<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk">
    <title>gmane.org.fsf.uk</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6027"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6026"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6025"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6024"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6023"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6022"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6021"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6020"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6019"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6018"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6017"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6016"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6015"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6014"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6013"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6012"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6011"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6010"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6009"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6008"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6027">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6027</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;More meetings on gov consultation on Open Standards

http://consultation.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/openstandards/events/

Upcoming Events

Roundtable 5: Levelling the Playing Field in the North West

29 May 3.30pm-5.30pm – Manchester

An event focussed on SMEs to discuss:

    How would mandating open standards in government IT affect your organisation?
    If the government adopts open standards, will it make it easier or harder for you to do business with us – does it help level the playing field?
    Do you have any examples of times when the lack of open standards has acted as a barrier to you doing business with us?
    What might adopting open standards prevent?

http://bitly.com/roundtable5

 

Roundtable 6: Competition and European Interaction

31 May 1.45pm-4.30pm – London (and via phone)

This event will be a face-to-face meeting but will also have teleconference facilities available for those unable to join us in person. Topics for discussion include:

    Are there any legal or p&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Glyn Wintle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-17T12:08:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6026">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6026</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Indeed - I'm curious to know more about that conflict of interest, like who 
knew about it before it was made public, and who forced that disclosure.

Best,

Sam.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sam Tuke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T11:47:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6025">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6025</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;UK Government open standards consultation deadline extended 1 month
due to conflict of interest row http://t.co/tNuLKNvs

Original Tweet
April 26, 2012 at 10:56PM

On 27 April 2012 00:18, Sam Tuke &amp;lt;samtuke&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;fsfe.org&amp;gt; wrote:
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ross Gardler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T23:56:19</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6024">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6024</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Indeed - the deadline may actually be the 1st; earlier this week the
official website stated both dates.

Plenty of information about the consultation, the key issues, and how to
respond here:

http://fsfe.org/uk/

Also a guide to the most important questions to answer here:

http://fsfe.org/projects/os/uk-standards-consultation.en.html

Thanks,

Sam.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sam Tuke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T23:18:36</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6023">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6023</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;

Just a reminder consultationcloses on 3 May 2012, the response must be sent in by then.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Glyn Wintle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-26T14:09:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6022">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6022</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Ordinary Free Software supporters can join the Fellowship, which I recommend. 
All UK Fellows are on the Fellowship-UK mailing list by default.

They can also join the public discussion list (discussion&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;fsfeurope.org).

This mailing list (fsfe-uk&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;gnu.org) has low traffic, and is not hosted by FSFE.

FSFE loves all Free Software supporters, and tried to provide forums for 
communication for both Fellows and non-Fellows alike.

Best,

Sam.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sam Tuke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-16T18:11:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6021">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6021</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Sam Tuke &amp;lt;samtuke&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;fsfe.org&amp;gt;

Out of interest, why is that?  Ordinary free software supporters
cannot join either of those lists.  Don't you love us any more?

Regards,
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-15T11:15:20</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6020">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6020</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Sorry about the silence over this issue so far, wheels have been turning.

I will be sending an email to all UK Fellows next week asking them to get 
active, submit a response to the consultation, and contact their professional 
bodies.

I'm also doing some planning with other UK NGOs to try and ensure we present a 
strong and consistent message / policy in our respective submissions.

Out of interest the UK team doesn't use this list any more. The main channels 
of communication are:

fellowship-uk&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;lists.fsfe.org - discussion &amp;amp; announcement list for UK Fellows
uk&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;fsfeurope.org - private UK team list - important news etc. can be sent here

Best,

Sam.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sam Tuke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-13T16:19:51</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6019">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6019</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Glyn Wintle &amp;lt;glynwintle&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;yahoo.com&amp;gt;

Thanks for the alert!  It closes on 3 May 2012.  Could people try to
remind the list and let everyone know how it's going about once a
month, please?  Maybe if several of us aim to, we'll manage it!

Thanks,
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-11T07:01:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6018">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6018</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;My comments on: Would this policy support innovation, competition and
choice in delivery of government services?

The policy might be gamed through production of artificial open standards-
that meet the requirements of the policy but which do not have broad vendor
support in that sector.

An infamous example is the Office Open XML specification which enjoyed
little support apart from by Microsoft and required much political
wrangling to receive standards status, in which it has been alleged that
ISO committee members installed with pressure from Microsoft ceased to
function after the standard was ratified, causing real problems for ISO
committees which then had problems reaching a full quorum for further
decisions.

To be simple, the open standards allow wide vendor participation are in
fact a potential benefit which is actually obtained when other vendors
actively and creatively participate.

Office Open XML is arguably a single vendor open standard present not to
deliver benefit to it's users but for it's &lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sam Liddicott</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T14:38:42</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6017">
    <title>Re: final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6017</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Great to see they prepared their "Open Standards Open Opportunities
Consultation_FINAL.pdf" In LibreOffice

Would have been even better if they had uploaded the Annex A template
in OpenDocument format.

Regards, Jon
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jon Grant</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T12:20:56</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6016">
    <title>final gov consultation on Open Standards</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6016</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Goverment Open Standards consultation has just gone live. This is important stuff http://consultation.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/openstandards/ Please respond
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Glyn Wintle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T11:47:00</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6015">
    <title>Freedom of Association in the Networked Workplace</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6015</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;*** START ***

Freedom of Association in the Networked Workplace: discussion workshop

Thursday 26th January 2012
1pm – 7pm
Rue Gallait – Gallaitstraat 80
1030 Brussels
Belgium

Participation is free, but places may be limited. Please contact us to
reserve a place.

Contact for more information or enquiries:
    http://foa.strickdistro.org/contact/

Website: http://foa.strickdistro.org

Ongoing developments in IT and social media are changing the boundaries
and structure of the workplace, causing a blurring of distinctions
between private and work-related activities. This is raising new issues
in regard to the extent of surveillance applied by businesses towards
their employees. Attempts to control workplace communications are
however conflicting with a number of basic employment rights. This
workshop seeks to address these issues with a specific focus on the
potential impacts of emerging surveillance cultures on the rights of
Freedom of Association in the networked workplace. It aims to bring
together a&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Rob Myers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-15T12:59:24</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6014">
    <title>Re: peer to patent uk</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6014</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;
Thanks Glyn, I've forwarded this to the UK Team and I'll dent it from the 
fsfeuk account.

Best,

Sam.

&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Sam Tuke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-21T14:16:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6013">
    <title>peer to patent uk</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6013</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Want to help fight UK software patents? Please take a few moments to comment on these patents.

https://ktn.innovateuk.org/web/peertopatentuk
If there is some thing that prevents you from commenting, please point it out here.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Glyn Wintle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-20T15:13:07</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6012">
    <title>Re: BBC "Can Whitehall open up to open source?"</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6012</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;You might find this article I wrote a little over a year ago about attempts
to introduce free software into London's regional government:

http://lwn.net/Articles/384863/

Regards,
Tom


On 7 September 2011 12:35, Jon Grant &amp;lt;jg&amp;lt; at &amp;gt;jguk.org&amp;gt; wrote:




&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Tom Chance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-07T11:50:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6011">
    <title>BBC "Can Whitehall open up to open source?"</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6011</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Lucky the figures were provided in CSV format!


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14765545


Can Whitehall open up to open source?


What's Whitehall's attitude to software procurement? A cynic might sum
it up as "nobody ever got sacked for buying Microsoft".

The current government has vowed to change the civil service mindset
that has always preferred to spend money with the biggest firms and
has been conservative about open source software.

The Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude has vowed to create a level
playing field for open source as part of a drive to cut costs.

Now a BBC Freedom of Information (FOI) request has given us a glimpse
of how big the challenge will be.

We asked government departments for details of how much they had spent
on proprietary software over the past year, and how much open source
software they had acquired.

The responses have been dribbling in for months now (available as a
Google doc, an Excel spreadsheet or as separate .csv files below), and
they've varied from det&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jon Grant</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-07T11:35:05</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6010">
    <title>EU consultation on cloud computing until 31 Aug</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6010</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;The EU is consulting on cloud computing until 31 August at
http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=cloudcomputing&amp;amp;lang=en

Cloud computing could be a great opportunity for free software, with
potential for more users to take control of their computing
infrastructure; but it could also be a great threat, which may make
users even more vulnerable to proprietary lock-in at either server or
service level.

Have you answered this consultation?  If so, anything you'd like to
point out to other free software supporters before we undermine you? ;)

Thanks,
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-25T18:07:26</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6009">
    <title>PyCon UK</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6009</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi,

I noticed that you had a stand at Oggcamp last week.

On 24th-25th September we have PyCon UK 2011, in Coventry.

website : http://pyconuk.org
wiki:        http://pyconuk.net

Maybe fsfe-uk would like to come and have a stand, even better give a Talk.

PyCon UK is being run on an Unconference basis this year, so please
add a talk to the Talks page if you wish, you just need to create a
login first - follow the 'Create an Account' link on the wiki home
page.

Best wishes,

John
--
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>John Pinner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-21T13:15:01</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6008">
    <title>Re: Quest for a Windows7 refund in the UK - laptop upgraded to GNU+Linux</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6008</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;ebuyer is another option I will keep a note of, thanks.

The main problem I have is that the only machines available are generic, 
bulky laptops. The Acer 3820T I bought with Windows7 is high-spec, and 
low weight.  Maybe I'll check lenovo next time, although I don't 
normally like their keyboards and that pointer thingy..  So what I mean 
is.. it would be great if I had the choice of all laptop manufacturers, 
rather than generic un-branded ones from ebuyer

Cheers, Jon
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Jon Grant</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-08T22:50:03</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6007">
    <title>Re: Quest for a Windows7 refund in the UK - laptopupgraded to GNU+Linux</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/6007</link>
    <description>&lt;pre&gt;Hi Jon,


There's http://nakedcomputers.org/ which has a Europe/UK category on the
right-hand side.  Perhaps effort is best spent improving that?

Cheers,
Ralph.
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
    <dc:creator>Ralph Corderoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-07T10:49:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput rdf:about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.org.fsf.uk">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.org.fsf.uk</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
