gmane.comp.java.geronimo.devel

[VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - second try

Forrest Xia — 2013-05-21T07:35:14

Hi Devs,

Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from the
previous release:
1. JSF 2.1 support
2. JDBC 4 support
3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
4. Quite a few bugs fixes

For details, see
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt

The server code up for vote is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip

The binary code up for vote is:
Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies

Cancelled [VOTE ] Release Geronimo 3.0.1

Forrest Xia — 2013-05-21T03:09:33

Since some modules' versions are not updated correctly via release plugin.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org> wrote:

[DISCUSS] Release Geronimo 3.0.1

Kevan Miller — 2013-05-20T12:25:18

I've been trying off and on to get a clean build since Friday. I'm currently failing with:

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project geronimo-clustering-wadi: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-clustering-wadi:bundle:3.0.1-SNAPSHOT: Could not find artifact org.apache.geronimo.ext.tomcat:tribes:jar:7.0.39.1-SNAPSHOT in apache.snapshots (http://repository.apache.org/snapshots) -> [Help 1]

I can try to clean out my maven repo. See if that helps. However:

looks like a lot of pom.xml files have <parent>'s pointing to 3.0.1-SNAPSHOT. Try running 'grep -Rni --include=pom.xml snapshot *' 

--kevan

On May 17, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org> wrote:

[VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1

Forrest Xia — 2013-05-17T13:56:28

Hi Devs,

Please vote Geronimo 3.0.1 release with these major differences from the
previous release:
1. JSF 2.1 support
2. JDBC 4 support
3. Some components upgrade, including Tomcat, JPA, Yoko, Tranql, ActiveMQ
4. Quite a few bugs fixes

For details, see
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.1/RELEASE_NOTES-3.0.1.txt

The server code up for vote is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.1/geronimo-3.0.1-source-release.zip

The binary code up for vote is:
Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.1-bin.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-009/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Tomcat fork 7.0.39.2 for a security fix

Forrest Xia — 2013-05-17T06:06:54

Hi,

Please revote for the Geronimo Tomcat fork 7.0.39.2 release, which merges a
tomcat security fix for CVE-2013-2071

The components up for vote are:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/ext/tomcat/tomcat-parent-7.0.39/7.0.39.2/tomcat-parent-7.0.39-7.0.39.2-source-release.zip


Staging repo is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008

tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/tags/tomcat-parent-7.0.39.2


 Vote open 72 hours

 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Tomcat fork 7.0.39.1

Forrest Xia — 2013-05-10T02:41:46

Hi,

Please revote for the Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.39.1 release, which is based on
Tomcat 7.0.39 tag.

The components up for vote are:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-029/org/apache/geronimo/ext/tomcat/tomcat-parent-7.0.39/7.0.39.1/tomcat-parent-7.0.39-7.0.39.1-source-release.zip


Staging repo is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-029

tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/tags/tomcat-parent-7.0.39.1


 Vote open 72 hours

 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

Cancel [VOTE] Release Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.39.1 for RAT check issue

Forrest Xia — 2013-05-10T02:19:41

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.39.1

Forrest Xia — 2013-05-09T16:15:40

Hi,

Please vote for the Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.39.1 release, which is based on
Tomcat 7.0.39 tag.

The components up for vote are:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-026/org/apache/geronimo/ext/tomcat/tomcat-parent-7.0.39/7.0.39.1/tomcat-parent-7.0.39-7.0.39.1-source-release.zip


Staging repo is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-026

tag is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/tags/tomcat-parent-7.0.39.1


 Vote open 72 hours

 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

Time for a new Geronimo 3 release?

Jarek Gawor — 2013-05-08T19:00:33

Hi all,

I think it's probably a good time to have a new Geronimo 3 release
(3.0.1?). We've fixed a bunch of stuff, upgraded Tomcat, OpenJPA, and
fixed Java 7 complication issues. TCK is also looking pretty good now.

Thoughts?

Jarek

geronimo deploy exception

红枫落叶 — 2013-05-08T03:36:59

hello:
 when i deploy a jar module(application client type) using the geronimo3.0.0 console,it exception:
Cannot deploy the requested application module because no deployer is able to handle it. This can happen if you have omitted the J2EE deployment descriptor, disabled a deployer module, or if, for example, you are trying to deploy an EJB module on a minimal Geronimo server that does not have EJB support installed. (moduleFile=/data/development/java/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0/var/temp/geronimo-deployer1159070535568604899.tmpdir/yaoyun-rds-core-cache-ehcache-1.0.0.jar)
org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Cannot deploy the requested application module because no deployer is able to handle it. This can happen if you have omitted the J2EE deployment descriptor, disabled a deployer module, or if, for example, you are trying to deploy an EJB module on a minimal Geronimo server that does not have EJB support installed. (moduleFile=/data/development/java/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0/va

Permission to translate your page at http://geronimo.apache.org/

Anja Skrba — 2013-04-28T20:07:19

Dear Sir,

I am writing to inquire regarding your web page about deploy and run 
J2EE application client where I have found a lot of useful information. 
My name is Anja and I'm currently studying at the Faculty of Computer 
Science in Belgrade.
Here is the URL of your article: 
http://geronimo.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/deploy-and-run-j2ee-application-client.html

I would like to share it with the people from Former Yugoslav Republics: 
Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Slovenia, Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

I would be grateful if you could allow me to translate your writing into 
Serbo-Croatian language, that is used in all Former Yugoslav Republics 
and to post it on my website. Hopefully, it will help our people to 
gather some additional knowledge about computing.

I hope to hear from you soon.

Regards,
Anja Skrba
anjas-FSqJnyRltE38RP/Ry8ufZUEOCMrvLtNR< at >public.gmane.org
http://science.webhostinggeeks.com/
Tel: +381 62 300604

update dependencies?

Kevan Miller — 2013-04-23T12:45:58

I see there is a new OpenJPA release. I also noticed that our OpenEJB depencency is 4.0.0-beta-1.

Any plans on updating these (or other dependencies)?

--kevan

ignore rules for geronimo-specs

Mark Struberg — 2013-04-19T18:54:52

Hi folks!

I'll set the following ignorerules for geronimo-specs


target
.metadata
.classpath
.project
.settings
*.iml
*.ipr
*.iws
.idea
.git
.gitignore
maven.log
mvn.log
junit*.properties


Previously this has been wildly different for a lot projects (most times only having 'target' ignored)

LieGrue,
strub

Java EE 7 API jars

Kevin Sutter — 2013-04-17T20:57:10

Hi,
Is there any activity in the Geronimo community to create and house the API
jar files for Java EE 7 technologies, just like we've had available in the
past with previous spec levels?  Is this work has already been started,
could you point me at the JIRA or wiki or whatever is tracking this piece
of work?  If the work hasn't been started, how should we kickstart this
activity?

The Java EE 7 family of specifications is very near to being finalized.  It
would be great to have these API jar files available for those projects
that will be implementing the specifications.  And, I think the Geronimo
project is a great holding place.  Not that the Geronimo team has to do all
the work, but it would be good to have a central project.

Thanks,
Kevin Sutter
Apache OpenJPA PMC

xbean finder getURLs()

Romain Manni-Bucau — 2013-04-17T07:22:36

Hi,

in org.apache.xbean.finder.UrlSet#getUrls we rely on META-INF (or "") to
find jars. There are cases where it doesn't work at all (a common case
where i saw it is when you only have META-INF/MANIFEST.MF which is consider
for a single entry and not META-INF then MANIFEST.MF - depends the build
tool/zip format if i understood correctly)

the question are:
1) do we getresources("META-INF/MANIFEST.MF") too
2) why not simply querying the classloader which is very very often an
URLClassLoader -> if (yes) return Arrays.asList(classLoader.getURLs());
else currentImpl;

The 2 seems less correct but in practise i think it is more efficient - we
can do both too (testing URLClassLoader and if not adding MANIFEST.MF
listing)

wdyt?

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: < at >rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*

commons-annotation-1.2.MR2

Mark Struberg — 2013-04-16T19:32:02

hi folks!

In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from commons-annotation-1.2.MR2.
Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation.

Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the missing annotations?

LieGrue,
strub

[VOTE RESULT] (take 2) Release yoko-1.4

Jarek Gawor — 2013-04-05T20:43:52

Hi all,

Here are the vote results:

+1: Kevan, Shawn, David, Jarek
+0: none
-1: none

The vote passes. I'll get the artifacts published.

Thank you all,

Jarek

tranql connector release candidate for jdbc 4 support

David Jencks — 2013-04-05T19:58:24

I've put together a release candidate for the tranql connector projects staged at 

https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgtranql-016/

The main purpose is to support jdbc 4.  I also simplified the prepared statement cache code by moving it to a new abstract MCF class and making the individual MCFs that support prepared statement caching themselves inherit from the new abstract class.  I also provided a generic wrapper that does PS caching.  Geronimo might want to use this in the < at >Datasource support, I'm not sure.

Please take a look.  If there are no problems reported I plan to release these no sooner than monday.

thanks
david jencks

[VOTE] (take 2) Release yoko-1.4

Jarek Gawor — 2013-04-02T15:07:12

Hi all,

I would like to call a vote on yoko-1.4. It is a minor release that
contains TCK related fixes (GERONIMOTCK-133, GERONIMOTCK-142) and
Genesis update to build with Java 7.

Source archives:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-052/org/apache/yoko/yoko/1.4/

Source tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/yoko/tags/yoko-1.4/

Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-052/

Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 [ ] +1  approve
 [ ] +0  no opinion
 [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Here's my +1.

Jarek

[VOTE RESULT] Release geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.2

Jarek Gawor — 2013-04-02T14:30:00

Hi all,

Here are the vote results:

+1: Kevan, Ivan, Shawn, Jarek
+0: none
-1: none

The vote passes. I'll get the artifacts published.

Thank you all,

Jarek

[VOTE CANCELED] Release yoko-1.4

Jarek Gawor — 2013-04-02T04:35:19

I tried building it with IBM Java 7 and it compiled fine. But it does
fail with Oracle Java 7. I'll update the code and start a new vote.

Jarek


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w< at >public.gmane.org> wrote: