http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1192 Are there tests for the 'jsd' layer of the debugger api? If so where are they hiding? Thanks, John. John J. Barton 2008-11-02T17:27:34 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1191 Hello, There are several Eclipse JS debuggers around (e.g. in the Eclipse ATF project) which use the jsdIDebuggerService interface, but they all require XPCOM and run the debugger inside the Mozilla framework. Since Spidermonkey is able to run without the Mozilla framework too, I was wondering if it would be feasible to debug a JS application that runs from a simple Linux shell? Best regards, Harald Harald Krapfenbauer 2008-10-29T14:39:06 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1190 I can't type anything into the interactive session, its as though the keyboard is disabled anyone got any ideas or is it a bug, am using running Venkman version 0.9.87.4 with Firefox 3.0.3 rnettle 2008-10-27T22:51:09 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1187 A Firebug user just told me about "jsParent". This is a property of jsdIValue objects and it turns out that if the jsdIValue object is jsdIStackFrame.scope, then the jsParent is a link to the scope chain for the function on the stack. Is there any way to get this scope chain from a jsdIScript object? Its a property of the function not the stack correct? jjb John J. Barton 2008-09-16T05:35:18 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1185 Just a little tidbit from Firebug experience: jsdIScript http://www.xulplanet.com/references/xpcomref/ifaces/jsdIScript.html has a method, PRBool isLineExecutable ( PRUint32 line , PRUint32 pcmap ) Based on some very informal measurements I found that it takes about 1ms per line to call this method. When you apply that to 40k lines, not much goes on for while. I don't know if this is intrinsic or just because of crossing in and out of C++ but it would be good to understand so we can create a faster next gen API. For example we could replace this with Array<int> executableLines(pcmap); for most applications. jjb John J. Barton 2008-08-20T03:20:26 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1184 Please take a look at Modernize jsdIDebuggerService https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449452 for links to several bug reports outlining improvements in jsd. Of the possible ways to proceed, I am inclined to push for Bug 379410 – debugger script detection using parent JSScript or if this is too hard, then a limited version of Bug 449454 – [jsd] Add frame argument to every jsd callback, eg jsdIScriptHook John. John J. Barton 2008-08-15T16:56:05 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1179 Would the readers of this newsgroup object if we started discussing Firebug internal code here? John. John J. Barton 2008-08-05T01:27:56 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1176 Is it possible to programatically open Venkman with specified file (chrome url) opened by default, which is also automatically scrolled to a given line? Honza Jan Odvarko 2008-06-18T20:05:15 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1173 Does anyone know if jsdIFilter works? I guess I could try it, seems like a good thing if it worked...John. John J. Barton 2008-06-11T05:45:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1171 Venkman has been working in FF3b5 (occasional crashes but it did what I needed). It will not install in FF3rc1. I have done some googling but have not seen anything that suggests there is any current work on this. Is there a work-around for this? Is there some source for an updated Venkman that I have not stumbled on? Bryan Bryan White 2008-05-23T13:41:31 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1169 When the option exclude browser file is selected, most of the files of browser are not shown, but It seems still some file in shown. such as file:/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.11/components/ nsMicrosummaryService.js file:/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.11/components/ nsBookmarkTransactionManager.js file:/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.11/components/ nsBrowserContentHandler.js file:/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.11/components/nsDefaultCLH.js file:/opt/mozilla/lib/firefox-2.0.0.11/components/ nsMicrosummaryService.js .... Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071204 BonEcho/2.0.0.11 Venkman version 0.9.87.3. luckyrandom 2008-05-21T16:04:23 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1167 I have two problems / feature requests. 1. I am trying to use Venkman to debug Selenium IDE which is a Firefox extension for automated testing of web application. Since it is a Firefox extension, I've uncheck the "Exclude Browser Files". Now Venkman debug all the browser files, ones that come from other extensions which I am not interested in. I've selected the ones that I want to ignore, right click, File Options -> "Don't Debug Eval/ Timeouts" and "Don't Debug Contain Functions", but as I switch back to the Selenium IDE window, an xul file (which I've specified Venkman to ignore) get loaded into Venkman, and Venkman wait for me to act on it. Is it possible for me to configure venkman to ignore a list of files, and have it persists across debugging session? 2. A lot of time, I find myself having to use Venkman when I have to have multiple Firefox windows or tabs open, and only want to debug js code in one specific window / tab. Is it possible to tell Venkman to ignore other windows / tabs ? I am using Venkman version 0.9.87.3 Thanks Khai Khai Doan 2008-05-19T23:40:47 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1160 Just installed TB3.0a1 and javascript_debugger-0.9.87.3-fx+tb+sb+sm.xpi. Opening any source produces the following error: XML Parsing Error: Location: x-jsd:source?location=chrome%3A%2F%2Fcommunicator%2Fcontent%2FcontentAreaClick.js&instance=26 Line Number 2, Column 1:<?xml-stylesheet type='text/css' href='chrome://venkman/skin/venkman-source.css' ?> Any advice how to work with both?? gNeandr 2008-05-05T13:20:50 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1159 Windows XP Kompozer v0.7.10 venkman 0.9.84. I am using the above combination. I have sucessfully install venkam 0.9.84 from the xpi file I found online but it does not show up on ANY of the Kompozer menu. I tired using venkman version 0.9.87.3(javascript_debugger-0.9.87.3-fx+tb+sb+sm.xpi) but Kompozer said that version is not compatible. The funny thing is that venkman 0.9.84 runs perfectly on NVU (version 1.0 (20050620) ) but Kompozer is suppoded to be and upgraded version of NVU with all the bugs out of it??? Shaba1 2008-05-03T22:34:06 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1158 He needs your help! http://www.freewebs.com/burndonation burndonation 2008-04-28T16:43:14 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1156 Bloqueador veícluar com tecnologia gsm - Sem mensalidades Tenha toda segurança para seu carro com um preço justo. Apenas R$ 299,00 ( sem mensalidades ) http://bloqueadorgsm.vila.bol.com.br/ Compare e Compre. Rastreador de Veículo Rastreadores de Veículos Rastreador GPS Rastreadores GPS Rastreador Ituran Rastreadores Ituran Rastreador Portátil Rastreadores Portáteis. Assistência 24 Horas Visite agora mesmo nosso site. http://bloqueadorgsm.vila.bol.com.br/ Graber - Teletrim - Tele Trim - Ituran - Rastreadores gps , Localizadores, Bloqueadores Graber - Teletrim - Tele Trim - Ituran - Rastreadores gps , Localizadores, Bloqueadores Graber - Teletrim - Tele Trim - Ituran - Rastreadores gps , Localizadores, Bloqueadores Graber - Teletrim - Tele Trim - Ituran - Rastreadores gps , Localizadores, Bloqueadores Graber - Teletrim - Tele Trim - Ituran - Rastreadores gps , Localizadores, Bloqueadores _______________________________________________ dev-apps-js-debugger mailing list dev-apps-js-debugger< at >lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-apps-js-debugger bloqueador sem mensalidade 2008-04-01T23:47:01 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1155 news.mozilla.org 2008-02-28T07:40:27 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1154 Hi guys, I'm wondering if I can use jsdIDebuggerService to log access to DOM functions, such as a call inside a webpage to "document.getElementById('foo')". I'd also like to be able to intercept property access, like "document.body". If it's not possible, is there another option? Thanks for any hints, Daniel Daniel Gredler 2008-02-21T06:11:54 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1151 Hi guys, I'm trying to use the jsdIDebuggerService interface in a Firefox extension to trace function invocations. Specifically, I'm using the debugger service's functionHook. This hook takes two arguments: the current frame and the invocation type. However, I'm having trouble accessing the name of the function being invoked, as well as the names and values of the arguments being passed to the function. The problem is that frame.functionName and frame.script.functionObject refer to the function within which the invocation is made, not the function being invoked. Has anyone used the functionHook to trace and/or log JavaScript function calls? If not, has anyone used a different method to do achieve this? I'm attaching a snippet of code below so as to give a better idea of what I'm doing (wrong). Take care, Daniel var functionHook = function(frame, type) { if(type != jsdICallHook.TYPE_FUNCTION_CALL) return; // Start with indentation. var s = ""; var parent = frame.callingFrame; while(parent) { if(!parent.isDebugger && !parent.isNative) s += " "; parent = parent.callingFrame; } // Continue with argument info. var args = ""; var p = new Object(); frame.script.functionObject.getProperties(p, {}); p = p.value; for(var i = p.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if(p[i].flags & jsdIProperty.FLAG_ARGUMENT) { args += p[i].name.stringValue + ": " + formatValue(p[i].value) + ", "; } } if(args.lastIndexOf(", ") == args.length - 2) { args = args.substring(0, args.length - 2); } // Continue with other information. var line = frame.line; var funcName = frame.functionName; // Log the gathered information. s += funcName + "(" + args + ") < at > line " + line + " of " + file; ftLog.push(s); } debuggerService.on(); debuggerService.functionHook = { onCall: functionHook }; Daniel Gredler 2008-02-18T20:50:54 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1147 Hi I have combed the web looking for a symbolic debugger I can use to debug my Firefox extensions written in JavaScript. I have tried venkman and firebug. I can not figure out how "load" my toolbar code? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Andy Andrew E. Davidson 2008-02-01T22:31:52 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger/1146 Hi, I am working on a Mail client application based on DirectFb. My Requirement is - I have a mail client application. In one of my mails i have two links. By clicking first link it needs to open Firefox browser with given URL. By Clicking second link it needs open new tab in existing firefox browser window and display second link URL. I build firefox on DirectFb backend. Please suggest me how to achieve this behavior. Thanks & Best Regards, Sreenivas Sreenivas Chowdary 2007-12-27T11:54:52 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.jsdebugger