<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit">
    <title>gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit</link>
    <description/>
    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
    <syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2862"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2861"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2860"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2859"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2858"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2857"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2856"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2855"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2854"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2853"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2852"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2851"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2850"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2849"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2848"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2847"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2846"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2845"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2844"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2843"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <image rdf:resource="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png"/>
    <textinput rdf:resource=""/>
  </channel>
  <image rdf:about="http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png">
    <title>Gmane</title>
    <url>http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png</url>
    <link>http://gmane.org</link>
  </image>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2862">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2862</link>
    <description>
Or going in a slightly different direction, what namespace should the
pages be in?  (Does the Gambit wiki's MediaWiki installation support
namespaces?)

I'll come clean... I have ulterior motives for asking the question.
I use the "All pages" special page a lot, partly because it gives a
one-screen overview of the wiki, partly because I have been maintaining
a "Release notes" page which nothing links to.  Having "All pages" suddenly
grow to contain the documentation would make it much less convenient.


Do you mean a naming convention for Wiki pages or the organization of
the contents into pages?  About a naming convention, if the documentation
gets its own namespace, there shouldn't be any problem just using the
Texinfo node names -- perhaps with a prefix like Section_ -- as the Wiki
page names.  As metadata rather than nodes, the table of contents and
indices should not get any prefix though.

About organizing the contents, is anything irretrievably wrong with the
Texinfo organization?  Specifically, usin</description>
    <dc:creator>Derek Peschel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T08:49:46</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2861">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2861</link>
    <description>
On 1-Dec-08, at 11:26 PM, Jonathan Arkell wrote:


That's a very good point!  So what I will do is settle on a formatting  
convention that will allow the official an unofficial parts of the  
documentation to be distinguished.  A &lt;texinfo&gt; ... &lt;/texinfo&gt; section  
can appear in both parts, and that should be the norm so that it is  
easy to move stuff from the unofficial to the official section.  In  
other words the page will have this form

   &lt;texinfo&gt;
     ...documentation from, or suggested for inclusion in, the Gambit  
manual
   &lt;/texinfo&gt;

   == Feedback ==

   &lt;texinfo&gt;
     ...general comments, questions, bug warnings, usage tricks,  
annotations, and stuff to be considered for inclusion in the official  
part
   &lt;/texinfo&gt;



I have written a script to export the Gambit manual Texinfo sections  
to wiki pages, using the wiki page title to indicate what this page  
refers to in the manual.  It shouldn't be too hard to write a script  
to "merge" the official part of the wiki documentation pages w</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Feeley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T06:04:59</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2860">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2860</link>
    <description>
On 1-Dec-08, at 11:46 AM, Marc Feeley wrote:

I like Special_form and Procedure_ prefixes. You might need some  
other prefixes as well. If you categorize all the documentation  
pages, you can automagickally have indexes and tables of contents  
built up with mediawiki.


Why not Documentation_of_debugging, and Documentation_of_I/O?

Again, the General Index and Concept Indexes should be handled via  
categories.


I am not sure I understand this question.  Why not handle them as  
wiki links?


Yes. I can even try and take a stab at this if you like.  I'm an okay  
designer, and rock solid web developer.


I guess that depends on how easy it is to copy back.  Something  
occurred to me however.  Most user-level comments, questions, and  
additions to the documentation would probably live outside of the  
texinfo section--by virtue of being harder to understand then normal  
wiki content, whereas the texinfo sections might be reserved for  
documentation that would actually make it into the Gambit manual. </description>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Arkell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-02T04:26:12</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2859">
    <title>Re: location of libgambcgsi.so</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2859</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
Gambit-list mailing list
Gambit-list&lt; at &gt;iro.umontreal.ca
https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
</description>
    <dc:creator>Marijn Schouten (hkBst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T22:34:52</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2858">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2858</link>
    <description>Greetings!

I am very interested in Gambit-C, because of using it in my project.
Very like it for the relative simplicity and good design.
And I would like to support it according to my abilities.

type_of_described_object___object_name - is reasonable for the
first-time choice. Procedure_getenv - sounds good. And thoughts about
integration with IDE are good too.

It will be great if whole documentation have strong hierarchical
structure. For instance:
|---Data types
|        |
|        |-----Numbers
        |        |         |---Intro
|        |         |---Exact/Inexact
|        |         |---Fixnum/Flonum
|        |         |---Numeric functions
|        |                    |---Conversion
|        |                    |---Math operations
|        |-----Lists
|        |-----Vectors
... and so on

So, IMHO navigation through pages should consist of next links:
same level articles navigation:      &lt;&lt; prev next &gt;&gt; (Intro &lt;-&gt;
Exact/Inexact&lt;-&gt;Fixnum/Flonum)
Up level:            ^Up
Jump to topic:   </description>
    <dc:creator>vasil</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T21:03:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2857">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2857</link>
    <description>I looked into what was necessary to write a Texinfo plugin for  
MediaWiki (which is used by the Gambit wiki).  It turns out to be  
simpler than I thought.  So I wrote a plugin which handles  
&lt;texinfo&gt; ...Texinfo document... &lt;/texinfo&gt; in any wiki page.  The  
plugin calls up texi2html to convert the Texinfo document to HTML  
(currently everytime the page is accessed).

Here are 3 pages written with the &lt;texinfo&gt; tag:

http://dynamo.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/wiki/index.php/Procedure_getenv
http://dynamo.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/wiki/index.php/Procedure_current-time
http://dynamo.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/wiki/index.php/Special_form_time

Go to one of these pages and click on "edit" to see what the source  
document looks like.  The Texinfo document is wrapped inside &lt;texinfo&gt;  
and &lt;/texinfo&gt; tags.

I'd like to get some feedback on these pages before I put the rest of  
the Gambit manual on the wiki.  Some issues:

1) What name should the pages have?  I use the Procedure_ and  
Special_form_ prefixes so tha</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Feeley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T18:46:17</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2856">
    <title>Can't use make update</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2856</link>
    <description>This doesn't work (from history):



It fails with

&lt;reconfiguring here&gt;

</description>
    <dc:creator>Bradley Lucier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T04:56:11</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2855">
    <title>Re: location of libgambcgsi.so</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2855</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marc Feeley wrote:

Hi Marc,

I guess you need to decide whether DESTDIR support is more valuable, than having
to have wrapper scripts that set LD_LIBRARY_PATH on some obscure platforms. Of
course this does not mean you HAVE to use libtool.

Libtool claims to support some AIX and sunos targets. It supports a lot of
platforms, probably more than gambit does.

I don't claim to be an expert on libtool; I only started reading its info pages
yesterday. They are very good. Basically you put "libtool --mode=compile" before
the compiler command to create objects and it will create the subset of static
and shared objects that is supported by the target, or you can specify what sort
of objects you want. No other commands, such as ranlib, need to be run.
Similarly there is "libtool --mode=link" for linking, "libtool --mode=execute"
for execution before installation and "libtool --mode=install" for installation.
Further they detail how libtool integrates with autotools.

An</description>
    <dc:creator>Marijn Schouten (hkBst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T15:53:47</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2854">
    <title>Re: location of libgambcgsi.so</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2854</link>
    <description>
On 30-Nov-08, at 7:39 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:


It is redundant unless your system needs it!  Probably redundant on  
most systems, but it is a quick operations (a few seconds to relink).


I forget.  But it was not a single system.  Wild guess: AIX and SUNOS.


The makefiles predate libtool.  Moreover libtool does not exist on all  
platforms (so using it would not be portable).  I guess its existence  
could be tested by the configure script.  How is libtool typically  
used for software installation?

Marc
</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Feeley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T13:37:38</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2853">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2853</link>
    <description>Having the documentation on the wiki or some user editable place would  
be useful.  However, I think the documentation should be written in  
one "universal" markup language so that all forms of the documentation  
can be generated from it (.pdf, .html, .info, and "wiki" editable).   
Currently that markup language is texinfo.  Moreover, eventually I  
would like the documentation for the procedures and special forms to  
be inside the source code and the examples in the documentation should  
be tested for consistency when the regression tests are run.  I'm  
unsure how all of this can work.  Is there a documentation maintenance  
system that supports all of this?  Otherwise can one be built?

Marc

On 29-Nov-08, at 8:24 AM, Ali wrote:

</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Feeley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T13:32:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2852">
    <title>Re: location of libgambcgsi.so</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2852</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marc Feeley wrote:

Hi Marc,

if so, then the first compilation is redundant. Delaying linking until after
install is incompatible with installing into a temporary staging area aka
DESTDIR. Are you certain it is really that bad? What platform are we talking
about that needs this? If you want portability shouldn't you be using libtool
instead of rolling your own?

Thanks,

Marijn


- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
&lt;http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/&gt;, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkyiYMACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wKXACdENnzgOHjOX6e4437Rhu30sEh
bdEAn3cxGxgwjg72OUipsqvMQImHXGKi
=Jjvi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
</description>
    <dc:creator>Marijn Schouten (hkBst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T12:39:31</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2851">
    <title>Re: Termite, IO and memory leakage</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2851</link>
    <description>Hello

Just to be sure: you *are* running a Termite which contains all fixes 
from SVN, i.e. your version *does* contain the "Fixed issues with unsafe 
procedures in base-exception-handler" patch?

I'm asking since some people are still running into the segfault with 
the unsafe ##cmd-b call whose argument order did change; recent Gambit 
means you need the above patch.

Christian.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Christian Jaeger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T09:35:35</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2850">
    <title>Re: location of libgambcgsi.so</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2850</link>
    <description>
On 29-Nov-08, at 6:44 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:


On some systems, when a program is linked against a shared library, it  
is important to link the program when the shared library is in the  
final (installed) location.  This way it is not necessary for the  
library to be in the PATH (actually LD_LIBRARY_PATH or similar) at run  
time.

Perhaps this is not needed on many, if not most, systems.  But in the  
interest of portability this is how it is done for all systems.

Marc
</description>
    <dc:creator>Marc Feeley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-30T04:13:10</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2849">
    <title>Re: location of libgambcgsi.so</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2849</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:

Alright, that probably wasn't the right question.

I've been staring at configure.ac and mostly gsi/makefile.in a lot. The files
libgambcgsi.so and gsi for exmaple seem to get built twice. Once during "make":

$(LIBRARY): $(LIBRARY_OBJECTS_IN_COMPILE_ORDER)
        rm -f $(LIBRARY)
        &lt; at &gt;MAKE_LIBRARY&lt; at &gt;

which on my system results in:

x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -Wl,-O1 -rdynamic -shared -o libgambcgsi.so  _gsilib.o
_gambcgsi.o ../lib/libgambc.so -lutil -ldl -lm

and once during "make install":

install-post: all
        $(srcdirpfx)$(rootfromhere)/mkidirs $(bindir)
        $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdirpfx)_gambcgsi.c $(libdir)/_gambcgsi.c
- --&gt;     &lt; at &gt;MAKE_LIBRARY_FOR_INSTALL&lt; at &gt;
        $(INSTALL_LIB) $(LIBRARY) $(libdir)/$(LIBRARY)
        &lt; at &gt;FIXLIB&lt; at &gt; $(libdir)/$(LIBRARY)
        #for library in $(LIBRARIES_SCM); do \
        #  $(INSTALL_DATA) $$library $(libdir)/$$library; \
        #done
        &lt; at &gt;LINK_FOR_INSTALL&lt; at &gt;
        $(INSTALL_PROGRAM</description>
    <dc:creator>Marijn Schouten (hkBst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T23:44:43</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2848">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2848</link>
    <description>
SVN isn't a distributed VCS.

Also, wikis which are just using Git as centralistic storage backend 
(maybe as plugin) without offering access to branching don't count. You 
really have to write code for new workflow models to take advantage of it.

Christian.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Christian Jaeger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T15:28:39</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2847">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2847</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
Gambit-list mailing list
Gambit-list&lt; at &gt;iro.umontreal.ca
https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
</description>
    <dc:creator>Sven Hartrumpf</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T14:37:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2846">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2846</link>
    <description>
cairographics.org already uses a Git backed wiki: ikiwiki. But well
I'd love to see a Gambit-based wiki system.
</description>
    <dc:creator>Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T14:10:45</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2845">
    <title>Re: Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2845</link>
    <description>
What will be different from the current possibility to change the 
documentation, namely using a Gambit Git checkout and a text editor to 
edit doc/gambit-c.txi in texinfo markup?

* it may be newbie friendlier (web browsers and wiki markup being the 
tools first used by new computer users nowadays);  it may be 
questionable how much of an advantage inviting newbies is actually, though

* it allows to split the docs into smaller units; but I think the 
existing texinfo converters can already do that, too

* wikis may have a nicer default layout than the currently offered html 
output of the texinfo converter: but I suppose that could easily changed 
too, if it matters at all

* it offers a more informal way of passing over thoughts, i.e. less for 
changing the actual documentation but for adding comments; I think this 
would probably be a good thing, but I wonder whether it wouldn't be a 
better solution to just have an annotation functionality for that; 
examples for such user annotated documentations:  
 </description>
    <dc:creator>Christian Jaeger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T14:04:13</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2844">
    <title>Adding docs to wiki?</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2844</link>
    <description>_______________________________________________
Gambit-list mailing list
Gambit-list&lt; at &gt;iro.umontreal.ca
https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list
</description>
    <dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-29T13:24:53</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2843">
    <title>location of libgambcgsi.so</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2843</link>
    <description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi list,

which line of configure.ac or one of the makefile.in's determines what the exact
path, as given by the first line of output of the command "readelf -d
/usr/bin/gsi", is at which the executable gsi searches for libgambcgsi.so in the
case that gambit has been configured with --enable-shared?

Thanks,

Marijn

- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML
&lt;http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/&gt;, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkvUS0ACgkQp/VmCx0OL2xLvACgsfu1/jL9knChwRm6Mm+0sDk/
f0oAoIR9xtjtgiZNiXB4BOBsRX3Reval
=bk9I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
</description>
    <dc:creator>Marijn Schouten (hkBst</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-28T02:02:22</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2842">
    <title>[ANN] Gambit-C v4.3.2 released</title>
    <link>http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit/2842</link>
    <description>Gambit-C v4.3.2 is now available.

Changelog: http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/repo/.cgit.cgi/Gambit/log/

The sources and prebuilt distributions can be obtained from
the Gambit web site by visiting one of the following links.

sources:
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/source/gambc-v4_3_2.tgz (for typical users)
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/source/gambc-v4_3_2-devel.tgz (for developers)

prebuilt:
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/prebuilt/gambc-v4_3_2-macosx-G3.dmg
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/prebuilt/gambc-v4_3_2-macosx-G4.dmg
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/prebuilt/gambc-v4_3_2-macosx-G5.dmg
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/prebuilt/gambc-v4_3_2-macosx-intel32.dmg
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/prebuilt/gambc-v4_3_2-macosx-intel64.dmg
  http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/download/gambit/v4.3/prebuilt/gambc-v4_3</description>
    <dc:creator>Logiciel Gambit</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T19:34:15</dc:date>
  </item>
  <textinput about="http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit">
    <title>Search Engine</title>
    <description>Search the mailing list at Gmane</description>
    <name>query</name>
    <link>http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.lisp.scheme.gambit</link>
  </textinput>
</rdf:RDF>
