<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel">
    <title>gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/24003"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/24001"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23999"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23998"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23992"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23984"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23983"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23981"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23979"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23978"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23972"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23968"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23960"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23959"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23932"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23920"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23918"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23914"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23906"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23898"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/24003">
    <title>TeamCity wizard?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/24003</link>
    <description>First - wicketstuff.org (Confluence) seems to be down (TeamCity / Maven repo
are both up).

Okay - Can a wicketstuff.org admin take a look at the build results of the
GMap2 project (as part of wicketstuff-core):
http://www.wicketstuff.org/teamcity/viewLog.html?buildId=2479&amp;buildTypeId=bt35&amp;tab=buildResultsDiv

Can we install those on a local repo on that machine so that it has access
to them for the builds?  Or is there another way?

Thanks!

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-04T02:38:21</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/24001">
    <title>Wicketstuff-core pom?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/24001</link>
    <description>Hi guys

I've just pulled my openlayers project from the wicketstuff-core on stuff svn. It does not build. Because it are unable to find the wicketstuff core pom... Where are it available from the ordinary wicketstuff repo?



nino-martinez-vazquez-waels-computer-367:openlayers-parent nino$ mvn eclipse:eclipse
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.

GroupId: org.wicketstuff
ArtifactId: wicketstuff-core
Version: 1.4-SNAPSHOT

Reason: Unable to download the artifact from any repository

  org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-core:pom:1.4-SNAPSHOT

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)


[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.reactor.MavenExecutionException: Cannot find parent: org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-core for project: null:openlayers-parent:pom:null for project null:openlayers-parent:pom:null
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:378)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:292)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:287)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: Cannot find parent: org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-core for project: null:openlayers-parent:pom:null for project null:openlayers-parent:pom:null
at org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.assembleLineage(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:1370)
at org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:821)
at org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildFromSourceFileInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:506)
at org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.build(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:198)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProject(DefaultMaven.java:583)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.collectProjects(DefaultMaven.java:461)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:365)
... 11 more
Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.ProjectBuildingException: POM 'org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-core' not found in repository: Unable to download the artifact from any repository

  org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-core:pom:1.4-SNAPSHOT

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
 for project org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-core
at org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.findModelFromRepository(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:603)
at org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.assembleLineage(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:1366)
... 17 more
Caused by: org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.ArtifactNotFoundException: Unable to download the artifact from any repository

  org.wicketstuff:wicketstuff-core:pom:1.4-SNAPSHOT

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)

at org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:212)
at org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:74)
at org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.findModelFromRepository(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:556)
... 18 more
Caused by: org.apache.maven.wagon.ResourceDoesNotExistException: Unable to download the artifact from any repository
at org.apache.maven.artifact.manager.DefaultWagonManager.getArtifact(DefaultWagonManager.java:331)
at org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.DefaultArtifactResolver.resolve(DefaultArtifactResolver.java:200)
... 20 more
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: &lt; 1 second
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Dec 03 11:47:01 CET 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 1M/2M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------



</description>
    <dc:creator>Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-03T10:52:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23999">
    <title>How about removing the timestamps from the snapshot builds?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23999</link>
    <description>Hello,

Would it be OK if the snapshots built by TeamCity would 
always just have SNAPSHOT as the version, without the 
timestamp that they currently have

  http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.4-SNAPSHOT/

I think that Buildr probably doesn't recognise the timestamped
versions but just gets the ones without the timestamp in the 
version number, dating from 30 June. And probably the old 
snapshots aren't worth filling the disk with them either.

And if this is OK, who could do it?

Best wishes,
Timo

</description>
    <dc:creator>Timo Rantalaiho</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T15:51:25</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23998">
    <title>Wait confirmation from ModalWindow</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23998</link>
    <description>Hi all,

I have a confirmation ModalWindow (I expect "yes" or "no") which opens above
another ModalWindow which allows to update a TextArea and a List which feed
a DropDownBox :

final ConfirmationModel confirmationModel = new ConfirmationModel(this);
final DialogWindow confirmPanel = new DialogWindow("confirmPanel",
confirmationModel);
add(confirmPanel);

public class ConfirmationModel extends Observable implements Serializable
.......

// Confirm to Add something
AjaxLink add = new AjaxLink(ADD_COMMAND)
{
    &lt; at &gt;Override
    public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target)
    {
        confirmPanel.setTitle(getString("confirm"));
        confirmPanel.setContent(new DialogPanel(confirmPanel,
parmeters));
        confirmationModel.setCommand(ADD_COMMAND);
        confirmPanel.show(target);

// 1st OPTION: I WOULD LIKE TO BE KEPT WAITING HERE UNTIL CONFIRMATION
OCCURS FROM confirmPanel

// Here below Add command dynamically updates TextArea and List
(session.getUserNotesList()) which feed a DropDownBox (notes)

        target.addComponent(notesForm.get("textArea"));
        // VITAL for the DropDownList to refresh its inner list when an item
is removed
        target.addComponent(form.get("notes"));
        String id = myNotesChapter + "_" +
(session.getUserNotesList().size() + 1);
        Note noteModel = (Note)form.getModelObject();
        Note note = new Note(id, (Person)(session.getUser()),
textArea.getContent());
        session.getUserNotesList().add(note);
        dao.addNoteToUser(session.getUser().getLogin(), note);
        textArea.setModelValue(new String[1]);

................................................................

       public void update(Observable observable, Object object)
       {
           String command = ((ConfirmationModel)observable).getCommand();
           String result = object.toString();
           AjaxRequestTarget target = new AjaxRequestTarget(getPage());


           if(command.equals(ADD_COMMAND))
           {
// 2nd OPTION: REPORT THE DYNAMICAL UPDATES WITH AjaxRequestTarget HERE
               ...........................
_______________________________________________________________________

So with 1st option I cannot block smartly the confirmation confirmPanel
until I get "yes" or "no" just after line: confirmPanel.show(target);

And with 2nd option where I try to deport dynamical updates inside the
update() method of Observer/Observable all works fine BUT the elements don't
refresh properly, I have to close then open again the ModalWindow with its
DropDownList and TextArea to check updates happened.

Is there either a way to block the confirmation ModalWindow until answer
comes, or to make the refresh in deported update() work properly?

TIA, best regards.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Eric Lemaitre</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T23:02:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23992">
    <title>WicketStuff owners - please review</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23992</link>
    <description>Hello everyone.  I have completed the bulk of the work planned on the
WicketStuff reorg discussed earlier this week.  A status report is located
at [1] below.

If you own a WicketStuff project, PLEASE review [2] below - there are still
quite a few things I need community input on to complete.  A brief summary
of input needed:

   - There are quite a few projects in trunk that are working with Wicket
   1.3 and have had work in trunk since the 1.3 branch was created.  Since
   trunk is technically for 1.4 development, I would suggest moving these to
   the Wicket 1.3 branch.
   - There are a couple of projects in trunk that are already on 1.4, but I
   have not heard from the project owner as to whether they want their project
   moved into wicketstuff-core.
   - Wicket-SECURITY - I have no idea what to do with this one since Maurice
   is no longer with us.  Would anyone like to take ownership of it (and commit
   to keep the work up-to-date on it)?

[1] - *http://tinyurl.com/647hjz*
[2] - *http://tinyurl.com/64tdor*

Quick summary of work done:
- 21 projects migrated (including examples projects)
- 32 removed from trunk
- 73 svn commits :)
- quite a few open questions - see above

Thank you!

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T07:06:49</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23984">
    <title>TeamCity on wicketstuff.org</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23984</link>
    <description>Who owns the wicketstuff.org server?  Since TeamCity has been continually
having problems building against SF repo, I set up Continuum on my server.
It has been working fine.  I'd like to see us get some permanent setup that
allows built artifacts to be deployed to the wicketstuff.org maven repo
since that's the repo everyone has in their POM for wicketstuff projects.
This will be especially important now that so many wicketstuff projects will
be able to be built together and released together.

I see two options:
1 - We switch from TeamCity to Continuum on the wicketstuff.org site.  This
would require someone with shell access installing Continuum or giving me
access to do so.  It's a VERY simple setup.  Also, if we switch to Continuum
and then have problems we'll know instantly that there is a network issue
between the wicketstuff.org server and SF (since my server has not had the
problem and been running Continuum against SF for weeks).

2 - Someone gives me information so that my server can SCP to the repo on
wicketstuff.org.  My server could continue to run the builds and then SCP
the artifacts to wicketstuff.org's repo.  This would be fine with me as
well.

Whatever works best - I'd just like us to have some Continuous Integration
actually running and deploying snapshots and release artifacts.  The next
step will be to get the central maven repo to mirror the
wicketstuff.orgreleased artifacts to central.  I don't mind working
through this at some
point.

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T13:59:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23983">
    <title>wicketstuff-core migration guide on wiki</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23983</link>
    <description>I have created a guide to migrating your project under the new
wicketstuff-core parent project.  If you own a WS project, you should
consider doing this as soon as possible so that your project will be
included in the 1.4 release (and even earlier in the RC2 release) when
Wicket releases the same - we will be releasing all projects under
wicketstuff-core in sync with Wicket's release.

*
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/WicketStuff+Core+-+Migration+Guide
*&lt;http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/NEW+-+WicketStuff+Core+-+Migration+Guide&gt;

Let me know if you see any additions that need to be made.
PS - One really nice thing about restructuring everything to follow
conventions is that we will be able to utilize maven plugins such as the
site plugin.  Here's an example of a current site generated for all the
wicketstuff-core projects:
http://www.wickettraining.com/wicketstuff-core/

Here's a link for the build server building wicketstuff-core:
http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=12

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-28T19:52:30</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23981">
    <title>donate source : Wicket reaction game...?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23981</link>
    <description>Hi guys

I'd like to donate the source for the wicket reaction game to the wicket 
examples or somewhere... What do you say to that?

You can see a demo here : http://wicketgames.ninosbox.thruhere.net/

</description>
    <dc:creator>Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T23:37:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23979">
    <title>[VOTE] Consistent naming for Wicket Stuff projects</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23979</link>
    <description>I am beginning the WS reorg as noted in previous emails.  You can monitor
progress here:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/

As we move projects into the wicketstuff-core, I would like to see us rename
them consistently, getting rid of the prepended "wicket-contrib-" or
"wicketstuff-".  This would mean that when we release WicketStuff 1.4 (when
Wicket 1.4 is released) that if you are using that project, you would need
to update your POM to the new name.  Please vote:

[ ] - YES - I would like consistent naming
[ ] - NO (convincing reason)

PS - I feel like I'm starting a lot of vote threads - should I not be?  Any
suggestions?  I would like to efficiently get this reorg done, but I am
leery of just moving other people's projects around and making changes
without permission.  Feelings / thoughts?

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T21:54:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23978">
    <title>[VOTE] End of Life wicket-contrib-gmap?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23978</link>
    <description>I am starting to work on the WicketStuff reorg as the community voted to
do.  In doing so, I noticed that wicket-contrib-gmap is still set up to
compile against 1.3.0-incubating-snapshot.  Also, we know that Iulian has
said he is no longer maintaining it.  In light of this, I propose the
following vote:

[ ] - YES, please create a branch in the Wicket Stuff repo just for
abandoned projects and move wicket-contrib-gmap into that branch.
[ ] - NO (please provide convincing reason).

For those who say "I'm still using it" - you'll still be able to - from the
abandoned branch, you can build your own release, just like you must be
doing now.  But it helps new users not be as confused with the multiple
projects, and trying to use one that's dead.

PS - I will probably be sending more votes along like this as I go through
the repo trying to organize it.  If you have suggestions, please let us
know.

Thanks,

Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T21:49:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23972">
    <title>Igor - FileUploadField change in 1.4-rc1 - WHY?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23972</link>
    <description>Igor,
  It has come up a couple of times on the user list, but in 1.4rc1 there was
a change to FileUploadField to make it always use a model.  Now, the new
FileUploadField("id") constructor is practically useless, and I would
venture to say that tons of apps out there (like mine do in numerous
places), have always just used the ID constructor since nothing else was
needed.

  Why the change?  At the very least, could we make the ID-only constructor
call super(id, new Model&lt;FileUpload&gt;()) ??

Thanks!

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-25T05:33:14</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23968">
    <title>[VOTE] Organizing Wicket Stuff / Regular Release Schedule?</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23968</link>
    <description>Hello everyone,
  I would like to get your opinion on an idea regarding the Wicket Stuff
project(s).  As you are familiar with, Wicket Stuff is where anyone can
create anything related to Wicket, small or large.  One problem that new
users of Wicket (and us "old" users) come across is that there is a lot of
stuff in there, and not all of it is well maintained, and there aren't
specific releases of many of the projects.  So, you have to build it
yourself and figure out which version matches which Wicket version, etc...

  What I would like to know is if everyone thinks it would be good to have a
subset of WS projects that are structured in a way that they are always in
sync with the Wicket versions.  IOW, there would be two branches - 1.3.X and
1.4 (trunk), just like Wicket has.  There would be a parent module and all
of the modules that wanted to participate would be structured under it.
They would all release in sync with Wicket.  For instance, when Wicket
releases 1.4-RC2, we would cut a release of this wicket-stuff-structured
(bad name) and all of the projects under it at 1.4-RC2.  I haven't yet
figured out how interim releases would work (new features are added to a WS
project and it wants to cut a release between wicket releases) or if that
matters.

  This would not have to effect all WS projects - someone could continue to
add projects to WS just like they do today.  This would simply create a
sub-tree of projects that are in the structured / scheduled release area.
For those that don't want to be part of that structure, they could continue
operating as they do today.

So, here's the vote:

[ ] - NO!  We should leave Wicket Stuff like it is - a free-for-all with no
structure
[ ] - YES - I would like to see at least the most used Wicket Stuff projects
structured so that they mirror Wicket, and a release is produced for each
Wicket release.
[ ] - Maybe - I have a better idea (perfect!)

Also - please add the following:
1 - Would you be interested in helping to maintain such a thing. (If we had
two or three of the owners of the larger projects on board, I don't think it
would be too hard to keep the codebase of this in sync with Wicket core.)
2 - What projects do you own (and by your vote we'll see if you want those
projects to be included in this restructuring).

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T18:13:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23960">
    <title>please make RequestLogger.log(RequestData, SessionData) protected</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23960</link>
    <description>Could we please make the method above protected (rather than private).  This
makes it very simple to do something like this:

    &lt; at &gt;Override
    protected IRequestLogger newRequestLogger() {
        return new RequestLogger() {
            &lt; at &gt;Override
            protected void log(RequestData rd, SessionData sd) {
                // do my custom logging HERE
            }
        };
    }

ALSO - it would be real nice if at the same time you extract that creation
of the AppendingStringBuffer to a method, so that the log method now looks
like:

protected void log(RequestData rd, SessionData sd)
{
    if (log.isInfoEnabled())
    {
        log.info(createStringBuffer(rd, sd, true);
    }
}
protected final void createStringBuffer(RequestData rd, SessionData sd,
boolean includeRuntimeInfo)
{
    ... all of the stuff that was taken out of log that creates the ASB
    if (includeRuntimeInfo)
    {
        Runtime runtime = Runtime.getRuntime();
        long max = runtime.maxMemory() / 1000000;
        long total = runtime.totalMemory() / 1000000;
        long used = total - runtime.freeMemory() / 1000000;
        asb.append(",maxmem=");
        asb.append(max);
        asb.append("M,total=");
        asb.append(total);
        asb.append("M,used=");
        asb.append(used);
        asb.append("M");
    }
    return asb;
}

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-19T23:31:54</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23959">
    <title>Update SCM in Wicket 1.3.x branch</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23959</link>
    <description>I'm adding the Wicket 1.3.x branch to the Continuum build server [1], and it
won't build because the SCM tag is incorrect after the branch.  Could a
committer please change the SCM tag in the parent pom to reflect the correct
location?  Here's the code:

Change:
&lt;scm&gt;
 &lt;connection&gt;scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk&lt;/connection&gt;

 &lt;developerConnection&gt;scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk&lt;/developerConnection&gt;

 &lt;url&gt;http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/wicket/trunk&lt;/url&gt;
&lt;/scm&gt;

to:
&lt;scm&gt;
 &lt;connection&gt;scm:svn:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.3.x/&lt;/connection&gt;
 &lt;developerConnection&gt;scm:svn:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.3.x/&lt;/developerConnection&gt;

 &lt;url&gt;http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/wicket/branches/wicket-1.3.x/&lt;/url&gt;
&lt;/scm&gt;

[1] - http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum/
Thanks!
</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-19T14:46:09</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23932">
    <title>Continuum Build Server Set Up</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23932</link>
    <description>Devs,
  In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a
Continuum instance on my server last night.  I added Wicket and several
Wicket Stuff projects.  It seems to be running fine, except that most
projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
configured.

  I don't mind going in and fixing or adding the SCM tag on all of the
projects that are currently on TeamCity and setting them up on this
Continuum server.  But since those aren't my projects, I wanted to run it
past the group first.  What do you think?  We could do this and let it run
for a while as a test.

http://www.wickettraining.com/continuum

</description>
    <dc:creator>Jeremy Thomerson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-18T16:21:08</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23920">
    <title>RES: Drop wicket:link</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23920</link>
    <description>What do you mean? Like recursively detect other pages?

    &lt;ul wicket:id="menus"&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="ControlCenter.html"&gt;ControlCenter&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt;
  &lt;ul&gt;
          &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="controlcenter/Users.html"&gt;Users&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
          &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="controlcenter/Departments.html"&gt;Departments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;/ul&gt;
      &lt;/li&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="Profile.html"&gt;Profile&lt;/a&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="../Home.html"&gt;Home&lt;/a&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;

Something that could parse this template?

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[mailto:nino.martinez-PgGV5VupRVRaa/9Udqfwiw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 17 de novembro de 2008 17:25
Para: dev-X1ioaoK8vgJd/SJB6HiN2Ni2O/JbrIOy&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org
Assunto: Re: Drop wicket:link


And another thing it could make autolink parser able to look in other 
packages aswell for pages... Currently theres no support for autolinking 
to pages not in the same package..

Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:

</description>
    <dc:creator>Bruno Cesar Borges</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:37:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23918">
    <title>RES: Drop wicket:link</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23918</link>
    <description>Maybe, but to migrate a codebase wouldn't be that harder. People will only have to replace &lt;wicket:link&gt; with &lt;span wicket:id="myid"&gt; and add the Java component. And if the codebase has a good test coverage, Wicket will point out automatically places where the component should be added.

Another solution to do a smooth migration, is to simply continue to interpret &lt;wicket:link&gt; during the first release of (temporary name) AutoLinkMarkupContainer, but still requiring to add the component. This way, only Java code would need to sufer from changes. Then, on a future release, definitely drop the support of &lt;wicket:link&gt;

I say +1

[]'s
Bruno Borges

-----Mensagem original-----
De: James Carman [mailto:james-+RXjrjb0GfS5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 17 de novembro de 2008 17:07
Para: dev-X1ioaoK8vgJd/SJB6HiN2Ni2O/JbrIOy&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org
Assunto: Re: Drop wicket:link


I'd say -1.  This would be a nightmare on existing codebases.

2008/11/17 Bruno Cesar Borges &lt;brunoborges-UAukSYTVTDhfJ/NunPodnw&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;:
***************************************************************************************************
"Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s) destinatários(s) acima identificado(s),
podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e seu sigilo é protegido por 
lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente e apague-a de seu sistema.
Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação, distribuição, cópia ou uso sem 
expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não refletem, necessariamente, 
o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas autorizadas."


"Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above identified, possibly 
containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose content is protected by law. 
In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. 
Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination, distribution, copy or use without 
express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do not necessarily reflect 
CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
***************************************************************************************************


</description>
    <dc:creator>Bruno Cesar Borges</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:15:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23914">
    <title>Drop wicket:link</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23914</link>
    <description>This might sound crazy, but what about dropping the support for the tag &lt;wicket:link&gt; ? :-)

People are starting to use it frequently, and because of that, features will be requested. And then we might end with a tag library. But, to not freak everybody out, I suggest develop a markup container to do that.

Example: 

   # Java
   AutoLinkMarkupContainer autolinks = new AutoLinkMarkupContainer("menus");

   # HTML
   &lt;ul wicket:id="menus"&gt;
     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="Users.html"&gt;Users&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="Departments.html"&gt;Departments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;/ul&gt;

What do you guys think?

Cheers,
Bruno
***************************************************************************************************
"Atenção: Esta mensagem foi enviada para uso exclusivo do(s) destinatários(s) acima identificado(s),
podendo conter informações e/ou documentos confidencias/privilegiados e seu sigilo é protegido por 
lei. Caso você tenha recebido por engano, por favor, informe o remetente e apague-a de seu sistema.
Notificamos que é proibido por lei a sua retenção, disseminação, distribuição, cópia ou uso sem 
expressa autorização do remetente. Opiniões pessoais do remetente não refletem, necessariamente, 
o ponto de vista da CETIP, o qual é divulgado somente por pessoas autorizadas."


"Warning: This message was sent for exclusive use of the addressees above identified, possibly 
containing information and or privileged/confidential documents whose content is protected by law. 
In case you have mistakenly received it, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. 
Be noticed that the law forbids the retention, dissemination, distribution, copy or use without 
express authorization from the sender. Personal opinions of the sender do not necessarily reflect 
CETIP's point of view, which is only divulged by authorized personnel."
***************************************************************************************************


</description>
    <dc:creator>Bruno Cesar Borges</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-17T19:03:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23906">
    <title>Client-Side Image Map...</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23906</link>
    <description>I've created a JIRA with an attached implementation of a new
client-side image map.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1936

Basically what it does is it borrows some ideas from the VelocityPanel
class, in that it generates its own markup.  So, it's able to "attach"
the AbstractLink objects to &lt;area&gt; elements within the &lt;map&gt;.  I think
this is a good replacement for ImageMap, since it's not so limiting
(works with existing Images and allows any AbstractLink, not just
Links).  My patch also deprecates ImageMap, so that we can remove it
in 1.5 (provided it makes it into 1.4; we could also back port it to
1.3.x).

</description>
    <dc:creator>James Carman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-15T14:43:18</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23898">
    <title>Wicket, url rewriting and shared resources browser caching</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23898</link>
    <description>I have recently started optimizing our wicket based application in terms of
reducing the number of requests sent by the browser. This can be easily
achieved by assuring the resources (js, css, gif, png and so on) get proper
headers and get cached by the browser so that only a mere HTTP 304 response
gets sent by the server or, even better, no request from the browser is
sent at all.

I noticed that when the session tracking is based on url
rewriting, resources attached programmatically (as opposed to the resources
"inlined" in the html templates) which urls are rendered by
the  o.a.w.markup.html.internal.HeaderResponse render(ResourceReference)
and further by a.o.w.RequestCycle encodeUrlFor(IRequestTarget), get
their respective session id appended to the returned url.

Adding a simple AjaxFallbackLink to the page results in the
following contibutions to the head section of the rendered page:

&lt;script type="text/javascript"
src="resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference/wicket-event.js;jsessionid=379002689AD867A2CC4A6BDD717FA439"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script type="text/javascript"
src="resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference/wicket-ajax.js;jsessionid=379002689AD867A2CC4A6BDD717FA439"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;

The same applies to the images inserted using autolinking or manually
as ResourceReference:

&lt;img
alt="programatically-resourcereference"
src="resources/org.drzewo.dummy.web.pages.OtherPage/java_powered_logo.gif;jsessionid=379002689AD867A2CC4A6BDD717FA439"/&gt;
&lt;img
alt="autolinking"
src="resources/org.drzewo.dummy.web.pages.OtherPage/java_compatible_logo.gif;jsessionid=379002689AD867A2CC4A6BDD717FA439"/&gt;

The result, in terms of client-side caching, is that the resources
are cached only within the scope of the current session (a they are keyed
in
the client-cache by the url containing sessionid). All of those
resources are easily referrable outside of the session and accessing them
without the
jsessionid suffix results in an appropriate resource returned as well
no additional session allocated on the server (based on jconsole &amp;
wicket-jmx
observations).

My suggestion is that the resource links should be generated
without jsessionid (although I realize that when the cookie based session
tracking
is enabled they are referred to within the scope of the session as
the request sent for such a resource contais a cookie with a session
id...).
Maybe all of the shared resources should be treated uniformly - as if
they were accessed without a session.

Cheers,
Dominik Drzewiecki
</description>
    <dc:creator>Dominik Drzewiecki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-14T21:20:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23893">
    <title>[ANNOUNCE] Apache Wicket 1.4 release candidate 1</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel/23893</link>
    <description>The Apache Wicket team is proud to present the first release candidate of
Apache Wicket 1.4.  This is the first Wicket version with java 1.5 as
minimum requirement.

Eager people click here to download the distribution, others can read
further:

* http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4-rc1

We thank you for your patience and support.

The Wicket Team

- Apache Wicket

Apache Wicket is a component oriented Java web application framework. With
proper mark-up/logic separation, a POJO data model, and a refreshing lack of
XML, Apache Wicket makes developing web-apps simple and enjoyable again.
Swap the boilerplate, complex debugging and brittle code for powerful,
reusable components written with plain Java and HTML.

You can find out more about Apache Wicket on our website:

* http://wicket.apache.org

- This release

The Apache Wicket team is proud to announce the availability of the third
milestone release of our first java 1.5 Wicket version: Apache Wicket
1.4-m3. This is the first release with java 1.5 as a minimum. Almost
everything has been converted to java 1.5. If you find something missing,
please help us and send a message to the dev&lt; at &gt; or user&lt; at &gt; list.

- Migrating from 1.3

If you are coming from Wicket 1.3, you really want to read our migration
guide, found on the wiki:

* http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migrate-14.html

h3. Downloading the release

You can download the release from the official Apache mirror system, and you
can find it through the following link:

* http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4-rc1/

For the Maven and Ivy fans out there: update your pom's to the following,
and everything will be downloaded automatically:

&lt;dependency&gt;
    &lt;groupId&gt;org.apache.wicket&lt;/groupId&gt;
    &lt;artifactId&gt;wicket&lt;/artifactId&gt;
    &lt;version&gt;1.4-rc1&lt;/version&gt;
&lt;/dependency&gt;

Substitute the artifact ID with the projects of your liking to get the other
projects.

Please note that we don't prescribe a Logging implementation for SLF4J. You
need to specify yourself which one you prefer. Read more about SLF4J here:
http://slf4j.org

- Validating the release

The release has been signed by Frank Bille, your release manager for today.
The public key can be found in the KEYS file in the download area. Download
the KEYS file only from the Apache website.

* http://www.apache.org/dist/wicket/1.4-rc1/KEYS

Instructions on how to validate the release can be found here:

* http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#check-integrity

- Reporting bugs

In case you do encounter a bug, we would appreciate a report in our JIRA:

* http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET

- The distribution

In the distribution you will find a README. The README contains instructions
on how to build from source yourself. You also find a CHANEGELOG-1.4 which
contains a list of all things that have been fixed, added and/or removed
since the first release in the 1.4 branch.

- Release Notes - Wicket - Version 1.4-RC1

** Sub-task
    * [WICKET-1624] - ServletWebRequest.getRelativePathPrefixToContextRoot()
double decodes servlet path
    * [WICKET-1805] - Allow to change charset in StringRequestTarget: change
CharSet used by the OutStream as well

** Bug
    * [WICKET-550] - Use WebRequestEncoder everywhere a query string is
constructed
    * [WICKET-861] - NumberFormatException with
UrlCompressingWebRequestProcessor in WicketTester
    * [WICKET-1120] - Problem closing a ModalWindow when used through an
IFrame
    * [WICKET-1180] - Converters : final vs non final
    * [WICKET-1220] - Component.visitParents visits the calling component as
well
    * [WICKET-1311] - Improper HTML escaping for most wicket components and
extensions
    * [WICKET-1376] - Using AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior and mounting that page
gives exception
    * [WICKET-1425] - appendToInit() method is not called in class
DatePicker
    * [WICKET-1436] - Unable to use properties file when generating XML
files
    * [WICKET-1496] - DataTable.html does not validate (HTML
4.01/XHTML-Strict)
    * [WICKET-1535] - ExternalLink JavaScript not working in FF 3
    * [WICKET-1565] - AbstractTransformerBehavior can't be added to a page
    * [WICKET-1582] - WicketTester executeAjaxEvent onclick generating
non-AJAX response
    * [WICKET-1583] - NPE in EnclosureResolver
    * [WICKET-1627] - AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy improper user
of URLEncoder.encode
    * [WICKET-1634] - ClassName needs conversion from Path to dotted
notation in AutoLinkResolver
    * [WICKET-1648] - AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy(line 174)
throws confusing exception. It would be better redirect to 404-page in this
case.
    * [WICKET-1652] - Hard-coded quotes in xml prologue
    * [WICKET-1704] - ResourceStreamRequestTarget.configure set wrong
ContentLength for non-ascii characters
    * [WICKET-1719] - StringResourceModel may fail to format numbers using
MessageFormat
    * [WICKET-1728] - remove obsolete check from LocalizedImageResource
    * [WICKET-1730] - RfcCompliantEmailAddressValidator accepts whitespace
and tab
    * [WICKET-1731] - When used in inherited markup, &lt;wicket:link&gt; tries to
load a class with an illegal name
    * [WICKET-1736] - Allow Access to AutoCompleteTextField
AutoCompleteBehavior
    * [WICKET-1737] - wicketTester does not find HTML mark-up if custom
location is used.
    * [WICKET-1740] - RequestCycle.urlFor modifies page parameters
    * [WICKET-1745] - Get rid of raw Model usage
    * [WICKET-1746] - gecko: ajax javascript reference rendering problem
    * [WICKET-1754] - form action URLs in non-Wicket forms not rewritten
    * [WICKET-1755] - In html Include component isAbsolute method returns
false for an absolute path in unix-like systems
    * [WICKET-1756] - Generify PropertyColumn
    * [WICKET-1759] - Typo in method name:
AttributeModifier#replaceAttibuteValue
    * [WICKET-1765] - Extending from org.apache.wicket.Page causes
StackOverflowError
    * [WICKET-1776] - Quickstart's archetype misses maven compiler
configuration
    * [WICKET-1777] - Overflow when setting Expires header in WebResource
    * [WICKET-1780] - NPE in feedback panel
    * [WICKET-1787] - AjaxSubmitLink in Internet Explorer does not work with
Wicket's automatically genreated id's
    * [WICKET-1788] - "Invalid procedure call or argument" on AJAX call with
IE7
    * [WICKET-1789] - Border fails to render if its contents are not visible
by default
    * [WICKET-1796] - When markup type is XML, getLocalizer().getString(
"xyz", (WebPage) ) throws Exception
    * [WICKET-1797] - Bug with default RadioChoice "for" attribute on label
generation.
    * [WICKET-1799] - wicket-extensions has unused reference to
commons-collections.jar
    * [WICKET-1809] - wicket does not compile for 1.3.x because of method
usage &gt; jdk 1.4
    * [WICKET-1816] - Wicket 1.3.4 violates servlet standard, Glassfish
spews warnings
    * [WICKET-1818] - wicket:id attribute with a value containing spaces
generates invalid markup
    * [WICKET-1820] - Embedded forms do not support multipart
    * [WICKET-1829] - MarkupComponentBorder skips first tag in MarkupStream
    * [WICKET-1834] - Invalid Cookie Names for persistence used according to
RFC (doesn't work in tomcat 6.x)
    * [WICKET-1836] - RequestUtils.toAbsolutePath() should handle dot paths
in the url
    * [WICKET-1839] - IAjaxIndicatorAware/WicketAjaxIndicatorAppender with
AutoCompleteTextField doesn't work
    * [WICKET-1843] - Disabling RadioGroup via authorization strategy does
not disable contained Radio buttons
    * [WICKET-1846] - Dutch text message for NumberValidator incorrect
    * [WICKET-1857] - Unfound markup information is not entirely cached even
in deployment mode
    * [WICKET-1870] - MinimumLengthValidator throws NullPointerException
    * [WICKET-1901] - Spelling error in fonts list in CaptchaImageResource
    * [WICKET-1903] - RadioChoice disable certain choice bug
    * [WICKET-1904] - CheckBox incorrectly converts its model value when a
custom Boolean converter is installed - again

** Improvement
    * [WICKET-1055] - Add ability to have Radio and RadioGroup not related
via component hierarchy
    * [WICKET-1103] - Support validator and package level resource bundles
    * [WICKET-1115] - DownloadLink fix that encodes non-ASCII file names
properly
    * [WICKET-1138] - Better warning of design errors during development
    * [WICKET-1692] - on Java 6+ DatePicker.localize should use
DateFormatSymbols.getInstance(Locale) instead of new
DateFormatSymbols(Locale)  to support DateFormatSymbolsProviders
    * [WICKET-1696] - CaptchaImageResource - should take an IModel&lt;String&gt;
instead of String for captcha-text
    * [WICKET-1744] - RadioChoice ,  MultiListChoice, DropDownChoice,
ListChoice - model handlers should take a Collection&lt;T&gt; instead of the more
specific List&lt;T&gt;
    * [WICKET-1748] - 304 Last Modified responses should include an Expires
header
    * [WICKET-1749] - Want to add SignInPanel_ja.html
    * [WICKET-1753] - Allow WicketFilter to be configured to skip certain
paths
    * [WICKET-1767] - Protection against Session Fixation
    * [WICKET-1770] - PagingNavigation's javadoc contains malformed html
snippet
    * [WICKET-1782] - Protection against CSRF (cross-site request forgery)
attacks
    * [WICKET-1801] - Make AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.findIndicatorId()
protected
    * [WICKET-1802] - Propertyresolver could be more informative
    * [WICKET-1810] - StringRequestTarget is bloated and needs some care
    * [WICKET-1824] - AbstractDecimalConverter
    * [WICKET-1830] - Include Component Path in Generated Markup
    * [WICKET-1833] - Ungenerifying IConverter, because overriding
Component.getConverter() generated warnings in user code
    * [WICKET-1844] - Wizard button implementations should not be final
    * [WICKET-1853] - Wicket should allow non-formcomponents to plug into
form's FormComponent#updateModel event
    * [WICKET-1854] - What's the point of requiring IConverters to be
superclasses of the objects they convert?
    * [WICKET-1891] - AjaxLazyLoadPanel shouldn't call
getLoadingComponent(String) in constructor
    * [WICKET-1895] - AjaxButton should have a constructor to set the label

** New Feature
    * [WICKET-1720] - Add clearLocalizerCache to Application JMX bean
    * [WICKET-1877] - Provide Option to Specify XML Attribute Name in
getDebugSettings().setOutputComponentPath(true);

** Wish
    * [WICKET-1758] - Make DiskPageStore#getSessionFolder protected (rather
than private)
</description>
    <dc:creator>Frank Bille</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-13T14:06:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.java.wicket.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
