http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/226042 <pre>Hello, I'm new to this list, and this is the first time ever I send a message to you. I'm learning PHP since a couple of months, and I really wanna be a good PHP programer, and I know that I should work hard for that. Now, I just wanted to know what is the best way or tool for debuging PHP. I have googled for this many many times, and found a lot of these stuff, but I didn't figure out which one is really the best. in fact, I don't care whether it's an easy way or hard way, all what I want is to know what is the best and preferred way or tool. Wish you all the best! </pre> LEOPARD Corporation 2012-05-26T14:40:48 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/226040 <pre>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, php 5.2.2 I have need of a remote procedure call the requires "allow_url_fopen" to be enabled. The remote call works fine on my test system which does have allow_url_fopen enabled. So I thought, "This is a job for ini_set()." It did not work. :-( $oldval = ini_set("allow_url_fopen", 1); The remote call is made after the above statement. Clearly there is more to it than I expected. What is the correct way to allow URL fopen on the fly? - -- James Moe moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com 520.743.3936 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/Ag00ACgkQzTcr8Prq0ZNpqACgsPg1UcmiXcxxWYhvl0XaUi7N KDMAn29qcLCYdVDGWWYGTqZhToRtJRfA =gnCT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- </pre> James Moe 2012-05-26T07:16:30 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/226032 <pre>If I use simplexml_load_string to create an XML object with the following XHTML ,---- | &lt;?xml version="1.0"?&gt; | &lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" | "http://www.w3.org/TR/ | xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"&gt; | &lt;html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt; | &lt;head&gt;&lt;meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" | /&gt; | &lt;title&gt;test title&lt;/title&gt; | &lt;/head&gt; | &lt;body&gt; | &lt;!-- comment --&gt; | &lt;/body&gt; | &lt;/html&gt; `---- I get this SimpleXMLElement back ,---- | object(SimpleXMLElement)#1 (2) { | ["head"]=&gt; | object(SimpleXMLElement)#2 (1) { | ["title"]=&gt; | string(10) "test title" | } | ["body"]=&gt; | object(SimpleXMLElement)#3 (1) { | ["comment"]=&gt; | object(SimpleXMLElement)#4 (0) { | } | } | } `---- but I cannot seem to get anything out of an xpath expression, no matter what I try. If, however, I remove the 'xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"' in the html element, it works fine. So yeah, I can just remove that text, but... is there something wrong here, in my expectation or in the xpath function? TIA. </pre> Gary 2012-05-25T07:57:25 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/226017 <pre>Not directly a PHP problem, but since PHP tends to automatically create a session cookie I thought it appropriate to ask here first. The European rules on asking permission to use cookies have been around for a year now, and very few sites seem to be worrying about it until now, but press coverage is flagging that the ICO in the UK will start 'prosecuting' next week. Not exactly what the ICO are saying themselves, as they would prefer that the BROWSERS defaulted to cookies being blocked generally, so every cookie action requires approval locally anyway. Session cookies could be claimed to be exempt, but with the increasing hidden use of Google Analytics or in my case Piwik, WE become responsible or all that activity and so a few 'commercial' sites are appearing offering chargeable services to manage this for you. I've been trying to dig down through the google results to find anything open source that provides something easily bolted on to existing PHP sites to intercept cookie use before it actually happens. My reading of the rules would suggest that simply adding a session cookie is acceptable as long as the site identifies they are being used, but until there is some 'case law', actually practice is very grey? Pop-up is obviously out of the question since that can be blocked, and even javascript could be blocked so what can be relied on to 'Obtain permission before using a cookie'? </pre> Lester Caine 2012-05-24T10:25:40 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/226012 <pre>HI all I need help to increment date in php. I found this code helpful $date = strtotime("+1 day", strtotime("2007-02-28")); But when My date is "2008-02-28" this code give output 2012-03-01. But it should be 2008-02-29. Where I am getting wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------- Dedicated Linux Forum in Bangladesh &lt;http://goo.gl/238Ck&gt; 2048R/89C932E1 &lt;http://goo.gl/TkP5U&gt; Volunteer, FOSS Bangladesh &lt;http://fossbd.org/&gt; &amp;&amp; Mozilla Reps&lt;http://reps.mozilla.org&gt; 01199151550 </pre> Md Ashickur Rahman Noor 2012-05-24T07:18:16 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225992 <pre>I have run into a problem that I am altogether unfamiliar with. A scenario. I retrieve a users private key from a database. I then use the openssl_pkey_get_private() function to load it as a resource object and proceed to call the openssl_sign() function to obtain a digital signature of a string. No problem, I get a valid signature which I then base64 encode and store in a database. Now lets say a couple of days from now I load up the public key which corresponds to the private key which was used to originally sign the data to verify it and it does not work. The kicker is if I perform the very same routine without saving the signature and attempting to verify it it works without problems. Example script: /* this part works */ $id = openssl_pkey_get_private($key, $pass); openssl_sign($unsigned, $signed, $id); $id = openssl_pkey_get_public($pub); openssl_verify($unsigned, $signed, $id); /* this doesn't (here I use the existing signature instead of generating a new one) */ $id = openssl_pkey_get_public($pub); openssl_verify($unsigned, $signature, $id); /* below here is all of the existing variables the above uses */ $unsigned = "w9A5Tt8JA/GVBn89WwpvXnnVsHvyWbEDu5GdX36m+ZQ=:ek4L55qc/VKAmiYdlIQhow==:ek4L55qc/VKAmiYdlIQhow==:6IraS+ArqK+/Yc472tfFqmhk5VdIACUQPCR7+kbLoAEldjejS/P1cSa8EMHxcV2s:50dt57IoKeQZ7eiwoILMR3E91MtbCgt+xVn483+9J1cNzBQGll02Qj40RVhNM/Rh:qEFBUlZzNYZNb7nksj8Fhd8Du52RVDjMBwoT/O0tdzKGfGVOeK2xrpuq1OdoAo2CN63U+Fra4zcfkzwkD3QxDA==:1337713224" $pass = "$2a$07$31a9f929d102f5f0374deuu.cfoTJbmZtGKk92CuAOP63XaRUAVIW"; $signature = "h+SdcyxuQ9kpb2CXZRA/grJjlYj+drlOH2f7Ifsnt5A8dSj9lkMYU11rtjT9sdaEhf3rvoIl9JUMvkzc6dJ4DMypqgGniqbesbK6yf30FmPd0an+bTyIpeQFasmUwxtB1y6wBjIENEzEDTyb6QHPTAZg6ep2m/NjZFfUn/iiDOnDt71KQD1whouwtRZ0+UcDfPvtLQ3bAGw9C5ThDoIHRlg1kzVLrq40QsjA/3zYJE+PKwG9i1srI8zbP6uW/0t6mnUpGQrZmz6sdekkdCjjc7R9bIsFdyZ2Gisr6W1pBH64/X4nGaDkYX99ss8vYfuQMp+fLyZGgEKXuAwHjT02iQ=="; $key = "-----BEGIN ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY----- MIIFDjBABgkqhkiG9w0BBQ0wMzAbBgkqhkiG9w0BBQwwDgQIgeRB2NhoaJgCAggA MBQGCCqGSIb3DQMHBAgk9XLQVrN2UQSCBMgNQWJWdwpXarX8Do5xPGSdEw526jai XlvAR0lX4QzkKGnx1Fe13r0Z7AwGsEyuZWhmiQTeL40sBGtKpqdwr3Eutj+W02Kg 7jlBcgeu5DnYeQHZ6kDUJD4o08LXtDlusTIjsVLOE0YtLA67M7X2GSJrCUOurW/r nPTYGwNt9Z59jtB/EwPqa7kxvhPF0OTZ/6+5NRmWczPnF5KAltLaH0PsR6JI9y9K ben/SZ6QYp4PTVva5HNDBXS2sYAW9AynA7ltEOzXtWTLK2SLcGsVuqWM/WBiTyKw MeRDPA4y6MwJDUuUvZNzNAi9FXy8c10shGSJBHyP4xBrn6DTEXEIrrsGhePRaCB1 GaH26K/q6yxq1HJdRttexHMK7GCyH325ufHT4Fup+FaJqkC0nAK6uuMbCqML4feC K73OVzCF9Sh2o43aaJR3Ktec5ACqW7SDSABirJMU+YQpE9Dyei5d6mo+3E1rulVr 7dfsjeLmJGx5SDf8ip+tEGj4VcVm48w7hWFAmi1KAif8YLbvFEaWwTYhJg0qrCPI eQuFVR8k6EDhGMKs2KnrfkUUhU4riosbryXACB1fi/oHmJmYAEBiYgFhYgwsNX/O QRqedbIPDYcTfCb/j0Z59kkN9Il5YuanzPvaU6zWDMBy6qo1SYdM0lstWH7RJodq eg/WAvKq1zwBPLoedt32UgTgHioQe4r8rVTwmQd0kFAVN+mdsdCtn7xCFliul042 n7bYWtVwiLeXecSOoY0G/0oJ7MhgddAbD9CJlLMoMmM669V+xQldoE0FKQUbrr3W vqOIoBWp1Bd8mQ0FHn5yn/blYYy0sgCEkuSvR+NqgBt620qJ+x7kIpnay9+tdDun v8bXz4gonA8+MGyf3yjwVNR6elZMGH/SxK1dQn65lK1AsPFKTHy+2TC5UgBw1zhe +DjkKkilgsL3TaIKIxr/aDctqja9PfxiZek5GkDRuJN1rk3StW75hpnCyJdIQYXo q4mpdR7MYfknH7l8hsMBGYhDJNQ2iBJ/HZag4FWl2GWRQcqlJ0cZOWST+inMCTs5 UhEKYQoifKpZGLZ9vFUC1U6jiJ5SMmHp8LlEW4XlX1fbpYWU4xiLXjrCgATW9eLE Af3/q0bqBKggjNLqI4ShXjzBhExRKlVOceWxO2PJUzBKYkmENJ3oV1ykuPFp2cwO 2jhmMvCIL9ja3d8xQXc/WbCkmKOIm94PvAT7SmZksf7tvKNlhRrKS53ncGyWxhNp VwRtxQq/VnKJvyXWjImqE4bIeh3Ca1kzVoO0fmSS1la42hRXoXOlFOC59i3P9Tfs qazgCepsMB+PfRoiarnxCRrTHunnExbNw+0aCWR8J0B6X9jTyfbga6dTNNqJvHBI ffp9R9tDd+3trwC7RNbCLSv8E6qRKiNM1kv4UhP4avn0J21wnB0fjz32PASrArNe NCauY0+sSCwrE03nDhdt4NUhylAa6JTJZwQlNM6zwt7ITBOnVTQh0EoZl+fJRN9f QROdqPuvJUHaO1UbL05cm9bqpovs7+vn2UxkpMTkQ/lyS8Vfl5DbqX6dCKz3/3pP KK7LjZegt9Ey2wZB/9OiKGyOPiXPwzXcXR/evC6TFeIA07/8018PRjdjefZV26c4 M4g= -----END ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY-----"; $pub = "-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY----- MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAyEFetjn8mpkqHTgtKATK Gu7dgG6UXHD+Ft8UO6WoWgVGhnjgk+SlNI+4RG9BvCaG4jbPueu4nb15oO4aObQg RXZ7el2gjgEYu90qRILsDSzouoGFc/qPe6tNOUZ/ZXR3kBTm9t3CAW4bNDsnfUnP YFQVdFco03Pbz8vejc0SVSC8l2lw+ZSkMYDzDmhv09Uk1zh1kc/ACOU0AoofEaUM 2eyekwcQiVwzKksGjW70eOuI2QtgpIwuvQSS/BAcymYKkxJZVxUMPCwdBwY+Pyo+ +lD4yGeki0E7x72uQy0bzulxa6iXhQOYFQEcShxyJEF6YN/R/XSIQBLTi9biWvGg 6QIDAQAB -----END PUBLIC KEY-----"; </pre> jas 2012-05-23T18:29:57 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225986 <pre>Hi gang: On May 21, 2012, at 8:32 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote: You hit upon a theory of mine -- and that is our functions grow in size up to our ability to view them in their totality. When our functions get beyond that limit, we tend to refactor and reduce. I know from the last several decades of programming, my functions have increased in number of lines. But, they have reached a limit that limit is generally about the number of lines I can read in half of my monitor's height. This of course, is dependent on monitor resolution, font-size, and how far I am sitting from the monitor. But I think this is a natural and physical limit that we don't normally recognize. I can cite studies that support my theory. It would be an interesting survey to ask programmers to review their code and provide the average number of lines in their functions AND how many lines of code their monitor's can display. In other words, look at your editor; count the number of lines your monitor can display; estimate the number of lines in your average function; and report the findings. For example, mine is about half -- my monitor can display 55 lines of code and my average function is around 25 lines. YMMV. Interesting, yes? Cheers, tedd _____________________ tedd.sperling&lt; at &gt;gmail.com http://sperling.com </pre> Tedd Sperling 2012-05-23T14:14:23 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225968 <pre>Hi all, How to handle E_ERROR,E_PARSE with a user defined function ? </pre> Yuchen Wang 2012-05-23T02:19:21 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225966 <pre>Can anyone tell me what differences I might encounter by working with PHP on a Unix server verses working with PHP on a Windows server. We use Windows production servers here but many of us would like to get more LAMP environments. So, I'm wondering if I can use the hive mind here to get a sense of the pros and cons of each platform. Thanks. Jeff </pre> Gates, Jeff 2012-05-22T18:15:11 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225956 <pre>Hi there how I can ignore [missing] images and other files completely in .htaccess from being processed by the index.php file RewriteRule .* index.php [L] the CMS itself gives 404 error page for unknown request thanks in advance </pre> muad shibani 2012-05-21T15:55:23 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225951 <pre>Hi. I wasn't happy with the fact that Google Analytics doesn't record many of the hits on my sites, so I decided to roll my own analytics software, and opensource it. It's now in a state where I can request early comments. You can view a demo at http://mediabeez.ws/stats (under construction, may fail at times) (browser compatibility may be an issue, I built it with chrome, should work in firefox too, but won't (ever) in IE.) If you click on the graph while the details for a given day are visible, you will see the errors for that day in a DIV below the graph. Normally you'd hide the error details and $hits for anyone's who's not registred as a developer, of course. I've turned it on for all at the moment, so you can comment on that feature and review my results array $hits. I've opted, for simplicity of design, to store all settings I thought could be remotely interesting in a mysql db (see attached sql init file) (which is filled from PHP every time a page is delivered, and again from JS when the page has initialized fully, or does a HTML5 History API location.href change), and then use PHP to retrieve all rows for a given datetime-range, and do the totals calculations in a php loop. I'm only keeping 1 row from the db in memory at any given time, but I'm building up a large deep array with the totals information in the php loop that goes over the rows. I'm wondering if this is a good approach, though. Maybe I should let the totals be calculated by the mysql server instead. I was thinking to let the totals calculations stay in php, and be executed from a cron job every hour. Only for the current month would you need to re-calculate every hour. I haven't figured out yet how to for instance only re-calculate the last hour, store results per hour, and then calculate the day and month totals from that "hourly cache" data when needed. I don't have a clue about how big companies do their totals calculations (for sites that get way more hits than mine, which is something i'd like to be able to support with my own analytics code), and would like to know how big companies do this. I've included the relevant draft code as attachment files to this mail, for your review. Please let me know if I have forgotten to include relevant code.. As always, thanks for your time, Rene </pre> rene7705 2012-05-21T10:46:51 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225944 <pre>hello, list! I have 'error_reporting = E_ALL' set in my php.ini file. However when I run a php script that has errors in it all that happens is that the page WSODs. I am running Mac OS X 10.6. Any thoughts on why errors don't show up in the browser and how to correct this? Thanks Tim </pre> Tim Dunphy 2012-05-20T03:55:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225938 <pre>Hey all - The articles on my web site already have a very nice stylesheet that produces a print version. Does anyone know if there's a such a thing as a PHP class that would let me put up a "Download PDF" link that would generate a PDF doc on the fly, using that same stylesheet? I've used various PHP PDF classes before, but I'd rather see if I can shortcut this rather than assembling the doc from scratch. - Brian </pre> Brian Dunning 2012-05-18T16:34:09 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225917 <pre>ok - finally had to come up with my own regexp - and am failing. Trying to validate an input of a time value in the format hh:mm, wherein I'll accept anything like the following: hmm hhmm h:mm hh:mm in a 12 hour format. My problem is my test is ok'ing an input of 1300. Here is my test: if (0 == preg_match("/([0][1-9]|[1][0-2]|[1-9]):[0-5][0-9]/",$t)) return true; else return false; Can someone help me correct my regexp? </pre> Jim Giner 2012-05-17T20:37:12 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225912 <pre>Hello, I am validating user DOM against schema files using the following piece of code: $valid = &lt; at &gt;$doc-&gt;schemaValidate($xsdFile); where $doc is of type DOMDocument and $xsdFile is the file location of the XSD file. Everything worked fine until the following validation occured: A validation of a XML against the SRW/U schema (http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/sru1-1archive/xml-files/srw-types.xsd) failed. Here is the XML: ----------------------------------------------------- &lt;?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?&gt; &lt;srw:explainResponse xmlns:srw="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/" xmlns:zr="http://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0/"&gt; &lt;srw:version&gt;1.1&lt;/srw:version&gt; &lt;srw:record&gt; &lt;srw:recordSchema&gt;http://explain.z3950.org/dtd/2.0/&lt;/srw:recordSchema&gt; &lt;srw:recordPacking&gt;XML&lt;/srw:recordPacking&gt; &lt;srw:recordData&gt; &lt;zr:explain&gt; &lt;zr:serverInfo wsdl="http://myserver.com/db" protocol="SRU" version="1.1"&gt; &lt;host&gt;myserver.com&lt;/host&gt; &lt;port&gt;80&lt;/port&gt; &lt;database&gt;sru&lt;/database&gt; &lt;/zr:serverInfo&gt; &lt;zr:databaseInfo&gt; &lt;title lang="en" primary="true"&gt;SRU Test Database&lt;/title&gt; &lt;description lang="en" primary="true"&gt; My server SRU Test Database&lt;/description&gt; &lt;/zr:databaseInfo&gt; &lt;zr:metaInfo&gt; &lt;dateModified&gt;27-11-2003&lt;/dateModified&gt; &lt;/zr:metaInfo&gt; &lt;/zr:explain&gt; &lt;/srw:recordData&gt; &lt;/srw:record&gt; &lt;/srw:explainResponse&gt; ----------------------------------------------------- This XML is valid. However, I keep getting the following libxml error: object(LibXMLError)#192 (6) { ["level"]=&gt; int(2) ["code"]=&gt; int(1871) ["column"]=&gt; int(0) ["message"]=&gt; string(133) "Element '{http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}record': This element is not expected. Expected is ( {http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/}version ). " ["file"]=&gt; string(0) "" ["line"]=&gt; int(0) } I think, the validator is unable to handle the xsd:extension part of the schema: &lt;xsd:complexType name="explainResponseType"&gt; &lt;xsd:complexContent&gt; &lt;xsd:extension base="responseType"&gt; &lt;xsd:sequence&gt;&lt;xsd:element ref="record"/&gt; &lt;xsd:element ref="echoedExplainRequest" minOccurs="0"/&gt; &lt;xsd:element ref="diagnostics" minOccurs="0"/&gt; &lt;xsd:element ref="extraResponseData" minOccurs="0"/&gt; &lt;/xsd:sequence&gt; &lt;/xsd:extension&gt; &lt;/xsd:complexContent&gt; &lt;/xsd:complexType&gt; The version-element exists and is at the right place. If I add another version-element after the first one, it complains about expecting a record-element instead, which is correct. But it is not correct to expect another version-element after the already existing one. Is this a bug? Or did I made a mistake somewhere and I am not able to see it right now? Thank you for any help! Best regards, Marko ------------------------------------------------------- Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftlich-technische Information mbH. Sitz der Gesellschaft: Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Amtsgericht Mannheim HRB 101892. Geschäftsführerin: Sabine Brünger-Weilandt. Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Thomas Greiner. </pre> Voß, Marko 2012-05-14T11:39:13 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225909 <pre>Hi all As PHP-GTK has "moved" to the PECL, I suppose several part of this documentation are not relevent anymore: http://gtk.php.net/manual/en/tutorials.installation.linux.php Would you know a place where I could find some way to work with it? Thank you! </pre> Mihamina Rakotomandimby 2012-05-14T05:05:15 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225902 <pre>I am running Windows 2008 R2, IIS 7 I am running into an issue where no matter what I set the script time out to be the server is Giving me a 500 error after like 60 seconds when the process exceeds the configured activity timeout. Here is the example script &lt;? set_time_limit(120); sleep(100); Echo "PASSED THE TIME OUT"; ?&gt; I fully understand this may not be a PHP error but if anyone has ran into this issue with a windows server and can explain in detail how I can adjust the timeout, I would be very grateful. Everything I have read online points to a fcgiext.ini file that does not exist on my server. Anyone know how to help ? </pre> admin 2012-05-12T19:42:20 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225894 <pre>Hi, shiplu and Jim, many thanks for the hints, I solved it; wasn't related to PHP, but I will write it down so if others search for this problem, at least they will have one solution that worked. Jim: the Apache was configured to listen on all interfaces - I had to, because I have multiple SSL-enabled hosts with different keys shiplu: it was the metric! Only problem, because these are alias interfaces, a simple ifmetric doesn't cut it: #~ ifmetric eth0:1 20 SIOCSIFMETRIC: operation not supported So I had to disable the alias interfaces with ifconfig down, the re-enable them; after that, add the gateways like this: #~ route add default gw &lt;GATEWAYIP&gt; metric 10 so now my routing table has a metric 0 gateway for eth0, and a metric 10 for both aliases. Many thanks again, and have a nice weekend! Regards, Csaba On Fri, 11 May 2012 23:54:56 -0700, Jim Lucas wrote: ... </pre> Tóth Csaba 2012-05-12T08:22:33 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225890 <pre>Hi Everyone, I've run into a curious problem, not even really sure it's PHP, but that's where I caught it, so here it is: I have two servers hanging on the net, without proxies. Let's call them Server1 and Server2. Server1 has multiple IP addresses, configured as aliases. My problem: When I do a wget --spider from 1 to 2, I get the eth0 (not alias) address in Apache's accesslog on Server2. But when I do a file_get_contents(http://server2.tld), and observe the $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] on Server2, I get one of the alias IP addresses back. What can cause this? I really need the eth0 IP address back in REMOTE_ADDR. Regards, Csaba </pre> Tóth Csaba 2012-05-12T05:57:19 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225884 <pre> Can someone point me at examples or directions on how I can pass a variable via a URL in the following way: http://server.domain.com//script///variable/ I will only be passing one single /variable/. And I want the /script/ to use that. I don't want to see what the script is, for example I don't want it to say 'script.php' or 'script.html' ... Is this possible through PHP only, or do I have to write a rewrite directive in Apache to accomplish this? </pre> Ashley M. Kirchner 2012-05-11T23:15:23 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.general/225883 <pre>Hello everyone, Got a quick one (I hope), and probably an easy one. For some reason it is eluding me at the moment. Hoping someone can help. I am building an ics file with PHP and the form that is submitting to create this ics file has a jQuery date picker on it. The date furnished comes to me like this "Saturday, January 1, 2012", and a time furnished like "4:20 pm" with no seconds. Now for the ics file, I need the date/time combo to be.. Ymd\THis\Z or in the case of the above date and time, 20120101T042000Z Here is the block of code that I am using for this. CODE [ ... } else { $dt_start = $_POST["field20"] ? $_POST["field20"] : $_POST["field21"]; //Saturday, January 1, 2012 $dt_end = $_POST["field22"]; //Saturday, January 1, 2012 $t_start = $_POST["field24"]; //4:20 pm $t_end = $_POST["field25"]; //5:55 pm //date_default_timezone_set('UTC'); try { $start_DT = new DateTime($dt_start . " " . $t_start); $st_date_fmt = new DateTime($start_DT-&gt;format("l, F d, Y\TH:ia T")); //$startdate_stamp = strtotime($st_date_fmt); $startdate = $st_date_fmt-&gt;format('U'); //$startdate = date('Ymd\THis\Z', $startdate_stamp); } catch (Exception $e) { trigger_error("startdate error: " . $e-&gt;getMessage(), E_USER_ERROR); exit(1); } try { if(empty($dt_end)) { $enddate = $startdate + (60 * 60); //If no end date provided, enddate is 1 hour after startdate. } else { $end_DT = new DateTime($dt_end . " " . $t_end); $end_date_fmt = new DateTime($end_DT-&gt;format("l, F d, Y\TH:ia T")); //$enddate_stamp = strtotime($end_date_fmt); $enddate = $end_date_fmt-&gt;format('U'); //$enddate = date('Ymd\THis\Z', $enddate_stamp); } } catch (Exception $e) { trigger_error("enddate error: " . $e-&gt;getMessage(), E_USER_ERROR); exit(1); } $stampnow = date('Ymd\THis\Z', time()); //$datestampnow = strtotime($stampnow); } ... ] I have a feeling I am mixing something up on my own, but I have been staring at this code to long to see it. Can anyone help me please? Like I said, this is probably an easy one. TIA!! Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com </pre> Karl DeSaulniers 2012-05-11T23:11:07 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.php.general