<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists">
    <title>gmane.linux.elitists</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12536"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12534"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12532"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12529"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12527"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12525"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12523"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12521"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12520"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12512"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12508"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12503"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12470"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12466"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12463"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12459"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12452"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12447"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12444"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12441"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12536">
    <title>RIP Ed Foster</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12536</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
linux-elitists mailing list
linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
</description>
    <dc:creator>Karsten M. Self</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-01T22:43:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12534">
    <title>Brett Glass speaks out against Net Neutrality</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12534</link>
    <description>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902077.html


</description>
    <dc:creator>Teh Entar-Nick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-31T14:56:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12532">
    <title>One more thing on DRM...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12532</link>
    <description>From the political news files:
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/26/michael-savage-lawsuit-ag_n_115103.html

  "In her ruling Friday, U.S. District Judge Susan
  Illston said people who listen to a public broadcast
  are entitled to use excerpts for purposes of comment
  and criticism."

Of course, if the comment and criticism had used a
circumvented copy of a DRM-restricted work, no such
exception applies.

Anyone got an example of a straight-up _political
speaker_ who's using a DRM-restricted format, and
a comment on or criticism of that speaker? 

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-27T21:49:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12529">
    <title>[rms&lt; at &gt;gnu.org: Re:  Defective By Design]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12529</link>
    <description>----- Forwarded message from Richard M Stallman &lt;rms&lt; at &gt;gnu.org&gt; -----

From: Richard M Stallman &lt;rms&lt; at &gt;gnu.org&gt;
CC: linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
Subject: Re: [linux-elitists] Defective By Design
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:14:51 -0400

    Is it just me, or is it the FSF that seems to have gone defective?

Maybe neither.  I think you and some others have misunderstood and
misjudged our protest.

    Their latest anti-iPhone campaign[1] crosses some lines I'm not too pleased
    with. They're urging people to setup a meatspace denial of service attack
    against the "Genius Bars" in Apple Stores world wide

That's not what we are doing.  We have asked people to go to Apple
stores and show Apple's staff their opposition to Apple's DRM.
Describing this with terms such as "denial of service" and
"disruption" is untrue.

Calling it an "attack" is an exaggeration.  When people go one by one
to a store and tell the staff what they think, that's not an attack.
When Apple implements DRM, when Apple deactivates unlocked iPhones,
that's an attack.

"Voting with your feet" means individually rejecting DRM.  Of course
you should do that, but acting collectively is stronger than acting
individually.  The movie companies organize, the record companies
organize, and a large company such as Apple is lots of people who are
organized to achieve an aim which in this case is unjust.

To overcome them, we must organize too.  It would be a shame if DRM
prevails because we artificially limited ourselves to individual
action in response to a well-planned attack on our freedom.

So if you recognize DRM as a threat to your freedom, please
participate in this and other protests.  If even 5 protestors visit a
store in a day, the protest will be a success there, but we cannot
take that much participation for granted.


I am not a supporter of Linux, and I am not on the linux-elitists
mailing list.  So it is likely that my response will not get through
to the list.  If it does not, would you please forward it there?

----- End forwarded message -----
</description>
    <dc:creator>Aaron Porter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-27T20:13:27</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12527">
    <title>Defective By Design</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12527</link>
    <description>
Is it just me, or is it the FSF that seems to have gone defective?
Their latest anti-iPhone campaign[1] crosses some lines I'm not too pleased
with. They're urging people to setup a meatspace denial of service attack
against the "Genius Bars" in Apple Stores world wide in an effort to
educate Apple about it's product is "restricting your freedoms".
They previously posted "5 reasons to avoid iPhone 3G"[2], a brief
but quite valid list of reasons users might want to avoid the iPhone
(curiously omitting the lack of any support for non-iTunes activation,
use, etc). Their last reason for avoiding the device -- "iPhone is not the
only option." seems to negate the militant tactics they're adopting now.
I've been a longtime supporter of the FSF (up to but not including
prefixing Linux with GNU), contributing my own time and money as well as
pushing through software "purchases" by my employers. I'm not sure I want
to be associated with the group after this.
Sure the iPhone is sexy, but there has been sexy hardware for
decades that lacked free software support. I have and continue to "vote
with my feet" -- making purchasing decisions for myself and my employers
based on our ability to use products in the way we desire. I have and will
continue to try to educate others and convince them to do the same. I
don't think I'll every be convinced that deliberately disrupting a legal
business practice and denying a valid service to users who have made
different ethical choices than my own will have a positive result in
freeing anything.


[1] http://www.defectivebydesign.org/apple-challenge
[2] http://defectivebydesign.org/5-reasons-to-avoid-iphone-3g
</description>
    <dc:creator>Aaron Porter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-26T20:31:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12525">
    <title>Installfest for Schools</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12525</link>
    <description>Hi Folks:

I'm very pleased to announce that Untangle &amp; ACCRC have teamed up with LinuxWorld (Aug 5-7) for our second Installfest for Schools.  The first ACCRC/Untangle Installfest for Schools in March refurbished 350 Ubuntu computers for schools[1].  This time we've gotten a large booth on the expo floor and will have workstations setup for volunteers to refurbish recycled computers with Ubuntu and GnewSense.  We particularly need help with the following:

1)Installing Ubuntu and/or gNewSense  
2)Hacking older hardware and identifying good/bad components

You can signup for a work station here:

http://www.untangle.com/installfest

Also, if you know of a school in need of computers that’s willing to try GNU/Linux please nominate them here:

http://www.untangle.com/index.php?option=com_collect&amp;task=installfestNominate&amp;Itemid=1426

And if you have an older computer that you want to donate or recycle, please bring it to LinuxWorld.  ACCRC will have a collection booth setup and can provide tax deductable receipts.  PIII and newer systems will be refurbished with Ubuntu for schools.  Older systems will be recycled properly by the ACCRC.

Lastly, we are always looking for help getting the word out.  If you want to give the event some love on your blog, Digg, StumbleUpon, Slashdot, or some crazy forum please link to the main installfest page, which is http://www.untangle.com/installfest

Thanks so much for your help!

-Andrew

P.S. The LinuxWorld Expo free if you register before the conference starts here: 
https://register.rcsreg.com/regos-1.0/lnsf2008/ga/index2.html

References:
[1]Here is a writeup of the first event: http://lwn.net/Articles/273770/ and here are some pictures: http://www.untangle.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=355&amp;Itemid=139

--
Andrew Fife
Untangle - The Open Source Network Gateway
www.untangle.com/download

650.425.3327 desk
415.806.6028 cell 
_______________________________________________
linux-elitists mailing list
linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
</description>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Fife</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-24T20:00:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12523">
    <title>Applications and the infamous DNS vulnerability</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12523</link>
    <description>On a properly set up home or office network, it should
be difficult to poison the nameserver completely
from the outside -- for a long time it's been best
practice to put your public DNS on a separate machine.

Of course an attacker can easily trick an application
on the inside into doing a bunch of DNS queries --
the simplest example is that a user could visit a
malicious web page with a bunch of images.

Should applications that handle untrusted data
be keeping track of the number of times they get
NXDOMAIN for subdomains of one domain -- some kind
of wrapper around getaddrinfo -- then refusing to
query again if there are so many that it looks like
an attack?  Maybe with a "I'm not looking up another
randomcrap.example.com domain for you" dialog, or
maybe just stop processing the offending web page or
whatever other data source is causing the queries?

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-24T16:40:04</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12521">
    <title>Obfuscated TCP</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12521</link>
    <description>Anyone following the "Obfuscated TCP" kernel patch
set and userspace library?
  http://code.google.com/p/obstcp/
Fast opportunistic crypto at the TCP level.

Looks like a useful way to make it difficult for
ISPs to use services such as Phorm and NebuAd to
collect user tracking data and ad revenue -- so
webmasters should be all over it.  And, of course,
it's protection against forged RST attacks.

Doesn't work if the attacker is willing to spend
more and do an MITM attack, though.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-18T17:16:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12520">
    <title>Spam complying with CAN SPAM</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12520</link>
    <description>Looks like the Marketing types of the world are
getting emboldened by our pro-spam FTC...
  http://weblog.infoworld.com/gripeline/archives/2008/06/ftc_says_yes_yo.html

I'm starting to see spam that looks like it traces
back to a semi-legit company.

Anyone else getting spam linking to disposable domain
names that copy the content from patchperfect dot
com -- with the company's actual contact info and an
apparently working unsubscribe link?

whois has officialtvwebsite822 dot com at the same
postal address as the original site:

6070 Mission Gorge Rd. Suite 1, San Diego, CA 92120.

Either this is a very good joe job, or it's another
attempt by DMA types to push the boundaries.

Looks like an opportunity for another Gevalia-style
lawsuit.  Of course, the infomercial impresarios
behind this grass seed company will start another
company selling something else, but there's probably
enough money to make it worthwhile for a small ISP
or mail host with a reasonably priced lawyer.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-14T18:10:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12512">
    <title>USB-Serial and pppd</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12512</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
linux-elitists mailing list
linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
</description>
    <dc:creator>Greg Folkert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-12T06:27:55</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12508">
    <title>eee-pc 900 FLOSS impurity [was Re: attack of thelow-cost ultra-mobile linux boxen]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12508</link>
    <description>
Yes, quite possibly.  But I'm willing to accept
baby steps in our direction.  While fully GPL-free
drivers are very much the ideal, I'll take BSD-free
as two steps forward, and semi-proprietary as
one step forward away from Microsoft-world.

I think this strategy is more effective than the
FSF-style all-or-nothing confontational approach.
It's more in line with Linus' and Ubuntu's
approach and look where it's got them vs FSF.
Heck, even Debian is not hostile to proprietary
software; they just say it won't be in Debian.

Anyhow, there's no pure Libre laptop in this
class and I think it's a huge step ahead to
(a) have Linux installed and (b) see the
manufacturer cooperate with and document
other peripherals not of its own manufacture
that work with it.


I hope not, but I'm not such a purist that
I'll avoid all proprietary software: I think
infrastructure (OS) should be Free, and more
importantly, that file and network standards
should be Free, but I don't mind letting the
market decide about apps, as long as they
don't do the MS monopolistic lockdown on
you.

Anyway, the voice activation is just a toy,
as is the multitouch zoom feature which
doesn't even work in Firefox.

I'll certainly have more opportunity to report
just what is and is not ideal from a FLOSS
standpoint when I get around to installing
and booting other distros (SD card)

</description>
    <dc:creator>Tony Godshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-19T21:32:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12503">
    <title>attack of the low-cost ultra-mobile linux boxen</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12503</link>
    <description>I was tempted by the eee-pc but stayed out
because of the screen (800 pixels wide?  heck,
my cell phone does that!).  To me, a device
needs 1024 wide to render a web page properly
(due to rigid web designers) and at least 100dpi.

But now with the HP2133 coming out (ship
date ETA 6/1 at last visit to HP.com) I looked
around again I found that there's now an eee-pc
with a bigger, sharper screen, and another very
interesting ultraportable: the wibrain (heheh).

I post here the specs I collected in the hopes it'll save someone else
some trouble:

wibrain b1lh   1024x600   4.8"   247dpi1.15lb$499512M RAM       30G
    VIA C7M 1.2GHz CPULinux/Ubuntudynamism.com or redorbit.com
wibrain b1le   1024x600   4.8"   247dpi1.15lb$6491G RAM
60G     VIA C7M 1.2GHz CPULinux/Ubuntudynamism.com or redorbit.com

eee pc 900    1024x600   8.9"   133dpi2.1lb$5501G RAM           20G
    IntelLinux/Susecentralcomputer

hp 2133         1280x1024 8.9"   184dpi2.8lb $550512M RAM
20G     VIA C7-M 1.2 GhzLinuxKR922UT Linux version from hp.com ships
~6/1/08

In the end I bought an eee pc 900 in person at Central Computer in
Santa Clara rather than wait for the HP, partly because I'm heading to
Asia in a week and partly because it has more memory.

A couple of cool things I found after I bought it:

1) ASUS has, in its manual, a list of devices qualified to work with
it (mostly USB devices) including normally problematic things like TV
tuners.

2) It has voice activation included for launching apps: you say
"computer, notes" and it brings up a sticky note.  You say "computer,
clock" and it brings up a world clock app.

3) Power supply is 12V DC which is handy

</description>
    <dc:creator>Tony Godshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-19T17:36:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12470">
    <title>What would be the proper course of action for apossible GPL violation?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12470</link>
    <description>All,

   As some of you may have seen on slashdot there is an announcement that all 
asus mobo's will in the near future contain built in splashtop Linux desktop.  
Being the curious monkey I am.  I go to the site and start looking for 
packages and source.  Just to see what it is I'm dealing with.

  Not only am I not finding a path to source, but I saw this page and the 
following paragraph contained within.  

http://www.splashtop.com/aboutus-corporate.php

&lt;snip&gt;
DeviceVM is releasing its first software product, Splashtop, in October of 
2007. Splashtop is a proprietary technology developed by DeviceVM that 
provides users with a rapid-start alternative to the traditional operating 
system.
&lt;/snip&gt;

Now before people start calling me alarmist.  I'm not trying to raise a call 
to arms, and I do understand business.  What I'm looking for is the proper 
method to follow to find the people able to assist DeviceVM in working with 
GPL'd software, and complying with it's license.  

Suggestions?

James
</description>
    <dc:creator>James Sparenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-15T02:55:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12466">
    <title>micro-linux servers powered over ethernet?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12466</link>
    <description>All,

We've got a possible application for a tiny linux server. The form 
factor would be small, USB-key sized, and they'd need to have an 
ethernet port and draw their power from a PoE socket.

(The specific application is plugging them into old ethernet switches, 
and the devices would emit LLDP packets, thus allowing us to 
topology-discover our network)

Anyone know of such a thing?
</description>
    <dc:creator>Phil Mayers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-14T16:03:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12463">
    <title>So, how about those 46 Patent Court Judges...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12463</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
linux-elitists mailing list
linux-elitists&lt; at &gt;zgp.org
http://allium.zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists
</description>
    <dc:creator>Greg Folkert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-06T21:05:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12459">
    <title>Deploying server apps with git hooks?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12459</link>
    <description>Is anyone using a git repository with an appropriate
hook script to deploy a server-side application?

You could do something like "git push staging" or
"git push live" on your own repository, and a hook on
the server takes care of checking out and deploying
the software, and running any necessary init scripts.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-05T19:04:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12452">
    <title>Announcement: FreedomHEC 2008</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12452</link>
    <description>FreedomHEC 2008, the Linux device driver
"unconference", will take place November 8-9, 2008
in Santa Monica, California, following WinHEC in Los
Angeles.  Plan to attend and learn why Linux support
has become an industry standard requirement for new
hardware, and how you can get your products supported
under Linux quickly and conveniently for customers.


Who:   Hardware engineers, driver developers, you.

What:  Device driver unconference

Where: Santa Monica, California, USA

When:  November 8-9, 2008

Why:   Make your hardware valuable to the growing
       Linux market.


At FreedomHEC, participants will learn how the Linux
driver development process works, differently from
the complex processes used to develop drivers for
proprietary operating systems.  The kernel team and
the Linux distributions take on much of the build,
test, and support work for a driver, freeing up the
hardware manufacturer's driver team to concentrate
on the core code.

You'll also have an opportunity to discuss your driver
development options, including the opportunity to work
with the Linux Driver Project and the Linux Foundation
to have a driver developed free of charge, under an
NDA that keeps your device documentation confidential
but that allows the actual code to become part of
the Linux process.  Bring your toughest technical
and organizational questions.

Sponsors are: host sponsor Edmunds.com; sponsors
Google, the Linux Foundation, and the Linux Driver
Project; and media sponsors LinuxWorld.com and LWN.

To attend FreedomHEC, sign up at the conference
Wiki at http://freedomhec.pbwiki.com/  Conference
attendance is free of charge for anyone who
pre-registers on the Wiki.

Contact: Don Marti &lt;dmarti&lt; at &gt;zgp.org&gt;

(WinHEC is a registered trademark of Microsoft
Corporation.  Linux is a registered trademark of
Linus Torvalds.  FreedomHEC is not affiliated with
Microsoft Corporation.)

</description>
    <dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-28T23:37:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12447">
    <title>NYLXS Press Release on the OLPC Project</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12447</link>
    <description>In response to many of the questions regarding the changes in the
OLPC project, and specifically the decision to base the project at
this juncture to a Microsoft Operating System, proponents of this
change have come out swinging against Free Software developers who
have worked for the current Free Interface, code named Sugar.  A
large segment of the critique of the against Free Software developers
like Bender is that they have put their "Open Source" agenda above the
welfare of the project.  Others claim that the "Open Source" advocates
should be pleased with the what has already been done and that the
project as it stands can either be relaunched or has already met
goals.

The problem, though, is that in many ways, the marketing and financial
positioning of the OLPC program is harder to develop then the hardware
and software. And the goals that have been met are small in light of
the original mission of the OLPC project.

An operating system is more than a commodity.  It becomes the looking
glass that develops how the user thinks and it literally shapes
the mind of it's users.  A system which is at it's core designed to
disenfranchise users from the learning experience, especially in how
the user views the software itself through learned expectations, and
forces information access through monopolistic channels and filters,
undermines the development of critical thinking skills.  In geek terms,
the operating system reprograms the end user.  The Microsoft operating
system is designed to do so from the ground up.  It is in fact the only
intended use of the Microsoft Windows Operating System franchise.

The interaction between technology on human and societal development
dates to the beginning of civilization, if not even before that.
One interesting scholarly article on the topic which is archived at
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources/technology_changes_how_we_think.txt
by Robin Wilson explores how the Gutenberg printing printing press causes
an explosion of mathematical usage and development, and how a large part
of that was developed by the standardization of mathematical symbols
for universal communication and expression.

"  Johann Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press (around 1440)
revolutionised mathematics, enabling classic mathematical works to be
widely available for the first time. Previously, scholarly works, such
as the classical texts of Euclid, Archimedes and Apollonius had been
available only in manuscript form, but the printed versions made these
works much more widely available.

At first the new books were printed in Latin or Greek for the scholar,
and many scholarly editions appeared. The earliest printed version
of Euclid’s Elements, published in Venice in 1482, and there is an
attractive 1492 edition of Ptolemy’s Almagest. Apollonius’s Conics
appeared in 1537, and seven years later the works of Archimedes were
published in both Latin and Greek, and there was a celebrated edition
of Diophantus’s Arithmetic in 1621, reissued in 1670, with the Greek
text, a Latin translation by Bachet, and comments by Fermat, including
his famous marginal comment on the ‘last theorem’. ....

The invention of printing also led to the gradual standardisation of
mathematical notation. In particular, the arithmetical symbols + and –
first appeared in a 1489 arithmetic text by Johann Widmann. Surprisingly,
the symbols × and ÷ were not in general use until the seventeenth
century – we’ll see how × developed shortly; the division sign ÷
was introduced by John Pell.

Needless to say, the quality of the mathematical printing in those days
was very variable. Here we see two version of Pascal’s arithmetical
triangle from the same year, 1545: Stifel’s publisher was having a
good day, while Scheubelius was less fortunate."

The most important point Wilson makes as relating to the OLPC project
is in this paragraph:

"Record was such a fine lecturer that his audience regularly applauded
his lectures. We don’t know what he looked like. For a long time, there
was only one known picture of him, but recently severe doubts have been
raised as to its authenticity. One might well ask: ‘Is this a Record?’

Record’s books were written in English, and ran to many editions. The
ground of artes of 1543 was an arithmetic book explaining the various
rules so simply that ‘everie child can do it’. As with all his books,
it was written in the form of a Socratic dialogue between a scholar and
his master."

Prior to this era of copyright and DRM encumbered communications,
the printing press caused a  prodigious discovery of the potential
of the human intellect and from it's most early uses western masters
used it to communicate with the masses, specifically targeting children
for education.  The art of printing exploded, it's teaching as a trade,
science  and technology every bit as vital to the democratization and
economic development that the West would experience from that very day
in  around 1440 when the press was invented.

In the short 600 years since technology has revolutionized communications,
through the printing era, into the wireless and wired analog era, the
broadcast media era and through to today with the digital media era
humanity has evolved directly in response to the use, development,
deployment and education with communications media, and diverse
(classically defined) liberal education has been the cornerstone of world
civilization as it has spread from the West to every corner of the world.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, in her ground breaking book, "Infidel", repeatedly
describes how her interaction with libraries and books.  Why surrounded in
a world of Islamic Brotherhood lectures and learnings with the repeated
mantra of "TOTAL OBEDIENCE" by local figures in her life such as Boqol
Sawm and Sister Aziza, Hirsi-Ali found comfort in cheap romantic novels.
She writes, "  But the allure of romance called to us from the pages
of books. In school we read good books, Charlotte Bronte, Jane Austen,
and Daphne du Maurier; out of school Halwaa's sisters kept us supplied
with cheap Harlequins. These were trashy soap opera-like novels, but
they were exciting — sexually exciting."

Hirsi-Ali has the advantage of literacy and the support of a free press.
The purpose of the OLPC project is also literacy.  Not just the literacy
of the pen, and the literacy of mathematics, politics and  arts,
but computer literacy, the new medium which will be required for the
development of children worldwide to fully share in our emerging enriched
worldwide culture.  There are too many stumbling blocks as there is.
The quoted material above was far too arduous from me gather into this
message.  The text, instead of being able to be be quickly cut and pasted
into this window had to be typed by hand because online resources like
Google-Books was prevented from making it available as text.  It was
only because of my 20 years of steep education in this topic, and my
ability to reverse engineer the protections that have been enforced
in this media that I was able even locate the appropriate material to
present this point to an interested public on this important point.

The Microsoft Operating system is designed to restrict digital
access according to information in order to optimize a monopolistic,
non-competitive agenda, the most essential restriction being the discovery
of the basic tools and carnal knowledge of the computer systems, the
modern printing press, itself.  This directly conflicts with the core
OLPC charter and goal.  While that can be ridiculed as an "Open Source"
agenda and irrational hangup, I'd argue based on the historical evidence
that the accusatory tone of such statements are fundamentally flawed
and very much more in line with the kind of rationality which one might
expect from a despot philosophy such as which might come from controlling
Communist Party in today's Red China.

The agenda, design and functionality of the Sugar interface, and it's
origins in GNU software and Linux kernels in specious and spurious.
Oxymoronic as that may sound, it is not the devotion to "Open Source"
which makes the move from Sugar to Microsoft Software untenable to
the goals of the One Laptop Per Child program. It is the change from a
classically Liberal based education program, a cornerstone of Western
and World progress to a regressive monopolistic platform which inhibits
by design those Western values and the knowledge of humanity so that
it can be adapted to other native cultures and thereby help assure the
survival all of mankind as a free, informed and tolerant civilization.

What, may I ask, is it intended that we teach these children in the
third world with a billion laptops?  That is the only relevant question.
Sugar is designed from the ground up to answer this question.  Obviously
the Microsoft product has no such agenda.

Ruben Safir
President NYLXS

</description>
    <dc:creator>Ruben Safir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-26T18:15:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12444">
    <title>Privacy project</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12444</link>
    <description>Hi all,

I started an open source project to enhance privacy. A lot is going on 
in Europa (actually the US too) that needs some attention. The whole 
story is below in the original posting. I would like to encourage 
everybody who feels like lurking or joining to mail me: 
brenno&lt; at &gt;dewinter.com and I'll put you on the list. Of course I won't 
start spamming this list now. This is a one off post and people that 
know me, know also that this is an urgent matter.

Cheers,

Brenno de winter



Dear all,

As promised I would kick-off a mailinglist on privacy in order to build
an open source project. I tried it off-list for some time, but it is
hard to get things going in a direction. So I start over without any
prejudice to technologies or solutions. Let the wisdom of the crowd take
care of the project. You're on the list, because we discussed this and
you wanted to lurk or participate. The list of members is not public, so
if you lurk you are not giving away your identity.

*Anecdote*
Today I flew back home from the US through London. On the flight from
Heathrow to Amsterdam something remarkable happened: A little girl (I
guess 4 years of age) went to the toilet and when she came out the pilot
was standing there. The door to the cockpit was open. When she came out
the pilot invited her in to have a look. Ten years ago this would not
get any reaction from anybody, but when I saw this I felt so happy:
Common sense is back! A captain that realizes that people should be able
to trust a small kid to a certain extend. I did make sure I told the
crew and they felt the very same about it. For me this underlines the
fundamental point that we are dealing with: we live in a society that
has become distrusting of anything and anybody with ourselves as the
main victim.

*Ground for the project*
In today's world we don't trust anybody and we go to extreme's to
violate the privacy of everybody to get .... a sense of security?
Currently there are some urgent matters that need our attention:

- Europe is implementing a new directive that enforces EU-nations to
create law that stores traffic information on communication we 500+
million Europeans have. So for a period of minimal 6 months we store
who's calling who (or who's attemting too), who's e-mailing who, who was
online and where, who has what IP-address of phonenumber. This is what
we call data retention. This is a big deal since whistle blowers and
journalist have to go to great length in order to do their work without
the government watching them all the time;

- In a similar move the Dutch government (through transportation
companies) is introducing a transportation card that fascilitates all
public transportation. For fiscal reasons this data is stored for seven
years. Unfortunately this has a side effect, since we are building a
database with each movement of humans in our country. We know what bus
they took, where they entered and where they went off. Current laws can
make this information available to police and soon also to secret
services. A similar system is being build for cars so that we can tax
them by the mile.

*The project*
For the data retention there is a lot one can do to circumvent and thus
obsolete the regulations. Of course without breaking the law. There are
a lot of tools that enable us to obtain more privacy. The project aims
to bundle those solutions and make them as broadly accessible as
possible to people as we possibly can.

We aim at two things:
1. Make tools available and as simple as possible;
2. Do knowledge transfer: a lot of people are in the dark on what
happens with data retention and travelling. So we need to tell the story
to the world. I have arranged a lot of action already behind the scenes
so that we will hit news when that is a good moment. I have good hopes
to arrange that very effectively, but we still need to tell a story. So
let's build that. Second anecdote: When I took the train home I ended up
with this guy. We started talking about the chipcard for transportation.
When I explained what was happening on the administrative side he was
visibly shocked and he told me he didn't know. I guess that goes for
many people. Information is key.

I would like to make a couple of suggestions on how we build the project:
1. We use the wisdom of the crowd. Everybody has knowledge let's bundle
that;
2. We play legal. We're not doing anything sneaky or wrong, but we fight
for our civil rights that we need;
3. We act as the KLM-pilot: Use our senses and stop accepting fear as
our keydriver. We're not helping terrorist (they have their toolsets
already), we're helping the people that want secure, reliable
communications and privacy;
4. We're an open group that works together on the same vision. Everybody
can help, everybody can benefit. So bring on everybody that shares our
worries.


To get started I'd suggest to think about how one can mail without data
retention restrictions. Any ideas? Anything we need?

Cheers,


Brenno de Winter
Skype: brennodewinter
MSN: brenno&lt; at &gt;dewinter.com
Jabber: brenno&lt; at &gt;jabber.org
Twitter: brenno
</description>
    <dc:creator>Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter, wgasa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-14T09:06:33</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12441">
    <title>Research Project: Legislation that impactsinformation rights</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12441</link>
    <description>
Greetings,

As Ilan and I attempt to document all of the various ways that the US 
government has tweaked (butchered?) IP laws, I was wondering if anyone can 
help pull together the pieces of legislation that I should look at. So far, 
I have these:

Federal government -

DMCA 1998
Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2007 (HR811)
FAIR USE Act of 2007 ( H.R. 1201)
PERFORM Act  (S. 256)
Open Government Act 2007 (S. 849 / H.R. 1309)
Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO IP) Act of 2007
H.R.1908 - Patent Reform Act of 2007
The Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act of 2004  (S.2560)
Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act of 2003 (HR 107)
Digital Media Consumer's Rights Act of 2005 (H.R.1201)
H.R. 3155: Intellectual Property Enhanced Criminal Enforcement Act of
2007
H. Res. 231, H.Res. 169,  and (H.R. 170 the Sunlight Act of 2007)

And on a California state level:

California Induce Act SB 96 (2005)
California  AB1668 - ODF / Open Standards in Government


If you can think of any more, whether on a state or federal level, I
would appreciate it. Basically, we're researching who supported and voted
for these bills, and which lobbyist groups supported which politicians.
We will then publish the information at http://deki.bytesfree.org/
 
One bill that comes to mind that I may have missed is the Sonny Bono
copyright act. But basically, we're looking for any legislation, good or
bad, which has had an impact on our ability to access and utilize
information. 

-JM
</description>
    <dc:creator>John Mark Walker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-09T08:48:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12438">
    <title>BytesFree.org Call for Participation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.elitists/12438</link>
    <description>
Greetings, 

We at BytesFree.org are putting out a call for participation and wanted
to share with LUG's and other Free Software-friendly groups what we are 
up to and why we need your help. We are currently in the process of, but 
have not yet completed, incorporating as a non-profit in California. 

If you're going to Lug Radio Live this weekend, we hope to see you in
our booth: http://lugradio.org/live/USA2008/


Our Mission

BytesFree.org is a group of concerned citizens dedicated to the
protection of information rights - the right to access information we
own. Some of us you may already know - myself, Ilan Rabinovitch from
SCALE, Deb Bryant from GOSCON, Josh Berkus from PostgreSQL, Sun and SPI,
Josh Drake from PostgreSQL and SPI, and David Fetter, also from PostgreSQL,
as well as a few others. As far as what we do, here's our mission statement:

    BytesFree.org is dedicated to the idea that all people should have full
and unrestricted access to all information to which they are legally or
morally entitled. BytesFree.org works to ensure that public data is
available to all, unburdened by restrictive access methods, non-standard
file formats, unreasonable fees, unnecessary bureaucratic delays, or
unpalatable legal requirements.


But wait, don't we already have that?

No, actually, and this exacts a societal toll that goes largely unnoticed.
For further reading, see the following pages:

 - BytesFree.org About page
   http://www.bytesfree.org/bfblog/index.php/about/

 - BytesFree.org Position Paper
   http://www.bytesfree.org/wiki/index.php/RightsPaper


Lug Radio Live

Our first event will be Lug Radio Live this Saturday and Sunday at the
Metreon in San Francisco. If you are willing, we could use your help in
the booth handing out flyers and talking to people about why these
issues are important.

If you're really super special, you'll volunteer to dress up as the
statue of liberty. I myself am going as Uncle Sam, and my
partner-in-crime, Ilan, is going as Abe Lincoln. 

If interested send me an email, or sign up on this page:
http://www.bytesfree.org/wiki/index.php/Lug_Radio_Live_Volunteers

If you can't volunteer, we hope you'll still visit. We look forward to 
meeting you there!


Support BytesFree.org

As of now, there are a couple of ways to get involved with BytesFree.org. 
Please consider joining the bytesfree-discuss mailing list:
http://www.bytesfree.org/mailman/listinfo/bytesfree-discuss

You may also subscribe to our blog feed:
http://www.bytesfree.org/bfblog/index.php/feed/

This weekend we will announce a voter information project, which will
contain information on members of congress with respect to their voting
records, funding sources, and more, as it pertains to copyright reform,
patent reform, net neutrality, and anything else we categorize as 
information rights. Ilan has been doing some great work there with a 
DekiWiki install, blending a myriad of information.

If you know of any congressional or state legislature bills that we
should obtain voting records for, please tell us. If you know of public
stances taken by political candidates or officeholders, we want to know
that, too. Basically, we need any information that will help voters
determine whether someone is a friend of information rights. This project 
will only be as valuable as the information that others provide. 

If you have any thoughts, questions, or ideas, please do not hesitate to
contact me directly or post to the mailing list.

Thanks!
John Mark
Founder, BytesFree.org
</description>
    <dc:creator>John Mark Walker</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-08T06:21:16</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.elitists">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.elitists</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
