<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss">
    <title>gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8964"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8945"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8941"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8938"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8920"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8919"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8909"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8889"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8879"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8871"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8868"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8867"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8863"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8862"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8853"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8836"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8811"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8808"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8797"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8795"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8964">
    <title>Grammar Checking in Writer</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8964</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I just did a complete cleaning and re-installation of LibreOffice on my 64
bit Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I now have LibreOffice Version 4.0.3.3 (Build ID:
0eaa50a932c8f2199a615e1eb30f7ac74279539) installed.

I was attempting to explore the grammar checking feature - using either F7
or "Tools | Spelling and Grammar ..." but have been unable to get it to do
anything. My sample was a new blank document in which I typed "the boyz is
good." The auto-correction capitalized the initial "T", and the spell
checker flagged "boyz," but there was no indication at all about a problem
with "boys is," even after re-running F7 once the spelling of "boys" had
been corrected.

Under Tools | Language Settings | Writing Aids - Available Language Modules,
"LightProof Language Checker" is checked.

Under Tools | Language Settings | Writing Aids - Options, "Check grammar as
you type" is checked.

In the Tools | Language Tool | Configuration dialog, I took one of the
checked examples of what the tool checks and used it in the document, as
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>CVAlkan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-17T18:59:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8945">
    <title>Are there some plans to extend PDF/A export to new versions of that standard in addition to PDF/A-1?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8945</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Everyone,

are there some plans to extend PDF/A export to new versions of that 
standard other than and in addition to PDF/A-1?
I mean PDF/A-2 and PDF/A-3 that are already ISO standards:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF/A

Nice Google SoC activity? ;-)

Have All a sunny day,

Carlo

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Carlo Strata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T15:04:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8941">
    <title>New Locale - Steps?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8941</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi All,

Is there a wiki or something that has all the steps associated with getting
a new locale setup? I think there are a ton of steps, from translating the
software itself to getting a website up, a mailing list, etc... etc....

There is someone over on google+ asking for help and just not sure where to
direct them.


Best,
Joel

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Joel Madero</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T16:37:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8938">
    <title>The brochure content stating NATO support the use of ODF</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8938</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
"ODF is recommended by numerous governments and NGO's worldwide, with 
Indonesia, the European Commission, and NATO amongst those who support 
policies calling for ODF as the preferred document production, retention 
and exchange format."

I like this "quote".
NATO - well the US and Canada are part of NATO - correct?

That means that the USA, when dealing with other NATO members should use 
ODF for their documentation and other files.

Any more national and international organization can added to that list?

That may force MSO to do ODF better or just start thinking about using 
an office package that does it better than MSO does.

I am a little vague on what is involved with the "European Commission", 
like how many of the EU are part of it, etc..  But, it does imply that 
countries in Europe support the ODF format[s].

Since LO uses ODF as their default format, we support the policies of 
these worldwide organizations.  Since any Tech Adminknows that MS/MSO 
have been sued by the EU many many times and MS&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Kracked_P_P---webmaster</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-10T16:42:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8920">
    <title>Fostering project internal communication</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8920</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

sorry for spamming all the lists, but in the light of recent events and 
discussions, I'd like to make all of you aware of an important mailing 
list, that so far has not been used as extensively as it should be, 
which led to some frustration and communication issues.

As part of our mission to foster the project internal communication, I'd 
like to tell you about our so called projects mailing list, which Sophie 
initiated quite a while ago, and which should be used for communication 
amongst the various projects - e.g. design and marketing, development 
and marketing, UX and development, and the like.

The list's intention is not to be a gossip list where everything should 
be thrown at, but to make all affected projects aware of important 
changes. Philosophy: Low traffic, but important topics.

Some examples are: Change of version numbers, a new slogan, design 
changes, new products. In other words: Everything that has an impact on 
other areas of working than the one where the change originally&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Florian Effenberger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-04T13:24:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8919">
    <title>Seeking for list moderators</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8919</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

at the moment, we are looking for volunteers who could help moderate 
this mailing list.

If you are interested, the only requirement is that you are subscribed 
to the list yourself and read its mails in a somehow timely manner, but 
that's about it.

Moderation means dealing with e-mails that do not automatically make it 
to the list, which you then manually forward, or reject. This happens 
either when an e-mail comes from an unknown sender, e.g. when a project 
member uses a different address for posting. It also occurs when someone 
unexperienced writes to the list, thinking it's a private account, but 
in fact it's a public list.

You'll receive the message to be moderated via e-mail, which you then 
can either "moderate through", or reject.

Is someone interested in joining our efforts? It'd be much appreciated - 
just drop me an email (please also copy me directly, and not only the 
list), then I'm happy to add you to the list of moderators.

Thanks!
Florian

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Florian Effenberger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-04T11:17:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8909">
    <title>Tool Bar Icons...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8909</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I've just recently upgraded LibreOffice on the EeePC 900 to LibreOffice 3.4.4
OOO340m1 (Build:402).
However, I now have the lower button bar that has most of the icons, like
Bold, Italic, Underline, etc. that with the updated looks of the tool bar
have become at about unreadable....

&amp;lt;http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4052213/LibreOffice_Tool_Bar.jpg&amp;gt; 

Obviously on a big screen this most likely will not be any issue, but on the
1024x600 netbook screen this just wasn't such a smart move.

I did look, but only did find old messages on the tool bar, so I started
this new topic.
I did look into LO to see if I can use a different look, but haven't found
that (yet).


Rgs, Angela



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Tool-Bar-Icons-tp4052213.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-25T08:13:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8889">
    <title>NMake vs MinGW</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8889</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Was nmake looked at as an alternative to mingw? as it is its part of visual
studio and works with make files just like make does. what does mingw have
that nmake doesnt?

i feel switching would greatly reduce build complexity in terms of building
on windows.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Aquilina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-22T16:40:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8879">
    <title>End of Life support for MSO 2003 countdown ?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8879</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

What are your thoughts about having a countdown towards April 8 2014 when
MS will stop supporting MSO 2003?

AOO has a blog dedicated to this:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/one_year_until_the_end

Should LibreOffice do the same?
Offer this deadline as an additional incentive to adopt our office suite?

Cheers from Montreal

Immanuel

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Immanuel Giulea</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-18T23:31:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8871">
    <title>Fwd: [it-users] Bugzilla</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8871</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

this is a message from an Italian user, he says that he can modify a bug not 
created by him in Bugzilla. Is it normal?

---------  Messaggio inoltrato  ---------

Oggetto: [it-users] Bugzilla

Mi sono accorto, cercando un bug, che ho i permessi per cambiare lo 
stato, cancellare gli utenti in CC, cambiare l'importanza, ecc.
Quasi un super user, è normale?


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Valter Mura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-09T19:26:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8868">
    <title>Cores and threads</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8868</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all

Why doesn't Calc (at least under Windows...) use all available cores and
threads to speed up operations?

Opening a heavy (200k lines x 26 cols) xlsx file takes 6 seconds in a Intel
Core i5 (2 cores, 4 threads) using MS Office 2010. I can see the first 3
threads briefly going up to 70% load and it's loaded.

Using Calc 4.0.2 after waiting 5 minutes watching the first thread at over
85% load (and the fan whirring like crazy), I gave up waiting.

Is this a compiler limitation? A code limitation?

Regards,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cores-and-threads-tp4047285.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-01T13:48:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8867">
    <title>Bachelor thesis, interview inquiry.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8867</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello! We are two students currently performing a study about the impact of
trust in open source projects.
We are currently looking for participants to interview about the
experiences of working within open source projects.

It would be absolutely awesome if some of you would like to help us by
participating, we are currently quite desperate for participants since our
deadline is approaching fast.
Please reply or send me a message at sebastian.skytt&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com if you are
interested, it would help us greatly.

The format for the interview is not set, it can be performed at your
convenience, through a skype-call or through textbased chat, which every
suits you the most.

Please don't be shy, we are practically newbies when it comes to open
source and we really need your expertise and experience!

/Best regards, Sebastian.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sebastian Skytt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-25T10:53:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8863">
    <title>still feedback needed for TDF annual report</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8863</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

this is just a nice reminder that if you have some time over the 
weekend, and some good material for our annual report, feel free to send 
it in. Being sick the past couple of days, I didn't start writing yet, 
but am still collecting material, so you would be just in time. ;-)

Thanks, and have a nice weekend,
Florian

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Florian Effenberger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-23T10:59:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8862">
    <title>Open source and open formats</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8862</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all

In the sequence of this topic at the Marketing list
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Open-Xchange-to-launch-open-source-browser-based-office-suite-tp4045197.html

I share Simon Phipps' concern that the company announces a GPL Open Source
office suite which is not free for commercial use???

Is this even possible under GPL? 
This just spreads further confusion on how free Open Source software really
is...

Another sentence that worries me is "Microsoft Word .docx files and
OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice .odt files"

This is bad marketing and bad public image that ODT seems to be proprietary
of OpenOffice and LibreOffice. And yet I don't see any concerns about this
in the topic commenting the news article.

Shouldn't TDF be championing the ODF open formats or is this an OASIS job?



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Open-source-and-open-formats-tp4045522.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-23T09:48:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8853">
    <title>[Wiki] chart "LibreOffice Lifecycle"</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8853</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi *,

I have "relaunched" the chart "LibreOffice Lifecycle" (s. [1]). Maybe 
someone can use this.

[1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan

regards

Jochen

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jochen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-14T19:26:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8836">
    <title>Google Summer of Code 2013</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8836</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

There is one week left to the deadline to apply for GSoC 2013
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013

Are there any plans to send an application for TDF and LibreOffice ?

Immanuel

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Immanuel Giulea</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-11T15:13:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8811">
    <title>Grant of License</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8811</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This grant does not specify any particular open-source license.

My intention is to not limit in any way the licensing of works
that my contributions are incorporated in.  The license is self-
contained for that reason.  There is no conflict with how
LibreOffice releases are licensed and there is nothing that has
to be done about the presence of my contributions or derivatives
thereof.

It is also my intention that everyone having access to my
contributions to LibreOffice where they are so contributed be
be granted the license whether or not the contribution is accepted
into LibreOffice and wherever those recipients might choose
to rely on its provisions.

The license makes no stipulations one way or the other concerning
works of mine that are not contributions to LibreOffice.  The
license does not transfer copyright nor does it assign patents.

 - Dennis

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

GrantTDF 1.00               UTF-8              dh:2013-03-07

                      GRANT OF LICENSE

All o&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dennis E. Hamilton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-08T03:48:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8808">
    <title>Scripting for LibreOffice</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8808</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi;

While working on my wiki page about a new Writer toolbar, I realized
that independently of my proposal, I believe it makes sense for
LibreOffice to prefer Python. I see how LO is heading in this
direction, but you could be explicit about it, create more workitems,
perhaps track it like you do the German comments and uncalled
functions, etc.

You may have to support Java for years, but that doesn't mean you
should invest in the language. I wrote almost an entire chapter in my
book about some of the biggest problems with it
(http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?page_id=2228). You've already got a
layer that allows you to have bindings with multiple languages, and
you can just keep it around for any of the ones people care about.
This isn't about taking away language choices for users, but doing
what is best for your code and community.

According to Ohloh, Java is 5% of your code, Python is .5%, and Basic
is .2%. I know some wizards have been ported over, but it appears that
was just the start. I would consider &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Keith Curtis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-10T00:16:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8797">
    <title>FW: GRANT OF LICENSE: Dennis E. Hamilton - ASF Contributions</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8797</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This is the complementary grant applicable to my contributions
to the Apache Software Foundation.  I am making copies of both
grants available to the ASF Secretary so they can be carried
in the records of the Foundation.

This posting can be found at 
 &amp;lt;http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201303.mbox/%3c008801ce1c21$0deb3560$29c1a020$&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;apache.org%3e&amp;gt;.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orcmid&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 09:19
To: dev&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;openoffice.apache.org
Subject: GRANT OF LICENSE: Dennis E. Hamilton

The grant of license (below) applies to all of my contributions 
to ASF projects beyond the provisions of the Contributor License
Agreement that I have entered into with The Apache Software 
Foundation.

The purpose is to make my contributions equally available beyond
the Apache Project to which I make the contribution.  The contri-
butions are licensed, by the grant below, to anyone who chooses
to make use of them, whether another Apache Pro&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dennis E. Hamilton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-08T21:17:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8795">
    <title>Experimental UI for LibreOffice proposal</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8795</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi;

I'm working on a proposal for building an experimental new LibreOffice
toolbar / UI in Python:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:KeithCu

I'm going to add some links to places where the C++ code would need to
be changed and a few more tweaks, but I'm interested in feedback. Feel
free to use email or post in the discussion page as you prefer.

Regards,

-Keith

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Keith Curtis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-08T20:44:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8793">
    <title>FW: Grant of License</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/8793</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Using the address by which I am subscribed to discuss &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;df.o
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orcmid&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 19:48
To: LOffice Developers List (libreoffice&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org)
Cc: 'discuss&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;documentfoundation.org'
Subject: Grant of License

This grant does not specify any particular open-source license.

My intention is to not limit in any way the licensing of works
that my contributions are incorporated in.  The license is self-
contained for that reason.  There is no conflict with how
LibreOffice releases are licensed and there is nothing that has
to be done about the presence of my contributions or derivatives
thereof.

It is also my intention that everyone having access to my
contributions to LibreOffice where they are so contributed be
be granted the license whether or not the contribution is accepted
into LibreOffice and wherever those recipients might choose
to rely on its provisions.

The license makes no stipulations one way or the othe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Dennis E. Hamilton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-08T04:47:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
