Blocking Single IP address, the right way?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user/5711</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi everybody,
I'm quite new to Endian and I have a question or two.
I have a Web Server published via a "Port Forwarding" rule, very simple. 
In the "Access From" rules section I have "Allow from: Uplink Any", 
since everybody can access to the Web Server.
Now, someone was trying a nice DoS, attacking the http port from a fixed 
IP address. The documentation say that I can add an "Access From" rules 
to tune the IP addresses. But, as far as I can see I can only add 
"Access From" rules of the "Allow from" type. I can't add a "Deny from:" 
rule if the original one is the "Allow" type. Is it correct? Or am I 
missing something?
To add a "Deny From" I added a duplicated "Port Forwarding" rule on top 
of the previous one, identical but for the "Deny From" rule. It works 
but is this the right way to configure? I'm asking because I know a bit 
of iptables and sounds a bit unnecessary to me. But as I said, I'm new 
to Endian and I'd like to know if I'm doing it right.
Thanks
Davo

---------------------------------&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>d.davolio-jhqqPEzQr+OgsXowIWgXJ16hYfS7NtTn&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-30T11:41:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.security.firewalls.efw.user</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
