http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers hourly 1 1901-01-01T00:00+00:00 http://gmane.org/img/gmane-25t.png http://gmane.org http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98969 <pre>There are a couple of issues am facing with the gnome screenshot tool : 1) its taking almost 4-5 sec to perform a screenshot. (have a parallel install of F16, on which it is much much faster) 2) Its not performing a screenshot operation when any panel menu is open. This feature is very much present in F16. The version of screenshot tool in use: $ rpm -qa gnome-screenshot gnome-screenshot-3.4.1-2.fc17.x86_64 Anyone else also seeing this? </pre> Pratyush Sahay 2012-05-26T08:56:41 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98968 <pre>in /etc/default/grub add the definition GRUB_GFXMODE=1024x768 then rebuild your grub.cfg file by grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg The problem is that grub2 selects inappropriate video modes for ATI cards The GFXMODE variable preselects a mode for grub2. I've had to do this for a Radeon card. </pre> G.Wolfe Woodbury 2012-05-26T08:52:37 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98967 <pre>The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8194/python-tornado-2.2.1-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8291/python-feedparser-5.1.2-2.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8274/socat-1.7.2.1-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8398/drupal7-7.14-2.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8284/moodle-2.2.3-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8290/rt3-3.8.12-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8428/apache-commons-compress-1.4.1-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8439/rubygem-rack-cache-1.2-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8392/python-crypto-2.6-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8434/python-virtualenvwrapper-3.4-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7939/openssl-1.0.0j-1.fc17 http</pre> updates< at >fedoraproject.org 2012-05-26T08:11:45 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98966 <pre>Today I've been installing F17 RC4 i386 on a system with a ATI RAGE 128 video card. The Live CD made my monitor display a message: "Cannot Display this Video Mode". I then tried the DVD. Installation went fine. At the end of installation I pressed the Reboot button and I got the above monitor message again. I couldn't see the grub menu. After the 5 second grub timeout, I could see hard drive activity, but monitor still had above message. Next, I booted off the DVD again and selected Troubleshooting &gt; Rescue a Fedora System From the shell prompt, I examined the Xorg.log. Relevant lines: ------------------------------------------------------ Failed to load module "r128" (module does not exist, 0) ... VESA BIOS detected VESA VBE Version 2.0 VESA VBE Total Mem: 32768 kB VESA VBE OEM: ATI RAGE128 Setting up VESA Mode 0x124 (1280x1024) VBESetVBEMode failed, mode set without customized refresh ------------------------------------------------------ I found xorg-x11-drv-r128-6.8.2-1.fc17.i686.rpm in the Fedora </pre> Allen Halsey 2012-05-26T07:52:08 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98965 <pre>Today I've been installing F17 RC4 i386 on a system with a ATI RAGE 128 video card. The Live CD made my monitor display a message: "Cannot Display this Video Mode". I then tried the DVD. Installation went fine. At the end of installation I pressed the Reboot button and I got the above monitor message again. I couldn't see the grub menu. After the 5 second grub timeout, I could see hard drive activity, but monitor still had above message. Next, I booted off the DVD again and selected Troubleshooting &gt; Rescue a Fedora System From the shell prompt, I examined the Xorg.log. Relevant lines: ------------------------------------------------------ Failed to load module "r128" (module does not exist, 0) ... VESA BIOS detected VESA VBE Version 2.0 VESA VBE Total Mem: 32768 kB VESA VBE OEM: ATI RAGE128 Setting up VESA Mode 0x124 (1280x1024) VBESetVBEMode failed, mode set without customized refresh ------------------------------------------------------ I found xorg-x11-drv-r128-6.8.2-1.fc17.i686.rpm in the F</pre> Allen Halsey 2012-05-26T07:43:39 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98962 <pre> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelStagingPolicy josh </pre> Josh Boyer 2012-05-25T10:49:02 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98961 <pre> Hmmm, I presume there's a document describing the selection criteria? Janina </pre> Janina Sajka 2012-05-25T04:47:06 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98960 <pre>The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8114/libreoffice-3.3.4.1-5.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7567/php-5.3.13-1.fc15,maniadrive-1.2-32.fc15.5,php-eaccelerator-0.9.6.1-9.fc15.5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8161/ikiwiki-3.20111106-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8205/python-tornado-2.2.1-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6630/dokuwiki-0-0.10.20110525.a.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7246/libsoup-2.34.3-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6629/gdb-7.3.1-50.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8339/rt3-3.8.12-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8360/drupal7-7.14-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8365/moodle-1.9.18-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8372/kernel-</pre> updates< at >fedoraproject.org 2012-05-25T00:03:40 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98959 <pre>The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7586/php-5.3.13-1.fc16,maniadrive-1.2-32.fc16.5,php-eaccelerator-0.9.6.1-9.fc16.5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8151/ikiwiki-3.20111106-2.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6628/dokuwiki-0-0.10.20110525.a.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5833/python3-3.2.3-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8217/python-tornado-2.2.1-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6614/gdb-7.3.50.20110722-16.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8359/kernel-3.3.7-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8363/rt3-3.8.12-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8328/socat-1.7.2.1-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8362/drupal7-7.14-2.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8325/moodl</pre> updates< at >fedoraproject.org 2012-05-25T00:03:28 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98958 <pre>On 2012/05/24 09:24 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed: I think too. I just looked through over a dozen Grub menus containing Rawhide installation stanzas, and found none containing a 3 on a Rawhide kernel line, so likely I've never before tried it with Fedora. Nevertheless, some people who ever use X don't habitually use runlevel 3 to get there, and I think it may be a shortcoming that an installation kernel and initrd may care in the usual sense about runlevels or would fail to initialize their primary purpose for existence just because a runlevel 5 state had not been reached. Maybe it's purposeful, maybe not. I brought it up here instead of Bugzilla purely to try to flesh out whether it may be good, bad, or don't care. IMO, an installation set should start the installation process in any event in which something specifically designed to thwart it has not been interposed. I don't think a 3 on cmdline should qualify as such. A standalone 3 could easily be an inadvertent result of a mi</pre> Felix Miata 2012-05-24T18:29:23 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98957 <pre> Can't get anywhere myself so: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824981 </pre> Frank Murphy 2012-05-24T18:12:44 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98956 <pre> Excellent! I'm one of those people who have been removing yum-presto for exactly the reason that you describe (40Mbps connection, 4-core SandyBridge CPU). Would love to test this out. Can we a F17 build? </pre> Ian Pilcher 2012-05-24T17:20:31 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98955 <pre> Well, 3 gets interpreted by systemd as 'boot to runlevel 3 equivalent', so you get a text mode boot. But nothing told anaconda to start up in text mode. So you just get...not much. You can't really assume that how it behaves on another distro is how it'll behave on Fedora, unless it's written down somewhere, and I don't recall ever seeing that. It's a bit of a 'doctor it hurts', I think... </pre> Adam Williamson 2012-05-24T16:24:08 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98954 <pre>The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8083/xen-4.1.2-17.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8194/python-tornado-2.2.1-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8291/python-feedparser-5.1.2-2.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8274/socat-1.7.2.1-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8284/moodle-2.2.3-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8290/rt3-3.8.12-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8314/kernel-3.3.7-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7939/openssl-1.0.0j-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7971/libgssglue-0.4-0.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7976/ikiwiki-3.20120516-1.fc17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7998/sudo-1.8.3p1-7.fc17 The following Fedora 17 Critical Path updates ha</pre> updates< at >fedoraproject.org 2012-05-24T15:36:35 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98953 <pre>&lt;snipped&gt; After removing prefix: ]# dracut initramfs-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64 3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64 F: installkernel failed in module multipat # rpm -qa | grep multipath device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-22.fc18.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-22.fc18.x86_64 Today's kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git5.1.fc18 no auto initramfs, also same manual fail "multipath" </pre> Frank Murphy 2012-05-24T14:08:31 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98952 <pre>Compose started at Thu May 24 08:15:03 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 ---------------------------------------------------------- [389-admin] 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.i686 requires libicudata.so.48 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.48()(64bit) 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.48()(64bit) 389-admin-1.1.28-1.fc18.x86_64 requires libicudata.so.48()(64bit) [389-adminutil] 389-adminutil-1.1.15-2.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.48 389-adminutil-1.1.15-2.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.48 389-adminutil-1.1.15-2.fc17.i686 requires libicudata.so.48 389-adminutil-1.1.15-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.48()(64bit) 389-adminutil-1.1.15-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.48()(64bit) 389-adminutil-1.1.15-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libicudata.so.48()(64bit) [389-dsgw] 389-dsgw-1.1.9-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.48()(64bit) 389-dsgw-1.1.9-2.fc17.x86_64 requir</pre> Fedora Rawhide Report 2012-05-24T13:58:45 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98951 <pre> dracut initramfs-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64 kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64 find: `/lib/modules/kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64/': No such file or directory find: `/lib/modules/kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64/': No such file or directory find: `/lib/modules/kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64/': No such file or directory find: `/lib/modules/kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64/': No such file or directory find: `/lib/modules/kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64/': No such file or directory find: `/lib/modules/kernel-3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64/': No such file or directory F: installkernel failed in module kernel-modules ls -R frank&lt; at &gt;test08 ~$ su - Password: [root&lt; at &gt;test08 ~]# ls -R /usr/lib/modules/3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64 Look closely. You're telling dracut the kernel version is 'kernel-3.5.0....' and it takes that very literally. Remove the 'kernel-' prefix and just use '3.5.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc18.x86_64'. None of that explains why there is no initramfs being created fr</pre> Josh Boyer 2012-05-24T13:27:06 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98950 <pre>Hello Folks, I am Bckurera (Buddhike) and I am working with some Fedora teams(FAms, Design, Marketing, etc..) and I would like to join with the Bug Zappers Team as well. I am not a geek but would like to join with the some technical work as well. My userpage[1] contains more info please refer to that if anyone seeks more info. I ll start studying the work and contribute as time permits, thanks and see you all around ! [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bckurera </pre> Buddhike Kurera 2012-05-24T13:17:59 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98949 <pre> Put up some more info: http://frankly3d.eu/kernel-error </pre> Frank Murphy 2012-05-24T13:08:09 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98948 <pre> Apologies, it happens on both 32 and 64. </pre> Frank Murphy 2012-05-24T12:03:15 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/98947 <pre> Erm... your grub2 config file you sent previously showed you were using and x86_64 kernel. Do you even have the i686 kernel installed? There are clearly modules in the RPM in koji, so I suspect maybe you want to try with x86_64? josh </pre> Josh Boyer 2012-05-24T11:53:23 Search the mailing list at Gmane query http://search.gmane.org/?group=$group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers