<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user">
    <title>gmane.network.wireshark.user</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15608"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15607"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15605"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15604"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15603"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15602"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15600"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15597"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15595"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15594"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15593"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15590"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15587"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15586"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15583"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15582"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15581"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15575"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15573"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15572"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15608">
    <title>Wireshark 1.8.7 is now available</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15608</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.8.7.

What is Wireshark?

   Wireshark is the world's most popular network protocol analyzer.
   It is used for troubleshooting, analysis, development and
   education.

What's New

  Bug Fixes

   The following vulnerabilities have been fixed.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-23

       The RELOAD dissector could go into an infinite loop.
       Discovered by Evan Jensen. (Bug 8364, (Bug 8546)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

       CVE-2013-2486

       CVE-2013-2487

     o wnpa-sec-2013-24

       The GTPv2 dissector could crash. (Bug 8493)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-25

       The ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. (Bug 8599)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6, 1.6.0 to 1.6.14.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-26

       The PPP CCP dissector could crash. (Bug 8638)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-27

       The DCP ETSI dissector could crash. Discovered by Evan Jensen.
       (Bug 8231, bug 8540, bug 8541)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-28

       The MPEG DSM-CC dissector could crash. (Bug 8481)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-29

       The Websocket dissector could crash. Discovered by Moshe
       Kaplan. (Bug 8448, Bug 8499)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-30

       The MySQL dissector could go into an infinite loop. Discovered
       by Moshe Kaplan. (Bug 8458)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

     o wnpa-sec-2013-31

       The ETCH dissector could go into a large loop. Discovered by
       Moshe Kaplan. (Bug 8464)

       Versions affected: 1.8.0 to 1.8.6.

   The following bugs have been fixed:

     o The Windows installer and uninstaller does a better job of
       detecting running executables.

     o Library mismatch when compiling on a system with an older
       Wireshark version. (Bug 6011)

     o SNMP dissector bug: STATUS_INTEGER_DIVIDE_BY_ZERO. (Bug 7359)

     o A console window is never opened. (Bug 7755)

     o GSM_MAP show malformed Packets when two IMSI. (Bug 7882)

     o Fix include and libs search path when cross compiling. (Bug
       7926)

     o PER dissector crash. (Bug 8197)

     o pcap-ng: name resolution block is not written to file on save.
       (Bug 8317)

     o Incorrect RTP statistics (Lost Packets indication not ok).
       (Bug 8321)

     o Decoding of GSM MAP E164 Digits. (Bug 8450)

     o Silent installer and uninstaller not silent. (Bug 8451)

     o Replace use of INCLUDES with AM_CPPFLAGS in all Makefiles to
       placate recent autotools. (Bug 8452)

     o Wifi details are not stored in the Decryption Key Management
       dialog (post 1.8.x). (Bug 8446)

     o IO Graph should not be limited to 100k points (NUM_IO_ITEMS).
       (Bug 8460)

     o geographical_description: hf_gsm_a_geo_loc_deg_of_long 24 bit
       field truncated to 23 bits. (Bug 8532)

     o IRC message with multiple params causes malformed packet
       exception. (Bug 8548)

     o Part of Ping Reply Message in ICMPv6 Reply Message is marked
       as "Malformed Packet". (Bug 8554)

     o MP2T wiretap heuristic overriding ERF. (Bug 8556)

     o Cannot read content of Ran Information Application Error Rim
       Container. (Bug 8559)

     o Endian error and IP:Port error when decoding BT-DHT response
       message. (Bug 8572)

     o "ACE4_ADD_FILE/ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY" should be
       "ACE4_APPEND_DATA / ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY". (Bug 8575)

     o wireshark crashes while displaying I/O Graph. (Bug 8583)

     o GTPv2 MM Context (UMTS Key, Quad, and Quint Decoded)
       incorrectly. (Bug 8596)

     o DTLS 1.2 uses wrong PRF. (Bug 8608)

     o RTP DTMF digits are no longer displayed in VoIP graph
       analysis. (Bug 8610)

     o Universal port not accepted in RSA Keys List window. (Bug
       8618)

     o Wireshark Dissector bug with HSRP Version 2. (Bug 8622)

     o LISP control packet incorrectly identified as LISP data based
       when UDP source port is 4341. (Bug 8627)

     o Bad tcp checksum not detected. (Bug 8629)

     o AMR Frame Type uses wrong Value String. (Bug 8681)

  New and Updated Features

   There are no new features in this release.

  New Protocol Support

   There are no new protocols in this release.

  Updated Protocol Support

   AMR, ASN.1 BER, BAT, Bluetooth DHT, BSSGP, DTLS, E.164, Ericsson
   A-bis OML, GSM A, GSM MAP, HDFSDATA, ICMP, ICMPv6, ixveriwave,
   IRC, KDSP, LISP Data, MMS, NFS, OpenWire, PPP, RELOAD, RTP, SASP,
   SIP, SSL/TLS, TCP, UA3G

  New and Updated Capture File Support

   Endace ERF, NetScreen snoop.

Getting Wireshark

   Wireshark source code and installation packages are available from
   http://www.wireshark.org/download.html.

  Vendor-supplied Packages

   Most Linux and Unix vendors supply their own Wireshark packages.
   You can usually install or upgrade Wireshark using the package
   management system specific to that platform. A list of third-party
   packages can be found on the download page on the Wireshark web
   site.

File Locations

   Wireshark and TShark look in several different locations for
   preference files, plugins, SNMP MIBS, and RADIUS dictionaries.
   These locations vary from platform to platform. You can use
   About→Folders to find the default locations on your system.

Known Problems

   Dumpcap might not quit if Wireshark or TShark crashes. (Bug 1419)

   The BER dissector might infinitely loop. (Bug 1516)

   Capture filters aren't applied when capturing from named pipes.
   (Bug 1814)

   Filtering tshark captures with display filters (-R) no longer
   works. (Bug 2234)

   The 64-bit Windows installer does not support Kerberos decryption.
   (Win64 development page)

   Application crash when changing real-time option. (Bug 4035)

   Hex pane display issue after startup. (Bug 4056)

   Packet list rows are oversized. (Bug 4357)

   Summary pane selected frame highlighting not maintained. (Bug
   4445)

   Wireshark and TShark will display incorrect delta times in some
   cases. (Bug 4985)

Getting Help

   Community support is available on Wireshark's Q&amp;amp;A site and on the
   wireshark-users mailing list. Subscription information and
   archives for all of Wireshark's mailing lists can be found on the
   web site.

   Official Wireshark training and certification are available from
   Wireshark University.

Frequently Asked Questions

   A complete FAQ is available on the Wireshark web site.


Digests

wireshark-1.8.7.tar.bz2: 24273700 bytes
MD5(wireshark-1.8.7.tar.bz2)=f4198728a20aa40752906031e08544f8
SHA1(wireshark-1.8.7.tar.bz2)=c131ce10555e608e691aa36190c8d5a1b271c955
RIPEMD160(wireshark-1.8.7.tar.bz2)=c9a2b59441a517e4943a2b7e3e994694125b1759

Wireshark-win32-1.8.7.exe: 20868704 bytes
MD5(Wireshark-win32-1.8.7.exe)=7aee0d82ed4efa3e709aa9e42a86c34c
SHA1(Wireshark-win32-1.8.7.exe)=95f42bfaee23351b504aca3fa57e29c0c2cd3227
RIPEMD160(Wireshark-win32-1.8.7.exe)=a95e303f9176d754d86a8f8198a801cba5c3e04f

Wireshark-win64-1.8.7.exe: 26549232 bytes
MD5(Wireshark-win64-1.8.7.exe)=a832cae3e9d0e312c3c1241a970f1080
SHA1(Wireshark-win64-1.8.7.exe)=845da671608323ca3154c03e47365e26fce80d69
RIPEMD160(Wireshark-win64-1.8.7.exe)=696f0c8090bcb22e7c2c641925db7b6958ce5df1

Wireshark-1.8.7.u3p: 28621210 bytes
MD5(Wireshark-1.8.7.u3p)=e38ae665e9a6799961c75e1c794b0241
SHA1(Wireshark-1.8.7.u3p)=5feb3b235ffe38315b94bd1de1fd269249737853
RIPEMD160(Wireshark-1.8.7.u3p)=162f88f661a31fd1902ece049b6d8a4937dd18f7

WiresharkPortable-1.8.7.paf.exe: 22051216 bytes
MD5(WiresharkPortable-1.8.7.paf.exe)=5f7624d355520650b1d61f86552ef06c
SHA1(WiresharkPortable-1.8.7.paf.exe)=7fbba81263fb957f37a8694ab36f39aa2d0dda7c
RIPEMD160(WiresharkPortable-1.8.7.paf.exe)=f1ee0f1aff528a88aad79024df371560a593f963

Wireshark 1.8.7 PPC 32.dmg: 22938629 bytes
MD5(Wireshark 1.8.7 PPC 32.dmg)=2df64ff6c884f8c9aa036be0ac850dc4
SHA1(Wireshark 1.8.7 PPC 32.dmg)=fac403ed5616d4f3736dc26ad6b46b43d92eeca5
RIPEMD160(Wireshark 1.8.7 PPC
32.dmg)=a3a2de3aeac6bfce17f95ed1bc803277cab504b5

Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel 64.dmg: 21653924 bytes
MD5(Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel 64.dmg)=8615eade01f43e6229d83a3148bd5566
SHA1(Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel
64.dmg)=3816f7a1d9fdea109a02c49d559f804516ebab6d
RIPEMD160(Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel
64.dmg)=847401b192639fd9ae85c4f2fe33cf6fc25df077

Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel 32.dmg: 19734453 bytes
MD5(Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel 32.dmg)=4c5e9c6ae11d0db53cb101acf06fe96f
SHA1(Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel
32.dmg)=5aaf4924318705e041041f2af4145966b63f4baf
RIPEMD160(Wireshark 1.8.7 Intel
32.dmg)=e324792142ea8a76f6f949b3fbe998dba7290c84

patch-wireshark-1.8.6-to-1.8.7.diff.bz2: 238913 bytes
MD5(patch-wireshark-1.8.6-to-1.8.7.diff.bz2)=898cc367b1ca964d13d5add01abd7dc3
SHA1(patch-wireshark-1.8.6-to-1.8.7.diff.bz2)=44668ceb45fc4953d9f782c61abcd67bd75cb8d1
RIPEMD160(patch-wireshark-1.8.6-to-1.8.7.diff.bz2)=43047d437df36cefce63d295fbbde1973d4867f7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlGWqCAACgkQpw8IXSHylJrVcACgkdCrVv8oME+n7xT8nMXJpe1R
hLcAnizCuOZjoSmRJZOCkIzBmbJ/FcIp
=Pjbu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;wireshark.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Gerald Combs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-17T21:58:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15607">
    <title>[HITB-Announce] HITB Magazine Issue 010</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15607</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi everyone,

A small reminder that article submissions for HITB Magazine Issue 010
are due tomorrow (15th May 2013). If you're interested in submitting
please send your &amp;gt; 3000 word article to editorial-Y0pbcourc9SI2xUbZzX/NA&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to the following:

    Next generation attacks and exploits
    Apple / OS X security vulnerabilities
    SS7/Backbone telephony networks
    VoIP security
    Data Recovery, Forensics and Incident Response
    HSDPA / CDMA Security / WIMAX Security
    Network Protocol and Analysis
    Smart Card and Physical Security
    WLAN, GPS, HAM Radio, Satellite, RFID and Bluetooth Security
    Analysis of malicious code
    Applications of cryptographic techniques
    Analysis of attacks against networks and machines
    File system security
    Side Channel Analysis of Hardware Devices
    Cloud Security
    Exploit Analysis

On an unrelated note, registration for the 11th annual HITB Security
Conference (#HITB2013KUL) is also open. Taking place from the 14th to
the 17th of October, the conference will be keynoted by Andy Ellis
(CSO &amp;lt; at &amp;gt; Akamai) and Joe Sullivan (CSO &amp;lt; at &amp;gt; Facebook). The event website is
here:

http://conference.hitb.org/hitbsecconf2013kul/

On behalf of The HITB Team, we look forward to your article
submissions and to hopefully seeing you in Malaysia in October!

---
Hafez Kamal,
HITB Conference Core Crew (.MY),
Hack in The Box (M) Sdn. Bhd.
36th Floor, Menara Maxis,
Kuala Lumpur City Centre,
50088 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia

Tel: +603-26157299
Fax: +603-26150088
PGP Key ID: 0xC0DC7DF8

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Hafez Kamal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T11:00:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15605">
    <title>Wireshark piping in of pcap data on windows</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15605</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Given I cannot specifiy a filename as device on windows, what is the best way to
take a stream (stdout) of pcap data and show it realtime in wireshark?

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant              10 West 24th Street #100    -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333            Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jason Pyeron</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-12T19:44:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15604">
    <title>summing DeltaT in one direction</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15604</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I would like to calculate how much time the Client and the Server spend turning around frames.

Client ------- Switch ------- Server
                 |
                 |
              sniffer

In this example, Client is using SMB to copy a file to Server.

I'm imagining that I can calculate the Server's contribution as follows:
tshark -r foo.pcap -Y tcp.srcport==445 -qz io,stat,0,SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta

================================================
| IO Statistics                                |
|                                              |
| Interval size: 44.1 secs (dur)               |
| Col 1: Frames and bytes                      |
|     2: SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta     |
|----------------------------------------------|
|              |1                  |2          |
| Interval     | Frames |   Bytes  |    SUM    |
|----------------------------------------------|
|  0.0 &amp;lt;&amp;gt; 44.1 |  50069 | 50551304 | 44.145992 |
================================================


And the Client's contribution in this way:
tshark -r foo.pcap -Y tcp.dstport==445 -qz io,stat,0,SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta
================================================
| IO Statistics                                |
|                                              |
| Interval size: 44.1 secs (dur)               |
| Col 1: Frames and bytes                      |
|     2: SUM(tcp.time_delta)tcp.time_delta     |
|----------------------------------------------|
|              |1                  |2          |
| Interval     | Frames |   Bytes  |    SUM    |
|----------------------------------------------|
|  0.0 &amp;lt;&amp;gt; 44.1 |  50069 | 50551304 | 44.145992 |
================================================

(1) Now, the fact that both incantations report precisely the same result seems suspicious to me ... particularly since using 
an IO Graph gives me different results for the Server side calculation:
Filter: tcp.srcport==445 Calc:SUM(*)tcp.time_delta Style:FBar
I'm claiming that this is a bug ... and have filed it as such ... but now I'm doubting my understanding of how -z io,stat[...] works
==&amp;gt; Can anyone see an error in my approach?  Or does this actually look like a bug?

[Screen shot of IO Graph approach inserted here]



(2) Does anyone have a better (or different) way of calculating the same thing, i.e. how much 'time' the Client and Server have each contributed?

--sk

Stuart Kendrick
FHCRC

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Stuart Kendrick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-12T18:15:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15603">
    <title>Process Information with packets</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15603</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt; hi i am going to work on project
 The application and  user associated with each packet should be shown
in the packet detail. like  wireshark show the packet sender's  host
user name. let suppose

a computer have 10 user .then we can not say who is the sender of this

packet.

please tell me what i can add new more feature in this project . and i
dont know this is already implemented or not . if  implemeted then
tell me .

i will greatly happy if  you help me to improve my project
thanks
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Prameswar Lal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-12T14:15:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15602">
    <title>Fwd:</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15602</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://intechnics.de/npot38.php

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fabio Mendes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-12T06:35:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15600">
    <title>live migration pcap</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15600</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;      hey everyone, do you have please any pcap file for a live migration
of virtual machine ???
thx in advance

-------------------------
http://www.linkedin.com/in/hamadisalaheddine
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>salah eddine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-03T13:04:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15597">
    <title>PCAP file</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15597</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;please if anyone have a pcap file of VM migration
or database backup, i need it to test a network application that im working
on
thx for advance
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>salah eddine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-02T20:47:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15595">
    <title>Extracting data from capture</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15595</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Wireshark users,
I have a packet capture in which there are http requests (over plain
connection, not SSL) and their response. Response received is
certificate or chain of certificates, possibly in binary data. It
shows the content type of the object as
'application/x-x509-ca-ra-cert'. However, when I try to do
'ExportObjects' &amp;gt; HTTP and export the object, it exports fine but I am
not able to view that certificate using any tool (like openssl or any
other).

I am suspecting wireshark is not exporting either fully or some issue.
I have attached the file 20130417-213837_TCPDump.pcap here
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=90024b432de06aed&amp;amp;id=90024B432DE06AED!1107&amp;amp;authkey=!AG9x61vd9JLHYL0

Can someone tell me how do export the http response that has
certificate so that I am view the certificate ? Appreciate the
response here.

Thanks/Satish.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>radiatejava</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-02T07:11:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15594">
    <title>[HITB-Announce] #HITB2013KUL Call for Papers</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15594</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi everyone - This is a Call for Papers for the 11th annual HITB
Security Conference in Malaysia, #HITB2013KUL which takes place on the
16th and 17th of October in Kuala Lumpur.

Keynote speakers for the conference will be Joe Sullivan (Chief Security
Officer, Facebook) and Andy Ellis (Chief Security Officer, Akamai)

We're looking for talks that are highly technical, but most importantly,
material which is new and cutting edge. Submissions are due BEFORE
Thursday, 25th July 23:59 MYT

HITB CFP: http://cfp.hackinthebox.org/
Event Website: http://conference.hitb.org/ (Opens 10th May)

===

Each accepted submission will entitle the speaker(s) to
accommodation for 3 nights / 4 days and travel expense reimbursement
up to EUR1200.00 per speaking slot.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to the following:

   Cloud Security
   File System Security
   3G/4G/WIMAX Security
   SS7/GSM/VoIP Security
   Security of Medical Devices
   Critical Infrastructure Security
   Smartphone / MobileSecurity
   Smart Card and Physical Security
   Network Protocols, Analysis and Attacks
   Applications of Cryptographic Techniques
   Side Channel Analysis of Hardware Devices
   Analysis of Malicious Code / Viruses / Malware
   Data Recovery, Forensics and Incident Response
   Hardware based attacks and reverse engineering
   Windows / Linux / OS X / *NIX Security Vulnerabilities
   Next Generation Exploit and Exploit Mitigation Techniques
   NFC, WLAN, GPS, HAM Radio, Satellite, RFID and Bluetooth Security

WHITE PAPER: If your presentation is short listed for inclusion into the
conference program, a technical white paper must also be provided for
review (3000 - 5000 words).

Your submissions will be reviewed by The HITB CFP Review Committee:

Charlie Miller (formerly Principal Research Consultant, Accuvant Labs)
Katie Moussouris, Senior Security Strategist, Microsoft
Itzik Kotler, Chief Technology Officer, Security Art
Cesar Cerrudo, Chief Technology Officer, IOActive
Jeremiah Grossman, Founder, Whitehat Security
Andrew Cushman, Senior Director, Microsoft
Saumil Shah, Founder CEO Net-Square
Thanh 'RD' Nguyen, THC, VNSECURITY
Alexander Kornburst, Red Database
Fredric Raynal, QuarksLab
Shreeraj Shah, Founder, BlueInfy
Emmanuel Gadaix, Founder, TSTF
Andrea Barisani, Inverse Path
Philippe Langlois, TSTF
Ed Skoudis, InGuardians
Haroon Meer, Thinkst
Chris Evans, Google
Raoul Chiesa, TSTF/ISECOM
rsnake, SecTheory
Gal Diskin, Intel
Skyper, THC

Note: We do not accept product or vendor related pitches. If you would
like to showcase your company's products or technology, please email
conferenceinfo-Y0pbcourc9SI2xUbZzX/NA&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org

---
Hafez Kamal,
HITB Conference Core Crew (.MY),
Hack in The Box (M) Sdn. Bhd.
36th Floor, Menara Maxis,
Kuala Lumpur City Centre,
50088 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia

Tel: +603-26157299
Fax: +603-26150088
PGP Key ID: 0xC0DC7DF8

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Hafez Kamal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-01T02:12:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15593">
    <title>tshark print raw data with -T fields (for partialssl records)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15593</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I'm printing a dozen fields or so from a trace with a limited snap length.
 Works great, but the thirteenth field is unfortunately not decoded from
partially captured packets.

Is there a way to print the raw data along with -T fields?  -x and -T
fields don't mix...  I suppose I could run tshark twice once with -x and
once with -T fields and correlate the output, but I'm hoping there's an
easier way.  I see some references on the web to an option for -e data, but
that doesn't print anything when I try it (on tshark 1.8.2).

Alternately, is there anyway to convince the ssl packet parser to emit the
fields that it has recognized from a partial record?  In particular, I'd
like to know that the header for ssl record type 23 (application data) has
been captured, even though tcpdump hasn't captured the entire contents of
the application data itself.

Cheers,
Lee
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Lee Mighdoll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-29T23:08:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15590">
    <title>Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 is now available</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15590</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.10.0rc1. This is the
first release candidate for Wireshark 1.10.0.

     __________________________________________________________

What is Wireshark?

   Wireshark is the world's most popular network protocol
   analyzer. It is used for troubleshooting, analysis, development
   and education.
     __________________________________________________________

What's New

  Bug Fixes

   The following bugs have been fixed:

  New and Updated Features

   The following features are new (or have been significantly
   updated) since version 1.8:
     * Wireshark on 32- and 64-bit Windows supports automatic
       updates.
     * The packet bytes view is faster.
     * You can now display a list of resolved host names in
       "hosts" format within Wireshark.
     * The wireless toolbar has been updated.
     * Wireshark on Linux does a better job of detecting interface
       addition and removal.
     * It is now possible to compare two fields in a display
       filter (for example: udp.srcport != udp.dstport). The two
       fields must be of the same type for this to work.
     * The Windows installers ship with WinPcap 4.1.3, which
       supports Windows 8.
     * USB type and product name support has been improved.
     * All Bluetooth profiles and protocols are now supported.
     * Wireshark now calculates HTTP response times and presents
       the result in a new field in the HTTP response. Links from
       the request's frame to the response's frame and vice-versa
       are also added.
     * The main welcome screen and status bar now display file
       sizes using strict SI prefixes instead of old-style binary
       prefixes.
     * Capinfos now prints human-readable statistics with SI
       suffixes by default.
     * It is now possible to open a referenced packet (such as the
       matched request or response packet) in a new window.
     * Tshark can now display only the hex/ascii packet data
       without requiring that the packet summary and/or packet
       details are also displayed. If you want the old behavior,
       use -Px instead of just -x.
     * Wireshark can be compiled using GTK+ 3.
     * The Wireshark application icon, capture toolbar icons, and
       other icons have been updated.
     * Tshark's filtering and multi-pass analysis have been
       reworked for consistency and in order to support dependent
       frame calculations during reassembly. See the man page
       descriptions for -2, -R, and -Y.
     * Tshark's -G fields2 and -G fields3 options have been
       eliminated. The -G fields option now includes the 2 extra
       fields that -G fields3 previously provided, and the blurb
       information has been relegated to the last column since in
       many cases it is blank anyway.

  New Protocol Support

   Amateur Radio AX.25, Amateur Radio BPQ, Amateur Radio NET/ROM,
   America Online (AOL), AR Drone, Automatic Position Reporting
   System (APRS), AX.25 KISS, AX.25 no Layer 3, Bitcoin Protocol,
   Bluetooth Attribute Protocol, Bluetooth AVCTP Protocol,
   Bluetooth AVDTP Protocol, Bluetooth AVRCP Profile, Bluetooth
   BNEP Protocol, Bluetooth HCI USB Transport, Bluetooth HCRP
   Profile, Bluetooth HID Profile, Bluetooth MCAP Protocol,
   Bluetooth SAP Profile, Bluetooth SBC Codec, Bluetooth Security
   Manager Protocol, Cisco GED-125 Protocol, Clique Reliable
   Multicast Protocol (CliqueRM), D-Bus, Digital Transmission
   Content Protection over IP, DVB-S2 Baseband, FlexNet,
   Forwarding and Control Element Separation Protocol (ForCES),
   Foundry Discovery Protocol (FDP), Gearman Protocol, GEO-Mobile
   Radio (1) RACH, HoneyPot Feeds Protocol (HPFEEDS), LTE
   Positioning Protocol Extensions (LLPe), Media Resource Control
   Protocol Version 2 (MRCPv2), Media-Independent Handover (MIH),
   MIDI System Exclusive (SYSEX), Mojito DHT, MPLS-TP
   Fault-Management, MPLS-TP Lock-Instruct, NASDAQ's OUCH 4.x,
   NASDAQ's SoupBinTCP, OpenVPN Protocol, Pseudo-Wire OAM,
   RPKI-Router Protocol, SEL Fast Message, Simple Packet Relay
   Transport (SPRT), Skype, Smart Message Language (SML), SPNEGO
   Extended Negotiation Security Mechanism (NEGOEX), UHD/USRP, USB
   Audio, USB Video, v.150.1 State Signaling Event (SSE), VITA 49
   Radio Transport, VNTAG, WebRTC Datachannel Protocol (RTCDC),
   and WiMAX OFDMA PHY SAP

  Updated Protocol Support

   Too many protocols have been updated to list here.

  New and Updated Capture File Support

   AIX iptrace, CAM Inspector, Catapult DCT2000, Citrix NetScaler,
   DBS Etherwatch (VMS), Endace ERF, HP-UX nettl, IBM iSeries,
   Ixia IxVeriWave, NA Sniffer (DOS), Netscreen, Network
   Instruments Observer, pcap, pcap-ng, Symbian OS btsnoop,
   TamoSoft CommView, and Tektronix K12xx
     __________________________________________________________

Getting Wireshark

   Wireshark source code and installation packages are available
   from [1]http://www.wireshark.org/download.html.

  Vendor-supplied Packages

   Most Linux and Unix vendors supply their own Wireshark
   packages. You can usually install or upgrade Wireshark using
   the package management system specific to that platform. A list
   of third-party packages can be found on the [2]download page on
   the Wireshark web site.
     __________________________________________________________

File Locations

   Wireshark and TShark look in several different locations for
   preference files, plugins, SNMP MIBS, and RADIUS dictionaries.
   These locations vary from platform to platform. You can use
   About-&amp;gt;Folders to find the default locations on your system.
     __________________________________________________________

Known Problems

   Dumpcap might not quit if Wireshark or TShark crashes. ([3]Bug
   1419)

   The BER dissector might infinitely loop. ([4]Bug 1516)

   Capture filters aren't applied when capturing from named pipes.
   (ws-buglink:1814)

   Filtering tshark captures with read filters (-R) no longer
   works. ([5]Bug 2234)

   The 64-bit Windows installer does not support Kerberos
   decryption. ([6]Win64 development page)

   Application crash when changing real-time option. ([7]Bug 4035)

   Hex pane display issue after startup. ([8]Bug 4056)

   Packet list rows are oversized. ([9]Bug 4357)

   Summary pane selected frame highlighting not maintained.
   ([10]Bug 4445)

   Wireshark and TShark will display incorrect delta times in some
   cases. ([11]Bug 4985)
     __________________________________________________________

Getting Help

   Community support is available on [12]Wireshark's Q&amp;amp;A site and
   on the wireshark-users mailing list. Subscription information
   and archives for all of Wireshark's mailing lists can be found
   on [13]the web site.

   Official Wireshark training and certification are available
   from [14]Wireshark University.
     __________________________________________________________

Frequently Asked Questions

   A complete FAQ is available on the [15]Wireshark web site.
     __________________________________________________________

   Last updated 2013-04-22 10:39:34 PDT

References

   1. http://www.wireshark.org/download.html
   2. http://www.wireshark.org/download.html#thirdparty
   3. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1419
   4. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1516
   5. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2234
   6. https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Win64
   7. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
   8. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4056
   9. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4357
  10. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4445
  11. https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4985
  12. http://ask.wireshark.org/
  13. http://www.wireshark.org/lists/
  14. http://www.wiresharktraining.com/
  15. http://www.wireshark.org/faq.html


Digests

wireshark-1.10.0rc1.tar.bz2: 27061529 bytes
MD5(wireshark-1.10.0rc1.tar.bz2)=39298e1c8343d3fa1acbd77ab33503fe
SHA1(wireshark-1.10.0rc1.tar.bz2)=d9d5e897c42def2a90b508fba0151a226abc41e4
RIPEMD160(wireshark-1.10.0rc1.tar.bz2)=707a6e512a441ed428cb53abf3b04253d0ef36a8

Wireshark-win64-1.10.0rc1.exe: 28079976 bytes
MD5(Wireshark-win64-1.10.0rc1.exe)=231929c1b044d66683edc0b260d885a6
SHA1(Wireshark-win64-1.10.0rc1.exe)=55a203223bb642f628335b72be3c23edd71c9b38
RIPEMD160(Wireshark-win64-1.10.0rc1.exe)=051103a241c709559ecce0c08b5de87c01eaeff4

Wireshark-win32-1.10.0rc1.exe: 22227088 bytes
MD5(Wireshark-win32-1.10.0rc1.exe)=dc357a87d11088aa768cd715ef4f3ad9
SHA1(Wireshark-win32-1.10.0rc1.exe)=90f9d2da7a674a632645a3b09bb9130ae9eb53e9
RIPEMD160(Wireshark-win32-1.10.0rc1.exe)=5f34cb06bb7e8503ca602debab4b1faecc0d09b6

Wireshark-1.10.0rc1.u3p: 30755518 bytes
MD5(Wireshark-1.10.0rc1.u3p)=988e672fea36e05015f037471cd045bf
SHA1(Wireshark-1.10.0rc1.u3p)=0922201c702b0a4ea0dad03d400a33b0cd1cf210
RIPEMD160(Wireshark-1.10.0rc1.u3p)=a09f3d384b008bc8d9d37a713c5b0a998a2c0134

WiresharkPortable-1.10.0rc1.paf.exe: 23584280 bytes
MD5(WiresharkPortable-1.10.0rc1.paf.exe)=fc439acd380c792cc3917858113ef6a6
SHA1(WiresharkPortable-1.10.0rc1.paf.exe)=65c129b7f3bbd4ba8d67559f6ee19631ac350d67
RIPEMD160(WiresharkPortable-1.10.0rc1.paf.exe)=a22ac09043c6577a2ac45a7926d92b1fb51974de

Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel 32.dmg: 24153010 bytes
MD5(Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel 32.dmg)=c828d4188e329c865cbb711ab93efe3e
SHA1(Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel
32.dmg)=9ac20ec957a3d4a372bf93319a2ce107a8a1a15d
RIPEMD160(Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel
32.dmg)=cb3ef75ddf48ac39eafe866876f54ed193a57e11

Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel 64.dmg: 24024741 bytes
MD5(Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel 64.dmg)=7628f6ef0d85960443a6cac147dd0455
SHA1(Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel
64.dmg)=d0b49d77671800d2a52cec6e478e826bb8ac5a02
RIPEMD160(Wireshark 1.10.0rc1 Intel
64.dmg)=81ff48a31c067166b9ec65acf3c66824333e7019
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlF7D98ACgkQpw8IXSHylJpy0QCgz2LQnk7nQ4hDluLv5WGby+9b
wU8AoMTP6BFHVDPSemIomzrpcjPcgME9
=kA9M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Gerald Combs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-26T23:38:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15587">
    <title>wireshark not deflating ipcomp packets</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15587</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I am trying to ping between two machines with large ICMP packets which are
compressed using DEFLATE. I would prefer to view the decompressed packets
in the expanded packet details, but seems like wireshark is not
decompressing them.  It identifies the packet having IPComp CPI equal to
 DEFLATE , but is not actually deflating the data that follows.

I am using only IPComp, no encryption or authentication in the packet.  I
am using version 1.2.7 of wireshark

Please let me know if anybody knows how to see them decompressed.

-rupapv
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rupa P V</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-22T16:12:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15586">
    <title>sqlite bindings for wireshark / lua interpreter</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15586</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I've been writing dissectors for some in house protocols with Lua and
exporting captures to pdml for further analysis (using xslt).  This is very
circumlocutious.  I'd rather write all my dissector output to a database.

I could build my own Wireshark binary with SQLite included, but I'd rather
not.  I'd also like to make my Lua tools easily accessible to users who
aren't in a position to do that.

What would really rock my world would be if Lua bindings for SQLite were
merged with trunk.  Any chance of that?

Cheers
Jono



&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Poff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-21T23:18:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15583">
    <title>Bug in the Show Capture options in Wireshark</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15583</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I am using Wireshark 1.6.7 on Ubuntu 12.04

Whenever I go to Show Capture options to mention the interface, the
interface textbox doesn't accept more than one character as input and
after that the software hangs and closes itself. Has anyone faced this
sort of problem
What is the solution to this?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Akshay Jindal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-19T23:18:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15582">
    <title>tcpdump only captures incoming packets in a tcpconnection</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15582</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi, all

      I wrote a program based on tcp and put it on a PlanetLab node A. The
program initiates a tcp connection with another host B(tcp listening port
30000).

      I used tcpdump on planetlab node to capture packets without any filter

       tcpdump - i eth0

      I notice all the packets I captured are only incoming packets, the
outgoing packets like TCP SYN packet and  TCP ACK packet are missing.

      On Host B I also use tcpdump and I can see the TCP SYN and ACK from  A

       I tried wget and udp sending on the Planetlab node and I can capture
outgoing packets. So this means tcpdump on Planetlab node can be infuenced
by specific program?

        what are potential reasons for this? thanks!
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>wen lui</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-18T00:17:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15581">
    <title>Query : How to decode MTP3 Message Over TCP usingTALI??</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15581</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I want to know how can I decode MTP3 messages encapsulated in TCP using TALI header (rfc 3094) in WireShark??


TALI is enabled in "Enabled Protocol" list on WireShark. But there is no option "Decode as -&amp;gt; TALI" on WireShark. I am using WireShark version 1.8.3 on Windows.___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>friends you</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-16T15:42:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15575">
    <title>About filter "udp &amp;&amp; !icmp"</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15575</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello everybody,

I'm a new user of Wireshark and I'm capturing UDP traffic. Startly I used
the "udp" filter but appears some undesirable ICMP packets, so then
googling I've found the "udp &amp;amp;&amp;amp; !icmp" filter to avoid capture ICMP
packets.

It's all right till here, but when I export the capture as plain text, the
ICMP packets appear again. Seems like the filter just works in the main
screenl of Wireshark. What can I do to capture just UDP traffic?


Thanks in advance.
Regards.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>delarge</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-16T22:28:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15573">
    <title>Negative time difference between two following packets. frame.time_delta is negative</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15573</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!

I have a capture taken with an Ethernet tap/splitter/monitor where several packets have a negative time difference to the previous packet, i.e. frame.time_delta is below zero. Actually, 13.4 % of all packets in the file have this characteristic, which can easily be seen by applying the filter

frame.time_delta &amp;lt; 0

It is only packets that go in one direction, e.g. from server to client, that appear to get negative time delta and this leads me to think that whatever causes this is not only due to some fault or feature in Wireshark itself.

What can this be caused by?

Best Regards,
Jaroslav Kazejev
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jaroslav Kazejev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-15T15:01:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15572">
    <title>Negative time difference between two following packets. frame.time_delta is negative</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15572</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!

I have a capture taken with an Ethernet tap/splitter/monitor where several packets have a negative time difference to the previous packet, i.e. frame.time_delta is below zero. Actually, 13.4 % of all packets in the file have this characteristic, which can easily be seen by applying the filter

frame.time_delta &amp;lt; 0

It is only packets that go in one direction, e.g. from server to client, that appear to get negative time delta and this leads me to think that whatever causes this is not only due to some fault or feature in Wireshark itself.

What can this be caused by?

Best Regards,
Jaroslav Kazejev
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jaroslav Kazejev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-16T06:41:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15569">
    <title>Question about ACK number</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.user/15569</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

 

Please help to comment about ACK calculation in below scenario.

 

Frame100: Client ACKs the data received till now..  ACK= 10000

 

Frame 101:  Server sends client TCP Data ( 924 bytes) with FIN,PSH and ACK
flags set. 

 

Frame 102: Client sends ACK= 10925    à QUESTION ..Why is client sending
10925 and not 10924 .. Is it adding 1 for FIN received in Frame 101 ..?  Is
it normal ?

 

Frame 103:  Client sends FIN,ACK == ACK = 10925

 

Best Regards

Amit 

 

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list &amp;lt;wireshark-users-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org&amp;gt;
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request-IZ8446WsY0/dtAWm4Da02A&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Amit Aggarwal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-15T07:10:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.network.wireshark.user">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.network.wireshark.user</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
