<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general">
    <title>gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2866"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2840"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2835"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2832"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2823"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2820"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2791"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2785"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2783"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2782"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2779"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2773"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2755"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2752"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2745"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2739"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2734"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2687"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2658"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2657"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2866">
    <title>Obtaining methods executed at least once?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2866</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

I hope this is the right mailing list to ask such questions (if not,
please point me to the right one), as I couldn't find an obvious
analogue to lists like jikesrvm-researchers.

Is the a way (preferably using "diagnostic" rather than "develop"
options) to obtain a list of all methods executed at least once?
Currently I am considering "-XX:-UseInterpreter -XX:+LogCompilation",
but this seems to be an awfully indirect way to achieve my goal -- and
it may not even give correct results if the only call of m() is inlined
during compilation.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Best wishes,

Andreas

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Andreas Sewe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T08:56:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2840">
    <title>Project Proposal: PowerPC/AIX port</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2840</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines [1], I'd like to start the
discussion of a new project to port the OpenJDK to the PowerPC/Linux
and PowerPC/AIX platforms.
 
The goal of the project will be to provide full-featured and certifiable
version of the OpenJDK on the two platforms which can be ultimately integrated
into the main OpenJDK development branch.
 
Besides the very fact that this project will enrich the OpenJDK platform
coverage with two new platforms we see two more main benefits. By supporting
the PowerPC architecture we will add the first weak memory architecture to the
OpenJDK. As we already know from past experience, this will unveil all kinds
of intricate memory ordering problems. Moreover, adding AIX as a new Unix
flavor to the set of supported operating systems will uncover numerous
implicit assumptions and shortcuts inside the code base which only hold true
for Linux and Solaris. We strongly believe that fixing these issues will
considerably increase the robustness and further portabilit&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Simonis, Volker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-07T15:03:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2835">
    <title>Source code mapping to projects</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2835</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

As part of the plan to pre-review low hanging fruit for the OpenJDK
(such as coinification, javac warnings and the like).  One of the
challenges is to split the patches into the appropriate groups (2d,
core-lib etc) and then a per class basis for easy review.

Is there a rough mapping outlined of OpenJDK source code to groups?

Cheers,
Martijn

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Martijn Verburg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-04T14:21:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2832">
    <title>OpenJDK logo?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2832</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I wonder if there are any plans to create a more attractive OpenJDK logo,
or maybe there's one already somewhere?.
SVG?

Just thinking aloud...

Thanks
FC
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fernando Cassia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-17T01:28:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2823">
    <title>OpenJDK 7 windows</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2823</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;anyone can share to me, regarding OpenJDK in Windows (outside openscg )

i need the binary and the tutorial

that will be interesting if you have test it in Azure.

F

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T08:03:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2820">
    <title>Anti Java rant from Kaspersky guy</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2820</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;It seems a trend lately... lots of "security firms" scaring people
telling them to "disable java" with the side effect this has on JWS
and JavaFX...
http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/java-osx-and-cross-platform-nightmare-040912

curiously I don t see them using the same tactics to speak about
Microsoft .Net which is as ubiquitous if not more, and gets patches
regularly...

FC

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fernando Cassia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T19:17:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2791">
    <title>Bug number not received after submitting</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2791</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

    We encountered the problem since yesterday, there are several bugs
reported, but no mail received.

    Is this mailing list the right place to ask ?

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sean Chou</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-20T02:25:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2785">
    <title>Project Proposal: Code Tools</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2785</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines [1], I would like to start the discussion of a new Project to provide tools of use to OpenJDK developers while working on the OpenJDK code base. Such tools currently include test tools and Mercurial extensions; it is envisaged that additional tools will be added over time, subject to the Project Lead's approval.

There are a number of initial candidates for inclusion in such a Project.

* jtreg
      jtreg is the regression test harness for the OpenJDK platform.
      It is currently just available via source bundles [2].

* jtharness
      jtharness is the test framework underlying jtreg [3].

* sigtest
      sigtest is a set of utilities relating to API signature checking [4].

* the Mercurial "jcheck" extension
      jcheck provides simple validity checks on the contents of a changeset

It is expected that most of these tools will have their own separate communities, and so each tool should have its own repositories and mailing list.


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Gibbons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-10T19:19:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2783">
    <title>Jar manifest and openjdk</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2783</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
If I create a jar using /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-amd64/bin/jar:
jar cf test.jar anyfile

It writes in META-INF/MANIFEST.MF :
Created-By: 1.6.0_24 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)

Why does it write "Sun Microsystems" ?
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>®om</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-06T19:17:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2782">
    <title>Miglayout</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2782</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all

just read this, a long bugs issue 2007

and a little discussion with Geejan from Netbeans around MigLayout

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=e02b026c1ef0bffffffffdfbd57e8f43560d?bug_id=6530906

any idea why, MIG Layout cannot be part of JDK?


--
Frans Thamura (曽志胜)
Shadow Master and Lead Investor
Meruvian.
Integrated Hypermedia Java Solution Provider.

Mobile: +628557888699
Blog: http://blogs.mervpolis.com/roller/flatburger (id)

FB: http://www.facebook.com/meruvian
TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;meruvian
Website: http://www.meruvian.org

"We grow because we share the same belief."

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-05T00:05:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2779">
    <title>where is the libstdc++ package?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2779</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I am looking for the libstdc++ package for the libjvm that I am building 
on fedora 16.

I was looking for a fedora compat package, but cant seem to find one.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Uncle George</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-02T19:24:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2773">
    <title>OpenJDK repositioning..</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2773</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all

a little discussion here.. inspired by OpenOffice model

which one from these statements?

OpenJDK is a OpenSource project which Oracle is the main contributor...

or.


Oracle is the owner of OpenJDK that decide everything, and the contribution
model under JCP..


anyway, this is a discusion outside this mailinglist with several of these
member also :0

like usually, i try to raise up :)

F

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-27T11:19:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2755">
    <title>OpenJDK BInary REsult</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2755</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all

just want to followup

what will happen to OpenJDK world, esp the binary..

the OpenJDK Windows binary will be an interesting topic :)

I love Denis work in the OpenJDK.. is it possible?

or the model , binary outside the OpenJDK?


F

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-23T20:46:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2752">
    <title>building under netbeans</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2752</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;The description under this web page for using netbeans


suggests that I read the README for further details on how to setup 
netbeans to work with openjdk.
What properties am I to set, and to what values?
BTW; is now tools-&amp;gt;options-&amp;gt;misc-&amp;gt;ant



How does one import all the OPENJDK files into netbeans, or point ant to 
the src repository.




&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Uncle George</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-23T12:21:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2745">
    <title>Bug System:  Brief update</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2745</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi.

Sorry you haven't heard from me in the past couple of weeks.   I was temporarily sidetracked.

The next revision of the DRAFT[1] will be out soon.  I'll update the discussion timeline at that point.

Thanks,
iris

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iris/jira/JIRAforOpenJDK.html

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Iris Clark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-22T20:39:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2739">
    <title>SQLSErver and Hadoop</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2739</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;anyone may be know, MS just launch a SQL Server 2012, with hadoop inside

can anyone know, which JDK is it? OpenJDK?

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/uk_faculty_connection/archive/2011/11/20/microsoft-big-data-solution-sql-server-apache-hadoop-and-windows-azure.aspx


--
Frans Thamura (曽志胜)
Shadow Master and Lead Investor
Meruvian.
Integrated Hypermedia Java Solution Provider.

Mobile: +628557888699
Blog: http://blogs.mervpolis.com/roller/flatburger (id)

FB: http://www.facebook.com/meruvian
TW: http://www.twitter.com/meruvian / &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;meruvian
Website: http://www.meruvian.org

"We grow because we share the same belief."

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-21T12:58:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2734">
    <title>Java 6 EOL Update</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2734</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;OpenJDK'ers,

For those that follow the BCL licensed "Oracle JDK", we just wanted to 
advise everyone that the Java 6 public EOL (for the Oracle JDK) has been 
pushed to November, 2012.  Also, we've described the criteria for 
setting the EOL to help understand future releases as well.  This has 
actually been the long standing criteria, but now clarified.

More details can be found here:
https://blogs.oracle.com/henrik/entry/updated_java_6_eol_date

Please let us know if you have any questions, here or on the blog.

Cheers,

  - Don

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Donald Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-16T23:41:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2687">
    <title>Ubuntu 11.10 VM including OpenJDK Build Image</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2687</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello All,

I have created a very basic installation of Ubuntu 11.10 on a Virtual Box
VM. It includes all of the tools required to build JDK 8. It is small (10
GB), but this is still rather large to me. I could put the image up to
allow people to download it, but that could take some time.Ultimately I
would like to get the image down to &amp;lt; 4GB so that we can use it on a memory
stick. I tried to use Ubuntu Minimal, but could not get it to install on
less than 4GB. I will see about adding this to the wiki, and also to the
README-builds.html in the root of the distribution.

I created a jdk7u build first to bootstrap the jdk8 build and it worked
perfectly.

John

____________________________

John Yeary
____________________________

&amp;lt;http://javaevangelist.blogspot.com/&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;https://twitter.com/jyeary&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;http://www.youtube.com/johnyeary&amp;gt;
  &amp;lt;http://www.linkedin.com/in/jyeary&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;https://plus.google.com/112146428878473069965&amp;gt;
  &amp;lt;http://www.facebook.com/jyeary&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;http://feeds.feedburner.com/JavaEvangelistJohnYearysBlog&amp;gt;
 &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>John Yeary</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-12T12:13:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2658">
    <title>OpenJDK Binary</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2658</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all

i got this

http://openjdk.java.net/install/index.html

for me this is "strange" open source project

why we dont have a distribution for windows, mac... for openjdk?

my feedback.. we should have those in main page.. but why there is no
build/binary?


F

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T18:58:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2657">
    <title>Java End of Life Time</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2657</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all

a small question..

we know the Java 6 will end , a life time support will be come..

but if, the community product.. we also the community people, can work
together to continue the life time . rather pay to oracle, no all of
us love this model.

https://java.sys-con.com/node/2154299

any idea to keep make J6 supported? if oracle ask us for pay for the life time


F

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T18:53:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2654">
    <title>Hacked OpenJDK</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general/2654</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi there..

if i use openjdk, and modify several code or API, and make it not
standard, and i am using for our own, and share across internet..

will oracle sue me because this is not "openjdk" that release

we know. that google, facebook, yahoo, twitter also using java, and
for a big company , that is "safer" they have their own skill , esp
java is their platform.

we call it hacked openJDK.

and in several case, they have team that manage the jdk, and several
can contribute, but several afraid, about "the sue".

because this model will strengthen the OpenJDK, but how about the JDK
for business?

that is my idea.. any comment?

F

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frans Thamura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T18:27:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.java.openjdk.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

