<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general">
    <title>gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315285"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315283"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315279"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315278"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315276"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315275"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315263"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315262"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315258"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315254"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315253"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315250"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315243"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315232"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315227"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315225"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315224"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315215"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315207"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315203"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315285">
    <title>F9/gnome: sometimes the background pattern of nautilus windows becomes crazy</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315285</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:creator>Joachim Backes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-07T05:20:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315283">
    <title>How to find KDE version</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315283</link>
    <description>
Somebody posted a command that returns the version of KDE currently 
running.  Now, I can't find it.  Could someone please refresh my memory?

(I know, I can use KDE Help-&gt;About, and that's what I've been doing 
up to now, but that assumes that the help has been kept up to date 
with the latest upgrade.)

Thanks...

</description>
    <dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-07T04:39:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315279">
    <title>OT:  Omega 10 Beta Released</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315279</link>
    <description>Dear all,

I am tagging this with an OT, but it was on the announce=list, I have just found out about it and I am compelled to share this with the community.  

Making a comparision, 
Omega is like is Like Mint is Ubuntu done right, with multimedis and codecs out of the box.  It is a snapshot of a joint effort from Fedora and Livna working together to produce a distro that will play multimedia files that could be played with a yum install away in Fedora, will now be possible to play in Omega :)

Here's a review:

http://reddevil62-techhead.blogspot.com/2008/10/omega-10-live-cd-beta-fedora-with-added.html

Great work Rahul and all users who are working with Omega :)

BTW, 
I was looking forward to Fedora Lite, but it was not available as a spin or only as a torrent.  I saw a reference to a SUGAR desktop which I had not heard of before.  

Regards,

Antonio 


      

</description>
    <dc:creator>Antonio Olivares</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-07T02:56:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315278">
    <title>sysylog and bluetooth</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315278</link>
    <description>Dear All,

Mine is FC9...
So, would you mind to tell me what different between rsyslog and syslog-ng ?
And how to remove the bluetooth packages / services ?

Thanks !

Edward.

</description>
    <dc:creator>edwardspl&lt; at &gt;ita.org.mo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-07T02:51:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315276">
    <title>multimedia keys stopped working</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315276</link>
    <description>hello,

I've rebooted my f8 desktop today (which I do rather rarely) and 
discovered that my multimedia keys suddenly stopped working. Since I 
have everything configured in  ~/.Xmodmap I decided to just rerun 
"xmodmap ~/.Xmodmap", but it did not help. I launched xev and was 
surprised to find that the multimedia keys which I've been using for at 
least 2 years now produce no keycodes whatsoever. Instead, the keys not 
detectable before (a row of 6 keys numbered from 1 to 5 plus a star, 
presumably browser bookmarks) produce the keycodes 183, 184, 93, 131, 
247 which are unknown to me.

my keyboard is Microsoft Wireless Laser Desktop 6000 v2 
(http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Wireless-Laser-Desktop-69A-00001/dp/B000H14IDC/ref=cm_cmu_pg_i)

and I would be very happy if someone could tell me what package I have 
to remove in order to bring things back to normal.

the only relevant thing updated recently, which I see from "rpm -qa --last"

is the kernel update to
kernel-2.6.26.5-28.fc8
kernel-headers-2.6.26.5-28.fc8
kernel-devel-2.6.26.5-28.fc8

thank you in advance




</description>
    <dc:creator>oleksandr korneta</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-07T02:30:48</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315275">
    <title>this got rid of IPV6 for me</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315275</link>
    <description>http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/how-to-disable-ipv6-on-fedora-linux-why/

I have: 2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686




      

</description>
    <dc:creator>Fred Silsbee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-07T02:30:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315263">
    <title>Can't remove old avahi package</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315263</link>
    <description>I've got a frustrating little problem. I'm trying to update my system 
and one package (avahi-autoipd) can't install because of conflicting 
packages from avahi-0.6.17-1.i386.fc7.

However, I"ve got the F9 version installed, so that's not a problem.  
What /is/ a problem is that I cannot remove that package.  rpm -e bombs 
with this:

[markh&lt; at &gt;sulla ~]$ sudo rpm -e avahi-0.6.17-1.fc7.i386
error: %postun(avahi-0.6.17-1.fc7.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1


And yum remove /says/ it's removed, but it's not:

Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
  Erasing        : avahi                                             [1/1]

Removed: avahi.i386 0:0.6.17-1.fc7
Complete!
[markh&lt; at &gt;sulla ~]$ sudo rpm -qa | grep avahi
kdnssd-avahi-devel-0.1.3-0.6.20080116svn.fc9.i386
avahi-glib-0.6.22-10.fc9.i386
avahi-devel-0.6.22-10.fc9.i386
avahi-0.6.22-10.fc9.i386
avahi-qt3-0.6.22-10.fc9.i386
avahi-compat-libdns_sd-0.6.22-10.fc9.i386
kdnssd-avahi-0.1.3-0.6.20080116svn.fc9.i386
avahi-0.6.17-1.fc7.i386


So, I can't update that package because of this. I could probably remove 
avahi altogether to see if that fixes this, but if I do it removes GNOME 
almost completely.  What can I do to get this package gone without major 
surgery to my system?




</description>
    <dc:creator>Mark Haney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-07T00:02:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315262">
    <title>ssmtp problem</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315262</link>
    <description>I need system mail to be delivered to my user account. I do not send mail to the outside world using mailx etc, as I use my ISP's pop server. I only have one user on the computer, me (and me as root).

I used sendmail successfully, but thought it might be overkill, so decided to try ssmtp.

I stopped the sendmail daemon. I configured alternatives --config mta. I edited /etc/ssmtp.conf, with root=me and mailhub=localhost.localdomain (I have also tried localhost.localdomain:25).

When I try to send mail as root to me, or as me to root, the following error ensues: send-mail: Cannot open localhost.localdomain:25. System mail is not delivered.

I left newaliases as it was for sendmail, with root's mail being delivered to me, as I still want that, but using ssmtp instead.

Do I need to open the firewall? But I don't want the program to send to the outside world, nor do I want to receive with this program from the outside world. Just system mail on this computer to an account on this computer.

</description>
    <dc:creator>kwhiskerz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T23:50:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315258">
    <title>Kaffeine codecs</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315258</link>
    <description>I am having trouble listening to streaming internet radio using 
Kaffeine. Does anyone know where I can find the proper codecs (if not 
all of them) and how to install them?

Thanks

</description>
    <dc:creator>Alex Makhlin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T22:18:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315254">
    <title>login - Error in service module</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315254</link>
    <description>I am running Fedora 8 in  run level 5. SELinux is enabled.

When I &lt;ctl&gt;&lt;alt&gt;&lt;F[1-6]&gt; to a virtual console I get the text login screen
I enter a username and password (either root or any normal user)
I press enter, and get a message "Error in service module"
The screen clears and returns to login.

If I disable SELinux with setenforce 0 this does not happen.

[root&lt; at &gt;confianza ~]# uname -a
Linux confianza 2.6.26.5-28.fc8 #1 SMP Sat Sep 20 09:12:30 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

in /var/log/messages I get
Oct 
6 15:37:21 localhost setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing login
(local_login_t) "read" to ./limits.conf (var_log_t). For complete
SELinux messages. run sealert -l 5f8baee3-51a7-4c91-bb95-2499cf6e0f6f

So as recommended I ran 
[root&lt; at &gt;confianza log]# sealert -l 5f8baee3-51a7-4c91-bb95-2499cf6e0f6f

Summary:

SELinux is preventing login (local_login_t) "read" to ./limits.conf (var_log_t).

Detailed Description:

SELinux denied access requested by login. It is not expected that this access is
required by login and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also
possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is
causing it to require additional access.

Allowing Access:

Sometimes labeling problems can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore
the default system file context for ./limits.conf,

restorecon -v './limits.conf'

If this does not work, there is currently no automatic way to allow this access.
Instead, you can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ
(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable
SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended.
Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi)
against this package.

Additional Information:

Source Context                system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
Target Context                system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0
Target Objects                ./limits.conf [ file ]
Source                        login
Source Path                   /bin/login
Port                          &lt;Unknown&gt;
Host                          confianza
Source RPM Packages           util-linux-ng-2.13.1-2.fc8
Target RPM Packages          
Policy RPM                    selinux-policy-3.0.8-117.fc8
Selinux Enabled               True
Policy Type                   targeted
MLS Enabled                   True
Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
Plugin Name                   catchall_file
Host Name                     confianza
Platform                      Linux confianza 2.6.26.5-28.fc8 #1 SMP Sat Sep 20
                              09:12:30 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64
Alert Count                   1
First Seen                    Mon Oct  6 15:37:21 2008
Last Seen                     Mon Oct  6 15:37:21 2008
Local ID                      5f8baee3-51a7-4c91-bb95-2499cf6e0f6f
Line Numbers                  

Raw Audit Messages            

host=confianza
type=AVC msg=audit(1223325441.857:129): avc:  denied  { read } for 
pid=4909 comm="login" name="limits.conf" dev=sda6 ino=1177254
scontext=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0 tclass=file

host=confianza
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1223325441.857:129): arch=c000003e syscall=2
success=no exit=-13 a0=7ff9a3aeb786 a1=0 a2=1b6 a3=0 items=0 ppid=1
pid=4909 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=tty2 ses=4294967295 comm="login" exe="/bin/login"
subj=system_u:system_r:local_login_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)



I check /etc/security/limits.conf
[root&lt; at &gt;confianza security]# ls -Z limits.conf
-rw-r--r--  root root system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0   limits.conf

I try to relabel
[root&lt; at &gt;confianza security]# restorecon -v './limits.conf'
restorecon reset ./limits.conf context system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0-&gt;system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0

Doesn't help

I read the FAQ at http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385
I read the man page for  audit2allow and I don't get it.

Has anyone run into this before? How do I fix it without having to disable SELinux?

Thanks for your help

Dennis K


      ¡Todo sobre Amor y Sexo!
La guía completa para tu vida en Mujer de Hoy.                       
http://mx.mujer.yahoo.com/

</description>
    <dc:creator>Dennis Kaptain</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T21:17:34</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315253">
    <title>Video card</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315253</link>
    <description>Could you give me some names of Video cards that are most compatible 
with Fedora 9 and that have drivers for Fedora 9??         


                              Thank you dan

</description>
    <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T21:04:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315250">
    <title>sendmail ! where to put my password</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315250</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Adel ESSAFI</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T20:38:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315243">
    <title>F-Spot crashes on load</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315243</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Dylan Semler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T19:42:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315232">
    <title>Fedora 9, IPSec, and 2.6.26 kernels...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315232</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Michael H. Warfield</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T17:10:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315227">
    <title>Why won't Redhat Bugzilla send me a registration confirmationemail ?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315227</link>
    <description>I am trying to create a new Redhat Bugzilla account here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

I click on Open a new Redhat Bugzilla account.  I give it a valid email
address.   It tells me that an email will be sent for me.  It never
arrives.  

I've done this twice, once on the weekend and again this morning.  I've
yet to receive any kind of an email.

What am I missing ?  How do I contact the administrator.

Thanks

</description>
    <dc:creator>Linuxguy123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T14:05:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315225">
    <title>PCI wireless suggestions</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315225</link>
    <description>I'm in the process of getting a Fedora 9 desktop finished for my kid. Due to the construction of our house ethernet is *not* a viable option in her room.

I'm looking for any annecdotal information or confirmed evidence of PCI wireless cards that Just Work (tm) 

Yes, I'm aware of nidswrapper but I'd rather not muck about with it just now.

Some Googling seems to indicate that Edimax EW-7128g works.

Others?






Tony Placilla &lt;aplacilla&lt; at &gt;jhu.edu&gt;



















</description>
    <dc:creator>Tony Placilla</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T15:54:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315224">
    <title>consolekit broken?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315224</link>
    <description>Anyone know what could cause this?


[root&lt; at &gt;xena ~]# ck-list-sessions

** (ck-list-sessions:4001): WARNING **: Failed to get list of seats: 
Failed to execute program /lib64/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper: Success


- Miek

</description>
    <dc:creator>Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T15:59:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315215">
    <title>F9: Nautilus weird behaviour for icons</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315215</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Joachim Backes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T14:39:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315207">
    <title>Postfix errors in Logwatch</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315207</link>
    <description>Hi all,

Over the past couple of weeks or so, I have noted new error messages in
Logwatch pertaining to Postfix. I use Postfix and Dovecot to support an
IMAP configuration for the local delivery of root's e-mail to my user
account, with Thunderbird as the client. These messages had not appeared
previously and I cannot at this point, recall any changes that I have
made or recent RPM updates that may have triggered this. The e-mail
delivery does work, so whatever is happening, it is not precluding basic
functionality.


The error messages (a subset) follows:

 **Unmatched Entries**
        1   Oct  5 21:38:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[7960]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 13:28:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[19392]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 21:38:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[7961]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 20:28:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[5056]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 16:58:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[28624]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 22:48:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[10868]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 22:48:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[10867]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 08:48:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[6426]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
        1   Oct  5 16:58:28 WALL-E postfix/smtp[28626]: connect to ghost.localhost.com[10.11.12.13]:25: Connection timed out
...


Note that the errors are not in chronological sequence and there are
lots of them. Also, I can find no reference to ghost.localhost.com or
the IP address in any of the Postfix or Dovecot config files. A Google
search showed some references to ghost.localhost.com, but nothing
appeared to be relevant to this particular situation relative to
solutions.

Any ideas? Anything jump out from the above?

TIA,

Marc Schwartz

</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Schwartz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T12:42:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315203">
    <title>"yum erase &lt;some kernel&gt;" does not remove /lib/modules/&lt;some kernel&gt;. Why?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315203</link>
    <description/>
    <dc:creator>Joachim Backes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T10:45:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315201">
    <title>RAID5 + 1 extra disk HOW</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general/315201</link>
    <description>Hello,

I have a  server running on RAID5, on which I would like to add a 4th  
disk, with a seperated filesystem. I need to have some workspace. The same  
disk could be used to replace a failing disk.

Stuart Sears explaned me howto install this disk as a hot spare, but it  
looks to me a little bit to dangereous. This server is serving 20  
workstations, so I need to do this without taking to many risks. I admit  
to be a novice on the matter of diskmanagement. I always do standard  
installation of a filesystem.

So if someone could tell me howto do this in a simple way. I searched the  
internet for a simple howto, but was unsuccessful. I have to do this at a  
client in France, few hours driving

Could someone keep me from having a sleepless night?
</description>
    <dc:creator>roland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-06T09:31:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
