http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8721 <pre>Dear mantainers, recent upgrade of gawk in squeeze-backports breaks, as in subject, "so-to-root". I noticed the problem trying to run synaptic. The output is: $ su-to-root -X -c /usr/sbin/synaptic awk: error while loading shared libraries: libsigsegv.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory head: errore di scrittura: Pipe rotta awk: error while loading shared libraries: libsigsegv.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory head: errore di scrittura: Pipe rotta No protocol specified (synaptic:20340): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 Downgrading to squeeze version solves the problem. Hi and thanks for all, Domenico </pre> Domenico Cufalo 2012-05-25T11:19:45 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8719 <pre>Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for my conky and conky-all packages. Both are already present in squeeze-backports; this RFS just brings them up-to-date with the current version in testing. Thanks in advance! http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7303069/debian/conky-bpo/conky_1.9.0-2~bpo60+1.dsc http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7303069/debian/conky-all-bpo/conky-all_1.9.0-2~bpo60+1.dsc Kind regards, Vincent </pre> Vincent Cheng 2012-05-24T06:43:46 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8717 <pre>Package: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 Version: 3.2.15-1~bpo60+1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-backports&lt; at &gt;lists.debian.org I am using squeeze with a bpo-kernel (3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64). Wake-on-lan is not working with the r8169 driver when the computer is off. It is working with suspend-to-ram. And it is working with the squeeze-kernel. Additionaly I tried with a 3.3-kernel from experimental, which does not work, either. Looking through the web brings no definite solution. The closest one I can find is http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/208170. Please let me know if you need more information, or when I can test something. The corresponding thread in the backports-list is http://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2012/05/msg00051.html which gives me the advice to post the bug here. Greetings, Wolfgang </pre> Wolfgang Kroener 2012-05-23T11:41:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8715 <pre>Hi everyone! Zabbix 2.0 is out :) Is it possible to get a backport of this ? Thanks, Mathieu </pre> Mathieu 2012-05-23T09:32:25 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8712 <pre>Hi, I am using squeeze with a bpo-kernel (3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64). Wake-on-lan is not working with the r8169 driver when the computer is off. It is working with suspend-to-ram. And it is working with the squeeze-kernel. Looking through the web brings no definite solution. The closest one I can find is http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/208170. Should I open a bugreport at bugs.debian.org? Do you need more information? Greetings, Wolfgang </pre> Wolfgang Kroener 2012-05-22T09:18:21 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8705 <pre>Hi, I have backported backintime for my own usage. The packages are available at : http://gilles.tk/~julien/squeeze-backports/backintime_1.0.8-1~bpo60+1.dsc I just follow the Contribute page. The package was build without changing anything, except debian/changelog, so I don't know if it worths it... Anyway, feel free to review and upload it to debian-backports. -- Julien Gilles. </pre> jul.gil< at >gmail.com 2012-05-19T15:58:42 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8703 <pre>Hello, is there anyone who want to make a squeeze-backport for the nagiosgrapher package to get rid of the nagios3 only dependency, especially for the icinga users. Thanks Patrik </pre> Patrik Karisch 2012-05-18T13:57:02 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8700 <pre>Hi, Would anybody be interested in backporting gtk2-engines-murrine and murrine-themes from wheezy to squeeze? The newest murrine themes (i.e. Greybird [1]) don't work in squeeze because the murrine engine is too outdated. I tried to manually install the wheezy packages in stable but, as expected, dependencies are not satisfied. Can anybody help? Thanks! [1] http://shimmerproject.org/project/greybird/ </pre> rent0n 2012-05-17T11:01:36 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8698 <pre>Dear debian-backports, I am current maintainer of Buildbot (packages are buildbot and buildbot-slave) which is a great continious integration tool used in lots of free and open source projects like chromium, memcached, twisted and lots of others[1]. There is a really old version in squeeze (0.7.12 which nevertheless does its work) while development does releases every 3 months and introduced a lot of handy features all this time. There is a slowly but steady growing auditory using buildbot in debian[2,3]. There are also some regularily appearing wishlist bugreports for packaging a new upstream version[4,5]. Considering this I believe buildbot and buildbot-slave is worth backporting to squeeze. However buildbot depends on python-migrate &gt;= 0.6.1 which is missing from squeeze and squeeze-backports, that means in order to backport buildbot there's a nedd to backport python-migrate(CC'ing its maintainer). I've found this version dependency only today so the original package is not updated yet. Current testing package of python-migrate builds with no modification against squeeze chroot with backports enabled using cowbuilder. All other tools required by buildbot (like dh_sphinxdoc from python-sphinx) are already available in backports. I'd like to ask you what do you think about it? Would you accept this package in backports? Shall I backport python-migrate by myself or should I ask the original maintainer for it? Currently I'm working on continious building Debian packages of buildbot 'the right way' and going to implement this on the project site and integrate with their continious integration process. If you'd like to see buildbot in action, pleas feel free to browse links from [1]. Or you may look on what I'm implementing right now on this[6] page. [1]: http://trac.buildbot.net/wiki/SuccessStories [2]: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=buildbot [3]: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=buildbot-slave [4]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587313 [5]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638771 [6]: http://buildbot.homeofus.org.ua Thanks in advance, </pre> Andriy Senkovych 2012-05-16T20:10:57 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8697 <pre>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I think I just found a bug in the latest icinga-idoutils 1.6.1-3~bpo60+1 . The init.d script ido2db got changed and now it doesn't start, returning: start-stop-daemon: unrecognized option '--status' start-stop-daemon does not report supporting the --status option as of dpkg version 1.15.8.12 . Replacing the init.d script with the one from from 1.6.1-2~bpo60+1 works again (at least for me!). Regards... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPs61gAAoJED6ZaBUy4WO6SxYQAKsJFpLOq5MGiSV5geCSxfeF Rdlcxx4T1TkZE+qdV9fM6gFQSiU4PTQHjuwLkA7t7oKoQGromCTvD90DNbnKV8tc Nnz+rQajZfMRj9RkvRbhiZOqaoyYX/YnZ8uHiaUoDggOP7GrXc7VyPYBaYgyPUTj TIQlB5PVCzp1QESfqLvMlNz534RiXFd/8ytuzbOwr02fPRJWK7WuLlItZPb+YeCO o4Zckohc+PomjM3hgX1xzMeHogGL8cuRMAkzoZ2cPrJMdYGCI2qmE2MJTTH4Wk8u BF3+/GAMcUG+KkKuoG6sc92Drwze8gW6L8it2UGdJzvwbzeXaK39ssak4DGQl4qt CaODFR61b9pMjtIL1Rdo/WcsLUCNOOm4aIIa8KuXnC+s2vkxF90BqmT+apgfAmC0 VML/ZUKPpNkR1/ewmzzQo+7f/C6DSM+4PTqv8wLXUKUuqQaebKGPtXoph+jfopI6 0EBd4/NjWrFGZL5VfsXXezrioFA4QQSghYPXC0HwAElU9dyPzNIEdF84H5eT2NIo 8XGz6+wXC84K9AD2EZ8x0t8iUsRukcIht2v42PKzYEf+4ja28SzDBnlqGwAFiufX 7xFSyzVvokYbH3jsQPng3IJON0WkYLCZrl+tQPCssgFBr869GvahPSxAGPMsXIy2 6tjhdKJWAbev9UjFqRLr =Hs+r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- </pre> Ezequiel Lara Gómez 2012-05-16T13:36:33 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8693 <pre>I think that major releases of those important pieces of a linux desktop should be backported. Thank you. </pre> Andrea Ratto 2012-05-06T06:18:35 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8692 <pre>Hi there! While re-reading the 'Contribute' webpage, I stumble across the following questions: - is not the dput's configuration useless? &lt;http://backports-master.debian.org/Contribute/#index2h3&gt; Rationale: dput includes the new backport stanza since 0.9.6.2 (and 0.9.6.1+squeeze1), see #595726. - what about previous debian/changelog entries for a package that was in lenny-backports, it has now a major version and it has also changed uploader? &lt;http://backports-master.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3&gt; I initially thought I should simply start with the new prosody_0.8.2 (because the new upstream version was never uploaded to backports), but now at a second lecture I think I should start with the old lenny-backports package and import all the successive versions. The differences between the two methods, if I got it right, should be only in the debian/changelog: ===== luca&lt; at &gt;gismo:~/src/Debian/pkg-lua$ debdiff \ prosody-backports-OLD/prosody_0.8.2-1~bpo60+1.dsc \ ~/var/cache/pbuilder/result/prosody_0.8.2-1~bpo60+1.dsc diff -Nru prosody-0.8.2/debian/changelog prosody-0.8.2/debian/changelog --- prosody-0.8.2/debian/changelog 2012-05-02 20:29:31.000000000 +0200 +++ prosody-0.8.2/debian/changelog 2012-05-15 17:25:02.000000000 +0200 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -4,7 +4,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; * debian/control: + add myself to Uploaders:. - -- Luca Capello &lt;luca&lt; at &gt;pca.it&gt; Wed, 02 May 2012 20:29:31 +0200 + -- Luca Capello &lt;luca&lt; at &gt;pca.it&gt; Tue, 15 May 2012 17:25:02 +0200 prosody (0.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=low &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -35,6 +35,12 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -- Enrico Tassi &lt;gareuselesinge&lt; at &gt;debian.org&gt; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:07:42 +0200 +prosody (0.7.0-1~bpo50+1) lenny-backports; urgency=low + + * Rebuild for lenny-backports. + + -- Bernd Zeimetz &lt;bzed&lt; at &gt;debian.org&gt; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:29:34 +0200 + prosody (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. luca&lt; at &gt;gismo:~/src/Debian/pkg-lua$ ===== Am I right? Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca </pre> Luca Capello 2012-05-15T15:48:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8689 <pre>Hi! $ host backports.debian.org backports.debian.org has address 86.59.118.148 backports.debian.org has address 206.12.19.9 backports.debian.org has IPv6 address 2001:858:2:2:214:22ff:fe0d:7717 backports.debian.org has IPv6 address 2607:f8f0:610:4000:211:25ff:fec4:59ae Release and Release.gpg on 86.59.118.148 and 2607:f8f0:610:4000:211:25ff:fec4:59ae differ from same files on 206.12.19.9 and 2001:858:2:2:214:22ff:fe0d:7717 But there is no guarantee, that Release and Release.gpg will be downloaded from the same server at least in next cases: - client under http 1.0 proxy - client under proxy with load balance. - repo mirrored by http (apt-mirror for example) This lead to "apt-get update" errors: W: GPG error: http://backports.debian.org squeeze-backports Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG AED4B06F473041FA Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (6.0/squeeze) &lt;ftpmaster&lt; at &gt;debian.org&gt; </pre> Alexander Golovko 2012-05-15T09:58:19 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8677 <pre>Hello everybody, I waited five days in the hope a update would appear, but so far nothing yet, so I would like to request a security update :) http://drupal.org/node/1557938 SA-CORE-2012-002 - Drupal core multiple vulnerabilities I also thought drupal6 had some core security updates. Kind regards, Jelle </pre> Jelle de Jong 2012-05-07T11:01:29 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8676 <pre>The following changes to the debian-maintainers keyring have just been activated: ben&lt; at &gt;benfinney.id.au Added key: 2870D307B74688ED2117AA73EBD1C0D4B8D660AF contact&lt; at &gt;thomaspierson.fr Full name: Thomas Pierson Added key: D5EA745C0B1FA932EB5CF7DA771750766E1C720B gawain&lt; at &gt;camlann.de Full name: Christian Welzel Added key: 3688337C0D3E372594ECE4018D52CDE95117E119 jeremy&lt; at &gt;bicha.net Full name: Jeremy Bicha Added key: 4D0BE12F0E4776D8AACE9696E66C775AEBFE6C7D jtaylor.debian&lt; at &gt;googlemail.com Full name: Julian Taylor Added key: 8B77BA48391B3CE51C22953132CC4AAC028756FF lordlamer&lt; at &gt;lordlamer.de Full name: Frank Habermann Added key: 25F3B67F038187D3ADF60A3329E36B9A01ED3AC7 manuel.montezelo&lt; at &gt;gmail.com Removed key: 6829E17471F2974C79DCCE132B807BFBFBE74E9A Added key: 2A8E80505C486298430DD0937F7606A445DCA80E mfv.debian&lt; at &gt;gmail.com Full name: Matteo F. Vescovi Added key: 4E8E810A6B445FDE68DAD0258062398983B2CF7A mitya57&lt; at &gt;gmail.com Full name: Dmitry Shachnev Added key: F24299FF1BBC9018B906A4CB6026936D2F1C8AE0 ryan&lt; at &gt;finnie.org Removed key: B0237C63DF2870AAC3ABC54A299610A9203ECA25 Added key: 42E2C8DE8C173AB102F52C6E7E60A3A686AE8D98 vbkaisetsu&lt; at &gt;gmail.com Full name: Koichi Akabe Added key: 281C6E4D93EFF746CAA9C2E8E40215299C840E81 Debian distribution maintenance software, on behalf of the Keyring maintainers </pre> Debian FTP Masters 2012-05-06T20:35:24 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8669 <pre>Hi, I want to backport sox using pbuilder. It depends on libavcodec-dev &gt;= 4.0.6, when 4.0.8 is in debian-backports. However, pbuilder fails to use the version in backports. How can I make it do that? I added debian-backports repository to the build chroot and updated. However, it does not see the packages there. I asked for pbuilder guys, they advised to use another pbuilder-satisfydepends-something_else[1]. Maybe there is a better way to do it (backport packages that have dependencies which are already backported)? I suspect you, backporters, *must* have come into this situation. Here is the message while building sox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/962374/ And if I execute this command within the extracted buildroot... (pbuilder --login): root&lt; at &gt;pierce:/# apt-cache showpkg libavcodec-dev Package: libavcodec-dev Versions: 4:0.8-2~bpo60+1 (/var/lib/apt/lists/backports.debian.org_debian-backports_dists_squeeze-backports_main_binary-i386_Packages) Description Language: File: /var/lib/apt/lists/backports.debian.org_debian-backports_dists_squeeze-backports_main_binary-i386_Packages MD5: dbbfe8ba88ea77a86c51d6548a08bbe4 4:0.5.6-3 (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.lt.debian.org_debian_dists_squeeze_main_binary-i386_Packages) Description Language: File: /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.lt.debian.org_debian_dists_squeeze_main_binary-i386_Packages MD5: bd72298770f02bc55b0b252be658ad87 Reverse Depends: libavformat-dev,libavcodec-dev 4:0.8-2~bpo60+1 libavfilter-dev,libavcodec-dev 4:0.8-2~bpo60+1 libvtk5-dev,libavcodec-dev libunicapgtk2-dev,libavcodec-dev libunicap2-dev,libavcodec-dev libucil2-dev,libavcodec-dev libhighgui-dev,libavcodec-dev 0.cvs20050918-2 libvalhalla-dev,libavcodec-dev 4:0.5.1 libavformat-dev,libavcodec-dev 4:0.5.6-3 libavfilter-dev,libavcodec-dev 4:0.5.6-3 Dependencies: 4:0.8-2~bpo60+1 - libavcodec53 (17 4:0.8-99) libavcodec-extra-53 (1 4:0.8.99) libavcodec53 (18 4:0.8-2~bpo60+1) libavcodec-extra-53 (2 4:0.8) libavutil-dev (5 4:0.8-2~bpo60+1) libfaad-dev (0 (null)) libgsm1-dev (0 (null)) libogg-dev (0 (null)) libschroedinger-dev (0 (null)) libspeex-dev (0 (null)) libtheora-dev (4 0.0.0.alpha4) libvorbis-dev (0 (null)) libx11-dev (0 (null)) libxext-dev (0 (null)) zlib1g-dev (0 (null)) libraw1394-dev (0 (null)) libdc1394-22-dev (0 (null)) 4:0.5.6-3 - libavcodec52 (18 4:0.5.6-3) libavcodec-extra-52 (2 4:0.5.6) libavcodec52 (17 4:0.5.6-99) libavcodec-extra-52 (1 4:0.5.6-99) libavutil-dev (5 4:0.5.6-3) libfaad-dev (0 (null)) libgsm1-dev (0 (null)) libogg-dev (0 (null)) libschroedinger-dev (0 (null)) libspeex-dev (0 (null)) libtheora-dev (4 0.0.0.alpha4) libvorbis-dev (0 (null)) libx11-dev (0 (null)) libxext-dev (0 (null)) zlib1g-dev (0 (null)) libraw1394-dev (0 (null)) libdc1394-22-dev (0 (null)) Provides: 4:0.8-2~bpo60+1 - 4:0.5.6-3 - Reverse Provides: [1]: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.packages.pbuilder.devel/4198 Thanks a lot, Motiejus Jakštys </pre> Motiejus Jakštys 2012-05-02T13:38:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8667 <pre>I've successfully built and installed sqlitebrowser from wheezy on squeeze. The only difference was to install debhelper from backports to reach compat 9 and then build against squeeze. sqlitebrowser in squeeze runs but looks very ugly as it is using Qt3 compatibility and lines of text overlap vertically. (I can provide a bug report for that, if required.) </pre> Neil Williams 2012-05-02T07:54:05 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8664 <pre>URL:  http://packages.debian.org/squeeze-backports/puppet-testsuite When I attempted to install the puppet-testsuite with the command: apt-get -t squeeze-backports install puppet-testsuite I got the error: puppet-testsuite : Depends: ruby-sqlite3 but it is not installable When I looked at the puppet-testsuite url it looks like there are 4 packages listed that are "not available" </pre> Renzo T 2012-05-01T22:52:47 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8661 <pre>In case some you you would worry: yes, I'm dealing with updating samba backport to 3.6.5 to fix CVE 2012-2111. Steve Langasek took care of updating samba in squeeze, now I'm handling the update for unstable and once done, I'll work on a backport, as usual. </pre> Christian PERRIER 2012-05-01T05:29:42 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8660 <pre>Dear all, I was wondering if a backport of gnuplot 4.6 to Squeeze could be possible? The new version has many many improvements in font handling, new terminals (e.g. qt terminal). Also it fixes several annoying bugs in the 4.4.0 stable version. Thanks Andres </pre> Andres Cimmarusti 2012-04-30T22:07:42 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.backports.general/8654 <pre>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Varnish maintainers, do you think it's possible to provide a varnish backport on squeeze-backports. As we are ~2 month til freeze for wheezy, there shouldn't hopefully so much work on maintaining it there. Many thanks, Jan. - -- Never write mail to &lt;waja&lt; at &gt;spamfalle.info&gt;, you have been warned! - -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ - ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPnoG/9u6Dud+QFyQRAkSJAJ0cV5qOwAoO9LaqjrLfJHribhU2gwCfT2zo mKf6akPJWefpVcdyhklu1wY= =0beM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- </pre> Jan Wagner 2012-04-30T12:12:51 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.debian.backports.general