<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint">
    <title>gmane.linux.fprint</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2300"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2298"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2295"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2290"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2288"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2286"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2285"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2282"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2270"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2268"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2267"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2264"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2261"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2254"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2252"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2250"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2249"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2246"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2244"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2243"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2300">
    <title>me puedes orientar</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2300</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;ok if you comment I used to opensuse but the link to install does not work, could you help me please
the link is:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/dgege/

or you could guide me in the installation with opensuse       _______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Roberto Antonio Herrera</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T17:50:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2298">
    <title>the fprint can be used on opensuse?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2298</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;the fprint can be used on opensuse?
since I've been trying to install and I could or distro Lunux that can be used right?       _______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Roberto Antonio Herrera</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-13T22:06:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2295">
    <title>New driver for AuthenTech AES3500</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2295</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all,

I'm submitting the AES3500 driver for peers to review.

The AES3500 is a pretty old fingerprint device produced by AuthenTech. It
possesses a *press-typed* sensor of dimension in 128x128. Which is
similiar to AES4000, except the later is in 96x96.

The driver is a deriative work of Daniel Drake's AES4000 driver, with a
few parameters tuned for AES3500. While there seems no problem scanning
fingerprint images with it, the verification rate is pretty low at the
moment.

Your contributions are very welcome.

* The bugzilla submission:
    https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64351
* Github repo: https://github.com/juvenn/aes3500

Thanks!


best,
--
jv
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Juvenn Woo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-08T08:54:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2290">
    <title>AES3500 patch test report</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2290</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I've tested Juvenn's patch as linked in recent message thread on the
mailing list: https://gist.github.com/juvenn/939298 . It bitrotted a
bit wrt to current HEAD, but was trivial to fix.

I should say that I didn't have much first-hand experience with
fingerprint scanning devices. Except for random cases which almost
everyone experienced, like you go to some office, where they have safe
with fingerprint lock, which they can't open for half an hour and
then call a technician with a hammer to work around the technology.

Neither I tried to look up that NIST "NBIS" thingy. But when I was a
young student I registered for access to a handwriting recognition
system from them, which arrived in snail mail on a CD with a nice
printed manual which said that the system achieves recognition rate of
36.578% and its sole purpose is to serve as a baseline for evaluating
other handwriting recognition systems. So, my wild guess is that NBIS
is just the same.

So, I'm not at all surprised with the initial results I got, which
match those posted by another subscriber: I had troubles enrolling a
finger, and then recognizing, while fingerprint images shown by
fprint_demo were pretty legible.

Some thinking helped though. First of all, AES3500 cannot capture a
*fingerprint*, it just physically too small for that. It can capture
only small sub-area of it, then depending on how exactly you put your
finger on it, areas will be rather different, likely straining NBIS.
As a fingerprinting layman, I also put my index finger's tip on
the sensor, and the tip contains almost parallel lines, and probably
lacks enough features to recognize. Shape of my APC Biopod kinda
suggests that they aim for thumb's fingerpad instead, which has curves
and stuff.

All in all, the best results I expectedly had with small finger - the
sensor can capture pretty large part of it. Except that NBIS couldn't
tell the difference between my left and right little fingers.

All in all, specifically AES3500 image capture driver works pretty well
- fingerprint lines are black, spaces between them are white,
grayscale shades are there. The only thing I noticed is that scanned
image is apparently rotated 90 degrees (i.e. mostly horizontal
fingerprint lines are shown vertically), not sure if that presents
additional puzzle for NBIS.

So, +1 for merging the patch, Juvenn, would you submit it via fprint
bugtracker, as was suggested by Vasily?


Thanks,
 Paul                          mailto:pmiscml&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Paul Sokolovsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-04T15:15:29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2288">
    <title>libfprint examples are broken for ages?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2288</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I'd like to to help with testing recently posted AES3500 patch.

Running img_capture example (output filtered):

--------
$ sudo ./examples/img_capture
supports USB device 08ff:5731 Found device claimed by AuthenTec AES3500
Opened device. It's now time to scan your finger.

image capture failed, code -95
sync:debug [fp_dev_close] 
--------

$ git blame core.c 
--------
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 840) API_EXPORTED int fp_dev_img_capture(struct fp_dev *dev, int unconditional,
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 841)    struct fp_img **image)
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 842) {
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 843)    struct fp_img_dev *imgdev = dev_to_img_dev(dev);
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 844)    if (!imgdev) {
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 845)            fp_dbg("image capture on non-imaging device");
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 846)            return -ENOTSUP;
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 847)    }
7e6f2590 (Daniel Drake        2007-11-02 17:04:19 +0000 848) 
3048b371 (Daniel Drake        2008-02-10 18:35:01 +0000 849)    //return fpi_imgdev_capture(imgdev, unconditional, image);
3048b371 (Daniel Drake        2008-02-10 18:35:01 +0000 850)    /* FIXME reimplement async */
3048b371 (Daniel Drake        2008-02-10 18:35:01 +0000 851)    return -ENOTSUP;


I.e. 2008, fp_dev_img_capture() was made unconditionally return
-ENOTSUP. fpi_imgdev_capture() is declared in fp_internal.h but
implementation not available. Thus, basic libfprint tests - capturing
fingerprint images - appear to be broken for 5 years. Am I missing
something?


Thanks,
 Paul                          mailto:pmiscml&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Paul Sokolovsky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-04T14:12:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2286">
    <title>libfprint-0.5.0 bug report</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2286</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello there,

I just ran the static analyser "cppcheck" over the source code of libfprint-0.5.0
and it said

1.

[drivers/vfs101.c:192]: (warning) Logical conjunction always evaluates to false: result &amp;lt; 0 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; result &amp;gt;= 3.

Suggest replace &amp;amp;&amp;amp; with ||

2.

[img.c:154]: (error) Resource leak: fd
[drivers/aesx660.c:296]: (error) Memory leak: stripdata
[nbis/bozorth3/bz_alloc.c:116]: (error) Memory leak: p
[nbis/bozorth3/bz_io.c:421]: (error) Resource leak: fp
[nbis/mindtct/init.c:593]: (error) Memory leak: powers
[nbis/mindtct/init.c:682]: (error) Memory leak: powmax_dirs
[nbis/mindtct/maps.c:662]: (error) Memory leak: cimage
[nbis/mindtct/maps.c:722]: (error) Memory leak: pmap
[nbis/mindtct/maps.c:729]: (error) Memory leak: pmap

I checked the first couple and they did look like real problems, although minor.

Regards

David Binderman       
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>David Binderman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T08:02:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2285">
    <title>Libfprint: Errors when compiling the library Libfprint</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2285</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,
When trying to compile with the library Libfprint. I get the following
errors.

/home/pablo/futronic/verify/fprint.h:237: undefined reference to
`fp_identify_finger_img'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:65: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_dev_for_dscv_print'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:66: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_print_get_driver_id'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:71: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_print_get_driver_id'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:95: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_print_get_driver_id'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:97: undefined reference to
`fp_print_data_from_dscv_print'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:102: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_print_get_finger'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:169: undefined reference to `fp_init'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:175: undefined reference to
`fp_discover_devs'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:181: undefined reference to
`fp_discover_prints'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:183: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_devs_free'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:190: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_prints_free'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:191: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_devs_free'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:197: undefined reference to
`fp_dev_open'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:198: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_devs_free'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:199: undefined reference to
`fp_dscv_prints_free'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:203: undefined reference to
`fp_print_data_free'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:218: undefined reference to
`fp_print_data_free'
/home/pablo/futronic/verify/verify.c:223: undefined reference to
`fp_dev_close'

Try installing "" libfprint "package in Ubuntu" solve the problem?
Of course, I appreciate any suggestion.

Pablo.
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Pablo Ignacio Calvo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-29T18:19:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2282">
    <title>'fprintd-verify' returns: "verify-no-match" on AES2810(08ff:2810)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2282</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I have the same problem the is described in this
thread&amp;lt;http://www.mail-archive.com/fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org/msg00280.html&amp;gt;
.
My setup is: Gentoo, libfprint-0.5.0, fprintd-0.4.1

ozt&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;plan9 ~ $ fprintd-enroll -f 7
Using device /net/reactivated/Fprint/Device/0
Enrolling right index finger.
Enroll result: enroll-completed

ozt&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;plan9 ~ $ fprintd-verify -f 7
Using device /net/reactivated/Fprint/Device/0
Listing enrolled fingers:
 - #0: right-index-finger
Verify result: verify-no-match (done)

ozt&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;plan9 ~ $ lsusb
Bus 004 Device 002: ID 08ff:2810 AuthenTec, Inc. AES2810

/var/log/messages
Apr 26 14:08:34 localhost dbus[2036]: [system] Activating service
name='net.reactivated.Fprint' (using servicehelper)
Apr 26 14:08:34 localhost dbus[2036]: [system] Successfully activated
service 'net.reactivated.Fprint'


I tried this numerous times with various fingers and it always give me the
same results.
I think fingerprint scans are in good quality by examining the scan photo
from 'fprint_demo'.

I compiled 'libfprint' with debug and collected 'fprint_demo' debug
(attached).

thanks and let me know if anything else is missing.

Regards,
Oz
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Oz Tamari</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-26T19:43:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2270">
    <title>APC USB Biopod device  aes3500 driver</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2270</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello, 

I found this site 
http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~micsmith/devices/

"Here you will find the source code for an open source GPL'd Linux
driver for the APC USB Biopod device which uses the AES3500 fingerprint
sensor"

in this base is not posible for some guru build a driver for this unit
on libfprint.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>newzenca</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-19T12:15:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2268">
    <title>AuthenTec, Inc. AES2810 fails to work</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2268</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;I've taken a fresh git clone of libfprint (commit
7eafca7babe40bc7dddd27ce9051b13b90ada021)
and built OK on Ubuntu 12.10.

My hardware is:
#lsusb |grep 281
Bus 001 Device 006: ID 08ff:2810 AuthenTec, Inc. AES2810

I'm using fprint demo v0.4 from the main repo. - I just copied my new
libfprint over the top of the system one.

I've setup udev rules and groups to grant my normal user access, and can
now enroll fingers from fprint.

But they never verify. I always get a status of 'finger does not match'
with minutiae numbers in the low tens.

Is there just a knack to this ?

Tom
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tom Chiverton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-18T23:00:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2267">
    <title>USBPcap: USB sniffer for Windows</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2267</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hello,

I have recently released USBPcap[1]. It is open source USB sniffer for
Windows XP, Vista, 7 and 8. The original idea behind the project was to
allow Wireshark to capture raw USB traffic on Windows hence you need to
install both USBPcap and Wireshark to actually do any real analysis.

Regards,
Tomasz

[1] http://desowin.org/usbpcap
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tomasz Moń</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-11T19:49:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2264">
    <title>Patch to add support for UPEK 147e:2020 in recent Thinkpads</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2264</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!
Could you please help us ?
In RHBZ patch included and it works!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913359

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Игорь Гнатенко</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-08T07:28:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2261">
    <title>device not found..</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2261</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Dear all.
My first steps compiling libfprint succeeded. I put drivers of aes2660 from
0.5 to 0.4, compiled and installed successfully.
But my fprintd v. 0.4.1 says "device not found" or "no devices in use". I
have checked ProductID and it should fit with aes2660.
How can I make fprintd detect my fingerprint device?

Thank you very much.

Milan
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Milan Lazecky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-02T19:16:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2254">
    <title>unable to make libfprint-0.5</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2254</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,
I have an issue making libfprint-05 version. I simply need AES2660 driver
included.
However make (using GLIBC_2.12) ends up with this error:

CCLD     fprint-list-udev-rules
./.libs/libfprint.so: undefined reference to `fpi_im_resize'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [fprint-list-udev-rules] Error 1

I have a RHEL-based distribution. There is no RPM prepared for 0.5 version
of libfprint (there is only version 0.1). Yes, there are some packages for
Fedora but it needs at least GLIBC_2.14. I don't want to mess the system
too much by compiling newer version of GLIBC..
So I would like to compile the libfprint with GLIBC version 2.12. I have
GTK2 (including GDK..) installed, so I don't understand why I get this
error.
Can you give me some advice please?

Thank you very much.

With kind regards

Milan
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Milan Lazecky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-31T09:24:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2252">
    <title>AuthenTec on Toshiba Tecra R850 (08ff:168b)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2252</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Is there a way to get the fingerprint reader in my Toshiba Tecra R850 working?

lsusb shows:

Bus 001 Device 003: ID 08ff:168b AuthenTec, Inc. 

I'm using openSuSE 12.3 but this fprint-reader is not detected.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Müller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-27T07:48:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2250">
    <title>Usability and modality issues with fprintd</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2250</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;First of all let me say thank you for building a fingerprint authentication
stack that works on free OSes!  It's much appeciated :)

I've been using fprintd for a year or two now,  and it strikes me that
there are some ways in which its usability could be greatly improved.
Perhaps this has already been discussed, though I can't see anything in a
quick scan of the archives.  Two big things that could be better:

1. Authentication with fprintd shouldn't be modal (either password or
fingerprint).  It's really inconvenient when you want to auth by means A
and the software expects means B.  The user should be able to authenticate
by either method , as they wish, and software shouldn't demand one or the
other at any given moment.

2. Fingerprint authentication shouldn't time out.  It often takes a while,
especially for newer users, to realise that they're being prompted for a
fingerprint, and they'll often go to swipe right as the timeout is kicking
in.  If you solve 1, there isn't any reason for a timeout anyway.

I don't know if PAM creates obstacles to fixing these...
_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Eckersley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-21T23:10:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2249">
    <title>(no subject)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2249</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
http://whaouh.com/www.google.searchnew.addnewlife3.php
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jim Beam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-21T08:04:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2246">
    <title>Writing a driver for UPEK 147e:1002</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2246</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi!

I would like to see this device (UPEK 147e:1002) supported and I would 
like to volunteer as much as I can. I own this device (it's built in 
ThinkPad Edge e420) and I'm interested in learning about USB protocols, 
devices, writing new device drivers for Linux and about reverse 
engineering working drivers.

I'm not sure where to start. I'm reading about Linux drivers and things 
like char device, ioctl and similar but it seems that libusb is better 
choice for learning and pyusb is interesting. I don't have a clue which 
device class fingerprint readers belong, what are interfaces, what 
transfer modes exist but I'm reading about it and it just would be nice 
if you could share few hints and suggest me where to go.

And an interesting thing, I found this in libprint/drivers/upeksonly.c :

* TCS4C (USB ID 147e:1000) support:
* Copyright (C) 2010 Hugo Grostabussiat &amp;lt;dw23.devel&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gmail.com&amp;gt;

I hope there can't be many differences between 0x1000 and 0x1002 models. 
I tried to find some datasheets but there's nothing usefull or I just 
couldn't find it.

Thanks in advance,

Nikola Hardi - Atlantic777
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Nikola Hardi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-11T22:43:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2244">
    <title>vfs101 driver and nr_enroll_stages</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2244</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Sergio,

I'm working on improvement for libfprint enrolling algorithm for
imaging devices;
basic idea is to scan same finger several times during enrollment and
store all scans for later usage.
It dramatically improves match rate on devices with small sensor
(AES1660, Upek 147e:2020, AES1610).

I've noticed that you're setting nr_enroll_stages in your vfs101
driver to 3, is there any reason for that?
Does vfs101 device assemble 3 images into one, or something like that?

My current version is on github:
https://github.com/anarsoul/libfprint/ branch anarsoul-wip
It would be nice if you can test it with your device and provide some
feedback/fixes.

Regards
Vasily
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Vasily Khoruzhick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-18T11:48:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2243">
    <title>Fwd:</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2243</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;http://www.stsutility.it/ycnukn.php?s=lf
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>杨扬 authenticated</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-16T05:43:06</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2241">
    <title>[PATCH] An experimental driver for VFS5011 138a:0011</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.fprint/2241</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I've made a modified version of libfprint 0.5.0 with experimental support for
138a:0011 Validity Sensors, Inc. VFS5011 Fingerprint Reader.
Everyone is welcome to test it.

Full source tree archive: https://github.com/ars3niy/fprint_vfs5011/archive/master.zip
Patch against libfprint 0.5.0: 
https://github.com/ars3niy/fprint_vfs5011/raw/master/libfprint-vfs5011.diff
Git repository: git://github.com/ars3niy/fprint_vfs5011.git

Before testing, please consider reading this instruction on how to get debugging 
information: https://github.com/ars3niy/fprint_vfs5011/wiki/Testing

I hope this stuff can become useful.

Best regards,
Arseniy

_______________________________________________
fprint mailing list
fprint&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fprint
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Arseniy Lartsev</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-11T18:57:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.fprint">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.fprint</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
