<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats">
    <title>gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6517"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6515"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6514"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6513"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6512"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6500"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6497"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6485"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6484"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6481"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6479"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6478"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6477"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6472"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6471"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6469"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6468"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6465"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6458"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6446"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6517">
    <title>Sounding off on the 40 % bit</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6517</link>
    <description>Attention all readers, 
 
If you stick with a "constant" that you think may apply to all nature you may 
run a risk and come across as being a dufuss (dufiss?). Ther ARE contants 
that occur in nature (like Plank's constant or G) and two of the most common 
constants in nature both apply to what we're doing here. Anyone want to guess what 
they are? One of them is arguably the most common...
 
Hint: one applies to anything that oscillates; the other is involved in the 
solutions of differential equations and pops up in trancendental functions. 
 
Anyone want to guess?
 
Anyway the "dufiss_risk" is trying to paste a constant onto a ratio of 
monohull to catamaran. Especially without any mention of initial conditions. Are the 
hulls like bathtubs? Are they as long as they structurally can be? Are we 
talking about power? Speed? Are there any other hull parameters ? Like the 
ability to turn?  What about hull wave interference and how far they are apart vs. 
how much structural weight for the catamaran? Next exercise will be jumping to 
conclusions.....Ready.....BEGIN, ...........and one and two and.....
 
The last thing I have to sayt on this subject is that after all the sophist 
crazy-talk, nobody has yet mentioned that the fastest time in an IHPVA/ 
Hydrobowl type flying start time trap is held by "close to perfection" with a time of 
eighteen seconds and some change for 100 meters by a pedal powered propeller 
boat. Perhaps a short-term-archive, long-term-chatterer would like to tell us 
what type of boat she is!!!!!
 
Yup. Close to Perfection is a catamaran.
 
 
 
jake 



**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
</description>
    <dc:creator>FreeEntTec-YDxpq3io04c&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-28T03:39:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6515">
    <title>V11J</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6515</link>
    <description>I posted some pictures of my latest variant of the V11 hull on the  
bottom of this page:
http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/showthread.php?t=23345&amp;page=6
The boat hull is made with glass/epoxy on 3mm Klegecell foam using  
the old hull as a male plug.  Total weight is 23kg.  It has twin  
"dipping" rudders that I am pleased with.

Rick Willoughby

</description>
    <dc:creator>Rick Willoughby</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-09T13:59:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6514">
    <title>(unknown)</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6514</link>
    <description>

Rick Willoughby
rickwill-bzGI/hKkdgQnC9Muvcwxkw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org
03 9796 2415
0419 104 821


</description>
    <dc:creator>Rick Willoughby</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-05T21:52:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6513">
    <title>Mono vs cat (both optimized)chart?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6513</link>
    <description>Larry
Too many options for a chart.  Also I an update of Godzilla that  
produces very interesting monohulls that work well when operated  
below hull speed.  So I can nor produce better shape monos with a  
length constraint.  They are very odd shapes that I am trying to  
understand.

Rick Willoughby
r


</description>
    <dc:creator>Rick Willoughby</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-04T21:37:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6512">
    <title>Hpv-boat Archived files</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6512</link>
    <description>














If anyone is interested, here is a link to a web archive server that has a lot of the early hpv-boat forum discussions:
 




http://web.archive.org/web/20050403170308/www.ihpva.org/pipermail/hpv-boats/ 


  
 It doesn't seem to have everything but there are a lot of discussions available. Also the server seems to get bogged down occassionally but try again in a few minutes. It's a great source for finding old web pages. Here is the link to the archive server: 
  
http://www.archive.org/index.php 
  
I also have about 2000 old posts going back to September of 2005 if someone needs specific information on a subject. 
  
Bruce Plazyk 
 
</description>
    <dc:creator>bruceplazyk-h1JbOMMV3WBtdF/iL03xVDBc0kxJFkfs&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-04T18:20:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6500">
    <title>gmane boat link</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6500</link>
    <description>Peter
Go to this link:
feed://rss.gmane.org/messages/excerpts/ 
gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats
The old IHPVA site is no longer supported and we seem to have lost a  
lot of history.  The gmane link has some data.

I have started a pedal powered boat thread at www.boatdesign.net.  It  
is a very good site.  Just register and away you go.  You can post  
images and video on that site.  It has a huge data resource.

I have been on the journey of understanding for about 5 years now and  
am happy to pass on what I have learnt.

I have spent a lot of my life on water for recreation and some work  
but I have not had as much pleasure as I get from  my various  
pedalled craft.  I think it is a largely untapped frontier of  
development.  Hope you find it enjoyable.  You have to dare to be  
different to get satisfaction from it.  So there are no dumb ideas or  
questions.

Rick Willoughby


</description>
    <dc:creator>Rick Willoughby</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-04T00:13:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6497">
    <title>Efficiency &amp; Marketability</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6497</link>
    <description>Larry
&lt;
I don't imagine myself, with this ramble, to be telling most members
of this group anything they don't know, ...only to be speaking out
for more consistent balance in appraisal,... for recognition and
keeping-in-mind of the fact that efficiency, as measured by
speed-for-effort, is simply one-of, not THE consideration when
judging a proposed design, ...unless the activity-scope is narrowed
to racing.
 &gt;

I do not disagree with what you have to say.  I have both cat and  
mono.  Horses for courses.

Not sure if you read Pete's web site.  It is directed at efficiency  
in the narrower sense of speed for power.

The comment on the Rocat is based on posts from Christopher Laughton  
some time ago.  I believe it is not widely known that catamarans  
suffer a 40% power disadvantage. I also have read a race report from  
a Rocat owner that indicated he was not initially aware he would be  
giving away so much to a monohull.  His expectations were not met.

All Hobie do is prove they have high bollard pull and they have used  
this as a real selling point.  Most owners are recreational users  
just out for time on the water.  On the other hand I have seen Hobie  
owners bitterly disappointed when they have been racing against  
conventional paddled canoes.

My wife just loved Mike Lampi's Nauticraft.  She has never tried one  
of my boats.  I have a good understanding there are horses for  
courses.   On the other hand I was not interested in trying the  
Nauticraft as I had the use of the Cadence.  I will put up with the  
twitchiness for the ability to hit 10+mph.

I was simply stating facts about efficiency with respect to hulls and  
propulsion systems.  Not saying any particular system is ideal to the  
exclusion of others.

Rick Willoughby


</description>
    <dc:creator>Rick Willoughby</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-03T22:27:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6485">
    <title>oar+some pedal paddled cataraman</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6485</link>
    <description>Hi All,

Oar+Some is a boat concept and design project. In essence it is a human
powered (you pedal it), catamaran designed for speed. Think of it as a top
notch, high performance touring bicycle for water.

Computer models, virtual video and discussion here:
http://peterhoward42.blogspot.com/2008/03/oarsome-virtual-photo-album.html

Regards

Pete Howard


</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Howard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-02T17:50:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6484">
    <title>24 hour HPB record</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6484</link>
    <description>Hi - not sure how many of you have been following my latest progress, so I
thought I would give you a quick update for anyone interested. I hit 16 kph
(10 mph) the other day, and finished a 5 hour circuit on the lake here with
11.4 km/hr average speed (7 mph, 35 miles)

http://www.adventuresofgreg.com/HPB/uploaded_images/P7200014-728295.JPG

More pictures and a video of the 10 mph run here:
http://www.adventuresofgreg.com/HPB/2008/07/fairing-test-10-mph.html

Greg K
</description>
    <dc:creator>Greg Kolodziejzyk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-22T22:48:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6481">
    <title>Displacement hydrofoils</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6481</link>
    <description>Most hydrofoil designs have relatively thin bladed foils for "flying"
mode and auxiliary floats for "floating" mode.

Does anyone know of any designs that have fatter foils that make
flying more of a cross between the two modes? If so, how is the
overall performance?

Could this be an option for a long distance hydrofoil design that
wouldn't require superhuman strength and endurance?

Michael Lampi

</description>
    <dc:creator>hpv-boats-8YlNjWPNNtQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-19T16:50:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6479">
    <title>Open Sourcery iii codes</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6479</link>
    <description>Bob, all,
 
I have been working on a building for too long now and there are good and bad 
about codes. The good is that it sifts out some problems in safety , corner 
cutting, etc. Good for safety. I make sure as best as I can that I'm anal about 
quality. If the code specifies a certain structural size or insulation 
amount, I usually end up a notch or two over the spec .It is not so bad to have a 
staircase a little wider (carry up hydrofoil) or make the place a little less 
expensive to keep warm, or have the place jiggle less when you jump up and down 
on the second floor.
 
Also good for not having to worry about a hog farm next to your condo 
complex, a dog kennel  (constant barking) next door...
 
 
Bad thing is the idea of having to report to someone about all your stuff 
sounds sort of a combination of buraeucratic and dictitorial...
 
Oh well....
 
jake



**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!      
(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)
</description>
    <dc:creator>FreeEntTec-YDxpq3io04c&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-16T22:54:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6478">
    <title>Open Sourcery ii Drive Unit Foot Ergo Specifications for Catamaran, Proa, etc.</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6478</link>
    <description>Giu - 2
 
Parameters may include ergonometrics for the feet. 
 
In your site, the model sitting on the Talssociclo is qualified as very OK 
(grin), but there have to be some parameters you have to address. 
 
Heel clearance: if it's too low, cyclists who want to stay dry won't in 
wether that you could still navigate in. In other words, it is wavy out, but not 
enough to be scared about, or force you to come ashore. The height of the heels 
above the water should address this. It is amazing how many boats I've seen 
and ridden have not addressed this tradeoff. OTOH, if the pedal bracket is too 
high the butt placement will get driven up too far and the CG will be too high 
and so on.
 
The relationship should be Water to heel at the lowest part of the pedal 
stroke, centering that to the pedal bracket, 
 
pedal bracket to the seat bottom!  Which indirectly influences the width of 
the hulls!
 
Mount Standardization. There should be a vertical-plane spec. that includes a 
tolerance to being vertical and perpendicular to the seat. In other words, 
dimensionally how close, how far off can it be from being vertical, and how 
close does the seat have to be to being horizontal. In the old days, I had 
terrible pain from not being lined up with the pedals closely enough. Now I use 
machine tolerances. Further, there should be some kind if indexing method to keep 
the drive in spec. I use vertical plane with a curvy edge that absorbs the 
extra real estate that the drive needs for strength . There is a vertical channel 
in my mount but is for bolt clearances particular to my drive.
 
The Carignani Kickup parallels traditions going back to the first outboard 
motor  (Evenrude), and is an increadibly innovative pedal powered boat 
component. It allows for kick up,relates to the cyclist being easy to clean out weeds 
when they're cought,  has few parts, is light, and has clearance with 
minimalistic material and weight. The one in your latest version may have the pivoting 
axis too far down and too close. Problem here may be that if she (your model 
that is) pushes too hard on the pedals the unit may kick fwd. If that is not a 
problem, overhung forces on the bolt bracket WILL be! And here is a real 
challenge. The cross bar (aiko) may be too close to the path of the foot in a pedal 
stroke. I would recomend that there be at least three, maybe 5 inches space 
around any tow path (heel paths against a floor need 6.5 inches from a size 14 
shoe (i.e. HUGE heel), for butt-pedal bracket relationships in our type 
seating. The best example for this may be akin to running through a doorway 1,5 
inches above your head as fast as possible. Your natural instinct would be to 
duck. On the same token, pedalers should not encounter bars, braces, etc too close 
to the pedal path; these protruberances will intimidate them too much (there 
is already enough intimidation  ;-)      ).
 
I may sound prickly here but if you want a standard that will last, all those 
pissy little details will have to be worked beyond any doubt. My solution for 
the counterbalance problem would be to make the mount bracket up high right 
under the pedal bracket part of the drive unit. I solve any rotation problems 
by using 4 or 5 bolts, but you could take it to some sort of ledge just as 
easy. Pedal path clearance dimensions should take you back to an aiko with an arm 
growing out of it that lets your feet/toes plunge through, kicks up and has 
super amount of side to side torque absorbtion, both with the axis in line with 
the aiko and *SKEWED FOR WHEN THE DRIVE UNIT HITS AN OBJECT FROM THE SIDE!!!. 
This means that the arm should be torsionally strong enough to flip the boat 
in lever relationship with the drive, instead of breaking off! The arm should 
grow right into where the pedal bracket is so there is no overhung forces in 
the pedal-pushing. 
 
Note: Tradeooff: This flipping requirement may dictate narrowing the hulls 
some; wave interference at speed will dictate widening them. On OP-1 (Outrigger, 
pedaled, one seat) the amma is obviously too far to be included in this spec, 
but the main hull surely is within it!
 
So what seemed to be a very simple part has evolved to what has to be a very 
light very diverse multifunctioning part. The last one I made was maybe a kilo 
or two.
 
Hope that clarifies with the positioning, the ergonomics and the mounting of 
a daggerboard drive!
 
Don't forget to talk up the Shutt Memorial,
 
 
best, 
jake
 
 



**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!      
(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)
</description>
    <dc:creator>FreeEntTec-YDxpq3io04c&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-16T22:38:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6477">
    <title>Open Source Water bike</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6477</link>
    <description>Giuseppe, Bob,
 
I agree that there would be varieties of a class of boat (such as a HP 
catamaran), and it would be good to establish a group of PARAMETERS, variables in 
the design, and PRIORITIZE them. What are the most important? What complete 
class branches can or must we come up with? i.e. a catamaran pack boat is one that 
is important enough to pursue? Or one that I hear the most, speed...? I too 
have been introducung additional parameters (other than speed that is) to this 
sport. High on the list includes 
 
*habitability, comfort
 
*ease of takedown, assembly
 
*efficiency  (the late Bill Murphy won a "captains surprise" at the race one 
time by having his rig rotate the most times when spun)
 
*Well made!! Long lasting, dependable etc.
 
*Low maintenance: I ran a hydrofoil in the '90s that took more energy to set 
up and keep tuned than to run. But the head-turning factor was worth it    ;-)
 
While some concepts related to open source really creep me out like politics, 
charlotinism, stealing of intellectual property, I have to wonder if I'm a 
Linous Torvolds or a Bill Gates kind of guy. (BTW, Giuseppe, You're not off the 
hook for goung over those issues just mentioned ;-)    ). Also, there may a 
lot to be said about a limited partnership with well recruited talent, clear 
goals in mind.
 
Discussing some of these things in the open (again) may not be like an 
argument in a committee (scary) but more of a concensus. I would not want to make 
products that no one would want to buy anyway......
 
See next.    .    .    .
 
jake
 
 



**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!      
(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)
</description>
    <dc:creator>FreeEntTec-YDxpq3io04c&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-16T22:38:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6472">
    <title>gmane bikelist board</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6472</link>
    <description>The gmane board seems a poor service.  The history gets lost and the  
board goes down regularly.

I suggest the HPBers take a look at:
http://boatdesign.net/forums/
This seems to offer a very good alternative.  There is some nonsense  
on the site but it provides an excellent platform.  It will accept  
all manner of files so very easy to post photos and video clips.   
Very rarely goes down.  Has an extensive following and a wide range  
of knowledge.

Also as fuel prices soar there are a lot of boaties looking for less  
expensive ways to get on the water.  Human power is gaining  
increasing use.  Still not many convinced on the virtues of pedal  
power but that is something we can  lead.

I will start a new thread for pedal power.


Rick Willoughby


</description>
    <dc:creator>Rick Willoughby</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-15T00:32:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6471">
    <title>Open Source Water bike</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6471</link>
    <description>QUESTIONS FOR GIUSEPPE:
 
Hey guys,
 
I would do a metaphor of boat building and inventing to musical  performance. 
Sometimes yopu have a symphony. Lots of differing individuals with  varying 
degrees of talent, and fur sure differing specialties. If you propose an  open 
source, how would you treat musicians with seniority? Now for the "64.00  
question": What about virtuosos? Who would conduct the symphony? 
 
There are other parallels; What about a sports team. Perhaps there are only  
a given number of openings on the team...? Who would coach? who would play 
what  position?
 
More questions later. Next subject: intellectual property
 
jake
 
 



**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!      
(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)
</description>
    <dc:creator>FreeEntTec-YDxpq3io04c&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-14T20:49:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6469">
    <title>Shutt Memorial Hydrobowl!!</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6469</link>
    <description>H T M L     on      the    Run
 
 
 
Dear Friends,
 
The Elkhart race for this year is ON!!
 
It is on July 26th. Link is here:
 
_http://members.aol.com/jfreeent/SMHBL01.htm_ 
(http://members.aol.com/jfreeent/SMHBL01.htm) 
 
jake



**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!      
(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)
</description>
    <dc:creator>FreeEntTec-YDxpq3io04c&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-14T20:33:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6468">
    <title>New drive leg</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6468</link>
    <description>Finished my drive leg and worked ok, boat was not as fast

but at least it worked. It consists of an involute gear box 

angled at 45 deg with two universal joints connected to a 

450mm prop. The boat was a bit slower than with the shaft 

and drive in the boat, advantage was transport and turned a 

lot tighter probably from having the prop in the middle and

not at the end. Disadvantage was the big hole (100mm x 1000mm)

to fit the drive leg, this has weakened the boat and when 

pedaling hard the drive wobbles a bit to the point where I 

sprang a few small leaks. One problem in raising the drive 

leg was getting the prop into the vertical position to lift it 

through the hole, without the outriggers I would have gone 

for a swim.



Ian Cassell
</description>
    <dc:creator>Ian Cassell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-10T00:41:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6465">
    <title>ELKHART RACE</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6465</link>
    <description>
Hey Everybody,
 
Sorry for being a little too silent lately, Will come up with stuff about  
Giuseppe community boat and MOLOKAI.
 
Meanwhile, the Elkhart race has just been approved!
 
It is the SHUTT MEMORIAL HYDROBOWL in Elkhart Indiana on Jul.  26.
 
More later, reserve the date!
 
jake.



**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.      (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
</description>
    <dc:creator>FreeEntTec-YDxpq3io04c&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-30T21:19:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6458">
    <title>Open water bike</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6458</link>
    <description>Giuseppe
               How do your drive legs work? Do you
use gears, chains, belts or whatever. To me the start
point for your open water bike project should be a
reliable drive leg that could be fitted to any type of
boat, the variable would be a range of different 
propellers to suit speed and power.
               I am making a driveleg using an involute
gear box with a 3:1 gearing, the gearbox is angled 
at 45 degrees with two universal joints connecting
to the propeller so the prop spins vertically.
               My boat is a 5 metre monohull with
outriggers, it has a centreboard casing for the driveleg
and hopefully this should work (nearly finished). If
you would like some pics let me know.

Ian Cassell
</description>
    <dc:creator>Ian Cassell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-13T03:55:50</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6446">
    <title>The Open Waterbike Project revised</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6446</link>
    <description>Dear colleagues and friends

I have carefully considered all your comments of The Open Waterbike
Project and I have therefore revised the project and updated the
website. Most of the comments made sense to me, and this shows that
often strong criticism is often  more useful than praise...
I hope I have provided an answer to Alex et al.
(who said: ...I'd really like to ask what the aim of any OpenSource
boat is first, because without that I really do think it's a
no-goer...)
at the page, in which I tried to summarize the requirements of an Open
Waterbike:

http://www.openwaterbike.com/architecture/the-open-waterbike-requirements

and I'd really appreciate your opinion!

I'd like also to stress that racing HPVs and leisure HPVs are possibly
not as far apart as Alex believes, as all the history of technological
change, e.g. the history of the bycicle, shows.

Finally, I'd like to comment of who said that we don't need an 'Open
Waterbike' since we have already some nice mass-produced pedal-boats
like the Hobie Mirage.
The is like saying that we didn't need Linux since we already had that
nice operating system, Microsoft's MS-Dos (and later Windows), we
didn't need Wikipedia since we already had that authoritative
encyclopedia, the Britannica.

Well, I don't agree. Do you?

Giuseppe
</description>
    <dc:creator>Giuseppe Carignani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-09T09:44:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6443">
    <title>catamaran waterbike on the waves...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats/6443</link>
    <description>Giuseppe
I posted a reply to this on my travels but it did not get through.   
You should look at the Rocat hulls:
http://www.rocat.co.uk/
You would need to mount the pod to face forward and also provide good  
fairing on it but the boat has proven safe in heavy conditions.   
There may be hulls available as I believe they stopped production.   
The boat would be a better performer in rough water with pedal  
power.  Remember you are giving away a lot of performance to s  
stabilised single hull.  The cat will require about 40% more power  
for the same speed as a good mono with outriggers.

It is similar in basic dimensions to my V4 boat:
http://www.rickwill.bigpondhosting.com/web_photos_video/video_v4.wmv
It is quite safe in rough water but gets very wet because there is no  
fairing in front of the seat.   The front cross brace punches through  
waves and makes it very wet.

Rick Willoughby
rickwill-bzGI/hKkdgQnC9Muvcwxkw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org
03 9796 2415
0419 104 821


</description>
    <dc:creator>Rick Willoughby</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-08T04:13:23</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.culture.transportation.humanpowered.boats</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
