<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user">
    <title>gmane.comp.java.activemq.user</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34120"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34114"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34112"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34111"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34105"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34101"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34098"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34094"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34092"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34087"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34084"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34078"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34074"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34073"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34065"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34059"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34057"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34052"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34050"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34042"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34120">
    <title>MessageListener not delivering any more messages at some point</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34120</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I've got an ActiveMQ 5.3.0 broker running in one JVM.

        &amp;lt;transportConnectors&amp;gt;
            &amp;lt;transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://localhost:19616"/&amp;gt;
        &amp;lt;/transportConnectors&amp;gt;

Another application (different JVM but currently on the same machine)
connects to that broker to receive messages from a single queue through
a MessageListener:

failover://(tcp://localhost:19616?keepAlive=true)?startupMaxReconnectAttempts=5

The message frequency is rather low (5-500 per hour) and can drop to
zero over multiple hours (during the night). Every now and then, the
MessageListener simply doesn't get any more messages and we have to
restart the application for a reconnect despite the failover protocol 
(as seen above). We've tried various connection URI parameters but so
far, the issue keeps popping up every few weeks. I somehow doubt it has
to do with some timeout because, yesterday, it happened during the day
during normal business, not in the night after hours of inactivity. When
the problem happe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremias Maerki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T10:23:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34114">
    <title>NetworkConnectors and prefetch</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34114</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

We are using a network of brokers but it's giving us some problems with load
balancing. Most of the messages are being delivered to the remote broker
instead of being shared between the network connector and the broker's
consumer. If a broker has 5 consumers and 1 network connector, and receives
50 messages, it processes 5-10 in its consumers and the rest outside

We are using prefetch = 1 for the consumers, so we set prefetchSize=1 for
the network connector. We have tried both with and without
conduitSubscriptions. The only configuration that have worked was setting a
high prefetch in consumers and network connector, but that was only for
testing purpose, as we cant modify the consumer's prefetch size.

So we need to know if there's any way to make it work with prefetch = 1 in
the consumers. The expected behaviour in the case explained before would be
processing 25 messages in the broker's consumers and send 25 to the network
connector.

Thanks

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.22833&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>RickSnz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T11:38:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34112">
    <title>change strategy for determining failure of primary in JBDC-backed setup</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34112</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

We are running activemq 5.5.1 in an active/passive failover configuration with 
JDBC Persistence to an Oracle backend. The default strategy for determining 
whether the current master has failed is for the secondary server to attempt to 
get a lock on the database table, waiting indefinitely for the lock to be granted.

This is not working (at least in our context) as, after a relatively short time 
in operation (a handful of hours at most) the connection to Oracle is dropped. 
Activemq doesn't notice this, so the secondary sits there happily waiting for a 
lock it can now never get and, in the event of a failure, won't serve any 
clients as it is not a master.

Is there some way to change the decision mechanism to, eg, a polling strategy? 
Or can anyone suggest another resolution to this problem?

Alex.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex Hooper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T10:45:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34111">
    <title>Unable to connect/send messages with MQTT transport from JMS client</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34111</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I'm trying to use MQTT protocol between ActiveMQ broker and JMS client.

Broker is started with MQTT transport: &amp;lt;transportConnector name="mqtt"
uri="mqtt://0.0.0.0:61616"/&amp;gt;
One queue and one topic are configured.

1. For testing I use HermesJMS tool. I've configured the tool with
MQTT jars (from /apache-activemq-5.6.0/lib/optional folder) and
brockerURL: mqtt://localhost:61616
When I try to open connection (just open an queue tab-panel) I receive
such exception:

javax.jms.JMSException: java.io.EOFException
at org.apache.activemq.util.JMSExceptionSupport.create(JMSExceptionSupport.java:49)
at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.syncSendPacket(ActiveMQConnection.java:1362)
at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.ensureConnectionInfoSent(ActiveMQConnection.java:1466)
at org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection.setClientID(ActiveMQConnection.java:396)
at hermes.impl.jms.ConnectionManagerSupport.createConnection(ConnectionManagerSupport.java:174)
        ...
at hermes.browser.tasks.ThreadPool.ru&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dmytro Pishchukhin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T10:29:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34105">
    <title>ActiveMQ 5.6, IllegalStateException, MessageServlet.java:368</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34105</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I attempt to put a text message on a queue using HTTP.  The admin shows the
enqueued *and* dequeued counters both incremented by one.  The broker log
excerpt follows.  I must be doing something it doesn't like.  Any assistance
will be apreciated.  Thanks.


2012-05-23 12:09:56,040 | DEBUG | call servlet MessageServlet |
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler | qtp32489992-25 -
/demo/message/request?type=queue

2012-05-23 12:09:56,040 | DEBUG | destination uri=request |
org.apache.activemq.web.MessageServletSupport | qtp32489992-25 -
/demo/message/request?type=queue

2012-05-23 12:09:56,040 | DEBUG | request (queue) |
org.apache.activemq.web.MessageServletSupport | qtp32489992-25 -
/demo/message/request?type=queue

2012-05-23 12:09:56,040 | DEBUG | Sending message to: queue://request with
text: this is a test23MAY12:12:09:56 |
org.apache.activemq.web.MessageServlet | qtp32489992-25 -
/demo/message/request?type=queue

2012-05-23 12:09:56,040 | DEBUG | localhost Message
ID:d22275-3380-1337789359310-3:1:1:1:1 &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Steve.V.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T16:23:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34101">
    <title>ActiveMQ Plugin references</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34101</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi everybody,

I am developing some plugins for ActiveMQ and because I have more than one
plugin in my configuration I would like to connect them, that is to have a
reference from the one to another. 

If you can help me with the configuration and some examples of how can I
achieve this.

So from one class that extends a BrokerFilter I want to have a reference to
another one that is also working as a plugin (also extends BrokerFilter).

Thanks...

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Plugin-references-tp4651507.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>mandjeo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T12:15:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34098">
    <title>ActiveMQ rar source?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34098</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi everyone,

I was searching for the ActiveMQ-rar 5.5.1 source code, but the -source.jar
file contains nothing other than a list of dependencies and legal notes.

http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/activemq/activemq-rar/5.5.1/

Can you help me where can I find it, and how come the source jar is empty?
Thanks,

-Peter-

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-rar-source-tp4651281.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Croo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T08:30:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34094">
    <title>CodeMaps updates for Active MQ</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34094</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey Folks,

We are excited to have interest from Active MQ at CodeMaps.org.  Welcome to
the CodeMaps.org community!  We have been hearing feedback, and improving
the usefulness of the site by leaps and bounds :-)

We were wondering if you guys could do us a quick favor. Would you take
5-minutes, go to the site, and tag code as being performance-sensitive,
messaging, integration pattern, needs-refactoring, or something similar.

We believe that with people tagging the Active MQ codebase - it will become
an awesome community resource.

Please go to *http://www.codemaps.org/c/Apache_ActiveMQ*, signup, and tag
at least 3 classes or methods to help.

Your feedback is important to us as it helps us help you guys - so let us
know your thoughts.

Thanks and Regards,
CodeMaps Team
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Abhishek Rakshit</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T01:33:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34092">
    <title>64-bit NMS build</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34092</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Is there a 64-bit release of ActiveMQ NMS?  I have not found one and
have had problems building from source.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mark Webb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T21:25:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34087">
    <title>How to config master-slave brokers based on share storage(SAN)?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34087</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt; Hi all,
    We have a disk array available and two servers and are ready for setting up a master-slave brokers based on SAN.
    We have mounted the shared storage partition to the same path of two servers.
    Now create a directory or write some files on one server in the mounted directory,
    we cannot see the directory or files on the another server in the same mounted directory except for remount.
    What's wrong or what others tools we need to synchronize files between two servers?
    Thanks!


--

Wangyin
SuoNayi2006-9Onoh4P/yGk&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org 
 &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>SuoNayi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T09:58:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34084">
    <title>ActiveMQ and Jboss AS 7</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34084</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi, 
I have been trying to integrate the active mq with JBOss as 7. I have
constantly running into errors and exceptions. I try to post them on jboss
forum. They are saying that its active mq that neds to resolve this. SO, if
some one can please post a small tutorial of sorts on how to do this
integration, it would be of great help.
THanks
Ram

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-and-Jboss-AS-7-tp4649224.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>bondrk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T01:51:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34078">
    <title>org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-elt.1: Cannot find the declaration of element 'beans'</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34078</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

We had recently done changes in our application that uses ActiveMQ. Upon
building and deploying the app, an exception was prompted during start-up:

...
Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-elt.1: Cannot find the
declaration of element 'beans'.
at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.createSAXParseException(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:195)
at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util.ErrorHandlerWrapper.error(ErrorHandlerWrapper.java:131)
at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:384)
at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLErrorReporter.reportError(XMLErrorReporter.java:318)
at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.xs.XMLSchemaValidator.handleStartElement(XMLSchemaValidator.java:1916)
at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.xs.XMLSchemaValidator.startElement(XMLSchemaValidator.java:705)
at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanStartElement(XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.java:400)
a&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>gctan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T14:08:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34074">
    <title>Oracle AQ JMS Bridge with Active MQ</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34074</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I followed the advice found on this link:
http://activemq.apache.org/jms-bridge-with-oracle-aq.html and got most of
the way there. However, I am reading Oracle Object types off the Oracle AQ
and as a result I get a JMS-137 error "Payload factory must be specified for
destinations with ADT payloads".

I do not understand how I can specify the Factory I have created in the
configuration to handle the custom payload.

When writing a simple program to read messages off the Oracle AQ I simple
do:

ORADataFactory orad = new DataFactory();
QueueReceiver receiver =
((AQjmsSession)queueSession).createReceiver(queue, orad);
queueConnection.start(); 

Does anyone know how to do this? If so, help would be much appreciated a I
have googled this to death.

Thanks,
J

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Oracle-AQ-JMS-Bridge-with-Active-MQ-tp4647863.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Lister</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T08:34:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34073">
    <title>Problem with network-of-brokers configuration after upgrading to AMQ 5.6.0</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34073</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello again,

We are from AMQ 5.4.0 to 5.6.0, and there appears to be a new uniqueness constraint in network connector names in network-of-brokers configurations.

Here's our setup:
- N copies of a producer application; each copy of the producer application consists of an embedded broker with 2 network connectors pointing at an embedded broker in the consumer application
- 1 consumer application; the consumer application consists of an embedded broker with 2 transport connectors

Messages in the consumer application are sent to the embedded broker, which pushes those messages to the embedded broker in the consumer application over the network/transport connectors, and are consumed by listeners on the embedded broker in the consumer application.

In AMQ 5.4.0, the name of the network connectors in the embedded broker in the producer application were not required to be unique across copies of the application, ie. for each copy of the producer application used the same name for each network connector.  In AMQ 5&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Geoffrey Arnold</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T20:45:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34065">
    <title>JMSXUserID propagation not working</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34065</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I am trying to get JMSXUserID to pass from producer (client) to consumer
(server) but am having no luck.

My client is a .NET app using NMS V1.5.0.2194, with STOMP V1.5.2.2508. My
server is a Java app using (indirectly via an internal framework)
activemq-core-5.3.0.

My understanding was that all I needed to do was:

1. From the client, connect to the broker using a given user name and
password:

    this.connection = this.factory.CreateConnection(userName, password);
    this.session =
(Session)this.connection.CreateSession(AcknowledgementMode.AutoAcknowledge);
    
2. Set populateJMSXUserID="true" in the broker configuration:

    &amp;lt;broker useJmx="true" persistent="false"
xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"
destroyApplicationContextOnStop="true" populateJMSXUserID="true"
useAuthenticatedPrincipalForJMSXUserID="true"&amp;gt;

3. From the server, obtain the JMSXUserID from the message headers:

    userId = (String) headers.get("JMSXUserID");
    
With that in place, I was expecting to see the JMSXUs&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>gauche</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-18T15:26:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34059">
    <title>Questions on upgrading to 5.6.0</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34059</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We are upgrading from AMQ 5.4.0 to 5.6.0, and noticed two issues right off the bat:

- The "activemq-all-5.6.0.jar" library is now bundled with the SLF4J Log4J binding, trumping the JDK 1.4 binding already in our classpath.  As a workaround we have switched to using the individual libraries (activemq-core, activemq-pool, geronimo-j2ee-management, geronimo-jms, kahadb, xbean-spring); are there any other libraries we should be including?

- Upon startup we are now seeing the following messages... could you point us to what settings we need to change?:

"Store limit is 0 mb, whilst the max journal file size for the store is: 32 mb, the store will not accept any data when used."
"Temporary Store limit is 0 mb, whilst the max journal file size for the temporary store is: 32 mb, the temp store will not accept any data when used."

Finally, are there any other caveats or settings we should verify?  For example, is the KahaDB log file format compatible with 5.4.0?

Thanks in advance for your help, and congratulati&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Geoffrey Arnold</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-18T04:24:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34057">
    <title>java.io.IOException: Too many open files (v5.4.2)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34057</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We’re running *ActiveMQ 5.4.2 *in production. The last few days we’ve had
clients unable to connect because of the /java.io.IOException: Too many
open/ files error. We’ve been able to temporarily solve the problem by
increasing the maximum heap size, however, the problem seems to come back a
few days later.

Do you have any suggestions how on we can more reliably solve this problem? 

Do we need to consider upgrading our production server?

Thank you for your time in advance.

John Boyer

================
ACTIVEMQ LOG OUTPUT
================
012-05-17 14:09:36,251 | WARN  | EXCEPTION  | org.eclipse.jetty.util.log |
qtp2112152548-3274 - Acceptor0 SelectChannelConnector&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;0.0.0.0:8161
java.io.IOException: Too many open files
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept0(Native Method)
at
sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.accept(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:145)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.server.nio.SelectChannelConnector$1.acceptChannel(SelectChannelConnector.java:74)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.io.nio.SelectorMan&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>johneboyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-17T22:07:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34052">
    <title>Consumption order on hierarchical queues using wildcards</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34052</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have a question concerning the consumption process on hierarchical queues
in combination with wildcards.

Defined Queues:  "A.B.C.D"
Subscribers subscribes to "A.B.&amp;gt;"

Now messages are published to C and D.

In which order does the subscriber receive the messages?
First all messages from C and then D?

What happen when a pool of subscriber exists?

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumption-order-on-hierarchical-queues-using-wildcards-tp4641049.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>mwessel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T09:05:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34050">
    <title>duplex and producer flow control</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34050</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,
  I'm having an issue when sending a number of messages that starts producer
flow control between two brokers and when the networkConnector between the
two is setup as duplex.  The setup I have is I have two brokers, A and B.  I
also have two consumers on B subscribed to two topics, topic1 and topic2.  I
then have two producers on A which are publishing on topic1 and topic2.  So
when I startup the consumer on B on topic1 and have it consume messages
slowly, and then I produce a large number of messages to topic1 on A so that
producer flow control is triggered and the producer on A is held back from
sending more because of this.  I then start the consumer on topic2 on B and
have it consume quickly.  When I produce to topic2 on A the messages do not
flow like they should.  Rather they hold on the networkConnector until 5
messages make it to topic1 and then 5 messages all get sent right away to
topic2.  It seems like this burst of messages always matches the
prefetchSize of the networkConnector.  Also wh&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Samslara</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T02:22:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34042">
    <title>ANN: Habari Client for ActiveMQ 3.1 - Delphi and Free Pascal STOMP client</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34042</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;May 8, 2012 - Habarisoft is pleased to announce version 3.1 of its 
Delphi and Free Pascal client library for Apache ActiveMQ.

With Habari Client for ActiveMQ, Delphi and Free Pascal developers can 
build integrated solutions, connecting applications using the 
peer-to-peer and the publish and subscribe communication model.

New in this release:
* support for 'client-individual' acknowledgment mode
* improved chat demo, improved throughput test utility
* VisualMM - FastMM4 visual memory allocation monitoring demo
* Extended RTTI supression
* ReceiveNoWait improvement
* GUID transaction identifier
* Tested with Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.2, 5.4.3, 5.5.1 and 5.6.0

Home page, documentation and demo download:
http://www.habarisoft.com/habari_activemq.html

Regards
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Justin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T19:14:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34039">
    <title>error "This producer can only send messages to..." in JBoss6 with embedded ActiveMQ4.1.1</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.activemq.user/34039</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi,

We are migrating from JBoss4.2.3 to JBoss6.1.  We have ActiveMQ integrated
in JBoss 4 and it works ok. 
Following this link:  http://activemq.apache.org/outbound-communication.html
http://activemq.apache.org/outbound-communication.html  I have migrated to
JBoss 6.  The application is deployed correctly but when I try to send a
message to a queue I get this error:

Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: This producer can only
send messages to: HomeTAOEventsQueue
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQMessageProducer.send(ActiveMQMessageProducer.java:459)
[:4.1.1]
at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQQueueSender.send(ActiveMQQueueSender.java:139)
[:4.1.1]

This error is thrown in the class ActiveMQMessageProducer. I have debbuged
the application and when the method ActiveMQMessageProducer.send is called,
it does this comparation (can't find how to tag code):


            public void send(Destination destination, Message message, int
deliveryMode, int priority, long timeToLive)
            throws JMSExce&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>pepgrifell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T14:54:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.java.activemq.user">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.java.activemq.user</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

