<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general">
    <title>gmane.org.creativecommons.general</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6670"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6668"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6666"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6665"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6662"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6646"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6633"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6620"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6617"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6606"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6604"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6602"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6596"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6589"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6586"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6583"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6582"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6580"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6564"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6563"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6670">
    <title>opendata diagram</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6670</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I realized a diagram including all the most important opendata
licenses that are now available, and classifying them according to
their legal effects (attribution and share-alike, attribution only,
public domain). I hope this work can be useful to better understand
the actual situation of database (open)licensing.
Comments (on the blog) are welcome.
http://aliprandi.blogspot.it/2012/05/opendata-graph.html
Bye,
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Simone Aliprandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T17:29:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6668">
    <title>(no subject)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6668</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;timekeeper3341-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>nathaniel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-12T16:32:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6666">
    <title>forum</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6666</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I'd like to join the forum.  I registered, but I'm unclear whether I now
need to email this address first to complete the registration, or whether I
am supposed to email forum questions to this email address.

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>zmiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-09T18:04:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6665">
    <title>open position at Creative Commons: Project Coordinator for Science and Data</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6665</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;FYI - Here's a new job opening at CC. Please help spread the word to your
networks.

Blog post - http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32434

Full description - http://creativecommons.org/opportunities#scienceanddata

Creative Commons is seeking a Project Coordinator for Science and Data! The
Project Coordinator will organize, coordinate and manage projects related
to data policy and governance and perform research and analysis on data
governance topics across relevant sectors — particularly for science — and
communicate results and recommendations from the project via writing and
related outreach.

We are looking for someone who is experienced in policy analysis,
development and processes, in addition to Open Source Software, Open
Access/Open Data and other Open content projects. A science and/or legal
background with international experience is highly desirable — especially
as the position will be representing Creative Commons at global events in
the Open Data and Open Science communities! See the job posting and apply
at our opportunities
page&amp;lt;http://creativecommons.org/opportunities#scienceanddata&amp;gt;.
Position is open until filled.

Thank you,

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Timothy Vollmer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-25T22:27:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6662">
    <title>Cultural Appropriation and IP</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6662</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello all,

I'm writing a paper an cultural appropriation and IP.

Specifically, there are one or two points I want to make.
 * IP is not a good way to protect against cultural appropriation
 * IP may encourag cultural appropriation

For the former, I need to show how IP has been ineffective for protecting
marginalized cultures from appropriation, how there may be a separate legal
framework, and draw on examles of successful protections in the past. If a
legal framework is not necessary, what else can be done?

For the latter, it's a point i'm not sure can be made, but any help
building or criticizing the idea is appreciated!

What do you all think? Please forward this to anyone you think would be
knowledgeable on this

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Danny Piccirillo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-22T17:30:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6646">
    <title>Code is Art (was: Version 4:0:Rebranding "noncommercial" to "commercial rights reserved": please don't!)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6646</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Would the GNU GPL be a 'better' license if it were NC?

Why or why not?


Is there really any difference between code and art?

Consider the case of a computer game that generates
it's artwork dynamically, using algorithms written in c.

What about a game that generates the music within
that game using code written by the author?

Why is code not considered art, and if it *IS* art, then
why does the GNU GPL not require attribution, and why
does the GNU GPL allow commercial distribution?

Sincerely,
Patrick Anderson
http://SocialSufficiencyCoalition.BlogSpot.com
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Anderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-20T19:01:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6633">
    <title>"Let's CC" is released as open source</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6633</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all,


As some of you know, CC Korea has opened a search service, so
called 'LetsCC' http://eng.letscc.net.



Let’s CC offers quick and easy access to search services provided by some
companies from one single

page like search.creativecommons.org. It makes use of the APIs provided by
Fiickr, Jamendo, ccMixter,

Youtube and Slideshare, so you can find CC-licensed images, sounds, videos
and docs at once with just

one click. You can also save your favorite contents, add tags to them,
search them and check most favorite

contents of all users. Let’ CC‘ let contents which is to be set favorites
locate the top of search results

so as to let users find more relevant contents easily. We has tried to put
emphasis on simplicity,

convenience and efficiency for designing this service.


*Now the code of "Let's CC" http://eng.letscc.net, is distributed as open
source.*
*Please refer to https://github.com/neomparam/letscc. *

I hope you find it useful.

If you have any idea related to Lets CC, feel free to let us know via me or
creative-+2GKGYw0ye5AfugRpC6u6w&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org .

Thanks

Jay


Jongsoo Yoon (Jay Yoon)
Project Lead, Creative Commons Korea
Presiding Judge, Seoul Northern District Court
mobile : 82-10-9187-9476
email :  iwillbe99-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
twitter : iwillbe99
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jay Yoon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-19T01:05:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6620">
    <title>On the Impossibility of Sharing Hardware (was: The Liberated Pixel Cup: FSF + CC + OpenGameArt game authoring competition)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6620</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
I don't understand what would stop groups of consumers
from funding an operation large enough to enjoy economies
of scale and therefore undercut any for-profit corporation.

Consumers already pay for all of the Costs of production
*and* they pay Profit because they do not have ownership.

Why would we not be able to attract consumers to pre-pay
for internet connectivity or cell-phone service or food
production or any/all of the goods and services we *already*
pay for?

The only difference now is that we pay *late*, and so
never gain the ownership needed to avoid also paying Profit.

This logistical problem is already being somewhat addressed
under the title "Crowd Funding", but in that case the people
that pre-pay for Product do not become real co-owners, and
so they continue to pay Profit and beg the real owners to do
"the right thing" while having no actual control of that production.



Yikes.  What would these vicious cops be enforcing?



Are you saying it is impossible to share hardware?


Sincerely,
Patrick Anderson
http://ImputedProduction.BlogSpot.com


http://P2PFoundation.net/Imputed_Production
http://SocialSufficiencyCoalition.BlogSpot.com
http://patware.freeshell.org/thesis.htm
http://P2PFoundation.net/User_Owned
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Anderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T15:49:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6617">
    <title>Communia book release "The Digital Public Domain: Foundations for an Open Culture"</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6617</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>melanie dulong</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-14T17:57:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6606">
    <title>creative commons in the fine arts</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6606</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;hi all,

i just wanted to share some pictures of an installation i've done last year in berlin.
you will find them here:
http://www.creativecommonscollages.org/

the installation was part of my soloshow 'Configuration No 7'.
the audience could take away the whole exhibition on their USB-Sticks.

it has been the first demonstration of #TakeAwayArt and has also been 
one of the most sophisticated uses of creative commons in the field of fine arts.

best wishes
florian


hello | floriankuhlmann.com

*** HOME&amp;lt; at &amp;gt; ***
twitter &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;fkuhlmann
skype florian_kuhlmann

_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>hello | florian kuhlmann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-11T18:35:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6604">
    <title>The Liberated Pixel Cup: FSF + CC + OpenGameArt gameauthoring competition</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6604</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

I'm extremely pleased to announce the Liberated Pixel Cup, a project
that brings together Creative Commons, the Free Software Foundation, and
OpenGameArt to run a gaming competition:

  http://lpc.opengameart.org/

There will be a style guide written, and both a (CC BY-SA + GPL dual
licensed) game art authoring competition, and a game coding (GPL)
competition that uses those assets.

I'm extremely excited about the launch of this project, and hope you
are also!  Please do spread the news!

More from Creative Commons' press release here:
  http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32322

Thanks!
 - Christopher Allan Webber
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Christopher Allan Webber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-11T16:20:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6602">
    <title>“I thought cc-by-sa is GPL compatible” and license incompatibility woes</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6602</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear cc-community,

2 months ago we discussed about GPL compatibility, and 2 main points
were raised against it:

* Artists who want GPL compatibility can just dual license, and
* If you want to use old content under GPL, just ask the artist if you
  may relicense

I then decided to try to put these principles to action: I created a
screencast in which I used GPL-licensed graphics and by-sa music. I
was finished with the screencast after 5h, plus 3h encoding time.

Then I started writing to the artists whose music I used to try to get
the right to use them under GPL.

The first two were happy to allow me to use their songs under
GPL. Finding ways to reach them took some time, but within one or two
days I had positive replies - with one of them even stating

 “tho I thought cc-by-sa 3.0 is GPL compatible”

I used Google+, email and Jamendo for contacting them.

The third band did not yet answer, though I tried to contact them over
email, myspace and Jamendo (not facebook: I am not on that network for
philosophical reasons). It’s over a week now, and I was not able to
clear the rights of a screencast which took me just 5h to make from
first keystroke of the draft to finished cutting (I don’t count
encoding time: that happens while I am away). So license
incompatibility is a real hindrance to free culture. And:

* Some artists already expect cc-by-sa to be compatible, so “broken
  expectations” are no argument against GPL-compatibility (though I
  know that 3 groups is a pretty small test-group)

* Just asking is no option, because then the rights clearance takes
  much longer than the creative process and sometimes is not possible
  at all. I’ll likely have to find new music - except if one of you
  knows someone from the woodenlegsband. I can only hope that I’ll
  find other music which works with the screencast.

* This was a calculated risk. I knew that those problems might appear,
  but I decided to give the benefit of doubt to those who say that
  GPL-incompatibility is no problem. Now I know by *experience* that
  they are wrong.

In short: We need GPL compatibility. This is one more usecase. Others
are in the wiki:
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/GPL_compatibility_use_cases#More_raw_material

Best wishes,
Arne
--
singing a part of the history of free software: 
- http://infinite-hands.draketo.de -
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Arne Babenhauserheide</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-11T05:59:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6596">
    <title>Derivative Works and Aggregation in 3D Printing(moved from cc-licenses)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6596</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hiya,

I've moved this email from the cc-licenses list to the cc-community list
as it doesn't have to do with 4.0 licensing legalcode and etc issues
specifically.  Thanks for your participation, and please keep non-4.0
licensing specific questions here!

 - Chris

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Christopher Covington &amp;lt;cov-PjAqaU27lzQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
To: cc-licenses-rm8PX32fqvbMZ2x0e22RKNi2O/JbrIOy&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
Cc: 
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 07:44:32 -0400
Subject: Derivative Works and Aggregation in 3D Printing
In reading the background regarding 3D printing on the wiki [1] I'm a
bit confused about the proposed conflict. So there are some designs for
mechanical parts that are CC-BY-SA. There are other designs for
mechanical parts that are GPL. Fabricating both creates derivative works
under incompatible inherited licenses.

My question is, does connecting one mechanical part to another really
create a third-generation derivative work encompassing both parts, or is
this "mere aggregation"? Could these incompatibly licensed parts not
happily co-exist as long as the attribution, source, etc. for each are
properly supplied, such as on a bill of materials?

1.
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Games_3d_printing_and_functional_content

Cheers,
Christopher
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Christopher Allan Webber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T20:10:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6589">
    <title>sound and video CC-ND</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6589</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hey. I have some problems to get a idea to improve the CC-ND license.
I dont find discussion area on the wiki and it is difficult to communicate
effectively in a mailing list.

I would greatly appreciate those who can read to get my idea to be
considered and discussed.
It is this:

My experience with the interpretation of the creative commons license
no-derivative-works is ambiguous in some cases.
The complicated case is deciding whether you can make a video from cc
audio-nd.

A video is a movie clip with sound? No.
(Cinema was mute when born)
A video may or may not have sound.
Like a video may or may not have an smell associated.

Therefore, a video are images in movement. Nothing more.

If audio with cc-nd is not modified and I get to dance at the same time.
.. Am I making a derivative work? No.

If audio with cc-nd is not modified and I show a picture at the same
time... Derivative work? No.
Audio is not changing.
Audio and video are distinct and separate.

Another example:
If I have a photo with cc-nd license and i play music .. Am I changing the
picture? No.
Am I making a derivative work? No.

So, my proposal is that any sound with cc-nd license can be used in a
video if the sound is not modified.

If not, all pictures or sounds with CC-ND can't be accompanied by other
images or sounds as in any website.

Sorry for my english.
I hope be useful.
Thanks for all.

yul01.

_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>yul01-sGOZH3hwPm2sTnJN9+BGXg&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-03T23:06:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6586">
    <title>Summer intern</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6586</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all

CC has just posted an opportunity for a summer
intern&amp;lt;http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32044&amp;gt;to work with our
worldwide affiliate network over the US summer
(June-August).

Added to the Regional Project Manager, Counsel and Communications Manager
positions posted earlier this week (see
http://creativecommons.org/opportunities), this makes a broad range of
opportunities for those interested in working more closely with Creative
Commons.

We look forward to hearing from some excellent candidates.


Jessica Coates
Affiliate Network Coordinator
Creative Commons

creativecommons.org
jessica-DXT9u3ndKiT7y3wIJjeDKkB+6BGkLq7r&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org

Like what we do? Please donate to https://creativecommons.net/donate
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jessica Coates</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-23T23:45:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6583">
    <title>Job opportunities - Regional Project Maangers forAfrica and Asia-Pacific</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6583</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all

Creative Commons is looking for two new part-time employees to become our
Regional Project Managers for Africa and Asia-Pacific.

The two new employees will work with the rest of our RPMs (for Europe,
Latin America and the Arab World) to support our local
affiliates&amp;lt;http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC_Affiliate_Network&amp;gt; in
their regions, including promoting CC use and knowledge, coordinating
regional activities and communications, and facilitating collaboration
between affiliates and the broader international community.

The successful candidate will be expected to work approx. 20 hours a week
and will ideally be based in the region they are managing.

If you have an interest in community management, open access and Creative
Commons, and have ties to Africa or the Asia-Pacific, we’d love to hear
from you. Also, please feel free to spread the word - we want as many good
candidates as possible, so we can get the best possible support for our
affiliates.

You can find the blog post about the positions here:
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/31964. And the full position
descriptions here:  http://creativecommons.org/opportunities



Jessica Coates
Affiliate Network Coordinator
Creative Commons

creativecommons.org
jessica-DXT9u3ndKiT7y3wIJjeDKkB+6BGkLq7r&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org

Like what we do? Please donate to https://creativecommons.net/donate
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jessica Coates</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-21T00:16:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6582">
    <title>CC0 tra le licenze OSI?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6582</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;CC0 AL PUNTO... ZERO
Dopo un lungo e interessante dibattito avvenuto nell’apposita mailing
list della Open Source Initiative (Osi), Creative Commons ha preferito
ritirare il tool chiamato CC0 (CC Zero) dalla procedura di
approvazione prevista per entrare nel novero delle licenze approvate
da Osi. Qual è il problema? I brevetti, ancora loro.

Leggi l'intero articolo:
http://www.apogeonline.com/webzine/2012/03/16/cc0-al-punto%E2%80%A6-zero

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Simone Aliprandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T07:16:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6580">
    <title>CC Qatar at QITCOM</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6580</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Congratulations CC Qatar on what sounds like a great community involvement
event at QITCOM this week!

http://www.qatar-tribune.com/data/20120308/content.asp?section=nation2_2

Jessica Coates
Affiliate Network Coordinator
Creative Commons

creativecommons.org
jessica-DXT9u3ndKiT7y3wIJjeDKkB+6BGkLq7r&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org

Like what we do? Please donate to https://creativecommons.net/donate
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jessica Coates</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T15:06:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6564">
    <title>Wrong license in WIRED CD ID3 tags</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6564</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

it seems that the license tag in track #4 [1] on the WIRED CD [2] is
wrong.  The website states it is Noncommercial Sampling Plus, while the
ID3 TCOP frame says just Sampling Plus, which would allow commercial
sampling.

I think it should be corrected, otherwise creativecommons.org promotes
rights the author hasn't provided. It isn't a huge thing, but since
(sadly) few people use the ID3 tags [3] correctly, CC could set a good
example.

[1] http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/ccmixter/contrib/Wired/My%20Morning%20Jacket%20-%20One%20Big%20Holiday.mp3
[2] http://creativecommons.org/wired/
[3] http://wiki.creativecommons.org/MP3


Johannes
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Johannes Weißl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-26T02:34:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6563">
    <title>Your help needed!</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6563</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi there everyone!

I hope no-one minds us posting this "call for help" here but we thought 
this might be the best place to get a positive response.

We are looking for sound and video clips for several projects we are 
working on and need your help.

Audio Promos.
We need as many clips of people saying one of the following phrases (if 
you wish to help, simply select the best match for you):

"Hi, I'm (insert your name) and I listen to Creative Commons!"
"Hi, I'm (insert your name) from (insert name of band/website) and we 
use Creative Commons!"
"Hi, this is (insert ccMixter or similar username) and I remix music on 
(ccMixter.org or similar site)!"

If you do not want to say your name, you can simply say "I listen to 
Creative Commons!" or similar.

You can write your own promo if you think the above suggestions can be 
improved (and I'm sure they can *BG*).

Video Promos.

You can record yourself saying the above suggestions (or write your own 
promo).

Another series of short promos we would really like to obtain are 
segments of video showing small clips of people working in their studios.
This could be you finishing a piece of music you have published under a 
Creative Commons Licence (which permits derivatives) and speaking one of 
the suggested phrases from above.
Again, you can write your own phrase.

We are also looking for voice-over talent for other projects we are 
currently working on. If you have the time and would like to help us 
out, please contact us directly (e-mail will be given below).

And lastly:
We are also looking for volunteers who would like to help us with a 
range of video tutorials and other general use video content. What we 
would like to do is create animated cartoon-style videos using real 
people. These will be consist of 2D pictures animated in a 3D 
environment. If you would like to become a cartoon character, please 
send a full -length photo of yourself.

So we can make use of your image, please make sure you stand straight 
with your legs slightly apart (so your feet are planted directly below 
your shoulders) and with your arms straight out at either side. If you 
are not able to do this, still send us your image in and we will do our 
best. Ensure that your head is slightly below the top of the photo and 
your feet are slightly above the bottom (don't cut your head off in the 
photo).

You can send your files to us in two ways:

For small files, you can send them via email: alpha-UpB4D61ZNI+K22NX1TYv9lN6ohzGQtmt&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
For larger files, please send them to our uploads server via FTP.

Our uploads server is located at uploads.openindieproject.org and you 
must use a FTP client. Use an anonymous username/password and make sure 
you name your files in the following way:
Please use your email address plus some description or random characters 
plus the file extension (do not use special characters).
For example, you could use alpha_at_openindieproject_org_videopromo1.avi

When your files have been uploaded, they will immediately become 
invisible to the public. This is to prevent abuse of our servers.
Once that is done, please send us an email alpha-UpB4D61ZNI+K22NX1TYv9mD2FQJk+8+b&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org 
with the filename/s of your submission/s and your required name for 
accreditation and a link to your twitter feed, ccMixter profile or other 
similar website. We will include any links you submit which relates to 
Creative Commons activities.

All of the projects we are producing will be published under the 
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0)  licence and we 
promise not to use your content in a negative way. We will give full 
credit whenever and however possible (if we use any of this content on 
our non-commercial radio feed we will add the credits to the relevant 
page on our website). If you make use of your own content in the 
submissions which not normally allow derivative works, please give us 
permission to use it (put this in your e-mail to us with your upload 
notification).

You can send as many files are you wish but please keep each one to 
under 60 seconds. We may need to edit the content to fit in with the 
overall theme or time constraints of each project.
We will not misuse your email addresses or add you to any mailing lists 
etc...

Thanks for reading this and if you have any questions, please ask.

-Bob
Open Indie Project Dot Org

_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Bob Noble</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-26T01:05:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6562">
    <title>5 years of 3.0</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.creativecommons.general/6562</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Did you know version 3.0 CC licenses were published 5 years and 2 days ago?

Congratulations all who helped and have used them since. Nice to see
many people who contributed to 3.0 doing likewise for 4.0 5-6 years
later. I wrote a quick personal blog post at
http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2012/02/25/cc-v3-5y/

More interesting would be anyone who wants to write about what has
changed in the past 5 years, if anything of note has. ;-)

Mike
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-25T23:26:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.org.creativecommons.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.org.creativecommons.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

