http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5304 <pre>On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Kévin Raymond &lt;shaiton-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt;wrote: It's been more than 24 hours. Are we still going to wait? </pre> Arif Tri Waluyo 2012-05-24T16:39:13 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5303 <pre>#110: Update XFCE screenshots --------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: heavensmile | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: spins.fp.o | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: easyfix Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+----------------------- Comment (by shaiton): Hi, I agree. The best would be for each spins to tell us how to update the content. I've asked them for last 3 releases, without any feedback (only KDE last release I think). See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora- spins/2012-May/002408.html That would be great if you can provide us screenshots (same resolution please). We would then be able to update them. Cheers, </pre> fedora-websites 2012-05-24T12:10:40 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5302 <pre>Errata corrige: Robert is too of part to be partial about this issue. </pre> Antonio Trande 2012-05-24T11:22:00 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5301 <pre>2012/5/24 Kévin Raymond &lt;shaiton-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; The idea of "local community" is relative. The freedom of build a new distro therefore should be considered a try to divide up the GNU/Linux users ? The main thing is to assicure yourself that all "local communities" respect, support, share, spread the fedoraproject values by its representatives. Robert is too of part to be impartial about this issue. But they need to understand how the local community works. I agree. </pre> Antonio Trande 2012-05-24T11:18:59 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5300 <pre>#110: Update XFCE screenshots -------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: heavensmile | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: spins.fp.o | Version: Keywords: easyfix | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+------------------------ The screenshots on the homepage of the fedora XFCE spin are from fedora 12. I think it would be a good idea to update the screenshots when fedora 17 is released. http://spins.fedoraproject.org/xfce/#about [[br]] http://spins.fedoraproject.org/xfce/#about </pre> fedora-websites 2012-05-24T11:08:23 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5299 <pre>[CC-ing] the Websites team On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:53 AM, &lt;robyduck&lt; at &gt;fedoraonline.it&gt; wrote: +1 I would add that Legal should not approve trademark license agreement to the unknown if the local community already exist. Example if my neighbor ask to register the greatitalianfedora.it, the request should be rejected if the owner is not involved in the local community. But they need to understand how the local community works. It's not easy, neither fast. At least guidelines would help define a process and prevent end users to ask for his own website reference… </pre> Kévin Raymond 2012-05-24T10:01:37 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5298 <pre>+1 And now, where to write the minimal requirements? :) </pre> Kévin Raymond 2012-05-23T23:45:59 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5297 <pre> </pre> Elad Alfassa 2012-05-23T23:13:43 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5296 <pre> Ahh okay, so here's the revision: Recommended installation requirements: * 64-bit Intel-compatible PC * 1 GB memory (RAM) * 10 GB disk space / storage Sound good? ~m </pre> Máirín Duffy 2012-05-23T22:17:19 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5295 <pre>Hi to all, I am Mario Santagiuliana, you can know more about me on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Marionline Sorry for my late to reply to Antonio email, in this weeks I have a lot of personal things to do. And sorry for my possible bad English. In data martedì 22 maggio 2012 17:54:55, Kévin Raymond ha scritto: Like Antonio said: the fedora-it.org website is born without following the fedora project request to don't open new domain with fedora name inside and without follow the trademark agreement or legals notice. In Italy we have just a big fedora community website: FOL or www.fedoraonline.it or it.fedoracommunity.org. FOL was born a lot of years ago and in the last months we (because I am part of the technical staff of fedoraonline.it community) also update all the portal. We are in contact with other fedora community, especial fedora- fr.org that help us to choose the right software to use to update our website. We are doing a big work to attract new users to Fedora and to</pre> Mario Santagiuliana 2012-05-23T20:23:50 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5294 <pre>On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:27:10 +0300 Elad Alfassa &lt;elad-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; wrote: The current requirement is 512MB of ram for install. &lt;adamw&gt; nirik: we verified that 512MB works in lots of tests before lowering it &lt;adamw&gt; 384MB is kinda 50/50. i think one person managed to get nearly all the way through with 256MB. So, I would suggest saying 512 there. kevin </pre> Kevin Fenzi 2012-05-23T17:51:18 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5293 <pre> specs, not the minimal. Also, I heard we now require less than 768MB of ram for install, but if we do recommended, it should be 1GB. </pre> Elad Alfassa 2012-05-23T17:27:10 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5292 <pre> TBH this is a lie though, we do support 686 systems, why not just say "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better", that the default download is 64-bit is spelled out pretty clearly on stg.fedoraproject.org. We shouldn't pretend we can't support 32 bit when we very much can. ~m </pre> Máirín Duffy 2012-05-23T17:08:56 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5291 <pre> "64-bit Intel-compatible system or better; 400Mhz or more." What is the downside of just saying then "768 MB memory (RAM)" ~m </pre> Máirín Duffy 2012-05-23T17:06:16 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5290 <pre>Spot was talking with the good folks on the kernel-39cwv0RK5kDuOkiIQyY8mQ&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org list about this very thing, not sure if there is a final answer yet. </pre> Robyn Bergeron 2012-05-23T16:53:54 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5289 <pre> Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we are still trying to figure out what is the earliest 64bit CPU we support. If we do this, we need to change the title from "installation requirement" to "recommended setup" or something similar. </pre> Elad Alfassa 2012-05-23T16:50:44 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5288 <pre>Hi, I noticed some cruft has surfaced on fedoraproject.org's front page. The Installation requirements section concerns me most. I've quoted the current text below and my suggestions for cleaning it up. Are these suggestions okay? --- "400MHz Pentium Pro or better processor (comparable AMD, Cyrix, and VIA processors also acceptable)" How about "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better" --- "At least 768MB memory (RAM), 1GB recommended for best performance" Be bold. Pick one. Forcing a dichotomy on the user is putting pressure on them that they don't need in the wake of an OS switch. How about "1 GB memory (RAM)" --- ~m </pre> Máirín Duffy 2012-05-23T16:42:37 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5287 <pre>It has come to my attention that the fedoracommunity.org site is not really discoverable from the front fedoraproject.org page. Actually, the only way I could find is through a small "hidden" link in http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-help header area or through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate wiki page, which is referenced also in http://fedoraproject.org/en/join-fedora. So, can give the link a better position within our pages? I'd propose couple alternatives: 1. we could add a link in the "Community" section of http://fedoraproject.org/en/join-fedora, something like "Find a local community" with "We are everywhere, and can speak your language!" as subtitle 2. a new "Local communities" block under "Get Interactive support here" Of course, we can also do both :) Cheers G. </pre> Gianluca Sforna 2012-05-23T10:19:19 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5286 <pre>#108: Need to update minimal requirments ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: shaiton | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Fedora 17 Component: General | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ As sent to our mailing list, now that we've defined the default download to x86_64, we probably need to update systems requirements. We also have to check the minimal memory needed for Anaconda, as it lower now… </pre> fedora-websites 2012-05-23T09:17:30 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5285 <pre>#107: Update robotics spin description. -------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: rmattes | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: critical | Milestone: Fedora 17 Component: spins.fp.o | Version: Production Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -------------------------+------------------------ Comment (by rmattes): Sorry for the delay in responding. The changes in the linked commit look good, thanks for taking care of this! </pre> fedora-websites 2012-05-23T03:18:19 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites/5284 <pre>2012/5/22 Kévin Raymond &lt;shaiton-rxtnV0ftBwyoClj4AeEUq9i2O/JbrIOy&lt; at &gt;public.gmane.org&gt; Thank you Kévin and sorry if i have not continued the discussion on this mailing list (i didn't know that my first mail was forwarded in websites ML). Summarizing: my request regards to add fedora-it.org (together the actual italian Fedora community) like a new Italian Fedora community. Fedora-it.org are not still signed the trademark agreement but we will take care soon. As i have written to Kévin Raymond, we respect the fedoraonline.it work and don't contrast it; however we (as a Fedora website in ILDN&lt;http://ildn.net/il-network-ildn&gt;) wish offer a further source of support, of information and a distinct viewpoint about Fedora. I would like know what you think about and if possible do it. Regards </pre> Antonio Trande 2012-05-22T18:57:33 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.websites