http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14424 <pre>This is automatically generated email about markup problems in a man page for which you appear to be responsible. If you are not the right person or list, please tell me so I can correct my database. See http://catb.org/~esr/doclifter/bugs.html for details on how and why these patches were generated. Feel free to email me with any questions. Note: These patches do not change the modification date of any manual page. You may wish to do that by hand. I apologize if this message seems spammy or impersonal. The volume of markup bugs I am tracking is over five hundred - there is no real alternative to generating bugmail from a database and template. -- Eric S. Raymond Problems with nautilus-connect-server.1: List syntax error. This means .IP, .TP or .RS/.RE markup is garbled. Common causes include .TP just before a section header, .TP entries with tags but no bodies, and mandoc lists with no trailing .El. These confuse doclifter, and may also mess up stricter man-page browsers like Xman and Rosetta. --- nautilus-connect-server.1-unpatched2012-07-24 03:31:10.710390722 -0400 +++ nautilus-connect-server.12012-07-24 03:31:38.718390202 -0400 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; -39,7 +39,7 &lt; at &gt;&lt; at &gt; .TP .B \-\-version Show version. -.TP +.PP Other standard GNOME options not listed here are also supported. .SH SEE ALSO Nautilus Connect Server documentation can be found from the "Help" menu, or by pressing the </pre> esr< at >thyrsus.com 2013-06-18T05:13:55 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14420 <pre>Hi, Samba4 does not have NetBIOS integration, therefore, the domain cotroller will not be visible on the network. Especially with Gnome3, the address bar has been removed from nautilus, therefore it becomes impossible to connect to a CIFS resource that is not broadcasting itselft. I highly suggest the introduction of the addess bar in nautilus. As of right now, the only way to access the shares on samba4 is to mount them from console, process that is unnatural when the GUI is meant to facilitate the work. This would be a great adition to Gnome3 and others would appreciate it for sure. Thank you. </pre> admin< at >blackpenguin.org 2013-05-20T15:57:52 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14419 <pre>Hi, i'm using Documents last version in Arch Linux and it would be nice to add some features to documents: - Ability to browse subdirectories in Google Drive, if i try all that i get is "Document not found error". - Integration with Abiword and Gnumeric as Libreoffice is a bit bloated for not so modern computers. Hope that this helps, keep the good work guys. Greetings, Joaquin Villanova </pre> Joaquin Villanova 2013-05-16T12:11:53 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14416 <pre>Hello all, we currently run a study about strength and weakness of file managers. To estimate pros and cons of a particular tool we need to compare its result with other programs. And for a reliable splitting of the results we need as much answers as possible. Therefore: Please participate! (and share the link to the study) http://user-prompt.com/participate-are-you-perfectly-satisfied-with-your-file-manager/ Thanks a lot in advance, Heiko. </pre> Heiko Tietze 2013-05-15T07:50:35 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14403 <pre>Hello, Forgive the possible noise. I tried to use the archive search but it did not give me meaningful results in fact it didn't give me results from this list at all, but google results. I've searched for this solution but found none, except that nemo has been forked from nautilus to provide dropped features. The problem with going to nemo is loosing accessibility with gnome orca and not having the wonderful features of nautilus. I find the new interface to be so frustrating to be nearly useless. The file listings and every feature work very well but I cannot minimize or close the window without much effort. I know that for some users the newer way of doing things is faster and more efficient but for some remembering new shortcuts to close a window when ALL the rest of the windows in GNOME can be closed by clicking the X in the menu, is frustrating. Could a setting be included in the next improvement to nautilus if it doesn't already exist to allow nautilus to have the regular buttons that everything else does if the user wishes to have them? Other than that there is no reason to use anything else. Nautilus is awesome and works very well for the blind user or visually impaired user. David David J. Ring, Jr., N1EA &lt;http://www.qsl.net/n1ea/&gt; Radio-Officers Group&lt;http://groups.google.com/group/radio-officers?hl=en&gt;-- Join CW email list &lt;http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/cw%20&gt; -- Historic Morse Recordings &lt;http://tiny.cc/n1ea&gt; *Gopher Hole:* gopher://sdf.org/1/users/djringjr/ (native or with Firefox's Overbite extension) or via http to gopher gateway&lt;http://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/gw?gopher://sdf.org/1/users/djringjr/&gt; *C**hat* Skype: djringjr MSN: djringjr (&lt; at &gt;) msn.com AIM: N1EA icq: 27380609 =30= </pre> D.J.J. Ring, Jr. 2013-05-07T15:15:07 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14401 <pre>Hi. After upgrading Nautilus 3.6→3.8 the menu item "MPlayer Media Player" disappeared from the context "Open" menu of Nautilus. A research has showed that this is because "/usr/share/applications/mplayer.desktop" has "NoDisplay=true". The specification http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec-latest.html states: |{{{ NoDisplay| means "this application exists, but don't display it in the menus". This can be useful to e.g. associate this application with MIME types, so that it gets launched from a file manager (or other apps), without having a menu entry for it (there are tons of good reasons for this, including e.g. the |netscape -remote|, or |kfmclient openURL| kind of stuff). }}} It states that "[a program] gets launched from a file manager". I agree that "this application exists, but don't display it in the menus" is confusing, because it *is* displayed in a menu --- in the context menu. But we all understand this mistake, isn't it? So, what do we do now? Ask to correct the mistake in the specification, and, probably, revert the behavior of Nautilus to its previous state? </pre> Roman Beslik 2013-05-01T09:46:25 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14397 <pre>Hi, I've made some changes to nautilus-2.28.4 source ( http://hammurabi.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/sources/nautilus/2.28/nautilus-2.28.4.tar.bz2), and would like to install and run them from a custom path. ./configure --prefix=/custom/path/ make install This does the trick for installing it in a different path, however I'm not certain how to get the system to run it form there. I'm running CentOS release 6.3 (Final). Adding /custom/path to my $PATH doesn't seem to do the trick, as the install has many other subfolders, i.e bin, etc, lib, libexec, share. I'm guessing Centos is loading /usr/local/bin/nautilus regardless of what's in the path anyway. I'm asking because I'd like to release these changes across (many) multiple machines, and installing this patch on each machine is not a feasible solution. Thanks in advance for your help. Shyal Beardsley </pre> Shyal Beardsley 2013-04-25T08:11:16 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14396 <pre>Hi, I have made a patch to solve the bug reported at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340094 and would like to have it reviewed. Also, the bug report shows version 2.12.x although the reported bug exists in 3.6.x as well. I'm not sure about 3.8.0 as I'm yet to build it but from the source code it seems it exists in 3.8 as well. </pre> M.S. Suraj 2013-04-22T08:58:54 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14389 <pre>Hello I'm new to this list, this is my first post. I have been a Linux and gnome user for many years, and quite happy at that. Yesterday I upgraded my Ubuntu installation to 13.4 Of course I was aware of the recent changes in Nautilus but Ubuntu 12.10 did not bring the new version yet, so until today it was a bit theoretical to me. But now I am confronted with the new Nautilus: 'Files', and slightly in shock. For me compact list view is the only view I have been using for years. I find icon view chaotic, and list view OK when you have a small number of files in a directory. Compact list view provides both structure and overview, and does (did) so exclusively. I have been reading the posts about this topic that have been made somewhere about June/July last year. I must admit I find the arguments against compact list view theoretical and even somewhat pedantic. My first reaction was to try and simply use a different file manager, like Marlin. But unfortunately this is not as easy as, say, configure a new default browser. although I like the changes to Nautilus in general this particular change makes me want to stop using it. That is not good. I hope this change could be reconsidered. The least thing that would sensible is actually investigate how many people are (were) actually using compact list view. The mailing list archives do not indicate such research took place. I Agree it is a good idea to remove clutter from software from time to time, and re balance the features with the underlying concepts. But to me compact list view was not clutter, but my favourite feature (however conceptually awkward). Please bring it back, one way or another. regards (and thanks for all the good work) Ernst Bunders </pre> Ernst Bunders 2013-04-17T08:48:58 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14386 <pre>Gentlemen I wish to introduce myself to the team working together on the GNOME OS. I am not sure if this is the right place for that. My particular area of expertise is file system design and so I am interested to specialise in this area. I understand that Nautilus is the file management component of GNOME OS and if this is not the case, please direct me elsewhere. My vision for GNOME is the best file system for any computer in the world for the individual. I am leaving Apple to join the GNOME effort because it is not possible to do anything on their Ipad and that is simply not good enough for the hardware type which holds the future for all of us. The move away from the PC to the ipad is fuelled by the tactile experience which, once sampled, it is not possible for Content Creators to return to the old environment, especially when working with text and photos, which is the dawn of electronic publishing. I have in excess of 40 years experience at the highest level of systems design and wish to apply that to the problem of file system integration between a mouse type and a surface type environment and in particular to the photographic and publishing workflow. Initially I would like to stimulate the design team members with my unique perspective, being also an artist, writer and content creator for new media yet to be invented and deployed on operating systems now being considered. If I fit in here, please let me know, or tell me to go somewhere else you might consider more appropriate. best wishes Adam </pre> Adam Essene 2013-04-16T21:41:22 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14382 <pre>Hi! I did this basic example: http://projects.gnome.org/nautilus-python/documentation/html/nautilus-python-overview-example.html#id2684063 It's running perfect in Nautilus 3.4.2. But in Nautilus 3.6.3, no contextual menu appears in Nautilus, then you can't run a python extension. Any idea, please? Is this a bug? Thanks in advance! Mark. </pre> Mark 2013-04-14T09:01:07 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14381 <pre>We are researchers from different parts of the world and conducted a study on the world’s biggest bogus computer science conference WORLDCOMP ( http://sites.google.com/site/worlddump1 ) organized by Prof. Hamid Arabnia from University of Georgia, USA. We submitted a fake paper to WORLDCOMP 2011 and again (the same paper with a modified title) to WORLDCOMP 2012. This paper had numerous fundamental mistakes. Sample statements from that paper include: (1). Binary logic is fuzzy logic and vice versa (2). Pascal developed fuzzy logic (3). Object oriented languages do not exhibit any polymorphism or inheritance (4). TCP and IP are synonyms and are part of OSI model (5). Distributed systems deal with only one computer (6). Laptop is an example for a super computer (7). Operating system is an example for computer hardware Also, our paper did not express any conceptual meaning. However, it was accepted both the times without any modifications (and without any reviews) and we were invited to submit the final paper and a payment of $500+ fee to present the paper. We decided to use the fee for better purposes than making Prof. Hamid Arabnia (Chairman of WORLDCOMP) rich. After that, we received few reminders from WORLDCOMP to pay the fee but we never responded. We MUST say that you should look at the above website if you have any thoughts to submit a paper to WORLDCOMP. DBLP and other indexing agencies have stopped indexing WORLDCOMP’s proceedings since 2011 due to its fakeness. See http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icai/index.html for of one of the conferences of WORLDCOMP and notice that there is no listing after 2010. See http://sites.google.com/site/dumpconf for comments from well-known researchers about WORLDCOMP. If WORLDCOMP is not fake then why did DBLP suddenly stopped listing the proceedings after? The status of your WORLDCOMP papers can be changed from “scientific” to “other” (i.e., junk or non-technical) at any time. See the comments http://www.mail-archive.com/tccc&lt; at &gt;lists.cs.columbia.edu/msg05168.html of a respected researcher on this. Better not to have a paper than having it in WORLDCOMP and spoil the resume and peace of mind forever! Our study revealed that WORLDCOMP is a money making business, using University of Georgia mask, for Prof. Hamid Arabnia. He is throwing out a small chunk of that money (around 20 dollars per paper published in WORLDCOMP’s proceedings) to his puppet (Mr. Ashu Solo or A.M.G. Solo) who publicizes WORLDCOMP and also defends it at various forums, using fake/anonymous names. The puppet uses fake names and defames other conferences to divert traffic to WORLDCOMP. He also makes anonymous phone calls and threatens the critiques of WORLDCOMP (see Item 7 in Section 5 of http://sites.google.com/site/dumpconf ).That is, the puppet does all his best to get a maximum number of papers published at WORLDCOMP to get more money into his (and Prof. Hamid Arabnia’s) pockets. Monte Carlo Resort (the venue of WORLDCOMP until 2012) has refused to provide the venue for WORLDCOMP’13 because of the fears of their image being tarnished due to WORLDCOMP’s fraudulent activities. WORLDCOMP’13 will be held at a different resort. WORLDCOMP will not be held after 2013. The paper submission deadline for WORLDCOMP’13 was March 18 and it was extended to April 6 and now it is extended to April 20 (it may be extended again) but still there are no committee members, no reviewers, and there is no conference Chairman. The only contact details available on WORLDCOMP’s website is just an email address! Prof. Hamid Arabnia expends the deadline to get more papers (means, more registration fee into his pocket!). Let us make a direct request to Prof. Hamid arabnia: publish all reviews for all the papers (after blocking identifiable details) since 2000 conference. Reveal the names and affiliations of all the reviewers (for each year) and how many papers each reviewer had reviewed on average. We also request him to look at the Open Challenge at https://sites.google.com/site/moneycomp1 Sorry for posting to multiple lists. Spreading the word is the only way to stop this bogus conference. Please forward this message to other mailing lists and people. We are shocked with Prof. Hamid Arabnia and his puppet’s activities http://worldcomp-fake-bogus.blogspot.com Search Google using the keyword worldcomp fake for additional links. </pre> georgepeter< at >hushmail.com 2013-04-12T17:40:12 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14380 <pre>This is a follow-up to the previous thread on gnome-os-list, I'm also posting this one to nautilus-list. There is currently a fundraiser for improved security in GNOME (http://www.gnome.org/friends/). One thing I'd like to see, is good encryption support. For the moment, I'm going to focus on one specific feature, modular encryption. The problem with full disk/home encryption, is that it can't be used by people who auto-login. It shouldn't be necessary to login everytime you use the computer, or to allow a friend to quickly look something up on the internet. But, at the same time, you shouldn't have to sacrifice security. My solution to one part of the puzzle, is to allow encrypting individual folders. Previously, there was no easy, GNOME-like way to do this. I've updated my previous Nautilus extension, so this is no longer the case. Encrypting folders is a simple matter of right-clicking a folder and selecting encrypt. Mounting the folder is as simple as opening the folder. This works with auto-login users, as the encryption password is stored in the keyring, so if it is still locked, it will try to unlock before it can mount the folder. If the keyring is already unlocked, it is exactly the same as opening a normal folder (albeit, with a slight lag). If you've managed to read this far, then I'd like some feedback on whether you think this is a good feature, that is worth working on further integration. And, as an extension of that, if this might make a good GSoC project, that I could work on. Here is a list of things that need to be considered: To meet the rest of this criteria, this probably needs to be integrated into Nautilus properly, rather than as an extension. If this is integrated into Nautilus, I'm guessing encfs should be an optional package, in which case we need to make sure the encryption option is not visible when encfs is not installed. The encryption password should be linked to the encfs key, rather than the folder location (to provide flexibility with moving folders). Using libsecret can remove the dependency on gnome-encfs, and will probably be needed for the previous point. If moving/renaming a folder in Nautilus, the encrypted counterpart should also be moved/renamed. Otherwise, the user will no longer be able to mount it. An option to revert an encryption should be added, so it is reversible. Possibly, some kind of emblem could be added to the folder to indicate it is encrypted. Something like a padlock, but would need to be visually distinct from the read-only one. The folder, before mounting, is empty. It might be an idea to hack the display of size to be the size of the encrypted folder. Otherwise, all non-mounted folders display "0 items". The implementation needs to copy items back to the original folder and present an error message if the encryption process fails. At the moment, the files would be dumped somewhere in /tmp. Hopefully, that about covers everything. If there's anything else that needs to be considered, please mention it. Link to current extension implementation: http://blog.sambull.org/easily-encrypt-folders-2 Thank you for your time, Sam Bull </pre> Sam Bull 2013-04-10T13:23:55 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14379 <pre>Hi! There's a bug in Nautilus [1] that I'd be willing to help fix. Basically, there's no way to add a custom application to the "open with" dialog box without creating a custom .desktop file (see related AskUbuntu q&amp;a [2-4]). Some very old (2005) dialog happened [5] on this list, discussing creating new .desktop files or creating new ones for custom launchers. I guess I'm pinging here to ask about what the best solution to the bug might be, as I'm happy to work on it. I've only contributed one patch before, and I'm not even sure if this is a Nautilus issue or an ubuntu issue. Thanks for the time! [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/799585 [2] http://askubuntu.com/questions/67216/unable-to-choose-default-application/90195#90195 [3] http://askubuntu.com/questions/67382/add-custom-command-in-the-open-with-dialog [4] http://askubuntu.com/questions/72535/creating-desktop-files-to-use-on-the-open-with-other-application-tab [5] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2005-January/msg00112.html </pre> Jacob Biesinger 2013-04-04T19:03:16 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14371 <pre>Hello all, I am using Gnome 3.6 on openSUSE Linux and would like to know how Nautilus creates thumbnails once it encounters a file that does not have one yet. Specifically, it is not creating thumbnails for RAW images (DNG files and Olympus ORF files), while they are created for many other file types (JPEG, PNG, ...). I have looked for solutions on the internet, and some say I should create the file /usr/share/thumbnailers/raw.thumbnailer, and others propose to create an entry with gconftool-2. I have done both, to no effect. On the command line, I can create thumbnails with ufraw-batch without problem. What is the 'official solution' to my problem? Best regards Daniel </pre> Daniel Karch 2013-03-31T08:57:59 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14370 <pre>Hello everyone, I'm using Nautilus 3.4.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 and whenever I go to "Browse Network"/"Windows Network" I instantly get an error dialog saying: *Unable to mount location* Failed to retrieve share list from server I CAN access a specific machine using the smb://(hostname|ip address) but I CANNOT browse the network environment. Is this a known bug? Could it related to some Ubuntu specificity. Best regards, Bahr. http://www.uci.cu </pre> D.H. Bahr 2013-03-28T13:02:49 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14369 <pre>Hello all, Considering the requirements of visually impaired, the pattern search feature (Ctrl+s) of file manager 'Nautilus' is enhanced. Please find the details of requirements, proposed solution and related patch attached hereby. Please try out and give your feedback. Patch generated on : ubuntu10.04, nautilus-2.30.1 Thanks &amp; regards Leena Chourey For Accessibility Team CDAC, Mumbai 022-27565303 </pre> Leena Chourey 2013-03-15T09:52:37 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14368 <pre>Hi folks, Been knocking up a simple nautilus extension in C to add a new column to the list view that will show mtime's as a fuller string such as Wed Jun 30 21:49:08 1993 This works fine, until you come to sort that column, it of course gets sorted in string order rather than chronological order. So OK, what I'd do here would be to store the mtime as a time_t in the list store and then add a cell renderer to format that as required. I knocked up a simple app to check that works and it does. When you click the column heading it sorts in chronological order. However, I just can't see how to do this within the nautilus-extension framework. I've looked at the nautilus source, to see if I can see how it does its "Modified" column, but so far can't really find it. Below is the bulk of the code I've got so far, largely knocked together from bits I found on the net. I'm adding two columns here, one with the above date string format and one in, YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss format (which of course does sort chronologically). I should add this is with nautilus-3.6.3 Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Andrew void nautilus_module_initialize(GTypeModule *module) { mtime_extension_register_type(module); provider_types[0] = mtime_extension_get_type(); } void nautilus_module_shutdown(void) { /* Any module-specific shutdown */ } void nautilus_module_list_types(const GType **types, int *num_types) { *types = provider_types; *num_types = G_N_ELEMENTS(provider_types); } static void mtime_extension_column_provider_iface_init( NautilusColumnProviderIface *iface) { iface-&gt;get_columns = mtime_extension_get_columns; } static void mtime_extension_info_provider_iface_init( NautilusInfoProviderIface *iface) { iface-&gt;update_file_info = mtime_extension_update_file_info; } static void mtime_extension_register_type(GTypeModule *module) { static const GTypeInfo info = { sizeof(MTimeExtClass), (GBaseInitFunc)NULL, (GBaseFinalizeFunc)NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, sizeof(MTimeExt), 0, NULL, }; static const GInterfaceInfo column_provider_iface_info = { (GInterfaceInitFunc)mtime_extension_column_provider_iface_init, NULL, NULL }; static const GInterfaceInfo info_provider_iface_info = { (GInterfaceInitFunc)mtime_extension_info_provider_iface_init, NULL, NULL }; mtime_extension_type = g_type_module_register_type(module, G_TYPE_OBJECT, "MTimeExt", &amp;info, 0); /* ... add interfaces ... */ g_type_module_add_interface(module, mtime_extension_type, NAUTILUS_TYPE_COLUMN_PROVIDER, &amp;column_provider_iface_info); g_type_module_add_interface(module, mtime_extension_type, NAUTILUS_TYPE_INFO_PROVIDER, &amp;info_provider_iface_info); } GType mtime_extension_get_type(void) { return mtime_extension_type; } /* Column interfaces */ static GList *mtime_extension_get_columns(NautilusColumnProvider *provider) { NautilusColumn *column; GList *clist; column = nautilus_column_new("MTimeExt::mtime_data_column", "MTimeExt::mtime_data", "Modified Time", "Show full mtime"); clist = g_list_append(NULL, column); column = nautilus_column_new("MTimeExt::mtime_data_ts_column", "MTimeExt::mtime_ts_data", "Modified Time", "Show full mtime"); clist = g_list_append(clist, column); return clist; } /* Info interfaces */ static NautilusOperationResult mtime_extension_update_file_info( NautilusInfoProvider *provider, NautilusFileInfo *file, GClosure *update_complete, NautilusOperationHandle **handle) { char *data; char datetime[32]; struct stat sb; struct tm *tm; GFile *loc; loc = nautilus_file_info_get_location(file); stat(g_file_get_path(loc), &amp;sb); g_snprintf(datetime, sizeof(datetime), "%s", ctime(&amp;sb.st_mtime)); /* Loose the '\n' added by ctime(3) */ datetime[strlen(datetime) - 1] = '\0'; nautilus_file_info_add_string_attribute(file, "MTimeExt::mtime_data", datetime); tm = localtime(&amp;sb.st_mtime); g_snprintf(datetime, sizeof(datetime), "%d-%02d:%02d %02d:%02d:%02d", tm-&gt;tm_year + 1900, tm-&gt;tm_mon + 1, tm-&gt;tm_mday, tm-&gt;tm_hour, tm-&gt;tm_min, tm-&gt;tm_sec); nautilus_file_info_add_string_attribute(file, "MTimeExt::mtime_ts_data", datetime); return NAUTILUS_OPERATION_COMPLETE; } </pre> Andrew Clayton 2013-03-09T13:26:19 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14367 <pre>Hi I am an Information Technology Student Pursuing Bachelor of Technology from NIT Durgapur, India. I am very much interested in working on Gnome-documents. I was looking at gnome-documents repository and current iteration design doc. I found the concept very fascinating and useful. I thought of starting with simple bugs for gnome-documents, but since it is new, I couldn't find anything to work on. It would be great if someone can give me some basic idea on how to proceed, may be some reading suggestions and then small feature/bugfixes to start with. Thanks &amp; Regards, Garima Joshi </pre> Garima Joshi 2013-03-03T06:44:39 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14366 <pre>Hi : Thanks for reading this msg: I am very very confused &gt;&gt;&gt; why nautilus LOSE compact-view on 3.6.3 ? Compact-view is a extremely useful for many users like me that get used to it. Waiting for your reply anxiously. </pre> Wei Guo 2013-02-21T06:23:08 http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus/14364 <pre>Hello, This is a very common problem of file manager applications. When you add new files to one device (copy) the speed copy decrease. This happen because the copy occur in paralel mode. How can i set nautilus to copy files to this device by serial form? Start a copy of new file after finish the actual file. Thanks, Miguel Silva </pre> Miguel Silva 2013-02-17T00:08:23 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus