http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel/1492 <pre>I want to set a variable number and type of ValueRangeProcessors at run time based on a configuration file. But I seem to be running into (what I think is) a C++ scope issue. I tried just a simple test to see if I could add 5 VPs in a loop. Xapian::QueryParser qparser; Xapian::Query query; int vp = 0; while(vp &lt; 5) { Xapian::StringValueRangeProcessor sproc(vp++); qparser.add_valuerangeprocessor(&amp;sproc); } query = qparser.parse_query(myquery); That will compile, but when that code executes I get this error: pure virtual method called terminate called without an active exception Abort trap I *think* what's happening is that the sproc object goes out of scope at the end of the while() loop and is GC'd by the time the qparser tries to actually parse the query, so the qparser is trying to access a pointer that has been freed. But that's just a guess based on my limited knowledge of C++. What's the correct way to dynamically add a series of ValueRangeProcessors? </pre> Peter Karman 2009-11-15T03:32:20 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel/1488 <pre>_______________________________________________ Xapian-devel mailing list Xapian-devel&lt; at &gt;lists.xapian.org http://lists.xapian.org/mailman/listinfo/xapian-devel </pre> Steve Huff 2009-09-17T13:16:28 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel/1486 <pre>_______________________________________________ Xapian-devel mailing list Xapian-devel&lt; at &gt;lists.xapian.org http://lists.xapian.org/mailman/listinfo/xapian-devel </pre> Ben Walton 2009-09-11T13:17:56 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel/1483 <pre>_______________________________________________ Xapian-devel mailing list Xapian-devel&lt; at &gt;lists.xapian.org http://lists.xapian.org/mailman/listinfo/xapian-devel </pre> Ben Walton 2009-09-10T17:34:23 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel/1479 <pre>Afternoon all. I was discussing the current licensing of Xapian and how it influences the way we work with someone at another OSS project recently, and although the upshot is likely to be that they'll amend their license (it's a corporate foundation, and GPL compatibility is something they desire for precisely this reason), it did prompt me to think about how we're tracking where we are on the license issue. As per &lt;http://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/CommercialLicence&gt;, we have a clear idea of who owns what (modulo some uncertainty around Brightstation copyright ownership). Certainly for easily-contactable entities, we know who contributed to which file, and indeed could figure out ownership down to the change level. It strikes me that, given many of the current contributors to Xapian are agreed in principle in a bright and shiny future of LGPL licensing, having everyone expressly license their contributions under the LGPL might be a helpful thing. It wouldn't get us any closer to changing the license (which </pre> James Aylett 2009-08-07T12:06:15 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.search.xapian.devel