<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel">
    <title>gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel</title>
    <link>http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36671"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36670"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36669"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36667"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36666"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36661"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36660"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36659"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36658"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36657"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36656"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36655"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36649"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36648"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36647"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36646"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36644"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36642"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36640"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36636"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36671">
    <title>Txn branch merge : headsup</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36671</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

so as of today, I have merged 37 out of 54 modules. The following 
modules still have to be merged :

apacheds-core-api
apacheds-core-shared
apacheds-core
apacheds-core-avl
apacheds-xdbm-partition
apacheds-ldif-partition
apacheds-jdbm-partition
apacheds-core-annotations
apacheds-server-config
apacheds-server-jndi
apacheds-server-replication
apacheds-xdbm-tools
apacheds-core-integ
apacheds-server-integ
apacheds-kerberos-test
ldap-client-test
apacheds-service

Some of them require few modifications, some other are more complex. 
I'll keep you informed as soon as I make progress.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Lécharny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T15:14:37</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36670">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-1728) Replace numeric errors by textual errors</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36670</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Emmanuel Lecharny created DIRSERVER-1728:
--------------------------------------------

             Summary: Replace numeric errors by textual errors
                 Key: DIRSERVER-1728
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1728
             Project: Directory ApacheDS
          Issue Type: Task
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M7
            Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
             Fix For: 2.0.0-RC1


We have declarations like :

ERR_42=An entry with a ''referral'' ObjectClass must contains a ''ref'' Attribute

It would be way better to have something like for clarity sake :

ERR_42_REF_ATTRIBUTE_MISSING=An entry with a ''referral'' ObjectClass must contains a ''ref'' Attribute


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T12:35:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36669">
    <title>Txn/trunk merge : DefaultOperationExecutionManager issues</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36669</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi guys,

I'm currently facing some interesting challenge on this class, as we 
have removed the OneLevel and SubLevel index from trunk. This has some 
direct impact on the txn branch code, as we have to update the code 
accordingly.

Methods like add/delete... are storing the changes done on those index :
             // Update the OneLevel index
             Index&amp;lt;?&amp;gt; oneLevelIdx = partition.getSystemIndex( 
ApacheSchemaConstants.APACHE_ONE_LEVEL_AT_OID );
             indexChange = new IndexChange( oneLevelIdx, parentId, id, 
IndexChange.Type.ADD, true );
             changeContainer.addChange( indexChange );

We have to remove those lines, but we also have to modify the RDN Index 
update.

I'm be working on that, it may take a bit of time.

In any case, the merge is way more complex than any other we have 
already done on the server, although I do expect to have it done by the 
end of this week.

SVN is not helping a lot here... :/

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Lécharny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-22T09:48:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36667">
    <title>&lt; at &gt;CreateDS annotation</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36667</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Why isn't &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;CreateDS annotation defined as &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;Inherited?

I'm trying to write a base class that includes &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;CreateDS annotation, but it is not inherited.

Thanks for any explanation of this.

Duane Fletcher
Alcatel-Lucent

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Fletcher, Duane W (Duane</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T19:41:57</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36666">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSTUDIO-815) Tiny translation error [DE]</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36666</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Peter Schwindt created DIRSTUDIO-815:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Tiny translation error [DE]
                 Key: DIRSTUDIO-815
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-815
             Project: Directory Studio
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 1.5.3
            Reporter: Peter Schwindt
            Priority: Trivial


When connecting to an LDAP source, after entering the password, the progress popup shows "Verbindungen am Öffenen".

Despite this being a typo itself, I propose something like "Öffnen der Verbindung".

Thanks,
Peter

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Peter Schwindt (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T12:29:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36661">
    <title>[jira] [Deleted] (DIR-285) life issues</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36661</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Emmanuel Lecharny deleted DIR-285:
----------------------------------

    

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T19:17:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36660">
    <title>[jira] [Deleted] (DIR-284) Strong love spells   +27764071887</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36660</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Emmanuel Lecharny deleted DIR-284:
----------------------------------

    

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T19:15:40</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36659">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIR-285) life issues</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36659</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;musa jadeja created DIR-285:
-------------------------------

             Summary: life issues
                 Key: DIR-285
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-285
             Project: Directory
          Issue Type: Improvement
         Environment: Strong love spells   +27764071887  
            Reporter: musa jadeja
            Assignee: Alex Karasulu


Strong love spells   +27764071887    
How many times have you:
.Been in love with a man who didn't love you back? 
.Thought your relationship was perfect, and then it fell apart? 
.Been scared because you didn't know how to fix your crumbling relationship or marriage? 
Wished you could be smarter about dating?
Do you have to be Beautiful to Win a Man's Love? 
You don't know it yet, but what's been missing is the foundation for a rock-solid relationship. Without a foundation, you're just sitting on sand and the first wave that comes along will wash away everything, no matter how solid you thought it was. 
.I was married for 29 years. I thought I had a great marriage. Then, he decided we should have an open marriage. Can you imagine? I didn't want to lose my marriage that I valued so much, but there was just no way could I be okay with what he was asking…. So here's what I did. Instead of licking my wounds, I went into action… I Used Dr. Jadeja love spell we are now back again… Becky Sanders, Australia.
Call Dr Jadeja on +27764071887
Skype, drjadeja99
Yahoo messenger, drjadeja99
drjadeja99-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
lostlove-psychic.webs.com


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>musa jadeja (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T17:53:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36658">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIR-284) Strong love spells   +27764071887</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36658</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;musa jadeja created DIR-284:
-------------------------------

             Summary: Strong love spells   +27764071887  
                 Key: DIR-284
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-284
             Project: Directory
          Issue Type: Improvement
         Environment: Strong love spells   +27764071887  
            Reporter: musa jadeja
            Assignee: Alex Karasulu


Strong love spells   +27764071887    
How many times have you:
.Been in love with a man who didn't love you back? 
.Thought your relationship was perfect, and then it fell apart? 
.Been scared because you didn't know how to fix your crumbling relationship or marriage? 
Wished you could be smarter about dating?
Do you have to be Beautiful to Win a Man's Love? 
You don't know it yet, but what's been missing is the foundation for a rock-solid relationship. Without a foundation, you're just sitting on sand and the first wave that comes along will wash away everything, no matter how solid you thought it was. 
.I was married for 29 years. I thought I had a great marriage. Then, he decided we should have an open marriage. Can you imagine? I didn't want to lose my marriage that I valued so much, but there was just no way could I be okay with what he was asking…. So here's what I did. Instead of licking my wounds, I went into action… I Used Dr. Jadeja love spell we are now back again… Becky Sanders, Australia.
Call Dr Jadeja on +27764071887
Skype, drjadeja99
Yahoo messenger, drjadeja99
drjadeja99-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
lostlove-psychic.webs.com


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>musa jadeja (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T17:53:41</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36657">
    <title>Next days roadmap</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36657</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi guys,

I was mostly MIA the few past days, and will come back on monday afternoon.

There are a few things pendng that require some action :
- ApacheDS 2.0.0-M7 has been released, and we have to update the site 
and make the announcement
- I'm fighting with the txn branch merge with trunk. Despite the fact 
that I have merged trunk into this branch mor ethan once, this is still 
a challenge. I'll propably spend most of my monday on that
- I still have to review Göktürk mail about OSGi. Will do that asap.
- We should decide how to fix the issue we have with cursor that aren't 
closed. This one is absolutly critical. Right now, the proposed solution 
is to read forward all the entries, and to store them either in memory, 
or on disk, before sending them to the client. Frankly, I don't see any 
better solution atm.

At some point, we also have to discuss what we should put into M8. IMO, 
OSGification of the server should be included as soon as it's done, and 
we should then cut a milestone. That would close one important step 
toward 2.0.

When done, I do think we should address the JIRAs we have, before piling 
up some new features.

Otherwise, we still have some important features to add in the next few 
milestones :
- Disaster Recovery System : what should the server do if it's brutally 
stopped ?
- MMR replication : M/S replication is supposed to work (more or less, 
it seems wehave issues with subentries : to be checked)
- Triggers and SP must be reviexed and fixed: currently, it does not 
work anymore due to the API modification (we aren't using JNDI anymore)
- Administrative Model is still incomplete. We have to get it working 
with the complete X500 features
- Caches must be improved
- Kerberos needs a *lot* of love !
- HBase backend must be improved and included into trunk
- We have to test JDBM3

There are probably more items I have not mentionned here, feel free to 
add what you have in mind.

Thanks !

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Lécharny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-20T16:32:28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36656">
    <title>[jira] [Deleted] (DIRSERVER-1672) Making Comparators extendable</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36656</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Göktürk Gezer deleted DIRSERVER-1672:
-------------------------------------

    

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Göktürk Gezer (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-19T00:10:32</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36655">
    <title>[jira] [Deleted] (DIRSERVER-1671) Create OSGI based deployer to start ApacheDS inside OSGI Framework</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36655</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Göktürk Gezer deleted DIRSERVER-1671:
-------------------------------------

    

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Göktürk Gezer (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-19T00:10:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36649">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-1727) LDAP Searches against boolean attributes with booleanMatch equality never return matches</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36649</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Richard Lowden created DIRSERVER-1727:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: LDAP Searches against boolean attributes with booleanMatch equality never return matches
                 Key: DIRSERVER-1727
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1727
             Project: Directory ApacheDS
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M6
            Reporter: Richard Lowden


If you carry out a search trying to match on a boolean attribute (syntax: 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.7) and an equality matching rule of booleanMatch then searching for classes with the attribute value equalling TRUE or FALSE never return results.

Changing the equality matching rule on the attribute to caseIgnoreMatch will return results.

Used to work in 1.5.7 but no longer works in 2.0.0-M6.

To recreate try searching ober the ou=config entry for "ads-enabled = TRUE" as per the example below from the search logs, which should return "ads-directoryServiceId=default,ou=config" but returns no results.

#!SEARCH REQUEST (667) OK
#!CONNECTION ldap://localhost:10389
#!DATE 2012-05-16T16:34:51.265
# LDAP URL     : ldap://localhost:10389/ou=config?objectClass?sub?(ads-enabled=TRUE)
# command line : ldapsearch -H ldap://localhost:10389 -x -D "uid=admin,ou=system" -W -b "ou=config" -s sub -a always -z 1000 "(ads-enabled=TRUE)" "objectClass"
# baseObject   : ou=config
# scope        : wholeSubtree (2)
# derefAliases : derefAlways (3)
# sizeLimit    : 1000
# timeLimit    : 0
# typesOnly    : False
# filter       : (ads-enabled=TRUE)
# attributes   : objectClass

#!SEARCH RESULT DONE (667) OK
#!CONNECTION ldap://localhost:10389
#!DATE 2012-05-16T16:34:51.265
# numEntries : 0

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Richard Lowden (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T15:39:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36648">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSTUDIO-814) eDirectory networkAddress attribute</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36648</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Aleks M created DIRSTUDIO-814:
---------------------------------

             Summary: eDirectory networkAddress attribute
                 Key: DIRSTUDIO-814
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-814
             Project: Directory Studio
          Issue Type: Improvement
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M3
            Reporter: Aleks M
            Priority: Minor


It seems that the eDirectory networkAddress attribute is hard for Studio to read.
There are several more attributes that use the same syntax (2.16.840.1.113719.1.1.5.1.12)
When looking at a ncpServer object (objectClass=ncpServer) it has several values in that attribute.
Studio displays them pretty well, they look like this:

13#l d a p : / / 1 7 2 . 1 6 . 2 4 2 . 7 4 : 6 3 6
Notice the space between each character.
I believe its a \u0000 but I'm 100% sure.
Anyway selecting a value and pressing CTRL+C gives me:
13#l
I.e. only the first four characters up to the first "space".
If I double click the value to edit it then Studio displays 13#l in the editor field.
If you by accident click anywhere and you don't press ESC then the value will be changed to 13#l
It would be nice if doubleclicking the attribute value wouldn't cause Studio to change the value.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Aleks M (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T15:11:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36647">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSTUDIO-813) Add default value editors for eDirectory</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36647</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Aleks M created DIRSTUDIO-813:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Add default value editors for eDirectory
                 Key: DIRSTUDIO-813
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-813
             Project: Directory Studio
          Issue Type: Improvement
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M3
            Reporter: Aleks M
            Priority: Minor


Is it possible for Studio to open these eDirectory attributes in the correct editor by default so that I don't have to add them manually to Studio preferences on each computer?

GUID = Entry UUID Editor
userCertificate = Certificate Editor
nDSPKIPublicKeyCertificate = Certificate Editor
cACertificate = Certificate Editor
ndsCrossCertificatePair = Certificate Editor

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Aleks M (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T14:57:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36646">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSTUDIO-812) Error while performing search</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36646</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Aleks M created DIRSTUDIO-812:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Error while performing search
                 Key: DIRSTUDIO-812
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-812
             Project: Directory Studio
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M3
         Environment: Windows 7 SP1 64-bit
            Reporter: Aleks M


I've come across a a directory where they have alot of objects named with #, e.g.
12345678911#38SA

Sometimes the LDAP search fails in Studio while it works in other tools.
If I search for something like this:
(workforceID=200511230101)
I should get two DNs back, Studio failes after retrieving the first one named 200511230101,
the other is named 200511230101#38SA and Studio gives me this error:

Error while performing search
 - expecting EOF, found '38'
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.exception.LdapInvalidDnException: expecting EOF, found '38'
at org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.ComplexDnParser.parseDn(ComplexDnParser.java:56)
at org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.Dn.parseInternal(Dn.java:1321)
at org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.Dn.&amp;lt;init&amp;gt;(Dn.java:282)
at org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.Dn.&amp;lt;init&amp;gt;(Dn.java:208)
at org.apache.directory.studio.ldapbrowser.core.utils.JNDIUtils.getDn(JNDIUtils.java:46)
at org.apache.directory.studio.ldapbrowser.core.jobs.SearchRunnable.searchAndUpdateModel(SearchRunnable.java:329)
at org.apache.directory.studio.ldapbrowser.core.jobs.SearchRunnable.run(SearchRunnable.java:192)
at org.apache.directory.studio.connection.core.jobs.StudioConnectionJob.run(StudioConnectionJob.java:109)
at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:54)
Caused by: line 1:16: expecting EOF, found '38'
at antlr.Parser.match(Parser.java:211)
at org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.AntlrDnParser.relativeDistinguishedNames(AntlrDnParser.java:338)
at org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.ComplexDnParser.parseDn(ComplexDnParser.java:52)
... 8 more

expecting EOF, found '38'

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Aleks M (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T14:51:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36644">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-1726) DefaultPasswordValidator always throws PasswordPolicyException when consecutive non-letter chars are in RDN</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36644</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Richard Lowden created DIRSERVER-1726:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: DefaultPasswordValidator always throws PasswordPolicyException when consecutive non-letter chars are in RDN
                 Key: DIRSERVER-1726
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1726
             Project: Directory ApacheDS
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M6
            Reporter: Richard Lowden


When adding an entry with a userPassword attribute and the entry RDN contains two non-letter characters in a row (such as cn=test1-EHIbwFwGAZ1BDgjK7y7TUQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org) then a CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION error is always received with the message "Password shouldn't contain parts of the username" regardless of what password you enter.

If you remove the "1" character or the "&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;" character then the entry will be created successfully

Believe the issue is caused by the regex expressions used within org.apache.directory.server.core.authn.ppolicy.DefaultPasswordValidator, as the String array of tokens will contain an empty string when two non-letter chars are together ("1&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;" in this case).

Full error message is:

Error while creating entry
 - [LDAP: error code 19 - CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION: failed for MessageType : ADD_REQUES
  javax.naming.directory.InvalidAttributeValueException: [LDAP: error code 19 - CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION: failed for MessageType : ADD_REQUEST
Message ID : 240
    Add Request :
Entry
    dn[n]: cn=test1-EHIbwFwGAZ1BDgjK7y7TUQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org,o=unitTest
    objectClass: inetOrgPerson
    objectClass: organizationalPerson
    objectClass: person
    objectClass: top
    sn: Smith
    userPassword: '0x70 0x61 0x73 0x73 0x77 0x6F 0x72 0x64 0x31 0x31 '
    cn: test1-EHIbwFwGAZ1BDgjK7y7TUQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
: Password shouldn't contain parts of the username]; remaining name 'cn=test1-EHIbwFwGAZ1BDgjK7y7TUQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org,o=unitTest'
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.mapErrorCode(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.processReturnCode(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.processReturnCode(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.c_createSubcontext(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.jndi.toolkit.ctx.ComponentDirContext.p_createSubcontext(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.jndi.toolkit.ctx.PartialCompositeDirContext.createSubcontext(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.directory.studio.connection.core.io.jndi.JNDIConnectionWrapper$4.run(JNDIConnectionWrapper.java:658)
at org.apache.directory.studio.connection.core.io.jndi.JNDIConnectionWrapper.runAndMonitor(JNDIConnectionWrapper.java:1272)
at org.apache.directory.studio.connection.core.io.jndi.JNDIConnectionWrapper.checkConnectionAndRunAndMonitor(JNDIConnectionWrapper.java:1203)
at org.apache.directory.studio.connection.core.io.jndi.JNDIConnectionWrapper.createEntry(JNDIConnectionWrapper.java:704)
at org.apache.directory.studio.ldapbrowser.core.jobs.CreateEntryRunnable.createEntry(CreateEntryRunnable.java:226)
at org.apache.directory.studio.ldapbrowser.core.jobs.CreateEntryRunnable.run(CreateEntryRunnable.java:117)
at org.apache.directory.studio.connection.ui.RunnableContextRunner$1.run(RunnableContextRunner.java:113)
at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(ModalContext.java:121)

  [LDAP: error code 19 - CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION: failed for MessageType : ADD_REQUEST
Message ID : 240
    Add Request :
Entry
    dn[n]: cn=test1-EHIbwFwGAZ1BDgjK7y7TUQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org,o=unitTest
    objectClass: inetOrgPerson
    objectClass: organizationalPerson
    objectClass: person
    objectClass: top
    sn: Smith
    userPassword: '0x70 0x61 0x73 0x73 0x77 0x6F 0x72 0x64 0x31 0x31 '
    cn: test1-EHIbwFwGAZ1BDgjK7y7TUQ&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;public.gmane.org
: Password shouldn't contain parts of the username]



--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Richard Lowden (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T13:39:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36642">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRKRB-85) &lt; at &gt;CreateKdcServer should include searchBaseDn attribute</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36642</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Josef Cacek created DIRKRB-85:
---------------------------------

             Summary: &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;CreateKdcServer should include searchBaseDn attribute
                 Key: DIRKRB-85
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-85
             Project: Directory Kerberos
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Josef Cacek
            Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny
            Priority: Critical


CreateKdcServer annotation doesn't contain searchBaseDn, so the KdcServer instance created by calling
org.apache.directory.server.factory.ServerAnnotationProcessor.getKdcServer(DirectoryService, int) can't be used for domain other than "example.com".
The KdcServer created from &amp;lt; at &amp;gt;CreateKdcServer configuration searches users always in "ou=users,dc=example,dc=com" (see to KdcServer constructor).

For a LDAP server it's possible to change the search domain after the retrieving an instance from ServerAnnotationProcessor, but it doesn't work for the KdcServer, because the original value is already stored in a DirectoryPrincipalStore instance created by KdcServer.start() method.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Josef Cacek (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T08:55:02</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36640">
    <title>Problem of JDBM being hard(impossible) to reconfigure once it is initialized</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36640</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Everyone,

As i told you in OSGI branch update, JDBM is so immutable in runtime.
Almost every setter calls checkInitialized() method first which throws an
exception when its already initialized.

We have to change that behavior in as much aspects of it as we can.
Otherwise there is no point in going into OSGI. However i can't always be
sure what my changes might lead on runtime. I need some serious help here,
especially from those are actively working on JDBM, otherwise i'll jump
into trial and error cycle which will probably last long.

Here is the current configuration points for JdbmPartition:

   - cacheSize(int)
   - optimizerEnabled(boolean)
   - partitionPath(File)
   - suffixDn(Dn)
   - syncOnWrite(boolean)
   - indexedAttributes(List&amp;lt;Index&amp;gt;)

Currently none of them is reconfigurable, once the partition is
initialized. However i need to know which are actually reconfigurable among
these ones. And which are not really reconfigurable and why?

Every reconfiguration will invoke some setter method at desired
configuration point. So i guess we can make this reconfigurations work
actually based on it's initialized or not, rather than throwing an
exception blindly.

For your information, as we have the lifecycle control capability of
components created from within ApacheDS, we can implement some fancy stuff.
Like re-instantiating a component when one of its immutable property is
changed, or stop it and remove from DirectoryService when one of its
immutable property is changed to prevent accepting operations while
reconfiguring. These migtht be implemented in case there is " no
possibility! " to handle reconfigurations in live and initialized
JdbmPartition reference.

I appreciate every single idea on this matter !

Thanks,
Gokturk
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Göktürk Gezer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T03:58:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36636">
    <title>Txn branch merge</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36636</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi guys,

just FYI, I'm currently trying to merge the txn branch into trunk. Not 
sure Il'll be able to do it completely today, but I'll try.

Thanks !

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Emmanuel Lécharny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-15T09:21:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36635">
    <title>[jira] [Created] (DIRSERVER-1725) attributes replication not working when administrativeRole is set</title>
    <link>http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel/36635</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>houmles (JIRA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-15T07:24:44</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.comp.apache.incubator.directory.devel</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>

