<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48">
    <title>gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2518"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2517"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2516"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2515"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2511"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2508"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2496"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2467"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2465"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2463"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2458"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2454"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2452"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2451"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2518">
    <title>string-hash</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2518</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.cse.yorku.ca/~oz/hash.html

vm/data/struct.scm has

(define (vm-string-hash s)
  (let ((n (vm-string-length s)))
    (do ((i 0 (+ i 1))
         (h 0 (+ h (char-&amp;gt;ascii (vm-string-ref s i)))))
        ((&amp;gt;= i n) h))))

also other places in the source (but not srfi-13)

I'm not complaining, just thought this might want to go on the to-do-someday list.

Interesting coincidence, this page was the top google hit for "string hash", and its author was the first person to get ahold of scheme48 (beyond Richard and me)

Jonathan

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Rees</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T18:29:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2517">
    <title>CFP: Commercial Users of Functional Programming 2012</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2517</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
   COMMERCIAL USERS OF FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING 2012
      CUFP 2012
                       http://cufp.org/conference
CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS
 Copenhagen, Denmark
      Sep 13-15
      Co-located with ICFP 2012
 Sponsored by SIGPLAN
    Talk Proposal Submission Deadline 29 June 2012

The annual CUFP workshop is a place where people can see how others
are using functional programming to solve real world problems; where
practitioners meet and collaborate; where language designers and users
can share ideas about the future of their favorite language; and where
one can learn practical techniques and approaches for putting
functional programming to work.

Giving a CUFP Talk
==================

If you have experience using functional languages in a practical
setting, we invite you to submit a proposal to give a talk at the
workshop. We're looking for two kinds of talks:

Experience reports are typically 25 minutes long, and aim to inform
participants about how functional programming plays out in real-world
applications, focusing especially on lessons learned and insights
gained. Experience reports don't need to be highly technical;
reflections on the commercial, management, or software engineering
aspects are, if anything, more important.

Technical talks are also 25 minutes long, and should focus on teaching
the audience something about a particular technique or methodology,
from the point of view of someone who has seen it play out in
practice. These talks could cover anything from techniques for
building functional concurrent applications, to managing dynamic
reconfigurations, to design recipes for using types effectively in
large-scale applications. While these talks will often be based on a
particular language, they should be accessible to a broad range of
programmers.

If you are interested in offering a talk, or nominating someone to do
so, send an e-mail to sperber(at)deinprogramm(dot)de or
avsm2(at)cl(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk by 29 June 2012 with a short
description of what you'd like to talk about or what you think your
nominee should give a talk about. Such descriptions should be about
one page long.

There will be a short scribes report of the presentations and
discussions but not of the details of individual talks, as the meeting
is intended to be more a discussion forum than a technical
interchange. You do not need to submit a paper, just a proposal for
your talk!  

Program Committee
=================

    Mike Sperber (Active Group), co-chair
    Anil Madhavapeddy (University of Cambridge), co-chair
    Ashish Agarwal (New York University)
    Thomas Arts (QuviQ AB)
    Chris Houser (LonoCloud)
    Tomas Petricek (University of Cambridge)
    Heiko Seeberger (Typesafe)
    Stefan Wehr (factis research)
    Noel Welsh (untyped)

More information
================

For more information on CUFP, including videos of presentations from
previous years, take a look at the CUFP website at
http://cufp.org. Note that presenters, like other attendees, will need
to register for the event. Presentations will be video taped and
presenters will be expected to sign an ACM copyright release
form. Acceptance and rejection letters will be sent out by July 16th.

Guidance on giving a great CUFP talk
====================================

Focus on the interesting bits: Think about what will distinguish your
talk, and what will engage the audience, and focus there. There are a
number of places to look for those interesting bits.

    Setting: FP is pretty well established in some areas, including
    formal verification, financial processing and server-side
    web-services. An unusual setting can be a source of interest. If
    you're deploying FP-based mobile UIs or building servers on oil
    rigs, then the challenges of that scenario are worth focusing
    on. Did FP help or hinder in adapting to the setting?

    Technology: The CUFP audience is hungry to learn about how FP
    techniques work in practice. What design patterns have you
    applied, and to what areas? Did you use functional reactive
    programming for user interfaces, or DSLs for playing chess, or
    fault-tolerant actors for large scale geological data processing? 
    Teach us something about the techniques you used, and why we
    should consider using them ourselves.

    Getting things done: How did you deal with large software
    development in the absence of a myriad of pre-existing support
    that are often expected in larger commercial environments (IDEs,
    coverage tools, debuggers, profilers) and without larger, proven
    bodies of libraries? Did you hit any brick walls that required
    support from the community?

    Don't just be a cheerleader: It's easy to write a rah-rah talk
    about how well FP worked for you, but CUFP is more interesting
    when the talks also spend time on what doesn't work. Even when the
    results were all great, you should spend more time on the
    challenges along the way than on the parts that went smoothly.


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Sperber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T18:18:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2516">
    <title>Commercial Users of Functional Programming 2012: Call for Presentations</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2516</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
   COMMERCIAL USERS OF FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING 2012
      CUFP 2012
                       http://cufp.org/conference
CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS
 Copenhagen, Denmark
      Sep 13-15
      Co-located with ICFP 2012
 Sponsored by SIGPLAN
    Talk Proposal Submission Deadline 29 June 2012

The annual CUFP workshop is a place where people can see how others
are using functional programming to solve real world problems; where
practitioners meet and collaborate; where language designers and users
can share ideas about the future of their favorite language; and where
one can learn practical techniques and approaches for putting
functional programming to work.

Giving a CUFP Talk
==================

If you have experience using functional languages in a practical
setting, we invite you to submit a proposal to give a talk at the
workshop. We're looking for two kinds of talks:

Experience reports are typically 25 minutes long, and aim to inform
participants about how functional programming plays out in real-world
applications, focusing especially on lessons learned and insights
gained. Experience reports don't need to be highly technical;
reflections on the commercial, management, or software engineering
aspects are, if anything, more important.

Technical talks are also 25 minutes long, and should focus on teaching
the audience something about a particular technique or methodology,
from the point of view of someone who has seen it play out in
practice. These talks could cover anything from techniques for
building functional concurrent applications, to managing dynamic
reconfigurations, to design recipes for using types effectively in
large-scale applications. While these talks will often be based on a
particular language, they should be accessible to a broad range of
programmers.

If you are interested in offering a talk, or nominating someone to do
so, send an e-mail to sperber(at)deinprogramm(dot)de or
avsm2(at)cl(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk by 29 June 2012 with a short
description of what you'd like to talk about or what you think your
nominee should give a talk about. Such descriptions should be about
one page long.

There will be a short scribes report of the presentations and
discussions but not of the details of individual talks, as the meeting
is intended to be more a discussion forum than a technical
interchange. You do not need to submit a paper, just a proposal for
your talk!  

Program Committee
=================

    Mike Sperber (Active Group), co-chair
    Anil Madhavapeddy (University of Cambridge), co-chair
    Ashish Agarwal (New York University)
    Thomas Arts (QuviQ AB)
    Chris Houser (LonoCloud)
    Tomas Petricek (University of Cambridge)
    Heiko Seeberger (Typesafe)
    Stefan Wehr (factis research)
    Noel Welsh (untyped)

More information
================

For more information on CUFP, including videos of presentations from
previous years, take a look at the CUFP website at
http://cufp.org. Note that presenters, like other attendees, will need
to register for the event. Presentations will be video taped and
presenters will be expected to sign an ACM copyright release
form. Acceptance and rejection letters will be sent out by July 16th.

Guidance on giving a great CUFP talk
====================================

Focus on the interesting bits: Think about what will distinguish your
talk, and what will engage the audience, and focus there. There are a
number of places to look for those interesting bits.

    Setting: FP is pretty well established in some areas, including
    formal verification, financial processing and server-side
    web-services. An unusual setting can be a source of interest. If
    you're deploying FP-based mobile UIs or building servers on oil
    rigs, then the challenges of that scenario are worth focusing
    on. Did FP help or hinder in adapting to the setting?

    Technology: The CUFP audience is hungry to learn about how FP
    techniques work in practice. What design patterns have you
    applied, and to what areas? Did you use functional reactive
    programming for user interfaces, or DSLs for playing chess, or
    fault-tolerant actors for large scale geological data processing? 
    Teach us something about the techniques you used, and why we
    should consider using them ourselves.

    Getting things done: How did you deal with large software
    development in the absence of a myriad of pre-existing support
    that are often expected in larger commercial environments (IDEs,
    coverage tools, debuggers, profilers) and without larger, proven
    bodies of libraries? Did you hit any brick walls that required
    support from the community?

    Don't just be a cheerleader: It's easy to write a rah-rah talk
    about how well FP worked for you, but CUFP is more interesting
    when the talks also spend time on what doesn't work. Even when the
    results were all great, you should spend more time on the
    challenges along the way than on the parts that went smoothly.


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Sperber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-21T18:57:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2515">
    <title>[Scheme Steering Committee announcements] R7RS public comment period</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2515</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;This message is being posted to various lists to inform members of the Scheme community on the development of R7RS.

I am pleased to announce that the sixth draft version of R7RS ("small" language) has been completed by working group 1 and is now available at the following URL:

 http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/r7rs-draft-6.pdf

A copy will also be posted on schemers.org .

Other documents produced by working group 1, including previous drafts and progress reports are available at the following URL:

 http://www.scheme-reports.org/2012/working-group-1.html

The editors of working groups 1 and 2, in consultation with the Scheme language steering committee, have provided a mechanism for comment and discussion.  For details, including instructions on how to submit a formal comment, please see this document:

 http://www.scheme-reports.org/2012/process1.html

The comment period is now open and will continue until June 30, 2012.

The steering committee thanks the editors for their intensive work on the draft R7RS, and looks forward to the public comment period on this sixth draft.

Enjoy!

For the Scheme language Steering Committee,
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Feeley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-17T06:44:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2511">
    <title>new package in sunterlib : xanadu</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2511</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

xanadu is a scheme Xanadu using XML scheming and trees for filesystem xml
features.
I't is in development and in the git repo.

Enjoy,
Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-22T21:57:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2508">
    <title>new package in sunterlib : schemedoc</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2508</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I've put a scheme coded perldoc .pod reader in sunterlib. It's in the git
repo.

There's preliminary .sod and scriblle features coming up.

Enjoy,
Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-22T21:53:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2496">
    <title>Fwd: Re: scheme-fb license change</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2496</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
In case you aren't aware of it, the community went through a big effort
to get scheme48 and most of the other copyrighted code unified under an
open source license many years ago (modified BSD). I don't know how much
is preserved in public archives, but I'm pointing you to the history so
you can be aware of it when you make your decisions.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Anthony Carrico</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-11T08:03:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486">
    <title>tmail - scheme mail demon</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

I'm working on a scsh/s48 mailer demon. The code now has a response system
and a socket listener etc.
See http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/tmail-0.2.tar.gz

Cya,

Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-08T23:12:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476">
    <title>For MIT, 27-trees</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Goodday schemers,

I've made an extension to octrees, called a 27-tree.
Paper is here :
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/papers/paper27tree.ps

Python code with ultima 8 game is here:
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/python/koboldsquest-2.1.tar.gz

Finally a scheme implementation which can be used with my former
framebuffer code, to make a 3D engine, is here:
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/
(version 0.3 has been tested in guile and s48, fb extension is also in that
directory)

Enjoy,
Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-06T14:15:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486">
    <title>tmail - scheme mail demon</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

I'm working on a scsh/s48 mailer demon. The code now has a response system
and a socket listener etc.
See http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/tmail-0.2.tar.gz

Cya,

Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-08T23:12:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476">
    <title>For MIT, 27-trees</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Goodday schemers,

I've made an extension to octrees, called a 27-tree.
Paper is here :
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/papers/paper27tree.ps

Python code with ultima 8 game is here:
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/python/koboldsquest-2.1.tar.gz

Finally a scheme implementation which can be used with my former
framebuffer code, to make a 3D engine, is here:
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/
(version 0.3 has been tested in guile and s48, fb extension is also in that
directory)

Enjoy,
Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-06T14:15:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486">
    <title>tmail - scheme mail demon</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2486</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

I'm working on a scsh/s48 mailer demon. The code now has a response system
and a socket listener etc.
See http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/tmail-0.2.tar.gz

Cya,

Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-08T23:12:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476">
    <title>For MIT, 27-trees</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2476</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Goodday schemers,

I've made an extension to octrees, called a 27-tree.
Paper is here :
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/papers/paper27tree.ps

Python code with ultima 8 game is here:
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/python/koboldsquest-2.1.tar.gz

Finally a scheme implementation which can be used with my former
framebuffer code, to make a 3D engine, is here:
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/
(version 0.3 has been tested in guile and s48, fb extension is also in that
directory)

Enjoy,
Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-06T14:15:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2467">
    <title>Changeset 0306c5a64775</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2467</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;What is changeset 0306c5a64775 intended to do?


Robert Ransom


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Robert Ransom</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-31T03:28:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2465">
    <title>Reading primitive procedures</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2465</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I don't understand the following Scheme behaviour:

+
'+
1 +
1
#{Procedure 93 +}

Why in the second interaction is the input '+' read as a procedure, but in
the first as a symbol?

I am very new to Scheme, so my apologies if this is a silly question. I'm
trying to write an RPN interpreter in Scheme, and I thought I'd apply the
procedure read from the input to a stack of operands, however, because of
the first case, this method isn't robust. I don't understand how to
'unsymbolise' a symbol into its corresponding procedure. Maybe there is a
better way to do this?

Thanks for reading.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Lay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-17T23:52:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2463">
    <title>Macro expander bug</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2463</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I tried to load the package defs from SSAX and it killed the macro expander.
It appears that when BIND-ALIASES was switched to the new cenv
representation it stopped including macro eval in the cenvs it generated,
and SSAX touches it somehow, causing a (force #f).

I put up a one-line patch to BIND-ALIASES so that it includes macro eval, as
it did before, at https://bitbucket.org/wnoble/s48. However, I don't know
exactly how SSAX triggers the access and didn't try too hard to come up with
a simple macro to reproduce the faulty expansion. So, if someone would
explain whether this is the correct fix, and why or why not, I would be
grateful!

And Mike: thanks for integrating my POSIX patch!

Best,
Will


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Will Noble</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-01T02:30:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2458">
    <title>bugs</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2458</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt; My system is opensuse 11.4,I download the source code (v1.8) and compile it .During 'make',a small error occured.I didn't record it .but i will try to explain it to you.
file: ./c/unix/socket.c
line: 354
func:gethostbyname_thread
host-&amp;gt;h_addr---&amp;gt;I was told that struct host has no member 'h_addr'
host----------&amp;gt;struct hostent
The same error happend in func s48_get_host_by_name (line 385)
and i checked my defination of struct hostent(netdb.h)


struct hostent
{
  char *h_name;            /* Official name of host.  */
  char **h_aliases;        /* Alias list.  */
  int h_addrtype;        /* Host address type.  */
  int h_length;            /* Length of address.  */
  char **h_addr_list;        /* List of addresses from name server.  */
#if defined __USE_MISC || defined __USE_GNU
# define    h_addr    h_addr_list[0] /* Address, for backward compatibility.*/
#endif
};



It seems some thing wrong with the marco defination.so i changed the h_addr to
h_addr_list[0] ,and it wored.I don't know whether other distributions has this problem.
hope it maybe helps to you


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>=?GBK?B?48a6vQ==?=</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-29T08:25:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2454">
    <title>Minor POSIX overhaul</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2454</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi all,

I modified the POSIX module so that Scheme code instead of C code
manages PID/errno/signal objects. So, where before posix_kill took
a PID record and a signal record, now it takes ints. I think the
comments hinted towards something along these lines. This removes
a good chunk of awkward (in my view) Scheme-written-in-C code.

I put up a repo at bitbucket.org/wnoble/scheme48. I've only tested
the code lightly, and thought lightly about the general approach,
so I definitely would appreciate any suggestions!

Best,
Will


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Will Noble</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-25T19:58:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2452">
    <title>s48 framebuffer</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2452</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

s48 with framebuffer initialising code and putpixel method :
check the last version 0.1.7 (./configure &amp;amp;&amp;amp; make &amp;amp;&amp;amp; make install) :

http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/

Regards,
Johan
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-30T15:33:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2451">
    <title>port Wii and linux 2.6.33 fb interface (for s48 in C)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2451</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

here's a rough Wii port, not too much UNIX :
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/embedded/

and here's a fb (C) code all packaged up, no configure needed just make:
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~jceuppen/scheme/

to use the last one in this s48 shell type :

(let ((rgb 255)
        (x 10)
        (y 10))
,open posix-i/o
(initfb)
(putpixel x y rgb)
)

Enjoy, all else to /dev/null.

Love,
erana
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>erana Owl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-29T22:06:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2446">
    <title>Profiling</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48/2446</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Sires,

I've chosen Scheme48 as one of implementations of Scheme to evaluate some
scheme code I'm developing. I didn't found any reference to a profiler for
Scheme48, although I've found references to a tracer. Is such profiling tool
available? If so, where can I find any references to it?

Thank you in advance.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Paulo Silva Filho</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-17T14:44:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.scheme.scheme48</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

