http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23231 <pre>Greetings, I wish to invest with you, I have $65 Million US dollars that I want to move out secretly for investment purpose in your country but I need a good partner I can trust. This fund is legal. This is a dormant account from the previous past Libyan regime leaving no trace behind. But the question is can I trust you when the funds gets to you? You will take your 30% for the assistance and keep the remaining for us in a safe custody. Regards Mr. Christopher Field </pre> Mr.Christopher 2012-05-23T16:03:48 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23229 <pre> Linus, please pull user namespace enhancements for v3.5-rc1 from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-linus The tree is against v3.4-rc1 aka dd775ae2549217d3ae09363e3edb305d0fa19928 The topmost commit is 4b06a81f1daee668fbd6de85557bfb36dd36078f This is a course correction for the user namespace, so that we can reach an inexpensive, maintainable, and reasonably complete implementation. Highlights. - Config guards make it impossible to enable the user namespace and code that has not been converted to be user namespace safe. - Use of the new kuid_t type ensures the if you somehow get past the config guards the kernel will encounter type errors if you enable user namespaces and attempt to compile in code whose permission checks have not been updated to be user namespace safe. - All uids from child user namespaces are mapped into the initial user namespace before they are processed. Removing the need to add an additional check to see if the user namespace of the compared uids remains the same. - With the user namespaces compiled out the performance is as good or better than it is today. - For most operations absolutely nothing changes performance or operationally with the user namespace enabled. - The worse case performance I could come up with was timing 1 billion cache cold stat operations with the user namespace code enabled. This went from 156s to 164s on my laptop (or 156ns to 164ns per stat operation). - (uid_t)-1 and (gid_t)-1 are reserved as an internal error value. Most uid/gid setting system calls treat these value specially anyway so attempting to use -1 as a uid would likely cause entertaining failures in userspace. - If setuid is called with a uid that can not be mapped setuid fails. I have looked at sendmail, login, ssh and every other program I could think of that would call setuid and they all check for and handle the case where setuid fails. - If stat or a similar system call is called from a context in which we can not map a uid we lie and return overflowuid. The LFS experience suggests not lying and returning an error code might be better, but the historical precedent with uids is different and I can not think of anything that would break by lying about a uid we can't map. - Capabilities are localized to the current user namespace making it safe to give the initial user in a user namespace all capabilities. My git tree covers all of the modifications needed to convert the core kernel and enough changes to make a system bootable to runlevel 1. Eric W. Biederman (45): vfs: Don't allow a user namespace root to make device nodes userns: Kill bogus declaration of function release_uids userns: Replace netlink uses of cap_raised with capable. userns: Remove unnecessary cast to struct user_struct when copying cred-&gt;user. cred: Add forward declaration of init_user_ns in all cases. userns: Use cred-&gt;user_ns instead of cred-&gt;user-&gt;user_ns cred: Refcount the user_ns pointed to by the cred. userns: Add an explicit reference to the parent user namespace mqueue: Explicitly capture the user namespace to send the notification to. userns: Deprecate and rename the user_namespace reference in the user_struct userns: Start out with a full set of capabilities. userns: Replace the hard to write inode_userns with inode_capable. userns: Add kuid_t and kgid_t and associated infrastructure in uidgid.h userns: Add a Kconfig option to enforce strict kuid and kgid type checks userns: Disassociate user_struct from the user_namespace. userns: Simplify the user_namespace by making userns-&gt;creator a kuid. userns: Rework the user_namespace adding uid/gid mapping support userns: Convert group_info values from gid_t to kgid_t. userns: Store uid and gid values in struct cred with kuid_t and kgid_t types userns: Replace user_ns_map_uid and user_ns_map_gid with from_kuid and from_kgid userns: Convert sched_set_affinity and sched_set_scheduler's permission checks userns: Convert capabilities related permsion checks userns: Convert setting and getting uid and gid system calls to use kuid and kgid userns: Convert ptrace, kill, set_priority permission checks to work with kuids and kgids userns: Store uid and gid types in vfs structures with kuid_t and kgid_t types userns: Convert in_group_p and in_egroup_p to use kgid_t userns: Use uid_eq gid_eq helpers when comparing kuids and kgids in the vfs userns: Convert user specfied uids and gids in chown into kuids and kgid userns: Convert stat to return values mapped from kuids and kgids userns: Fail exec for suid and sgid binaries with ids outside our user namespace. userns: Teach inode_capable to understand inodes whose uids map to other namespaces. userns: signal remove unnecessary map_cred_ns userns: Add negative depends on entries to avoid building code that is userns unsafe userns: Convert binary formats to use kuid/kgid where appropriate userns: Convert devpts to use kuid/kgid where appropriate userns: Convert ext2 to use kuid/kgid where appropriate. userns: Convert ext3 to use kuid/kgid where appropriate userns: Convert ext4 to user kuid/kgid where appropriate userns: Convert proc to use kuid/kgid where appropriate userns: Convert sysctl permission checks to use kuid and kgids. userns: Convert sysfs to use kgid/kuid where appropriate userns: Convert tmpfs to use kuid and kgid where appropriate userns: Convert cgroup permission checks to use uid_eq userns: Convert the move_pages, and migrate_pages permission checks to use uid_eq userns: Silence silly gcc warning. Sasha Levin (1): cred: use correct cred accessor with regards to rcu read lock arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c | 4 +- arch/parisc/hpux/fs.c | 4 +- arch/s390/kernel/compat_linux.c | 18 +- arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc32.c | 4 +- arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c | 4 +- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 2 +- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-log-userspace-transfer.c | 2 +- drivers/video/uvesafb.c | 2 +- fs/attr.c | 8 +- fs/binfmt_elf.c | 12 +- fs/binfmt_elf_fdpic.c | 12 +- fs/compat.c | 4 +- fs/devpts/inode.c | 24 +- fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c | 2 +- fs/exec.c | 15 +- fs/ext2/balloc.c | 5 +- fs/ext2/ext2.h | 8 +- fs/ext2/inode.c | 20 +- fs/ext2/super.c | 31 ++- fs/ext3/balloc.c | 5 +- fs/ext3/ext3.h | 8 +- fs/ext3/inode.c | 32 +- fs/ext3/super.c | 35 ++- fs/ext4/balloc.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 4 +- fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/inode.c | 34 +- fs/ext4/migrate.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/super.c | 38 ++- fs/fcntl.c | 6 +- fs/inode.c | 10 +- fs/ioprio.c | 18 +- fs/locks.c | 2 +- fs/namei.c | 29 +- fs/nfsd/auth.c | 5 +- fs/open.c | 16 +- fs/proc/array.c | 15 +- fs/proc/base.c | 93 +++++- fs/proc/inode.c | 4 +- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 4 +- fs/proc/root.c | 2 +- fs/stat.c | 12 +- fs/sysfs/inode.c | 4 +- include/linux/capability.h | 2 + include/linux/cred.h | 33 +- include/linux/fs.h | 42 ++- include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 2 +- include/linux/proc_fs.h | 4 +- include/linux/quotaops.h | 4 +- include/linux/sched.h | 9 +- include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 4 +- include/linux/stat.h | 5 +- include/linux/uidgid.h | 200 +++++++++++ include/linux/user_namespace.h | 39 +- include/trace/events/ext3.h | 4 +- include/trace/events/ext4.h | 4 +- init/Kconfig | 130 +++++++- ipc/mqueue.c | 10 +- ipc/namespace.c | 2 +- kernel/capability.c | 21 ++ kernel/cgroup.c | 6 +- kernel/cred.c | 44 ++- kernel/exit.c | 6 +- kernel/groups.c | 50 ++-- kernel/ptrace.c | 15 +- kernel/sched/core.c | 7 +- kernel/signal.c | 51 +-- kernel/sys.c | 266 ++++++++++----- kernel/timer.c | 8 +- kernel/uid16.c | 48 ++- kernel/user.c | 51 ++- kernel/user_namespace.c | 595 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- kernel/utsname.c | 2 +- mm/mempolicy.c | 4 +- mm/migrate.c | 4 +- mm/oom_kill.c | 4 +- mm/shmem.c | 22 +- net/core/sock.c | 4 +- net/ipv4/ping.c | 11 +- net/sunrpc/auth_generic.c | 4 +- net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c | 7 +- net/sunrpc/auth_unix.c | 15 +- net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 18 +- security/commoncap.c | 61 ++-- security/keys/key.c | 2 +- security/keys/permission.c | 5 +- security/keys/process_keys.c | 2 +- 88 files changed, 1790 insertions(+), 608 deletions(-) </pre> Eric W. Biederman 2012-05-22T18:48:47 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23228 <pre>Hello, Linus. Please pull from the following branch to receive cgroup changes for 3.5-rc1. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-3.5 cgroup file type addition / removal is updated so that file types are added and removed instead of individual files so that dynamic file type addition / removal can be implemented by cgroup and used by controllers. blkio controller changes which will come through block tree are dependent on this. Other changes include res_counter cleanup and disallowing kthread / PF_THREAD_BOUND threads to be attached to non-root cgroups. There's a reported bug with the file type addition / removal handling which can lead to oops on cgroup umount. The issue is being looked into. It shouldn't cause problems for most setups and isn't a security concern. Merging with mainline causes a conflict in feature-removal-schedule.txt. Simple append collision which can be trivially resolved. Thanks. Frederic Weisbecker (2): res_counter: Merge res_counter_charge and res_counter_charge_nofail res_counter: Account max_usage when calling res_counter_charge_nofail() Glauber Costa (2): cgroup: pass struct mem_cgroup instead of struct cgroup to socket memcg cgroup: get rid of populate for memcg Mike Galbraith (1): cgroups: disallow attaching kthreadd or PF_THREAD_BOUND threads Tejun Heo (16): cgroup: deprecate remount option changes cgroup: move cgroup_clear_directory() call out of cgroup_populate_dir() cgroup: build list of all cgroups under a given cgroupfs_root cgroup: implement cgroup_add_cftypes() and friends cgroup: merge cft_release_agent cftype array into the base files array cgroup: relocate cftype and cgroup_subsys definitions in controllers cgroup: convert all non-memcg controllers to the new cftype interface memcg: always create memsw files if CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP cgroup: convert memcg controller to the new cftype interface cgroup: remove cgroup_add_file[s]() cgroup: relocate __d_cgrp() and __d_cft() cgroup: introduce struct cfent cgroup: implement cgroup_rm_cftypes() cgroup: use negative bias on css-&gt;refcnt to block css_tryget() cgroup: make css-&gt;refcnt clearing on cgroup removal optional cgroup: remove cgroup_subsys-&gt;populate() Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt | 4 +- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 9 + block/blk-cgroup.c | 45 +-- include/linux/cgroup.h | 81 +++-- include/linux/res_counter.h | 2 +- include/net/sock.h | 12 +- include/net/tcp_memcontrol.h | 4 +- kernel/cgroup.c | 564 +++++++++++++++++++++------- kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 11 +- kernel/cpuset.c | 31 +- kernel/res_counter.c | 71 ++-- kernel/sched/core.c | 16 +- mm/memcontrol.c | 115 +++--- net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 30 +- net/core/sock.c | 10 +- net/ipv4/tcp_memcontrol.c | 77 ++-- net/sched/cls_cgroup.c | 31 +- security/device_cgroup.c | 10 +- 18 files changed, 685 insertions(+), 438 deletions(-) -- tejun </pre> Tejun Heo 2012-05-22T17:34:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23220 <pre> Hello Sales I went over your contact online and found some items which we have interest in purchasing to our store in Spain for urgent supply. I will like to know the prices per each items plus the shipping cost. I also want to know if Letter of Credit or T/T is acceptable for payment. I await your quick response asap so i can proceed with my needed items and quantity. Thank you mcckoy robertson N.B.M Global Supply Inc Address: Autovía A-5, salidas 22 y 26. Arroyomolinos, 28939 Madrid Spain Tel: +34 902 26 77 26 Email: nbmglobalsupply-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org Website : http://www.brplastics.com _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mcckoy Robertson 2012-05-20T15:35:44 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23214 <pre> Hello Sales I went over your contact online and found some items which we have interest in purchasing to our store in Spain for urgent supply. I will like to know the prices per each items plus the shipping cost. I Also want to know if Letter of Credit or T/T is acceptable for payment. I await your quick response asap so i can proceed with my needed items and quantity. Thank you Robertson Spencer N.B.M Supply Inc Address: Autovía A-5, salidas 22 y 26. Arroyomolinos, 28939 Madrid Spain Tel: +34 902 26 77 26 Email: robertsonspencer1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org Website : http://www.brplastics.com _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Robertson Spencer 2012-05-16T12:53:05 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23211 <pre>This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: vovse-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:&lt;vovse-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host relay4.kataweb.it [213.92.19.144]: 550 5.1.1 &lt;vovse-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table voverton-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:&lt;voverton-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host relay4.kataweb.it [213.92.19.144]: 550 5.1.1 &lt;voverton-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table votqv-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:&lt;votqv-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host relay4.kataweb.it [213.92.19.144]: 550 5.1.1 &lt;votqv-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table vossdenf-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:&lt;vossdenf-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host relay4.kataweb.it [213.92.19.144]: 550 5.1.1 &lt;vossdenf-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table vossdaltonmckeewelch-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:&lt;vossdaltonmckeewelch-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host relay4.kataweb.it [213.92.19.144]: 550 5.1.1 &lt;vossdaltonmckeewelch-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------ Return-path: &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Received: from server.naturemds.org ([89.248.172.70]) by svr04.erc-automatisering.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;) id 1ST2zP-000838-Nh; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:27:27 +0200 Received: from [10.0.0.100] by server.naturemds.org id COTZ9GFB9i0N; Sat, 12 May 2012 03:26:13 +0000 Message-ID: &lt;00a501cd2fee$f99ab500$6400000a-ZB7k/664AjY8SI+3A7PBwGD2FQJk+8+b&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; From: "I" &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; To: &lt;vossdaltonmckeewelch-77etuK4CMF+onA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Subject: Siete stati fatturati. Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 03:26:13 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus Gentile utente, Siete stati fatturati. Numero 96925779. Essa dovra essere versata in un prossimo futuro File Pdf con i dettagli necessari per il download all'indirizzo: http://quehacerhoypanama.com/riferire/Price.Pif </pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-12T03:27:28 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23209 <pre>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at osomaki.alien8.it. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. &lt;press-7Ru9TcpSK6qOW8tTIqUZ221x7RZD+kYr&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: maildrop: maildir over quota. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Received: (qmail 1466 invoked by uid 0); 11 May 2012 17:30:39 -0000 Received: from host220-211-149-62.serverdedicati.aruba.it (HELO mx2.alien8.it) (62.149.211.220) by host218-211-149-62.serverdedicati.aruba.it with SMTP; 11 May 2012 17:30:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.alien8.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80EB58D583A for &lt;press-7Ru9TcpSK6qOW8tTIqUZ221x7RZD+kYr&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:30:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx2.alien8.it X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.45 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.45 tagged_above=-100 required=4.202 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, SPF_FAIL=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mx2.alien8.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.alien8.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fge9FP2IiFjE for &lt;press-7Ru9TcpSK6qOW8tTIqUZ221x7RZD+kYr&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:30:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sitenow.co.nz (unknown [208.99.211.118]) by mx2.alien8.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF8958D5848 for &lt;press-7Ru9TcpSK6qOW8tTIqUZ221x7RZD+kYr&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:30:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sitenow.co.nz (Rsz-31-96 [208.99.211.118]) by sitenow.co.nz (mailer) with SMTP id zwC27rU31aFC for &lt;press-7Ru9TcpSK6qOW8tTIqUZ221x7RZD+kYr&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:30:41 -0700 Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:30:41 -0700 From: "Billing" &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Message-ID: &lt;38630969.32151701722807-AH9seTFQ2VlBWQWeTLFoew&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; To: &lt;press-7Ru9TcpSK6qOW8tTIqUZ221x7RZD+kYr&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Subject: Re: Re: Forum Reply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type text/plain charset= iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Gentile utente, press-7Ru9TcpSK6qOW8tTIqUZ221x7RZD+kYr&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org In risposta alla tua domanda sul prodotto sul forum di annunciare che Le informazioni di interesse per l'utente si trova in: http://radio-euro-classic.eu/aggiornare/aggiornare.zip Siamo lieti di collaborare. Tel./Fax.: (070) 384 57 53 </pre> MAILER-DAEMON-JF7WAA3tEy7c7T1cLYmjZF6hYfS7NtTn< at >public.gmane.org 2012-05-11T17:30:40 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23208 <pre>This is the mail system at host smtp02-smtp-1.daemonmail.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system &lt;alessandromaionchi-tuXb/Z829FWGzLJY+7CQzQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mx.interfree.it[213.158.72.46] said: 553 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) (in reply to RCPT TO command) &lt;alessandromaionchid-tuXb/Z829FWGzLJY+7CQzQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mx.interfree.it[213.158.72.46] said: 553 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) (in reply to RCPT TO command) &lt;alessandromaionchidd-tuXb/Z829FWGzLJY+7CQzQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mx.interfree.it[213.158.72.46] said: 553 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) (in reply to RCPT TO command) &lt;alessandromalvaldi-tuXb/Z829FWGzLJY+7CQzQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mx.interfree.it[213.158.72.46] said: 553 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) (in reply to RCPT TO command) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-11T00:09:18 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23207 <pre>Hello I'm doing some tests with LXC and how it interacts with the memory cgroup limits, more specifically the memory.limit_in_bytes control file. Am I correct in my understanding of the memory cgroup documentation[1] that the limit set in memory.limit_in_bytes is applied to the sum of the fields 'cache', 'rss' and 'mapped_file' in the memory.stat file? I am also trying to understand the values reported in memory.stat when compared to the statistics in /proc/$PID/statm. Below is the sum of each field in /proc/$PID/statm for every process running inside a test container, converted to bytes: size resident share text lib data dt 897208320 28741632 20500480 1171456 0 170676224 0 Compare this with the usage reports from memory.stat (fields total_*, hierarchical_* and pg* omitted): cache 16834560 rss 8192000 mapped_file 3743744 swap 0 inactive_anon 0 active_anon 8192000 inactive_file 13996032 active_file 2838528 unevictable 0 Is there a way to reconcile these numbers somehow? I understand that the fields from the two files represent different things. What I'm trying to do is to combine, for example, the fields from memory.stat to approximately reach what is displayed by statm. Thank you in advance, Andre [1] http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt </pre> Andre Nathan 2012-05-10T21:38:23 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23206 <pre>Your message Subject: Richiesta was not delivered to: e096f658&lt; at &gt;naoc.agip.it because: User e096f658 (e096f658&lt; at &gt;naoc.agip.it) not listed in Domino Directory _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> postmaster-h3WbwRhx77M< at >public.gmane.org 2012-05-10T21:10:58 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23205 <pre>I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to &lt;postmaster&gt; If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. &lt;46eff148.7060806-czlgayvd9obzM4FeTNmR7w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: 550 5.1.1 &lt;46eff148.7060806-czlgayvd9obzM4FeTNmR7w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; User unknown; rejecting _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-10T19:08:13 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23203 <pre>This is the mail system at host post02.wizzbit.nl. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system &lt;clioispra-y5SIUuNh4s0&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mail.jrc.org[178.33.25.189] said: 554 5.7.1 &lt;clioispra-y5SIUuNh4s0&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Relay access denied (in reply to RCPT TO command) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-10T15:05:19 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23202 <pre>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at envialiaworld-rhel.acens.net. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. &lt;grisoliac-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Connected to 213.205.33.248 but sender was rejected. Remote host said: 550 5.1.0 &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; SPF Failed - not authorized &lt;grisoliagrisoliavin-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Connected to 213.205.33.248 but sender was rejected. Remote host said: 550 5.1.0 &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; SPF Failed - not authorized &lt;grisomicben.reilly-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Connected to 213.205.33.240 but sender was rejected. Remote host said: 550 5.1.0 &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; SPF Failed - not authorized &lt;grisoliabianca-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Connected to 213.205.33.240 but sender was rejected. Remote host said: 550 5.1.0 &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; SPF Failed - not authorized &lt;grisom-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Connected to 213.205.33.240 but sender was rejected. Remote host said: 550 5.1.0 &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; SPF Failed - not authorized --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Received: (qmail 24022 invoked from network); 10 May 2012 15:07:52 +0200 Received: from server.naturemds.org (89.248.172.70) by mail.envialia-urgente.com with SMTP; 10 May 2012 15:07:52 +0200 Received: from [10.0.0.100] by server.naturemds.org id jTSx2leootDN; Thu, 10 May 2012 13:07:52 +0000 Message-ID: &lt;005901cd2ead$e6cc9700$6400000a-ZB7k/664AjY8SI+3A7PBwGD2FQJk+8+b&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; From: "CFX Group." &lt;containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; To: &lt;grisoliabianca-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Subject: BANK transazione non autorizzata Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:07:52 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cari titolare del conto bancario, L'operazione ACH, recentemente avviato dal vostro conto in banca, e stata respinta dall'Associazione dei pagamenti elettronici. Si prega di leggere il resoconto delle transazioni, cliccando sul link sottostante: http://redarr.com/conto/AdobePdf.Pif </pre> MAILER-DAEMON-m06wyfOVpVgiYD3Z9jO1QKx1fchgwxRQ5NbjCUgZEJk< at >public.gmane.org 2012-05-10T13:07:54 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23200 <pre>This is the mail system at host smtpauth.interhost.it. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system &lt;claudio.sperduti-82W6x1roggEkYyEGKg6nWwC/G2K4zDHf&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: service unavailable. Command output: mittente non corrispondente al dominioMessage content rejected _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-10T02:09:35 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23199 <pre>This is the mail system at host mail.termaschillan.cl. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system &lt;noemihumphrey-p0aYb1w59bp+nBQpE4LXFjUZDU+1vuVT&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host epistola.iperbole.bo.it[213.174.176.146] said: 550 &lt;noemihumphrey-p0aYb1w59bp+nBQpE4LXFjUZDU+1vuVT&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command) &lt;nof1391p-p0aYb1w59bp+nBQpE4LXFjUZDU+1vuVT&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host epistola.iperbole.bo.it[213.174.176.146] said: 550 &lt;nof1391p-p0aYb1w59bp+nBQpE4LXFjUZDU+1vuVT&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-10T00:15:42 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23198 <pre>La presente e' una notifica di stato della spedizione. -- This is a delivery status notification from %s. The original message was received on %s from %s --------------------------------------------------------------------------- RITARDI NELLA SPEDIZIONE DEL TUO MESSAGGIO DI POSTA La spedizione del tuo messaggio sta subendo dei ritardi. Il presente e' solamente un avviso, ed e' stato inviato automaticamente dal server di posta per avvisarti che c'e' stato un momentaneo ritardo nella spedizione del tuo messaggio. Non c'e' bisogno di effettuare alcuna operazione al momento, in quanto saranno effettuati nuovi tentativi di spedizione. Alcune ragioni per questo ritardo possono essere: * Congestione o problemi della rete. * Il mail server di destinazione potrebbe essere temporaneamente off-line. Le informazioni diagnostiche vengono fornite per ogni recipient. Se sono state inviate piu' copie del presente messaggio a recipients addizionali, le spedizioni verso gli altri indirizzi non verranno inclusi nel presente rapporto di notifica. La presente notifica di avviso comprende gli indirizzi elencati sotto: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DELAYS IN DELIVERING YOUR MESSAGE The delivery of the following E-mail message has been delayed. This is an advisory notice only; it is sent only to notify you about a temporary delay in delivering your message. You DO NOT need to do anything at this time. Additional attempts to deliver your message will be made. Some possible reasons for this delay: * Network congestion or failure. * The destination mail server is temporarily off-line. Diagnostic information is provided below for each recipient. If copies of this message were sent to additional recipients, deliveries to those addresses are not included in this notice. This is an advisory notice for the following addresses only: &lt;frimm280-7yYh8Pf4p/UAvxtiuMwx3w&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: &lt;&lt;&lt; Delivering mail coming from IP: 192.168.1.141 &lt;&lt;&lt; Spam check disabled, mail comes from IP 192.168.1.141 &lt;&lt;&lt; maildrop: maildir over quota. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Se il tuo messaggio e' stato inviato anche ad altri recipients, il loro stato circa la spedizione non e' incluso nel presente report. In tal caso potresti ricevere altre notifiche sullo stato della spedizione per gli altri indirizzi. Il messaggio originale segue come un allegato separato. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If your message was also sent to additional recipients, their delivery status is not included in this report. You may or may not receive other delivery status notifications for additional recipients. The original message follows as a separate attachment. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> mailer-daemon-MyvEODUHlcXQT0dZR+AlfA< at >public.gmane.org 2012-05-09T21:51:37 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23197 <pre>This is the mail system at host smtpauth.interhost.it. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system &lt;aurelia.mucci-NO+ENkreYd8&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: service unavailable. Command output: mittente non corrispondente al dominioMessage content rejected _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-09T19:57:01 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23196 <pre>This is the mail system at host presentaweb.be. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system &lt;impresatoscano-PkbjNfxxIASonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.188.72] said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (in reply to RCPT TO command) &lt;impresatrasporticiullocosimo-PkbjNfxxIASonA0d6jMUrA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.188.72] said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (in reply to RCPT TO command) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Mail Delivery System 2012-05-09T08:39:31 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23195 <pre>This is the mail system at host smtpsrv.playnet.it. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please contact Playnet Helpdesk Support. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system &lt;ulisse200-tuXb/Z829FWGzLJY+7CQzQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;: host mx.interfree.it[213.158.72.46] said: 553 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) (in reply to RCPT TO command) _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> postmaster-noreply-FMRk+c35SBqonA0d6jMUrA< at >public.gmane.org 2012-05-03T01:08:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23192 <pre>Having Trouble Viewing This Email? Click Here. &lt;http://loclville.com/newsletter/newsletter000007.html&gt; Loclville Your place for a hyper-local shout out! Twitter &lt;http://twitter.com/loclville&gt; |Facebook &lt;http://www.facebook.com/loclville&gt; The New Loclville! &lt;http://www.loclville.com/&gt; A virtual user-friendly community board for you and your neighbors to browse around… your own neighborhood! From yard sales to carpentry classes, road closures to weather alerts, this is your place for a hyper-local shout out! &lt;http://www.loclville.com/&gt; About Loclville Welcome to a new old fashioned way to interact. What you see is a community board that belongs to you and your neighbors ONLY. A maximum radius of thirty miles, a minimum of one block. The choice is yours. We Never SAVE your passwords!! We supply the Board and the tools to use it and that's ALL!! Apart from the obvious,We make no judgement to the content posted. That is up to you and your neighbors. Three local dislikes and it's gone. loclville.com saves you time and shows you what's going on right where you live. Let your voice be heard, make something happen, find like minded, seek help among your close neighbors, find those who need help. Keep small businesses going. Save on gas!! What appears on your Board is a reflection of YOUR COMMUNITY. Free for everyone to post, browse and connect. -- To unsubscribe from this list visit http://newsletter.loclville.com/?p=unsubscribe&amp;uid=af2de58a61591199e9e5d65e2ce3658e _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers&lt; at &gt;lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers</pre> Kim Braden 2012-04-30T15:08:08 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers/23191 <pre>You are receiving this email because we wish you to use our digital photo editing services. We are a China based Imaging Professionals. We offer basic and advanced digital photo Editing services and solutions like photo Cutout, morphological photo Editing, photoshop photo Editing, satellite photo Editing, color photo Editing and vector photo Editing using latest techniques. Our mainly services are: 1. Photo Cutout 2. Photo Enhancement 3. Photo Retouching 4. Vector Conversion 5. Pop Art 6. Images Masking 7. Clipping Path 8. Photo Restoration 9. Web Design Looking forward to work for you! Best regards, Rick Wansaksomi Imaging Professionals Contact: ibwallace-Mj/0Miq2reM&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org Send address to imremove-Mj/0Miq2reM&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org for remove </pre> Rick 2012-04-29T15:55:44 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.kernel.containers