gmane.comp.php.simpletest.general

Error in PHP Unt test

arpit agarwal — 2008-12-02T06:27:54

Hi, I have followed all proper steps stated in Read me and all are successfully done but there are no option is coming in eclipse while creating a ner project as sample as stated in Docs. And while i am trying to Run Test Case as Run As Simple test as option started coming Its giving error Running: echo "addTestFile($fullpath);$test->run(new XmlReporter()); ?>" | "C:\Program Files\PHP\php.exe" -q -c "C:\Program Files\PHP\php.ini" ************* Process returned: 255 Process error: PHP Warning: include_once(eclipse.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Documents and Settings\arpit716\Local Settings\Temp\Simpletest14634.php on line 1 PHP Stack trace: PHP 1. {main}() C:\Documents and Settings\arpit716\Local Settings\Temp\Simpletest14634.php:0 PHP Warning: include_once(): Failed opening 'eclipse.php' for inclusion (include_path='.;C:\php5\pear;C:\simpletest_1.0.1.eclipse_0.2.4\plugins') in C:\Documents and Settings\arpit716\Local Settings\Temp\Simpletest14634.php on line 1 PHP Stack trace: PHP 1. {main}() C:\Documents and Settings\arpit716\Local Settings\Temp\Simpletest14634.php:0 PHP Fatal error: Class 'GroupTest' not found in C:\Documents and Settings\arpit716\Local Settings\Temp\Simpletest14634.php on line 1 PHP Stack trace: PHP 1. {main}() C:\Documents and Settings\arpit716\Local Settings\Temp\Simpletest14634.php:0 Read error:Read error [Ljava.lang.StackTraceElement;< at >1220c1b Please find out the problem if any in Installation.Lookin forword for positive responce Thanks Arpit Agarwal (+91)9899655375 Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Simpletest-support mailing list Simpletest-support< at >lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simpletest-support

Mock functions?

Douglas Hubler — 2008-11-09T01:55:29

I find mock functions useful because many times I'm writing code that interfaces with functions and not other objects. I found I could mock functions with the library http://code.google.com/p/php-mock-function/ without requiring runkit. Instead I run my tests each in their own process and control the include files and it works great. The php-mock-function library is very alpha and hasn't taken off. Anyway, I just want to start a conversation on the subject. What are others using? Reference http://www.workhabit.com/labs/mock-function-testing-drupal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Global variables between tests/setup

Taras Diakiw — 2008-10-27T15:06:36

Hi everyone, I have a configuration file, which is required_once, and sets a global variable called 'root_path'. However, when simpletest runs the third test in a test suite, root_path is unitialised. I am certain that root_path does, in fact, get set to something prior to this point, as I have set up a break point at the line which sets root_path (which gets hit). config.php ------------- $root_path = 'blah'; and then SimpleTest will load FooUnitTest as part of the 'All' Test Suite FooUnitTest --------------- require_once('config.php'); // doesn't get included... config.php is included as part of the Test Prolog require_once($root_path.'Bar.php'); // fails because the $root_path global variable is unitialised at this stage I was wondering if SimpleTest changes global variables between unit tests. This is the only explanation of the $root_path variable being unitialised that I can think of, as my code does not explicitly unset it. If, in fact, SimpleTest *does* unset all of the global variables between unit tests, shouldn't it also reset the state of whether files have been included or not. After the following line in the 'load' function in test_case.php gets run: $existing_globals = get_defined_vars(); include_once($test_file); $existing_globals does not contain the $root_path variable.. ? Taras Diakiw Software Developer Practical Law Company T: +44 (0) 20 7202 1200 ext 5629 F: +44 (0) 20 7202 1211 W: http://www.practicallaw.com This e-mail from Practical Law Company (http://www.practicallaw.com) is subject to our terms of use (http://www.practicallaw.com/9-103-0884). Information about our companies: Practical Law Company Limited. Registered in England and Wales. Registered Number: 02889191. Registered Office: 19 Hatfields, London SE1 8DJ. Telephone: +44(0)20 7202 1200. Practical Law Company, Inc. Incorporated in Delaware, USA. Corporate Office: 747 Third Avenue, 36th Floor, New York, NY 10017. Telephone: +1(646) 562-3400. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Can simpletest print out the value that causesfailure?

YC — 2008-10-17T05:32:54

Hi all, I'm new to simple test. I've a ValidationManager that has one function to validate names. I've written testIsValidName to be: function testIsValidName(){ Is this the right way to go about it? I was thinking of creating an array of names and then using foreach() to run through each name. That will save me time from coding so many lines. But the thing is when there's a failure, I won't know which line, hence value, causes the failure. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Code coverage

tarjei — 2008-10-03T08:35:50

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, does anyone have any tips on how to get coverage data out of simpletest? Tarjei -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI5dlmYVRKCnSvzfIRAqKQAJ4knchkPUS69GSzPOoStNbScKUwUwCgsv0G bH5HR337pS963RzkzmeAzMQ= =n6sh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

simpletest.org vs. htmlspecialchars

troels knak-nielsen — 2008-10-04T14:38:57

Hi, Currently, all documentation on simpletest.org is double-encoded, so -> becomes -> thereby making the code samples rather unreadable. -- troels ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

MultipleExpectation

Travis Swicegood — 2008-10-02T22:10:46

Hey all... Is there a reason we don't ship with a MultipleException decorator that takes N expectations and passes if they all pass? -T ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

twist testing

Mark Rickerby — 2008-09-30T07:20:14

http://studios.thoughtworks.com/twist-agile-test-automation/writing-tests *cough*... arbiter ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Web form submitting

Claude Paroz — 2008-09-23T18:58:48

Hi, I'm probably missing something very obvious, but I can't figure it out. I'm testing a Web form with SimpleTest (the form currently works well on the Web), and when I do a $this->clickSubmit('Envoyer');, I'm getting a "403 Forbidden" error (You don't have permission to access /folder/file.php on this server). That's strange, because if I do a simple get() with the same destination as the form action URL, I'm getting the page (with an error in the page content because there is no form data, of course). I'm suspecting the problem is with the interpretation of the root (/) on the server. Is it possible to tell SimpleTest to prefix all URLs with the absolute path, including the domain name? Claude ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

More < at >var phpdoc tags for private variables

Perrick Penet — 2008-09-11T19:31:44

Hi everyone, Chris asked on the bugs tracker for < at >var phpdoc tags. On the devel-mailing list, Travis answered we were not going to implement this feature for a bunch of entirely good reasons (see his answer below). However whenever I'm in the middle of a debugging session -- again a few minutes ago trying to correct a problem with assertNoCookies -- I found these Eclipse shortcuts really useful when navigating to the root cause. So I'd be tempted to add them anyway. What do you think ? Yours, Perrick -------- Original Request -------- https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2090232&group_id=76550&atid=547455 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Simpletest-devel] More < at >var phpdoc tags for private variables Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:52:14 -0500 From: Travis Swicegood public.gmane.org> Reply-To: simpletest-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f< at >public.gmane.org To: simpletest-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f< at >public.gmane.org References: <1220199417531-795659.post-PKuAHvtXa09l57MIdRCFDg< at >public.gmane.org> Hey Chris; On Aug 31, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Chris Vogt wrote: Thanks for the email and the kind words. I'm sure I speak for the rest of the team when I say it really makes the work that's gone into ST worth it when we realize how useful others find it. :-) That said, we won't be implementing documentation on private attributes or methods as those are not meant to be used by other developers. There are a few problems with documented private methods: * It encourages use by third-party developers * It adds to the overhead of internal refactoring (not just the code has to change for everything to be current) For anything that is meant to be used directly, we do try to keep the docblock tags as up-to-date as possible, but private variables aren't meant to be directly accessed, so we want to make you work for them if you're going to use them :-) -T ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Where is the dom tester?

Dagfinn Reiersøl — 2008-09-08T09:14:28

In the 1.0.1 docs, there is a section called DomTestCase, but no DomTestCase class, just CssSelector and CssSelectorExpectation. In simpletest_1.0.1.tar.gz , there is no DomTestCase, no CssSelector and no CssSelectorExpectation. Can someone explain this? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Deleting a cookie

Taras Diakiw — 2008-09-03T16:22:56

Hi everyone, How do you delete a particular cookie? I am aware that you can set ignoreCookies, but this is unsuitable as: * It can't (AFAIK) be reversed * You can't specify that you want to receive but not send cookies * It will ignore ALL cookies (I wish to only ignore a particular cookie) The context of my question is that I'm implementing single sign on for a forum. When a user logs out of their account, it destroys a 'universal' guid cookie, but any other cookies will remain. This is the behaviour I'm trying to simulate. Thanks Taras Thanks Taras Diakiw Software Developer Practical Law Company T: +44 (0) 20 7202 1200 ext 5629 F: +44 (0) 20 7202 1211 W: http://www.practicallaw.com Practical Law Company Limited. Registered in England and Wales. Registered Number: 02889191. Registered Office: 19 Hatfields, London SE1 8DJ. Telephone: +44(0)20 7202 1200. http://www.practicallaw.com. DISCLAIMERS: This e-mail is confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed; it may contain personal views which are not the views of PLC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately; do not use, copy or disclose the information or otherwise use it or any part of it in any form whatsoever nor act in reliance on it. All liability for loss or damage caused by viruses is excluded. PLC uses the MessageLabs SkyScan service to monitor all outgoing and incoming e-mails for virus es, prohibited file-type attachments and inappropriate content in accordance with its Information and Communications Systems policy. You signify your consent to these terms by any further e -mail communication. Save a tree...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Forcing a mock to throw an exception

todd runstein — 2008-09-02T20:41:48

I'm looking for a way to make my mock object throw an exception. I want to test that my class under test catches and handles any thrown exceptions correctly. I want to add a call to my mock object similar to: $this->mymock->setReturnValue('doomedmethod', new Exception('thanks')); Or even better: $this->mymock->expectAndThrow('doomedmethod', new Exception('thanks')); Any advice on whether this exists in simpletest? If not, is there any other way to test my classes exception handling logic? Thanks, Todd

assertNoCookie

Taras Diakiw — 2008-09-02T15:39:28

Hi everyone, I'm trying to use assertNoCookie: it seems simple enough to use, but I've been getting unexpected results. In particular, doing the following (inside a WebTestCase of course): $this->assertNoCookie('arandomstringl;1jk5ljk15ljkldjasfljkasglajkgag') fails (?!) however, calling $this->getCookie('theSameStringAsAbove') returns 'null'. Is this a bug, or am I missing something really obvious? Thanks Taras Practical Law Company Limited. Registered in England and Wales. Registered Number: 02889191. Registered Office: 19 Hatfields, London SE1 8DJ. Telephone: +44(0)20 7202 1200. http://www.practicallaw.com. DISCLAIMERS: This e-mail is confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed; it may contain personal views which are not the views of PLC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately; do not use, copy or disclose the information or otherwise use it or any part of it in any form whatsoever nor act in reliance on it. All liability for loss or damage caused by viruses is excluded. PLC uses the MessageLabs SkyScan service to monitor all outgoing and incoming e-mails for virus es, prohibited file-type attachments and inappropriate content in accordance with its Information and Communications Systems policy. You signify your consent to these terms by any further e -mail communication. Save a tree...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Mocks and $this references?

Travis Swicegood — 2008-08-27T16:28:06

Hey guys; Another random bug, and one I haven't dove into at all, but I'm seeing some test failures where $this is being referred to in mocked objects. I'm assuming the code is just using mocks as statics where Mock::generate() didn't know it was a mock, but... Anyone else seen something similar? If I get it narrowed down and it's a real bug, I'll get a test case together to show it. -T ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

sprintf error

Travis Swicegood — 2008-08-26T20:34:18

Hey guys; Was just trying to upgrade from an older version of SimpleTest to the latest in SVN and I'm getting a ton of these errors: Exception: testSomeTest -> Unexpected PHP error [sprintf() [function.sprintf]: Too few arguments] severity [2] in [/path/to/simpletest/test_case.php line 315] Any ideas? -T ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Setting a checkbox

Margy Levine Young — 2008-08-22T12:38:06

I'm having trouble setting a checkbox -- it ought to be simple, but I don't seem to be able to get the value right. The form contains this field: The SimpleTest test contains this: $this->setFieldByName('directory', 'on'); But the test failed to check the checkbox. Is 'on' not the right value to use? I've tried true, 1, -1, 'checked', 'selected', you name it! Thanks in advance for any help! Margy Levine Young, Systems Analyst UUA Information Technology Staff Group myoung-5IfnEjJzJ3M< at >public.gmane.org, 802-989-3371 "We need not think alike to love alike." -- David Ferenc ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

"Mocking" internally called functions/classes

Kyohere Luke — 2008-08-22T03:57:59

Hi, here's the scenario: I'm trying to test Class_A::Method_B(..). Method_B internally calls Class_C::Method_D() - which takes a long time, and is accessed from the global/autoload mechanism of the application. I'd like to skip this call, since it's irrelevant to my tests. Aside from re-designing my class/method to read in Class_C as one of it's arguments, or else creating a dummy Class_C, and loading it before the real one is loaded, is there a way to achieve this with Mocks? Secondly, is there a way to prevent the class I'm trying to test from calling such mundane php functions like file_exists(), etc? Because in such a case, I have to design my test to create/delete files from the file system and so on. Thanks! Luke

How to expect an exception

Kyohere Luke — 2008-08-20T15:54:35

I want to check that a certain function throws an exception of a certain kind. How do I do this? Thanks. Luke ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Mocks: How to use regular expressions to testthe arguments with expectOnce()

Kyohere Luke — 2008-08-20T15:48:15

I would like to use expectOnce(...) but one of the arguments will be a long string, which will include an Error Code that I would like to test for. e.g. if the function call I want to set for would be something like $form->addElement('html', 'ERROR CODE: ERROR MESSAGE'); where ERROR CODE is set by the calling function. How do I test that ERROR CODE is equal to 123, for example. I've already created a Mock of the $form object, and want to do something like $form->expectOnce('addElement', array('html', '*ERROR 123*'); How would I do this? Thanks. Luke ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Using test libraries/classes

Mark Donohoe — 2008-08-18T20:28:42

Hello, Have been using ST for about 2-3 months now. Like it lot, well except for the documentation... a great start but then.....I'd like to help fix some of that... Here is the problem of the week. I'm sorta new to OO as well, so it could be that and not ST. I'm trying to use Jason's suggestion to extend WebTestCase with my own project specific class. So far so good. But now my fossologyWebTestCase class is getting big with more methods than I want. I tried to refactor but could not get things to work that way.... Specifics I tried: class fossologyWebTestCase extends WebTestCase { function uploadAFile(....) { ... } function browseMiniMenu(...) { ....} etc.... } What I would like to do is create a number of 'utility' test classes that can be used by the basic unit tests as well as for other higher level functional and stress testing. I tried to factor our things like uploads to an upload class, browse to a browse class etc... I tried class uploadsTests extends WebTestCase { function uploadAFile(....) { ... } .... } class browseMenusTests extends WebTestCase { function browseMiniMenu(...) { ....} .... } Then in my runner script: test = &new TestSuite('Experiment for test libraries'); $test->addFile('testClasses/uploads.php'); $test->addFile('testClasses/browseMenus.php'); $test->addTestFile('testClasses/exfoss.php'); if (TextReporter::inCli()) { exit ($test->run(new TextReporter()) ? 0 : 1); } $test->run(new HtmlReporter()); exfoss.php is a test that tries to use tehe functions uploadAFile and browseMiniMenu, but always gets: Fatal error: Call to undefined method expfoss::uploadAFile() in /home/markd/Src/fossology/tests/testClasses/exfoss.php on line xx I also tried using autorun and extending TestSuite like the example in the web_tester docs. Same result. I also tried to have the above classes extend fossologyWebTestCase instead of WebTestCase, but still get the same failure? I also tried having my main fossologyWebTestCase require_once uploads.php and browseMenu.php and still got the failure above. Tried it twice, once as a 'extends WebTestCase' and once with extends fossologyWebTestCase and still got undefined method error. All of my 'Tests' extend fossologyWebTestCase. The above functions (uploadAFile) are also tests in that they use assertions and the like to ensure what they are doing is correct. I want methods like uploadAFile to be accessible by any test that needs it, but would like them to be in their own file at least so that everything doesn't have to be in one class. What am I missing, how do I do this? Thanks for your time and help.