<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder">
    <title>gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15524"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15523"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15520"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15476"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15475"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15444"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15440"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15422"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15389"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15387"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15386"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15383"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15369"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15351"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15350"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15329"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15294"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15283"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15262"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15261"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15524">
    <title>Shutting down the sounder mailing list</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15524</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;We have regularly been made aware of recurring problems on this list.
The tone and atmosphere are unmatched in other Ubuntu mailing lists. At
one point, Mark reached out [1] to remind everyone how we want to
communicate with each other. Still debates kept getting out of hand and
were mostly wildly unrelated to Ubuntu. Alan reached out again [2] and
made clear that the list had long moved away from its initial focus and
welcoming atmosphere. No solutions for the problem were brought up in
the list discussion or in the Community Council meeting.

In the meeting on April 19th the CC decided to shut down the Sounder
mailing list. In essence, this is a decision to prune areas of the
project which are offtopic or ungoverned, on the basis that they
distract from our shared community focus on the goal of delivering free
software in the best possible state, on particular terms (free of
charge, cadence). While we appreciate that the Sounder list (and
possibly other, similar forums) provide a particular social release for
those who use them, we think there are better forums for each of the
varied topics discussed there. Some of those are inside the project,
most are elsewhere.

[1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2009-December/013663.html
[2] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2011-April/016351.html

Thanks for all the fun moments on the list, see you elsewhere,
 your Community Council

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Holbach</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-20T09:25:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15523">
    <title>Looks like it's closing time. Lets move the party.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15523</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Given that sounder is closing, those of us who still think this
sub-community is worth preserving could move to
   http://groups.google.com/group/bikeshed

Any objections?

I have put up a draft description:

"This group is for informal discussion between people who identify as
members of the Ubuntu community. This group is not affiliated with the
Ubuntu project, does not represent the official view of anyone, and
probably isn't representative either of users or developers. Try not
to feed flame-wars."

I don't claim that is the best possible description of the group. Nor
do I claim to know whether the group needs moderation, or needs to be
more inclusive etc. Such issues could perhaps be decided by discussion
between people who care enough to show up at the new mailing list.


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>John McCabe-Dansted</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-20T08:54:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15520">
    <title>Dead community walking</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15520</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear Community Council

Dissent, disagreement and debate are not bad. Inclusion does mean
inclusion. Monocultures are inherently flawed. Consider some
introspection.

You are the Community Council. Good for you. Sounder members are part
of the Ubuntu community. That is, or should be, far more important. As
a result what your decision to close the list says, louder and more
clearly than anything else is this:

"we, The Community Council, get to decide who should and should not be
members of the community. We, The Community Council, don't like the
Sounder list, nor do we approve of the attitudes of many of the
members who frequent it. We, The Community Council, think inclusion
means to include those we approve of and exclude everyone else. We,
the Community Council, want everyone who is not like us or does not
hold our narrow political views to be eliminated from the community
forthwith"

But inclusion is about tolerance; not your weird narrow view of
tolerance, but actual tolerance. Inclusion is not about including some
identified groups while excluding others, grouped or otherwise. In
fact identifying groups is inherently anti-inclusion: those people
(who are not like us, this group) need to be specifically included
(now we have identified them as a specific group who are different and
need special treatment).

"It’s important to remember that a community where people feel
uncomfortable or threatened is not a productive one" Ubuntu CoC

Absolutely, well said. It's equally important to remember that
eliminating dissent and difference is the beginning of the end, the
descent towards monoculture; communities rarely survive becoming
monocultural because evolution tends to difference, and because
monocultures are prone to succumbing to fatal diseases; i.e. the
Ubuntu community is going in the wrong direction. Sounder members,
especially the most opinionated ones, are needed in the Ubuntu
community for that community to be healthy and strong. They also
should be entitled to be covered by the CoC i.e. need to not be made
to "feel uncomfortable or threatened" by the rest of  the community's
actions.

I sincerely hope that the Community Council reconsiders its decision.
Sounder might be a a bit strange at times, and we who are on the list
might be representative of some of the stranger parts of the Ubuntu
community; but nonetheless Sounder serves a valuable purpose in the
Ubuntu community. Sounder is a celebration of diversity,  a place
where all, utterly regardless of their age, religion, gender, race,
height, physical state or political views, are welcomed; a place of
true inclusion. To close it has no positive outcomes for the Ubuntu
community, only negative ones.

Chris

CC'd to my blog.

---
&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;putt1ck
putt1ck.blogspot.com
skype:putt1ck

Opinions in this email are my own and may not reflect that of my
clients, past employers, associates, friends, family, pets etc..

Documents attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format:
http://iso26300.info

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Chris Puttick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-20T07:24:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15476">
    <title>FYI, Seagate lands Samsung's hard drive uniSeagate lands Samsung'shard drive unit</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15476</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Seagate lands Samsung's hard drive unit for $1.37 billion: It's duopoly
time
&amp;lt;http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=781960099-f09aff1f3240c763b781087d83996fa3-bf&amp;amp;brand=ZDNET&amp;amp;s=5&amp;gt;

Seagate has acquired Samsung Electronics' hard disk drive (HDD)
operations for $1.37 billion in a move that boils the market down to two
players. Seagate and Western Digital now control the HDD market.

READ FULL STORY
&amp;lt;http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=781960100-f09aff1f3240c763b781087d83996fa3-bf&amp;amp;brand=ZDNET&amp;amp;s=5&amp;gt;


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fred A. Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-20T01:43:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15475">
    <title>An open letter to Alan Pope</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15475</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear Mr Pope and the rest of the Ubuntu Community Council,

Alan, you have displayed your true colors today.  After assuring me
that this item would be brought up at the next community meeting
rather than today's, I decided to disregard the inflammatory rhetoric
about your character, and put my trust in you as a representative of
the community.

That trust was obviously misplaced.

I say this because I feel that on top of you misleading me (and
others) about the time of the meeting, you also chose to deliberately
mischarachterize a number of my statements and selectively present the
evidence I so exhaustively prepared, so as to bolster your own opinion
that the list should be closed.

I call foul.  I call foul on the entire CC.  Because if you voted to
close the list you did so because it was your opinion that it should
be shut regardless of community input and evidence to the contrary OR
because you neglected to do your duty and investigate the information
put forth by Mr. Pope (he was kind enough to link to original messages
while quoting out of context, isn't that nice?)

Whether it be negligence or malfeasance, I stand disappointed in your service.

Due to this misconduct, and other recent flagrant missteps by the
Ubuntu community, I will be looking elsewhere for my Linux needs.  I
have no need for a community in which someone so dishonest and
underhanded gains a respected and representative status.

Thank you and good day,
Samuel

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Samuel Thurston</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-20T01:43:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15444">
    <title>Dead List Walking</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15444</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Heh, my first, and last post to this list.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncil/TeamReports/11/April

Meeting 2011-04-19

    CC decided to close the Sounders mailing list. In essence, this is a 
decision to prune areas of the project which are offtopic or ungoverned, 
on the basis that they distract from our shared community focus on the 
goal of delivering free software in the best possible state, on 
particular terms (free of charge, cadence). While we appreciate that the 
Sounders list (and possibly other, similar forums) provide a particular 
social release for those who use them, we think there are better forums 
for each of the varied topics discussed there. Some of those are inside 
the project, most are elsewhere. 

Transcript of IRC meeting log here:
http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/04/19/%23ubuntu-meeting.html

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>sktsee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-19T21:45:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15440">
    <title>The OOo, LibreOffice Tale Should Be a Warning To Canonical, OtherFOSS Projects</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15440</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/04/oracle-gives-up-on-ooo-after-community-forks-the-project.ars

Oracle is throwing in the towel on OpenOffice after the majority of
the community jumped ship and sided with The Document Foundation and
LibreOffice.  This move by the community to fork OOo due to Oracle's
heavy handed handling of the project should be a warning to not just
Canonical, but any other major Open Source project that runs things
like a totalitarian regime and fails to listen to the cries of its
community.

Anger the community enough and they will fork the project, and the
community will leave the original to molder and die.

That's the beauty of Open Source, if the project you love is being run
by a tyrant who isn't listening to your suggestion or complaint you
can fork the project and build a new community based on higher ideals.
 There is a growing sense that Canonical isn't listening to its
community.  There's been several issues which haven't been addressed
for some time, and when they're brought up they're usually blown off.
One of the big issues is the removal of the monitor model selection
feature from the screen resolution system preferences window.  This
has left a greatly underestimated number of users in a quandary, and
since the majority of them are newbies to Linux most give up and never
give Ubuntu a second glance.  This in turn is hurting Ubuntu's image
as a "user friendly" Linux distribution in the eyes of those whom the
project depends the most more so than developers ... the user
community.  Without the users Ubuntu would be Linux distro that simply
exists but isn't being used.

Unity is another issue.  Given time Unity may turn out to be a great
desktop for Ubuntu, but it still needs work.  Canonical is really
gambling with their future releasing Unity in 11.04 and making it
compulsory in 11.10.  I understand the releases in between the LTS
distributions are meant to perfect new features and technology for the
next LTS release, but Canonical should have made Unity voluntary only
and gave users incentives to use it to help the dev community make the
necessary improvements.  Thus, once the next TLS release came around
Canonical could release Ubuntu with a version of Unity that was rock
solid.

The moral of the story is, if you fail to listen to your community
they'll fork the project, and abandon the original to die in
obscurity.  If it can happened to Open Office it can happen to Ubuntu,
and Gnome too.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Haney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-19T18:02:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15422">
    <title>Windows Update Will Push IE9; IE10 Will Snub Vista - Yahoo! News</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15422</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;IE9, which became available on March 14, has previously been available
through manual downloads. The company said it has seen strong customer
and business demand for the new browser, which supports HTML5 and
Windows 7 integration. On April 18, existing IE9 beta and release
candidate users will be upgraded through Windows Update.

*Goodbye, XP *

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20110415/tc_nf/78171

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fred A. Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-18T00:19:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15389">
    <title>5 Out Of 11 Participants Crashed Unity In Canonical’s Study</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15389</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://digitizor.com/2011/04/15/crashed-unity-canonical-study/

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Liam Proven</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-16T14:36:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15387">
    <title>Unity: Nothing can go wrong!</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15387</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Nothing can go wrong! Nothing can go wr!"&amp;amp;%!£%"^!%£!"""&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;

5 out of 11 testers managed to crash Unity:

http://digitizor.com/2011/04/15/crashed-unity-canonical-study/

How far are we from release day?


- d.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-16T08:46:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15386">
    <title>Using spare CPU cycles to help upstream projects find bugs.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15386</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I have been working on software for monkey testing. The way monkey
testing works is to randomly generate keypresses until a bug is
detected. My vision is that this would allow end users to donate CPU
cycles to improve the quality of upstream software. This was inspired
by the fact that Ubuntu has a very high user to developer ratio, and
appears to need more ways to allow enthusiastic users to contribute.

This software has found over 80 bugs in the LyX project and more
recently I have also used it to find bugs in Abiword and Gnumeric. I
suspect that it could be used to find bugs in pretty bug any rich GUI
application.

The LyX developers found this bug reports quite useful as: Keytest
often finds the bug within one week of it being checked in, while it
is still fresh on their minds; Keytest does a bisect and reports the
change that caused the regression where possible; and Keytest finds
the smallest subset of the key presses needed to reproduce the bug to
provide a convenient recipe to reproduce.

It is available at:
  http://dansted.co.cc/Mon-Keytest.html

Would anyone like to have a play with this? Feel free to drop me a
mail, as it is still quite experimental. Note that although the
intention is that one day end users could use keytest, in its current
state you'd really have to be completely comfortable with compiling
software, version control, and tracking down resource hogs with top to
be able to use it.

Incidentally this is an example of a mail that sounder seems suited
for, as sounder is place that we can discuss such things without
worrying whether it e.g. technically relates to the development of
Ubuntu.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>John McCabe-Dansted</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-16T07:59:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15383">
    <title>Ubuntu sheep</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15383</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Ubuntu-coloured sheep!

  "Orange sheep: Farmer dyes sheep to stop theft"
  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13077375

-Paul


&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Paul Sladen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-14T16:42:58</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15369">
    <title>OSGUI's Xubuntu 11.04 Beta 1 64-bit First Look &amp; Overview</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15369</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;The OSGUI Tech Show from Down Under does a first look overview of the
64-bit edition of the Xubuntu 11.04 Beta 1 release.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MUUsHOaneQ

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Haney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-11T23:46:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15351">
    <title>11.04 schism</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15351</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;with the recent spate of religious discussion here on sounder, I am
left to wonder about the future of Ubuntu.  I for one will probably
not use a distro based around unity because it doesn't meet my
workflow needs.  (at least not unless it matures quickly)

I'm not sold on gnome shell yet which seems to be the preferred alternative.

But this makes me wonder, will the community split into two factions?

perhaps Unity-arians and GNOstics?

:P

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Samuel Thurston</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-11T01:51:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15350">
    <title>[OT][META] historical analysis of the list's traffic.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15350</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Just to beat the dead horse a little, I found the message heralding
the switch from the old mailing list description (which was "Ubuntu
community news and chit-chat .. anything goes ") to the current one:

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2010-August/015091.html

How I came across this is moderately interesting: I was thinking about
doing another epic data post, along the lines of my previous one,
detailing the history of the list.  Since the archives start in August
of 2004, I decided to only look at each august as "annual milestones."
Here are the interesting points of my finds:

Initially the list was a lot of install reports of warty and technical
information probably better suited to the ubuntu-users list.
august 2005 sees the shift into how Alan characterizes the list, as
mostly a "ubuntu sightings and ubuntu in the news" type list. However
even at this time there were discussions about more "political" type
issues.

Darl McBride Sco/novell lawsuit drivel:
             https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2005-August/002329.html'
Stuff about space (because sabdfl is an astronaut, get it?)
             https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2005-August/002376.html
Open source -&amp;gt; guerrilla warfare -&amp;gt; US justifies Iraq War (seriously)
             https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2005-August/002363.html
===

August of 2006 shows really what I think is the beginning of the way
the list is today:

An ubuntu distro with religious overtones:
             https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2006-August/008327.html
An argument about a similar change in the description of ubuntu-users list
             https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2006-August/008558.html
Merits of various email providers:
            https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/sounder/2006-August/008510.html

===
August of 2007 was much more of the same.

August of 2008 is the big story.  Aug 2007 had 97 messages.  low, but
only about half of the previous couple years volume, something you
could write off as a statistical anomaly.  Aug 2008 has 11.  11
messages posted to sounder for the whole month.  in one year's time,
the list volume went from 3 messages per day to 1 every 3 days.

====

August 2009 sees a comeback, 67 messages, or back to two a day: but
the content of the list is DECIDEDLY non-ubuntu and mostly even
non-linux related.

August 2010 sees an almost complete return to the prior model: mostly
topical, reasonably high traffic still (90ish messages)

Since Aug 2011 is still to come, I want to compare the most-recent
whole month data we have: March 2011

167 messages, overwhelmingly ubuntu related.(actually overwhelmingly
Unity related, but that's a horse of a different color.)

====

In short the list is almost as healthy as it's ever been.  If Ubuntu
doesn't "need this list" anymore, perhaps that's because Ubuntu's
grown to the point where it's no longer exciting when it's mentioned
in the news. That's kind of sad.

If people are interested I may do an analysis on what the big dip in
2008 was all about. Not sure I want to invest the time if nobody cares
though.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Samuel Thurston</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-10T19:04:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15329">
    <title>Sounder is a valuable Ubuntu community asset.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15329</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Alan Pope feels that "the Ubuntu community doesn't need this list anymore."

I feel that sounder provides a very valuable function in the Ubuntu
community. I have only my own perspective to offer, limited as it is.
As Alan seems predisposed to press the case for the closure of the
list in the face of vocal and vehement public disapproval, I'd like to
enlist your help.

What do you value about the sounder list?

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Samuel Thurston</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-09T03:01:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15294">
    <title>20 Years of Linux down, and the best is yet to come</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15294</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/20-years-of-linux-down-and-the-best-is-yet-to-come/8613?tag=nl.e589

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fred A. Miller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-08T14:14:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15283">
    <title>[ADMIN] [ANNOUNCE] This list</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15283</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I've added an proposal to the Ubuntu Community Council agenda to shut
the sounder list down.

When the Ubuntu project was started, the sounder list was a place
where new ideas and fun things like 'Ubuntu sightings' were discussed
- it was the first mailing list you would read in the mornings.
However nowadays I don't believe this list is serving its purpose &amp;amp;
isn't helpful to the project. It only serves to allow a small set of
people to argue about subjects very tenuously related to Ubuntu, or
unrelated at all. The Ubuntu project doesn't need this list anymore.

If anyone has an opinion / counter proposal I would recommend they
turn up to the next CC meeting where it can be discussed.

The next CC meeting is due to be on the 17th April 2011 at 11:00 UTC
and will be held in #ubuntu-meeting on freenode IRC. I'll send a
reminder nearer the time.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncilAgenda

It can of course also be discussed on this list, and at the meeting
I'll do my best to objectively pull together opinions and proposals
from those not present.

Thanks,
Al.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Alan Pope</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-08T09:17:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15262">
    <title>Don't Know Whether To Laugh Or Cry About This One</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15262</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;16 March 2011
Microsoft, the do-gooder, makes the ethics grade

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-20044027-75.html#ixzz1IsK9MpGy

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nathan Bahn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-07T21:29:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15261">
    <title>Ubuntu 11.04 Beta 1 Review and First Impressions</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15261</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;The guy who does the This Week in Linux podcast on Youtube has done a
new piece on Ubuntu 11.04 Beta 1.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryDE2klMGU8&amp;amp;feature=uploademail

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Michael Haney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-07T21:14:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15238">
    <title>GNOME 3 released; Ubuntu GNOME remix announced</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder/15238</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;It's out.

http://www.gnome3.org/

As seen here:
http://www.techworld.com.au/article/382495/gnome_3_will_ubuntu_reconsider_/

And if you read the comments:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntugnome/

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Liam Proven</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-07T13:15:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.ubuntu.sounder</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

