http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/2023 What is the proper way to test a property of an argument passed into a method of a mock, under JMock 2.5? Let's say that my CUT would normally be called like: myObject.myMethod(arg); and I'd like to verify that "arg" is of a particular type, and that it has a particular property set. I'm trying to do this: one(mock).myMethod(with(hasProperty("prop", eq("value")))); but hasProperty() returns Object, while myMethod() is expecting type Argument. I *can* do the following, which works: one(mock).myMethod(with(any(Argument.class))); I've been googling this problem for 2 days now, so any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks. Limbic System 2008-10-02T03:19:19 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/2020 Hi I got a problem with jmock2.5.0. Below is my tests that past under jmock2.2.0. After upgrading jmock to 2.5.0, these tests got failed with the stack trace below. < at >Test public void testCollectMissDataRight() throws Exception { final Collector collector0 = context.mock(Collector.class); final SocketSession fSession = context.mock(SocketSession.class); MaintenanceSession session = new MaintenanceSession(null,collector0); context.checking(new Expectations() { { one(collector0).isConnectedSector(with(equal("TACC00"))); will(returnValue(fSession)); one(fSession).startCollectLeftData((byte[])with(anything())); } }); byte[] data = "0000004820000001234567890123456789012345678999 TACC00 ".getBytes(); session.processData(data); context.assertIsSatisfied(); } < at >Test public void testCollectMissDataWrong() throws Exception { final Collector collector1 = context.mock(Collector.class); final SocketSession fSession1 = context.mock(SocketSession.class); MaintenanceSession session = new MaintenanceSession(null,collector1); context.checking(new Expectations() { { one(collector1).isConnectedSector(with(equal("TACC00"))); will(returnValue(null)); never(fSession1).startCollectLeftData((byte[])with(anything())); one(collector1).processAPError((String)with(anything())); } }); byte[] data = "0000004820000001234567890123456789012345678999 TACC00 ".getBytes(); session.processData(data); context.assertIsSatisfied(); } java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: a mock with name collector already exists at org.jmock.Mockery.mock(Mockery.java:128) at org.jmock.Mockery.mock(Mockery.java:120) at rae07a.collect.MaintenanceSessionTest.testCollectMissDataWrong(MaintenanceSessionTest.java:45) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:59) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:98) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:79) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:87) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:77) at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:42) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:88) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.runMethods(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:51) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner$1.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:27) at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:37) at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit4ClassRunner.run(JUnit4ClassRunner.java:42) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196) I got into jmock2.50 source and found out this problem has something to do with defaultNameFor method which always gives the same name for the same class. public <T> T mock(Class<T> typeToMock) { return mock(typeToMock, namingScheme.defaultNameFor(typeToMock)); } Maybe this is supposed to do. Can anybody help me with some answer? James ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, storing, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 王軍＠Neusoft 2008-09-19T01:42:24 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/2018 i am trying to write a test case for the exception scenario. my code looks as below. *public* ActionForward execute(ActionMapping mapping, ActionForm actionForm, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) *throws* Exception { ActionForward actionforward = *null*; *try*{ SimpleDateFormat format = *new* SimpleDateFormat(ReportingConstant.* DATE_FORMAT*); ReportRequest reportReq = *new* ReportRequest(); String distID = request.getParameter("distId"); String beginDate = request.getParameter("beginDate"); String endDate = request.getParameter("endDate"); *if*(*null* != beginDate){ reportReq.setBeginDate(format.parse(beginDate)); }*else*{ *LOG*.error("Begin date not present in the received form "); *throw* *new* ReportingException("Begin date not present in the received form"); } *if*(*null* != endDate){ reportReq.setEndDate(format.parse(endDate)); }*else*{ *LOG*.error("End date not present in the received form "); *throw* *new* ReportingException("End date not present in the received form" ); } *if*(*null* != distID){ reportReq.setDistributorId(distID); }*else*{ *LOG*.error("Distributor Id not present in the received form "); *throw* *new* ReportingException("Distributor Id not present in the received form "); } some code.... }*catch*(Exception e){ *LOG*.error("Error sending XLS file to the client ",e); actionforward = mapping.findForward("exception"); } *return* actionforward; } now i would like to test a execute method for exception i.e. i am expecting that if the request obj do not have any parameters set then my code will throw an exception. and i need to verify that. my test case method is like.. *public* *void* testDownloadXLSReportFailure()*throws* Exception{ httpServletRequestMock.expects(once()) .method("getParameter") .with(eq("distId")) .will(returnValue(*null*)); request = (HttpServletRequest)httpServletRequestMock.proxy(); *try*{ ActionForward forward = downloadReportAction.execute(actionMapping, reportForm, request, response); *fail*("Error .."); }*catch*(Exception e){ } } org.jmock.core.DynamicMockError: mockHttpServletRequest: unexpected invocation Invoked: mockHttpServletRequest.getParameter("beginDate") Allowed: expected once and has been invoked: getParameter( eq("distId") ), returns null at org.jmock.core.AbstractDynamicMock.mockInvocation(AbstractDynamicMock.java:58) at org.jmock.cglib.CGLIBCoreMock.intercept(CGLIBCoreMock.java:71) at $javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$7c120c24.getParameter(<generated>) at com.toro.rebate.reporting.struts.action.DownloadXLSCommercialReportAction.execute(DownloadXLSCommercialReportAction.java:47) at com.toro.rebate.reporting.struts.action.DownloadXLSCommercialReportActionTest.testDownloadXLSReportFailure(DownloadXLSCommercialReportActionTest.java:116) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154) at org.jmock.core.VerifyingTestCase.runBare(VerifyingTestCase.java:39) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118) at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208) at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.junit3.JUnit3TestReference.run(JUnit3TestReference.java:128) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196) can sombody tell me how do i chk the exception condition here? thanks, sush Sushil Dodake 2008-09-16T21:44:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/2015 Hi All, i am trying to write a test case for a struts action call. in the action call i am trying to send a file on the response output stream. when i get the output stream using response.getOutputstream i get a object of ServletOurtputStream. which is a abstract class.. i then write a byte stream on the output stream and fluch it to close i am confused as to how to write a test case. can sombody help me here? any example? regards, Sush Sushil Dodake 2008-09-16T04:21:22 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/2004 I was trying to write testcases for a method which takes an enum as parameter. I dont want to pass any particular value to it. This enum also contains a few methods that i want to mock. Is there any way to do so? Please let me know if my question is not clear. I will try to post a sample then. Thanks, Avinash --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Avinash Nayak 2008-09-12T11:01:07 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1981 Hi, Pardon me for a not so great subject :). Anyways, my question follows: Consider src file X.java Y obj1; Z obj2 = Y.f(); obj2.g(); Consider the mocking file XMock.java I am creating 2 mock objects mock1 = mock object of class Y mock2 = mock object of class Z; /* Now, for the code :) */ one(mock1).f();will(returnValue(mock2)); one(mock2).g(); Q: Is this ok ? It throws an exception saying "forgot to mention an expectation?" on the line "obj2.g()" (in X.java) Thanks Vivek Vivek R 2008-08-26T05:56:40 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1980 Hi, Pardon me for a not so great subject :). Anyways, my question follows: Consider src file X.java Y obj1; Z obj2 = Y.f(); obj2.g(); Consider the mocking file XMock.java I am creating 2 mock objects mock1 = mock object of class Y mock2 = mock object of class Z; /* Now, for the code :) */ one(mock1).f();will(returnValue(mock2)); one(mock2).g(); Q: Is this ok ? It throws an exception saying "forgot to mention an expectation?" on the line "obj2.g()" (in X.java) Thanks Vivek Vivek R 2008-08-26T05:56:29 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1979 We've just released jMock 2.5.1, a bug-fix release that improves error messages. The changelog is at: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10336&styleName=Html&version=14527 --Nat --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Nat Pryce 2008-08-24T10:20:55 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1971 Hi, Sorry for inconvenience. I have a question on jMock use. Would you PLS give me some comments? I have a class Foo and an interface Goo like below: public class Foo { private Goo goo; private int i; public Foo (Goo aGoo) { goo = aGoo; i = goo.getCount(); } public int getI (){ return i; } public void incre () { goo.incre(); i = goo.getCount(); } } public interface Goo { public void incre (); public int getCount (); } And I set up a test case like below: public class oneTest extends TestCase { protected void setUp() throws Exception { super.setUp(); } protected void tearDown() throws Exception { super.tearDown(); } public void testSth () { Mockery mockery = new Mockery(); final Goo mockGoo = mockery.mock(Goo.class, "MockGoo"); mockery.checking(new Expectations() { { one(mockGoo).incre(); one(mockGoo).getCount(); will(returnValue(1)); } }); Foo aFoo = new Foo(mockGoo); aFoo.incre(); mockery.assertIsSatisfied(); } } But after I run the test case I get below error. And if I remove “i = goo.getCount();” from Foo’s constructor, it is OK. Does it means that we should not use the mock objects (in my code is Goo)’ method in the constructor of the class (in my code is Foo) to be tested? Thank you very much! - Wei Yang Error: unexpected invocation: MockGoo.getCount()expectations: expected once, already invoked 1 time: MockGoo.incre(); returns a default value expected once, already invoked 1 time: MockGoo.getCount(); returns <1>what happened before this: MockGoo.getCount() MockGoo.incre() at org.jmock.internal.InvocationDispatcher.dispatch(InvocationDispatcher.java:56) at org.jmock.Mockery.dispatch(Mockery.java:218) at org.jmock.Mockery.access$000(Mockery.java:43) at org.jmock.Mockery$MockObject.invoke(Mockery.java:258) at org.jmock.internal.InvocationDiverter.invoke(InvocationDiverter.java:27) at org.jmock.internal.FakeObjectMethods.invoke(FakeObjectMethods.java:38) at org.jmock.lib.JavaReflectionImposteriser$1.invoke(JavaReflectionImposteriser.java:33) at $Proxy45.getCount(Unknown Source) at myTest.Foo.incre(Foo.java:18) at myTest.oneTest.testSth(oneTest.java:32) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) _________________________________________________________________ 一点即聊，MSN推出新功能“点我！” http://im.live.cn/click/ 杨威 2008-08-20T07:29:39 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1963 Hi. Firstly; I'm very new to jMock so I apologize for any obvious oversights. I'm using States but I can find no way to verify the final state at the end of the test? The only workaround I have found is declaring an (irrelevant) method call in the desired state and making that call at the end of the test to force a failure if the state is incorrect. Thoughts? MSanchez 2008-08-04T11:54:16 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1952 Hi, I've uploaded maven artifacts for release 2.5.0 Just follow instructions from http://jmock.org/maven.html replacing 2.4.0 -> 2.5.0. Note that new module jmock-script has been added. Any issues with it please let me know. Cheers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Mauro Talevi 2008-07-21T19:04:56 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1949 i'm encountering some problems downloading the jmock jars using the specified maven configuration (http://www.jmock.org/maven.html).for some reason, the .pom and the .sha1 files get downloaded into my local repository, but the jar files don't. i'm using repo1.maven.org as the download location for the dependency. i can see the jar files on the site ( http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jmock/jmock-junit4/2.5.0-RC1/) but they don't get downloaded. i'm using maven 2.0.9. is there some other repository that i should be using instead? cheers, owen. Owen Rogers 2008-07-17T20:47:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1942 Hi there, I'm using jmock 2.5.0RC1. When trying to mock concrete classes with final toString methods, I'm getting: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: ClassNameHere has a final toString method Looking through jira and the changelogs, this is a direct result of this bug: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JMOCK-150 and was implemented in changeset: http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/jmock?cs=1152 Is there a middle ground somewhere? I'm working with 3rd party classes where I have no control over their class structure. JMOCK-150 seems like squashing a bug with a hammer. The original bug reporter mentioned that: * an un-expected exception during the assertIsSatisfied() check (got the exception when tring to describe the mocked class using the final toString() which uses other methods from the original class) Could the code in Mockery.assertIsSatisfied() look for the fact that a ClassImposteriser is being used and to bypass the toString method in case it is final? pseudo-code follows: new ExpectationError("not all expectations were satisfied", !toStringMethodIsFinalAndUsingClassImposteriser(dispatcher) ? dispatcher : dispatcher.getClass().getName() ); Cheers, -- Haroon Rafique <haroon.rafique-H217xnMUJC0sA/PxXw9srA< at >public.gmane.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Haroon Rafique 2008-07-16T18:39:04 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1932 JMock 2.5.0 has been released. The full changelog is at: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10336&styleName=Html&version=13840 --Nat --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Nat Pryce 2008-07-14T11:06:00 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1930 Hi, I just wanted to know, why JMock cannot mock a class that doesn't have an interface ? I mean, I know if you specify mockery.setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);, it would actually be able to. But why is it designed in such a way that you have to specify this to mock a class ? Just out of curiosity, I thought every mock class would be implemented as an extension to the original class. Could anyone throw more light on this ? -Vivek Vivek R 2008-07-14T09:20:42 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1927 Hi, I am facing a prob while mocking a concrete class. I am giving a simplified version of the prob. In the given testcase, its trying to run the method, when i call mockery.checking(). Is it an expected behaviour? Because of this, i am not able to use mocking of a concrete class. I am using JMock 2.4.0. Thanks, avinash package com.nayak; public class OpClass { public final void execute(boolean validate) { System.out.println("In execute() : " + validate); if (validate) validate(); } private void validate() { // No Validations done System.out.println("In validate()"); } } package com.nayak; import org.jmock.Expectations; import org.jmock.Mockery; import org.jmock.lib.action.VoidAction; import org.jmock.lib.legacy.ClassImposteriser; import junit.framework.TestCase; public class OpClassUTEST extends TestCase { public void testExecute() { Mockery mockery = new Mockery(); mockery.setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE); final OpClass opClass = mockery.mock(OpClass.class); mockery.checking(new Expectations() { { one(opClass).execute(with(any(Boolean.class))); will(VoidAction.INSTANCE); } }); mockery.assertIsSatisfied(); } } Output : "In execute() : false" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Avinash Nayak 2008-07-14T05:23:14 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1910 Hi, I'm using JMock for testing with JUnit. Everything works fine, and I've defined number of test, but now I have one wierd problem when testing Struts actions. So I have like this in my testing class : public class MyTestingClass { PersonService service = context.mock(PersonService.class); Person person = new Person(); // fill person object < at >Test public void testMethod() throws Exception { context.checking(new Expectations() {{ one (service).findByUsername(person.getUsername()); will(returnValue(person)); }}); } // set service // run action } and when this line of code is called in my class, like this: public MainClass { PersonService service; get/set methods public method() { person = service.findByUsername(username); } } I get this exception: "unexpected invocation: service.findByUsername(username); It seems like that JMock doesn't recognize this method, but I don't get any syntax errors. What is the problem here ? -- Thx, Milan Milan Milanovic 2008-07-11T19:11:30 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1904 Hello, I'm using latest Jmock stable version and I want to use equals and hashCode methods on mock objects. But, I notice that theses method are handled in a special way in the ProxiedObjectIdentity class. Could you explain the reason of that? Finally, is it possible to use these methods on mock objects? Thanks in advance. Gueze Thomas 2008-07-11T11:26:37 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1902 hello there I'm trying to make a first little program with JMock work but cannot make it, so I searching for some help here is my code, could someone explain what's wrong with it? in fact, the test succeed every time I launch it, yet it shoudnt as I have a change in the Math class, so it should fail as it isnt anymore an addition thanks in advance package test.jmock; public class Math { public int doCalculation(int a, int b){ return a-b; } } package test.jmock; import org.jmock.Expectations; import org.jmock.Mockery; import org.jmock.integration.junit4.JMock; import org.jmock.integration.junit4.JUnit4Mockery; import org.jmock.lib.legacy.ClassImposteriser; import org.junit.Test; import org.junit.runner.RunWith; < at >RunWith(JMock.class) public class FirstJMock { Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery(){{setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE); }}; Math mockUpdate = context.mock(Math.class); < at >Test public void doMathTest() { context.checking(new Expectations() {{ one (mockUpdate).doCalculation(4, 3); will(returnValue(7)); }}); mockUpdate.doCalculation(4, 3); context.assertIsSatisfied(); } } --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email bekeffy zoltan 2008-07-10T16:13:17 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1900 I've pushed a release of 2.5.0-RC2. This fixes a class-loader issue that stopped jMock working in Eclipse Plug-In tests (JMOCK-124). It also adds a new expectation function "oneOf" that means the same as "one" but makes the entire expectation read more clearly (JMOCK-181). If nobody has any issues with the class-loader change, then I'll publish a final release early next week. --Nat --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email Nat Pryce 2008-07-07T09:51:09 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.jmock.user/1898 Hi all - I've been using JMock for years. Suddenly I'm having trouble. I'm on 2.4, and have just realized that I should be using the JUnit-4-specific classes in JMock (the JUnit4Mockery, and the JMock test runner). I am running inside of Eclipse. Previously I was using the JUnit jar that Eclipse furnishes you with for your classpath - 4_4.3.1. When I added the RunWith annotation to my test case, Eclipse began to complain that the JUnit4ClassRunner class was unreachable. So I removed this item from the classpath and added the real JUnit 4.4 jar. That msg went away, but now I have this for many of my assertions: "The method assertEquals(Object, Object) is ambiguous for the type ..." I don't get it on every assert, but many of them. Before I hit the sack, I'm posting this, maybe someone has a clue? Larry Edelstein Principal Software Engineer LiveVox ribs-HInyCGIudOg< at >public.gmane.org Larry Edelstein 2008-07-07T09:24:48 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.java.jmock.user