<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust">
    <title>gmane.comp.lang.r.robust</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/195"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/194"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/193"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/191"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/190"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/183"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/181"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/180"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/177"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/166"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/164"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/162"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/160"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/160"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/157"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/155"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/152"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/150"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/149"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/148"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/195">
    <title>Are PcaHubert and PCAproj randomized algorithms?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/195</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I am reading about these robust PCA functions in R...

I read words like "random directions"...

It seems that these algos are random algorithms, i.e their results will be
different each time we run them?

Thank you!

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T16:05:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/194">
    <title>In robust PCA methods, how to get variance explained?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/194</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;In robust PCA methods, how to get variance explained?

For example, PcaHubert,

how to get the variance explained which are similar to those concepts in
traditional PCA?

In traditional PCA, you have a bunch of eigenvalue lambdas...

and you sort the lambdas from the biggest to the smallest,

the lambda_i / (sum of all lambdas) is the variance explained by that
principal component...

how to obtain the equivalent concepts in PcaHubert?

Thanks a lot!

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-24T16:03:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/193">
    <title>library cox robust : weights?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/193</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I'm a italian student and I use R for my final degree thesis ... I want
study a Robustly Proportional Hazards (Bednarski's teory) for a dataset
of medical result. 
I have exstimate with library coxrobust a coxr model (exponential
weights)


site , cyto5.6 and zeb1 are my esplicative variables so the model is:

0.95, f.w= "exp" , singular.ok = TRUE, model = FALSE)

with plot(exp) I can see 5 graphs 
- the firs shows the standardizzed survival differences : one with Cox
model, and one green with Kaplan -Meir stimator 
-other four show the same differences for four strata, defined by the
quartiles of the estimated linear predictor. 

But my problem is the I want a graphic the robust exponential weight
(log trasformed) versus case number for the dataset..
If I ask R about weight of the model exp: 
NULL
If I write 
Error in plot.window(...) : 'xlim' devono essere finiti
Inoltre: Warning messages:
1: In min(x) : no non-missing arguments to min; returning Inf
2: In max(x) : no non-missing arguments to max; returni&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Elisabetta Mattiolo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-07T21:12:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/191">
    <title>get outlier list without plot</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/191</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

First time posting on the robust list. New to R.

How do I get the outliers list generated via uni.plot without opening a
graphics device?

Regards,

Ben

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ben qant</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-28T23:12:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/190">
    <title>Call for Papers ICPRAM 2012</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/190</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all,

My name is Pedro Latorre Carmona, program co-chair of the "2012  
International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and  
Methods (ICPRAM2012)". I send you the Call for Papers for this  
conference and would like to draw your attention in particular to the  
six special sessions that are also organised. I hope you will find it  
interesting and may contribute to ICPRAM 2012.


*********************************************************************
        2012 International Conference on Pattern Recognition
                  Applications and Methods (ICPRAM2012)

                            February 6-8, 2012
                      Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal
                         http://www.icpram.org
*********************************************************************

ICPRAM (1st International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and
Methods - http://www.icpram.org/) has an open call for papers, whose
deadline is set for July 26, 2011. We hope you can participate in this
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pedro Latorre Carmona</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-27T10:17:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/183">
    <title>minimum sample size for the robust counterpart of the t-test</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/183</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear List,

I am a beginner in the use of robust methods. Is there a minimum  
sample size
for which the robust analog of a two sample t-test using rlm with  
default parameters and categorical
explanatory variables may be trusted to yield reliable p-values?
Is so, can you please point me at a reference which treats this problem.

Thanks and best wishes,
Rich
------------------------------------------------------------
Richard A. Friedman, PhD
Associate Research Scientist,
Biomedical Informatics Shared Resource
Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (HICCC)
Lecturer,
Department of Biomedical Informatics (DBMI)
Educational Coordinator,
Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (C2B2)/
National Center for Multiscale Analysis of Genomic Networks (MAGNet)
Room 824
Irving Cancer Research Center
Columbia University
1130 St. Nicholas Ave
New York, NY 10032
(212)851-4765 (voice)
friedman-VS9ntHdz6ztaNOFNA11YEsysmGwsrwg7h13vi7wywA4&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
http://cancercenter.columbia.edu/~friedman/

I am a Ba&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Richard Friedman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-15T19:10:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/181">
    <title>Estimating robust distances in R (MVE vs. MCD)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/181</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have been trying to estimate robust Mahalanobis distances in R for a
set of three regressors that includes one dummy variable.  Initially,
I tried generating robust MCD estimates and their associated VCE using
cob.rob.  However, when I did so I received the following error
message:  "Error in solve.default(cov, ...) :  Lapack routine dgesv:
system is exactly singular".  I believe that the MCD estimator
involves subsampling and that the parameter for the discrete variable
could not be identified in one of the subsamples due to insufficient
variance.  When using the minimum volume ellipsoid (MVE) estimator, I
did not experience any problems.  My code is given below.


x&amp;lt;-cbind(c0[,3], c0[,7], c0[,8])
rest&amp;lt;-cov.rob(x, method = "mve", nsamp = "exact", cor=FALSE)
xrd&amp;lt;-mahalanobis(x, rest$center, rest$cov, inverted=FALSE)
xrd&amp;lt;-xrd^.5
d0&amp;lt;-ifelse(xrd&amp;gt; 3.0575159,1,0)


Can anyone explain to me why the MVE estimator is able to accommodate
discrete variables, whereas the MCD estimator cannot do so?  I would
like to b&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>James Shaw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-01T21:47:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/180">
    <title>VIF for robust regression?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/180</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,
I was looking at the vif function in the car package
and it it is trivial to modify to make a version for robust
regression. However, after trying it out I noticed  that what 
were reasonable values under ols, jumped way up. 
So my thought is that either,
I made a coding error, and the weights attribute needs to be used
to modify the variance covariance matrix of the coefficients
Or, the reduced variance from the robust regression, causes peripheral
points
(outside the mve) to have much more influence in the r^2's for each
predictor.
So that the standard vif measure, 1/(1-R^2_i) is not relevant in this
context.
Am I off base here? 

Thanks
Nicholas
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nicholas Lewin-Koh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-31T15:35:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/177">
    <title>hubers m-estimator in R / SPSS</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/177</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hello, i'm new to robust statistics but found out very quick that R 
(used huber, hubers and huberM) and SPSS (huber m-estimator) calculate 
different location estimates, given the same tuning constant k. since 
the differences a really not very small, i wanted to get some detailed 
information about this but i couldn't find out which algorithm SPSS uses 
to calculate hubers estimator so far...

does anyone know something about SPSS's huber function?

greetings,

manfred

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Manfred Hammerl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-19T02:30:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/166">
    <title>best robust fit</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/166</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
dear all,

I want to choose between different polynomial robust  regressions, 
however R2 may be misleading since the highest de degree is, the "better 
fit" to data. Is there any function implemented in robust or robustbase 
that computes an index for "model selection" ???

Thanx for helping!
pep
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pep Serra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-01T14:48:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/164">
    <title>choosing and plotting a model</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/164</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all,

Trying to choose between different curve fittings within different 
robust models (what we would get with cftools in MATLAB, but I am 
definetly R-addicted).

Maybe it is a trivial questions:

lm1&amp;lt;-lmrob(y ~  x, data=a)
pl2&amp;lt;-lmrob(y ~   poly (x,2), data=a)
pl3&amp;lt;-lmrob(y ~   poly (x,3), data=a)
pl4&amp;lt;-lmrob(y ~   poly (x,4), data=a)
pl5&amp;lt;-lmrob(y ~   poly (x,5), data=a)
pl6&amp;lt;-lmrob(y ~   poly (x,6), data=a)

I want to choose between different models according to the best fit, but 
the problem is that there is no "best fit" in robust (or R2). How could 
I do that?

In addition, I would love to plot these models (scatterplot and than 
later add the lines to see how the models look like)

I tried, for instance:

lines (x,predict (pl2),col="red")

but I get many curves (I think) or a filled polygon. Is there any way to 
get a simple line out of the model?
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pep Serra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-29T14:52:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/162">
    <title>calculating deviance for glmrob</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/162</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Standard glm returns a deviance field, which is apparently minus twice the maximized log-likelihood.
glmrob claims to do the same in its help page, but seems to always return NULL for deviance.

It seems to be an unimplemented feature.  Does anyone have code or an algorithm that can calculate it?

Any pointers appreciated


Alex Holcombe
www.psych.usyd.edu.au/staff/alexh/

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex Holcombe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-26T06:57:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/160">
    <title>robust scatterplot with fits</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/160</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;  Dear RsR list members,

  I somehow got stuck wth lmRob and I am sure I am missing something and 
I do not know what. It is my first time using robust statistics and I 
have read all your posts and pdfs recommended

I think it is likely to be a newbie question. I ploted two variables and 
the pictures shows a number of outliers that I want to identify given 
that the main trend between those two measurements is positive. 
(although they look like a lot, it is more or less 800 points out of 6000)





I used then

robust&amp;lt;-lmRob(WPROB~NPP,data=a)


lmRob(formula = WPROB ~ NPP, data = a)

Coefficients:
  (Intercept)          NPP
499.86274538  -0.00990502

Degrees of freedom: 6002 total; 6000 residual
Residual standard error: 250.3199

1) I do not really understand the slope of the regression, why is it 
negative???

then used plot.lmRob(robust) and choose for option 11 (scatter plot with 
fits)



What is meant to be the x axis (WPROB) turns into the y axis.
The regression line and the confidence intervals sh&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pep Serra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-19T14:32:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/160">
    <title>robust scatterplot with fits</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/160</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pep Serra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-19T14:32:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/157">
    <title>Can robust estimators outperform least squares in nonlinear regression for pure Gaussian noise?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/157</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I have recently conducted a Monte Carlo simulation study for robust univariate *nonlinear* regression estimators using small sample data taken from case studies in the chemical engineering field. The paper is available from doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.04.009

A very unusual finding was that for *pure* Gaussian error some of the robust estimators could *outperform* the least squares estimator. Even though I do not known of any theoretical result which prevents this behavior to happen, I have never seen it reported either.

I would like to known whether you find this acceptable or not and what you think might be causing it.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Eduardo L.T. Conceição
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
University of Coimbra
Portugal
e-mail: econceicao&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;kanguru.pt; etc&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;eq.uc.pt

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Eduardo Conceição</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-13T03:45:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/155">
    <title>S-estimates</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/155</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I'd like to S-estimates of regression, could anyone give me a hint whether a solution of this problem is already implemented or point me to some reference?
Thanks!!!Nanda       
_________________________________________________________________
Los cochazos de los famosos Patrick Dempsey, Tom Cruise o Michael Douglas presumen de automóvil

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nanda Mendez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-29T19:35:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/152">
    <title>spherical principal components</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/152</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I'd like to compute spherical principal components, could anyone give me a hint whether a solution of this problem is already implemented or point me to some reference?
Fernanda       
_________________________________________________________________
[[elided Hotmail spam]]

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nanda Mendez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-16T22:06:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/150">
    <title>Robust Parameter Estimation: Negative Binomial</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/150</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear R-SIG Robust

I'd like to estimate the parameters of a negative binomial in a
robust way. Could anyone give me a hint whether a solution of
this problem is already implemented or point me to some
reference?

Thank you very much!

Kind regards
Markus Kalisch

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Markus Kalisch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-28T12:40:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/149">
    <title>Box-Cox transformation and reverse Box-Cox transformation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/149</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I am wanting to use Box-Cox transformed values to develop a reference intervals for clinical chemistry tests given 25 observations per test. After I have used the transformed values to find the range as a function of the interquartile range, I want to remap the transformed variables back to the original scale using a reverse Box-Cox transformation. This will allow me to present the reference range in the original scale.

I have looked at the alr3 package, but do not see a way to get the reverse transformation and I have looked at boxcox (MASS), but it is dealing with linear models.

Any guidance will be appreciated.

Mark
R. Mark Sharp, Ph.D.
msharp-KTAgM73DmtE&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;lt;mailto:msharp-KTAgM73DmtE&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;





[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mark Sharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-13T20:36:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/148">
    <title>Vote Concentration Equation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/148</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,
I'm just a beginner on R issue, but improving.

Does anyone knows how can I get vote concentration to each ID by city
(CIDADE) considering each UF (State), because my data is long and has all
states together and IDs repeating across states.
I also tried to get  totals and then apply for division, but R din't allow
me to attach new column with less rows, of course.
So, someone have any light for me do that? Can I print values all without my
pain programing?

total.UF &amp;lt;- tapply(senador$Votos, senador$UF, sum)
total.MUN &amp;lt;- tapply(senador$Votos, senador$CODMUNIC09, sum)

z &amp;lt;- cbind(senador, total.UF)
Error in data.frame(..., check.names = FALSE) :
  arguments imply differing number of rows: 54861, 27

========= my data look likes these ===========

 ID         UF     CIDADE       VOTOS
1515      SP    SÃ£o Paulo       15
1515      SP    Campinas       100
1515      SP    Santos             0
1212      SP    SÃ£o Paulo      1500
1212      SP     Piracicaba      20
1212     SP      Campinas      300&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-23T04:24:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/147">
    <title>robust ridge</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.robust/147</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi dears
I am writing a program in R for robust ridge estimator based on LTS. is there any code or package relating to it? could you please help me out?

Regards

Alamgir
Ph.D scholar 




      
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alamgir Gir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-10T06:43:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.lang.r.robust">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.lang.r.robust</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

